資料載入處理中...
跳到主要內容
臺灣博碩士論文加值系統
:::
網站導覽
|
首頁
|
關於本站
|
聯絡我們
|
國圖首頁
|
常見問題
|
操作說明
English
|
FB 專頁
|
Mobile
免費會員
登入
|
註冊
切換版面粉紅色
切換版面綠色
切換版面橘色
切換版面淡藍色
切換版面黃色
切換版面藍色
功能切換導覽列
(18.97.9.171) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 08:06
字體大小:
字級大小SCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,如為IE7或Firefoxy瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT功能
:::
詳目顯示
recordfocus
第 1 筆 / 共 1 筆
/1
頁
論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
目次
參考文獻
電子全文
紙本論文
QR Code
本論文永久網址
:
複製永久網址
Twitter
研究生:
侯郁琦
研究生(外文):
HOU, YU-CHI
論文名稱:
再生醫療產品品質管制風險考量-以美國為例
論文名稱(外文):
Risk Considerations of Quality Control for Regenerative medical products in the United States and Taiwan
指導教授:
鄭幼文
、
鄭慧文
指導教授(外文):
CHENG, YU-WEN
、
CHENG, HUI-WEN
口試委員:
張偉嶠
、
蕭哲志
、
張雅惠
口試委員(外文):
CHANG, WEI-CHIAO
、
HSIAO,CHE-CHIH
、
CHANG,YA-HUI
口試日期:
2020-12-21
學位類別:
碩士
校院名稱:
臺北醫學大學
系所名稱:
藥學系碩士班
學門:
醫藥衛生學門
學類:
藥學學類
論文種類:
學術論文
論文出版年:
2021
畢業學年度:
109
語文別:
中文
論文頁數:
73
中文關鍵詞:
再生醫療製劑
、
品質管制
、
風險考量
外文關鍵詞:
Regenerative medical products
、
Quality control
、
Risk consideration
相關次數:
被引用:
1
點閱:400
評分:
下載:85
書目收藏:1
近年來隨醫藥產業發展大幅躍進,細胞治療、基因治療及組織工程產品等再生醫療可為傳統醫學無法治療之疾病帶來一線生機,歐美等先進國家之製藥廠紛紛投入此產業發展,並已陸續核准該類產品上市,成為目前醫藥領域研發之趨勢。然該類製劑成分異質性、製程特殊性及治療複雜性,風險管控有別於化學或生物製劑,且其成分使用活細胞,取自於人體或動物來源,可能有外來性病源污染之風險,但因無法最終滅菌,須藉由良好無菌操作、環境管控與品質檢驗層層把關,以降低製程可能遭受之污染及確認製劑品質安全,即所謂製程即是產品概念。如何由製造端至病人施打階段維持該類製劑良好活性與安全性,都將面臨諸多挑戰,各國主管機關為此建立許多規範指引以因應再生醫療領域所面臨之問題,同時協助產業界管控製劑品質。有鑑於國外早已核准多件再生醫療產品,發展相較於我國快速,而我國礙於過去法案尚未完善以致病患無法獲得相關治療方式,為即早滿足國內癌症患者之醫療需求,近期推動再生醫療技術及製劑之雙軌制管理架構,以「特定醫療技術檢查檢驗醫療儀器施行或使用管理辦法」(簡稱特管辦法)管理醫療技術,並以「再生醫療製劑管理條例(草案)」管理製劑,此條例尚於立法院審議。有鑑於我國尚未有再生醫療製劑上市,相較先進國家管理經驗少,因此本研究考量美國屬再生醫療製劑發展之先導國家之一,並以目前備受討論之CAR-T產品為例,透過研析美國與我國再生醫療製劑管控途徑了解CAR-T產品管理位階,進一步探討其製程管控、品質檢驗、儲存運送、醫院處置等相關規範。經研究顯示,我國再生醫療管理主要參照美國及各國規範,於既定藥品管理規範下,考量再生醫療製劑複雜性與特異性,以個案進行討論,於原則性規範中保有彈性管理空間,而細部處理流程則可藉由汲取美國再生醫療製劑之官方稽查報告、不定期發布之參考文件及專家學者研究文獻等經驗,作為我國管理再生醫療品質之參考,強化品質風險管控,為未來製劑上市預先建立事前準備。
Recently, along with the growth of emerging medical industry, regenerative medical industry includes cell therapy, gene therapy and tissue engineering products, bring hope to cure diseases that current medical can't cure. Therefore, the industry is right on trend in technologically advanced countries like European and the United States, and those countries already approved several regenerative medical products. However, because of the heterogeneity, specificity and complexity of these products, the risk considerations of quality control different from chemical drugs and biological products. Besides, as their ingredients include human or animal living cells, they can’t be sterilized and have potential adventitious agent risks. To prevent potential contamination risks by aseptic operations, environment control and quality tests in every step of the process and the final product is the concept of “processes is products”. Nevertheless, manufacturers and authorities face many challenges with the viability and safety of the product from manufacture to deliver product to patients. Authorities of many countries establish regulations and guidelines to help manufacturers solve these problems. In view of the development of foreign countries, our national authority established two regulatory systems to manage medical technologies and medical products in regenerative medical field to fulfill medical demands in Taiwan. Two regulatory systems include revised “Regulations Governing the Application of Specific Medical Technique and Medical Device” and “Act Governing of Regenerative Medical Preparations” draft, which is unapproved. Considering regenerative medical products haven’t been marketed in Taiwan and lack management experiences, this study analyzed regenerative medical regulation systems and quality control of risk consideration in the United State as references for Taiwan. This study focused on CAR-T products to investigate these products management level and discuss further about manufacturing controls, quality tests, storage, shipping, and handling in hospitals, etc. The results shown that, Taiwan’s regulations/guidelines of regenerative medical products mainly made references to the regulations of America or other countries. Considering the complexity and specialty of regenerative medical products, our national authority maybe use established regulations as a basis to discuss management policies case by case, and leave space to the requirement. Besides, taking FDA and experts experiences to improve quality control system of regenerative medical products in Taiwan, and make well preparations for marketing products in the future.
摘要 I
目次 IV
圖/表目次 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 緣由與目的 6
第三節 研究範圍 6
第四節 研究方法與架構 6
第二章 再生醫療管理 8
第一節 管理途徑 8
一、國際管理-以美國為例 8
二、我國管理 14
三、第一節討論-比較美國與我國管理架構與途徑 19
第二節 品質管理-以CAR-T產品為例 21
一、原料管控 24
二、製程管控 29
三、品質檢驗 35
四、後端處理 44
五、第二節討論- 美國與我國再生醫療品質管理之比較 51
第三章 結論 57
第四章 參考文獻 58
附錄一、美國已核准上市之再生醫療產品分類 65
附錄二、美國與我國再生醫療品質管理比較表 69
圖/表目次
圖目次
圖 一、歐美日已上市之再生醫療產品 2
圖 二、研究架構 7
圖 三、美國再生醫療管理架構 13
圖 四、人體試驗與臨床醫療之定義 17
圖 五、我國再生醫療管理架構 18
圖 六、彙整美國與我國再生醫療領域管理架構 21
圖 七、CAR-T 產品製程風險流程圖 22
表目次
表 一、美國 CAR-T 產品比較表 3
表 二、我國已核准之細胞治療技術分類 5
表 三、美國與我國針對再生醫療產品品質管制規範 23
表 四、CAR-T 產品品質檢驗項目及規格 (舉例) 36
表 五、不同藥品種類之風險管控比較表 56
1. Timothé Cynober. (2020). Why Are There Only 11 Cell and Gene Therapies in Eu-rope? Labiotech.eu.
https://www.labiotech.eu/in-depth/atmp-cell-gene-therapy-ema/
2. Matt Mulkey. (2019). FDA’s Framework for Regulating Regenerative Medicine Will Improve Oversight. The Pew Charitable Trusts.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2019/10/17/fdas-framework-for-regulating-regenerative-medicine-will-improve-oversight
3. 行政院。2018。「再生醫療製劑管理條例」草案。
https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/a602e0f5-ee02-40cb-a955-25e31c4c4cc5
4. 衛生福利部。2020。衛生福利部核定之細胞治療技術施行計畫。
https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/doma/cp-4127-48287-106.html
5. 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心。醫療機構實施細胞治療技術資訊揭露平台。
http://spmcell.cde.org.tw/Public/default.aspx
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Cellular & Gene Therapy Guidances.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/biologics-guidances/cellular-gene-therapy-guidances
7. 財團法人醫藥審查中心。2015。美國FDA於2014年12月發表「人類細胞、組織相關產品之最小操作」指引草案。當代醫藥法規月刊第56期。
https://www.cde.org.tw/Content/epaper/201564154120.html
8. 財團法人醫藥審查中心。2016。美國FDA於2015年10月發表「人類細胞/組織相關產品之同源使用」指引草案。當代醫藥法規月刊第65期。
https://www.cde.org.tw/Content/epaper/20163217938.html
9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration - human cell and tissue establishment registra-tion website.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cber/CFAppsPub/tiss/Index.cfm?fuseAction=fuse_DisplaySearchResults
10. UCI Office of research website. Expanded Access to Unapproved Drugs, Biolog-ics, or Devices And Right to Try Laws.
https://research.uci.edu/compliance/human-research-protections/researchers/expanded-access-and-right-to-try.html
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2020). Expanded Access.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access
12. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2020). Right to Try.
https://www.fda.gov/patients/learn-about-expanded-access-and-other-treatment-options/right-try
13. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2018). FDA Regulation of HCT/P's Product List
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/tissue-tissue-products/fda-regulation-human-cells-tissues-and-cellular-and-tissue-based-products-hctps-product-list
14. 林志六。2018。特定細胞治療技術法規簡介。月旦醫事法報告第25期。
http://www.angle.com.tw/ahlr/journal/content.aspx?no=413704
15. 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心。2015。為何Platelet Rich Plasma不是細胞治療,當代醫藥法規月刊第55期。
https://www.cde.org.tw/Content/epaper/20155611843.html
16. Genet新聞彙整網站。2019。《特管辦法》醫事司司長石崇良真心話!
http://www.genetinfo.com/investment/featured/item/28139.html?start=
17. Genet新聞彙整網站。2019。迎接細胞量法高速成長新時代 基亞/高端攜手台寶合作 全台灣最大規模細胞製備中心。
http://www.genetinfo.com/investment/featured/item/23887.html
18. 日環球生技月刊。2019。高端疫苗(6547)明年好旺?
https://www.gbimonthly.com/2019/12/59735/
19. 衛生福利部。2015。有關高濃度血小板血漿(PRP,Platelet Rich Plasma)是否合法可適作於人體相關疑義一案。衛福部104年7月6日衛部醫字第1041663683號函。
20. 國立台灣大學醫學院。2019。細胞與基因治療研討會。
21. David Stroncek, et al. (2020). CAR T-Cell: Cell Processing Laboratory Considera-tions. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Cancer. chapter 3.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323661812000032
22. Philipp Vormittaga, et al. (2018). Review: A guide to manufacturing CAR T cell therapies. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. Volume 53: 164-181.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0958166917301945
23. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2017). FDA approval brings first gene therapy to the United States.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approval-brings-first-gene-therapy-united-states
24. Lauren C. Fleischer, et al. (2019). Targeting T cell malignancies using CAR based immunotherapy: challenges and potential solutions. Journal of Hematology & On-cology., 12:141
https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-019-0801-y
25. Sourima B, et al. (2015). CD3+ T Lymphocyte. Mucosal Immunology, Fourth Edi-tion., Volume 2.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/cd3-t-lymphocyte
26. Diane Seimetz, et al. (2019). Approval of First CAR-Ts: Have we Solved all Hur-dles for ATMPs?. Cell Medicine, Volume 11: 1-16.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343443/
27. Andrew Fesnak, et al. (2016). CAR-T cell therapies from the transfusion medicine perspective. Transfus Med Rev, 30(3).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914456/#R27
28. Harjeet Singh, et al. (2013). Manufacture of Clinical-Grade CD19-Specific T Cells Stably Expressing Chimeric Antigen Receptor Using Sleeping Beauty System and Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells. PLoS One., 31;8(5).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23741305/
29. Vineti website. (2019). Chain of Identity and Chain of Custody in personalized therapies -- core differences from traditional pharma.
https://vineti.com/resources/blog/chain-identity-and-chain-custody-personalized-therapies-core-differences-traditional-pharma
30. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2020). Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs).
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/chemistry-manufacturing-and-control-cmc-information-human-gene-therapy-investigational-new-drug
31. 食品藥物管理署網站。2020。人類基因治療製劑臨床試驗審查基準(草案)。
https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteList.aspx?sid=4403
32. Kenneth Cornetta, et al. (2020). Regulatory Issues in Gene-Modified Immune Ef-fector Cell Therapy. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Cancer, chap-ter 14.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323661812000147?via%3Dihub
33. Kenneth Cornetta, et al. (2018). Screening Clinical Cell Products for Replication Competent Retrovirus: The National Gene Vector Biorepository Experience. Mol Ther Methods Clin. 10: 371–378.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6134358/#bib3
34. Katherine T.Marcucci, et al. (2018). Retroviral and Lentiviral Safety Analysis of Gene-Modified T Cell Products and Infused HIV and Oncology Patients. Molecular Therapy. Volume 26, Issue 1, 269-279.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525001617305282
35. Nirali N. Shah, et al. (2019). Clonal expansion of CAR T cells harboring lentivector integration in the CBL gene following anti-CD22 CAR T-cell therapy. Blood Ad-vances., 3(15): 2317–2322.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693002/
36. A. Chen, et al. (2020). Vector copy number quality control testing for CAR T-cells: critical validation parameters. Cytotherapy. Volume 22.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1465324920303479
37. Jennifer Solomon., et al. (2016). Current perspectives on the use of ancillary materi-als for the manufacture of cellular therapies. Cytotherapy, 18:1-12.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26596503/#affiliation-1
38. Petrenko Y, et al. (2019).Clinically relevant solution for hypothermic storage and Transportation of Human Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem cell inter-national, 1-10.
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sci/2019/5909524/
39. Miltenyi Biotec. CliniMACS Prodigy® Platform.
https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/upload/assets/IM0022746.PDF
40. Brian D. Plouffe, et al. (2015). Fundamentals and Application of Magnetic Particles in Cell Isolation and Enrichment. Rep Prog Phys. 78(1).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310825/
41. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. 2007. Devices Used to Process Hu-man Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps).
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/devices-used-process-human-cells-tissues-and-cellular-and-tissue-based-products-hctps
42. Rapid Microbiological Methods website. (2018). FDA Promotes Rapid Sterility Testing for Human Gene Therapy Products in its Draft Guidance for Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs).
http://blog.rapidmicromethods.com/2018/07/fda-promotes-rapid-sterility-testing.html
43. Scott Sutton. (2011). The sterility tests. Parenteral Drug Association and Davis Healthcare International Publishing.
http://microbiologynetwork.com/content/file/sutton_the-sterility-tests.pdf
44. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2011). Potency Tests for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products.
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/potency-tests-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products
45. Biopharma Dive website. (2018). In CAR-T, manufacturing a hurdle Novartis has yet to clear.
https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/in-car-t-manufacturing-a-hurdle-novartis-has-yet-to-clear/543624/
46. U.S. National library of medicine - ClinicalTrial.gov website. (2020). CTL019 Out of Specification MAP for ALL or DLBCL Patients. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03601442?term=kymriah&draw=2&rank=3
47. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. (2017, 2018, 2020) Summary Basis for Regulatory Action Kymeriah/ Yescarta/Tecartus,
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/kymriah-tisagenlecleucel
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/yescarta-axicabtagene-ciloleucel
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/tecartus-brexucabtagene-autoleucel
48. 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心。2020。FAQ
https://www3.cde.org.tw/faq/?uid=&classid=84&keys=&x=21&y=8
49. 食品藥物管理署。2020。再生醫療製劑品質管制指引與檢驗技術交流研討會。
50. 行政院衛生署。2012。生物檢體輸入輸出作業要點。行政院衛生署2012年1月5日署授食字第1001408806號。
https://mohwlaw.mohw.gov.tw/FLAW/FLAWDAT01.aspx?lsid=FL064260
51. 食品藥物管理署網站。2017。申請輸出入「研究用、教學或檢驗用之非感染性人類檢體之進出口」事宜。
https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteContent.aspx?sid=2162
52. Jennifer P Booth, et al. (2020). The pharmacist's role in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. J Oncol Pharm Practice. Vol. 26(7) 1725-1731.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32819199/
53. Specialist pharmacy service. (2020). Pharmacy Institutional Readiness for Marketed CAR-T Therapy: Checklists for Pharmacy Services.,V4.
https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/pharmacy-institutional-readiness-for-marketed-car-t-therapy-guidance-for-chief-pharmacists/
54. 衛生福利部。2020。藥師法。中華民國一百零九年一月十五日總統華總一義字第 10900003791號令。
https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0030066
55. 衛生福利部。2004。藥品優良調劑作業準則。中華民國九十三年十一月二十五日行政院衛生署衛署藥字第 0930332950 號令。
https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawHistory.aspx?pcode=L0030052
56. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. (2019). Gene Replacement and Gene Modifying Therapies: Therapeutics and Safety for Pharmacists.
http://symposia.ashp.org/lms/content/19-gene-therapy/
57. John Petrich, et al. (2020). Gene Replacement Therapy: A Primer for the Health-system Pharmacist. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. Vol. 33(6) 846-855.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31248331/
58. Jill E. Blind, et al. (2019). Viral-mediated gene therapy and genetically modified therapeutics: A primer on biosafety handling for the health-system pharmacist. AM J Health-Syst pharm. Vol. 76(11) 795-802.
https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article-abstract/76/11/795/5490797
59. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website.. (2018). Mixing, Diluting, or Repack-aging Biological Products Outside the Scope of an Approved Biologics License Application Guidance for Industry.
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/mixing-diluting-or-repackaging-biological-products-outside-scope-approved-biologics-license
60. Daniel Hollyman, et al. (2009). Manufacturing validation of biologically functional T cells targeted to CD19 antigen for autologous adoptive cell therapy. J Immunoth-er. 32(2): 169–180.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19238016/
61. European Medicines Agency. (2018). Kymriah: EPAR – Public assessment report.
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/kymriah#assessment-history-section
電子全文
國圖紙本論文
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
網路書籤
當script無法執行時可按︰
網路書籤
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
評分
當script無法執行時可按︰
評分
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
相關論文
相關期刊
熱門點閱論文
無相關論文
無相關期刊
1.
幹細胞研究與再生醫療產品之法律規範
2.
台灣再生醫療技術的制度化
3.
再生醫療法制之研究
4.
腰椎退化性疾病感覺症狀改變與 對健康相關生活品質之影響
5.
管制科學與細胞治療治理:如何促進台灣獲得安全有效的細胞治療
6.
再生醫療法制訂對台灣生技產業股價影響之探討
7.
「特定醫療技術檢查檢驗醫療儀器施行或使用管理辦法」施行後細胞治療服務系統初探
8.
輕度頭部外傷老年人腦震盪症候群變化與對生活品質及回歸社區之影響
9.
再生醫學應用相關法制之研究
10.
再生醫療產品的整合行銷傳播工具之探討– 從臍帶血儲存消費者的觀點剖析
11.
台灣長期照顧產業發展探討-過去、現在與未來
12.
利用結構生物學探討DNA擬態蛋白SAUGI之潛在生物醫學和生化應用研究
13.
Discriminative Linguistic Features Fusion with BERT for Aspectbased Sentiment Prediction of Airline Reviews
14.
Assessment of malaria interventions in Malawian children
簡易查詢
|
進階查詢
|
熱門排行
|
我的研究室