( 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/24 10:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


論文名稱(外文):Enterprise Talent Retention Strategy-Taking the Analysis of Factors of A Company's Incumbency and Resignation as an Example
指導教授(外文):WENG, SUNG-SHUN
外文關鍵詞:Organizational ClimateStrategic Human Resource ManagementIncentive CompensationResignation RiskReason for Resignation
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在離職因素非常複雜並非單一因素造成,其主要影響有組織信任(Organization Trust)、組織文化(Organizational Culture)、組織氣候(Organization Climate)、員工自我體現在工作上的滿意度、員工對薪酬體系的滿意度等原因。隨著大數據的發展,組織內部如何快速透過內部既有系統資訊取得相關訊息,如固定薪資、激勵性報酬、出勤異常狀況、延長工時、額外工作投入、薪資、職位、年資、考績、學歷、年齡、性別、婚姻狀況、等因素資訊,透過大數據工具之決策樹、類神經網路、K-means等模型等資料探勘(Data Mining)技術,使得企業能提早預測離職員工的跡象,提早擬定因應策略有效留住人才,本研究利用類神經網路預測離職人員與K-means方法將人員分出重要人才等兩項工具交叉比對人員清單,再透過決策樹分析出留用與離職敏感因子,提供企業更精準人員的用留策略。
1. 利用現有ㄧ般大多數企業內部已存在共同資料訊息內容,透過大數據分析工具,進行人員資料分析與群集。
2. 透過類神經網路預測將離職重要關鍵人才,透過決策樹分析在職影響因素、及離職影響因素與類別,提供有效留才參考決策方向。

According to the statistical results of the 2018 Business Manpower Employment Survey by the Comptroller and Accounting Office, seniority and turnover rate are negatively correlated, and age and turnover rate are negatively correlated. In addition, in terms of education level, it shows that the entry and exit rates of higher education levels are higher than those of lower edu-cation levels, which means higher education levels and more ability and opportunities to choose the workplace.
Therefore, about one-fourth of the new employees who have served in the company within 1-3 years will choose to leave and switch to another workplace, and 62.8% of those who leave within 10 years of work. This part of the talents is under the age of 25 to 34. Talents are the most. Companies invest more resources at this stage to train talents at this stage. When compa-nies actively invest in education and training costs, they cannot be reflected in the internal re-muneration of the company itself. To some extent, there is an intangible imbalance between in-put and output. As a result, companies that lack resources may be hesitant to invest in personnel training costs, which will affect the overall economic development of the company and society. The resignation factor is very complex and not caused by a single factor. It mainly affects the organizational trust (Organization Trust), organizational culture (Organizational Culture), organ-izational climate (Organization Climate), employee satisfaction at work, and employees’ percep-tion of the salary system. Satisfaction and other reasons. With the development of big data, how can the organization quickly obtain relevant information through internal existing system infor-mation, such as fixed salary, incentive compensation, abnormal attendance, extended working hours, additional work input, salary, position, seniority, performance appraisal, and academic qualifications Information on factors such as age, gender, marital status, etc., through data min-ing technology such as decision trees, neural networks, K-means and other models of big data tools, enables companies to predict the signs of leaving employees early. To formulate response strategies to effectively retain talents, this study uses neural networks to predict resignation per-sonnel and K-means personnel to classify important talents and other two tools to cross compare the personnel list, and then analyze the retention and resignation sensitivity factors through the decision tree. The company's more precise personnel retention strategy.
Based on the mature technology of data mining and big data, combined with the huge data owned by the company's internal HR, this research uses tools to achieve:
1. Use the existing common data message content in most companies to analyze and cluster personnel data through big data analysis tools.
2. Use neural networks to predict key talents who will resign, analyze in-service influencing factors, and resignation influencing factors and categories through decision trees, and pro-vide effective reference for decision-making directions for retaining talents.

摘 要 i
誌 謝 v
目 錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 策略人力資源管理 5
2.2 策略人力資源管理定義與研究 6
2.3 SHRM模型 8
2.4 激勵性薪酬 11
2.4.1 總體獎酬系統 11
2.4.2 薪酬管理原則:公平理論 12
2.4.3 激勵性薪資策略應用 13
2.5 組織氣氛 15
2.6 離職傾向 15
第三章 研究方法 18
3.1 研究設計 18
3.2 資料處理及研究方法流程 18
3.3 研究分析工具 26
3.3.1 K-means群集分析 26
3.3.2 決策樹分析 27
3.3.3 類神經網路分析 28
第四章 結果分析與討論 30
4.1 K-Means結果分析 33
4.2 類神經網路預測分析結果 34
4.3 決策樹結果分析 36
4.4 模型綜合分析結果應用 37
第五章 結論與未來展望 41
5.1 研究結論 41
5.2 各模型研究發現 42
5.3 研究貢獻 43
5.4 研究限制與未來展望 44
參考文獻 46

1.Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity–Journal of abnormal and social psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.
2.Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of management, 25(3), 231-292.
3.Appelbaum, S. H., & Shapiro, B. T. (1991). Pay for performance: implementation of individual and group plans. Journal of Management Development.
4.Batt, R. (2002). Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of management Journal, 45(3), 587-597.
5.Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (1981). Race and sex differences in quits by young workers. ILR Review, 34(4), 563-577.
6.Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of economic literature, 55(3), 789-865.
7.Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Garcia-Serrano, C. (1999). Job tenure and job mobility in Britain. ILR Review, 53(1), 43-70.
8.Burgess, S., & Metcalfe, P. (2000). Incentive pay and product market competition: University of Bristol, Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
9.Calaguas, G. M. (2017). Satisfied and happy: Establishing link between job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 104-111.
10.Campbell III, C. M. (1997). The determinants of dismissals, quits, and layoffs: A multinomial logit approach. Southern Economic Journal, 1066-1073.
11.Chao, H.-C. (2016). 人力資源管理措施與人格特質對工作投入與組織承諾之影響探討. National Central University,
12.Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Invited editorial: Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital–based competitive advantages. Journal of management, 37(5), 1429-1443.
13.Cohen, A. (2000). The relationship between commitment forms and work outcomes: A comparison of three models. Human Relations, 53(3), 387-417.
14.De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 858.
15.Dunford, B., Snell, S., & Wright, P. (2001). Human Resources and the Resource Based View of the Firm. CAHRS Working Paper Series, 27. doi:10.1177/014920630102700607
16.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
17.Fombrun, C. J., Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1984). Strategic human resource management. New York: Wiley.
18.Friedlander, F., & Greenberg, S. (1971). Effect of job attitudes, training, and organization climate on performance of the hard-core unemployed. Journal of applied psychology, 55(4), 287.
19.George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1996). The experience of work and turnover intentions: Interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood. Journal of applied psychology, 81(3), 318.
20.Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41-52.
21.Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of applied psychology, 75(5), 561.
22.Hall, R. E., & Lazear, E. P. (1984). The excess sensitivity of layoffs and quits to demand. Journal of labor economics, 2(2), 233-257.
23.Hom, P. W., Caranikas-Walker, F., Prussia, G. E., & Griffeth, R. W. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 77(6), 890.
24.Idson, T. (1993). Employer size and labor turnover.
25.Javdani, M. (2020). Visible minorities and job mobility: Evidence from a workplace panel survey. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 18(4), 491-524.
26.Kidd, M. P. (1991). An econometric analysis of interfirm labour mobility. Canadian Journal of Economics, 517-535.
27.King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The quarterly journal of economics, 108(3), 717-737.
28.Lazear, E. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346-1361.
29.McLaughlin, K. J. (1991). A theory of quits and layoffs with efficient turnover. Journal of Political Economy, 99(1), 1-29.
30.Michaels, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. Journal of applied psychology, 67(1), 53.
31.Nasir, F., Ashraf, M., & Riaz, M. (2019). The Role of Gender in Employee Retention: A Study of Private Hospitals in Karachi. International Journal of Experiential Learning & Case Studies, 4(1), 157-171.
32.Nwahanye, E. (2019). Facing The Challenge Of Staff Retention In Financial Institutions In Cameroon: The Importance Of Human Resource Management Practices’Degree Of Integration. Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, 5(3), 22-41.
33.Ram, R. G. (2017). Gender discrimination in wage. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(10), 181-186.
34.Revue, M. (2005). Researching on SHRM: An analysis of the debate over the role played by human resources in firm success. Rainer Hampp Verlag, 16(2), 213-241.
35.Royalty, A. B. (1998). Job-to-job and job-to-nonemployment turnover by gender and education level. Journal of labor economics, 16(2), 392-433.
36.Sager, J. K., Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P. W. (1998). A comparison of structural models representing turnover cognitions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53(2), 254-273.
37.Schneider, B. (1980). The service organization: climate is crucial. Organizational dynamics, 9(2), 52-65.
38.Serrano, C. G. (1998). Worker turnover and job reallocation: the role of fixed-term contracts. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(4), 709-725.
39.Sicherman, N. (1990). Education and occupational mobility. Economics of Education Review, 9(2), 163-179.
40.Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel psychology, 50(3), 617-633.
41.Sousa-Poza, A., & Henneberger, F. (2004). Analyzing job mobility with job turnover intentions: An international comparative study. Journal of economic issues, 38(1), 113-137.
42.Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2000). Well-being at work: a cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. The journal of socio-economics, 29(6), 517-538.
43.Sullivan, J. F. (1988). The future of merit pay programs. Compensation & Benefits Review, 20(3), 22-30.
44.Summers, T. P., & Hendrix, W. H. (1991). Modelling the role of pay equity perceptions: A field study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64(2), 145-157.
45.Sun, L.-Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
46.Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., & Kang, S. C. (2017). Incentive pay and firm performance: Moderating roles of procedural justice climate and environmental turbulence. Human Resource Management, 56(2), 287-305.
47.Winter-Ebmer, R., & Zweimuller, J. (1999). Firm-size wage differentials in Switzerland: Evidence from job-changers. American Economic Review, 89(2), 89-93.
48.Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. J. J. o. m. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. 18(2), 295-320.
49.Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Organizational climate and its effects on organizational variables: An empirical study. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(2), 189.
50.Zimmermann, K. F. (1998). German job mobility and wages. In Internal Labour Markets, Incentives and Employment (pp. 300-332): Springer.
51.Zweimüller, J., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2000). Firm-specific training: consequences for job mobility. Working paper/Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, 37.
52.人力資源管理-理論與實務、人力資源管理的12堂課. (2019)。
53.吳雅惠,(2016),晉升對工作滿意度 與離職傾向影響之研究,國立中央大學。
54.洪福彬,吳錦碧,& 陳君遠, (2009),台灣地區金控公司員工離職傾向之研究,未出版之碩士論文, 大葉大學管理研究所,彰化。
55.經理人月刊,(2012, 2012/01/13), 《這是你的船》運用10個管理技巧,成為成功的領導者。Retrieved from https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/10611
56.管理資訊計算,(2018), 組織氣候影響組織文化與工作滿意度之研究,藍天雄、崔家豪,44-56,doi:10.6285/MIC.201809_7(2).0004。
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20260607)
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top