臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討社會關懷對青少年霸凌行為的影響，社會關懷包含「關心他人福利」、「渴望與他人有所連結」、「遵循明確道德觀」和「遵從他人眼光和行為與社會規範」四個要素。研究中也將社會關懷作為中介變項，檢視目睹經驗、家人支持對青少年霸凌行為的發生可能性，最後整理研究結果，並統合結論及提出建議，以驗證社會關懷理論之觀點對青少年偏差行為的解釋，且提出防治青少年霸凌行為之相關政策與未來研究之方向。
本研究採次級資料分析，使用中央研究院所釋出的學術調查研究資料庫，謝意苹主持的研究計畫「網路惡勢力 : 青少年網路霸凌之多面向研究」(Cyberbullying among Adolescence in Taiwan)作為實證研究的資料來源。研究對象為國小五年級與國中三年的學生，以問卷調查及班級施測的方式蒐集資料，有效樣本共853人。
統計分析的二元羅吉斯迴歸分析(binary logistic regression)結果顯示，社會關懷中的「遵循明確道德觀」，若是程度愈高，霸凌行為的發生可能性愈低；其他因子中，「目睹經驗與否」的程度愈高，霸凌行為的發生可能性也愈高。且順序羅吉斯迴歸分析(ordinal logistic regression)的結果顯示，無論在網路或手機上以及校園或其他地方之情境中，當目睹經驗的次數愈多，霸凌行為的發生可能性就愈高。
依據研究結果，建議未來應多加注意青少年於校園、網路目睹到的霸凌行為，以防青少年相互模仿。對學生的防治霸凌之教育，應可加強青少年對霸凌行為的判斷準則、對於霸凌行為的覺察，使他們無論在實體或網路世界中皆遵循明確道德觀而不出現霸凌行為，並學習有效地協助被害者。由於本研究中無法完全驗證社會關懷理論的內容，希冀未來研究也可增加對社會關懷的探討。

This study aimed to investigate the effects of social concern on adolescent bullying perpetration, and effects of other factors, including witness experiences, and family support. The study also examined whether social concern mediated the relationship between witness experiences, family support and bullying behaviors.
The data were based on the database “Cyberbullying among Adolescence in Taiwan”, which were derived from “Survey Research Data Archive”. Samples
are 853 five grade elementary school and junior high school students in Taiwan.
The results indicated that if the higher level of follow certain moral intuitions, the lower likelihood of bullying perpetration. Besides, the higher level of witness experiences, the higher likelihood of bullying perpetration. The outcome of ordinal logistic regression revealed that the higher frequency of witness experiences on internet or cellphone or on campus and at other places, the higher likelihood of bullying perpetration.
In view of research results, strategies of preventing bullying and suggestions for future research are proposed. It suggests that prevention of bullying education may strengthen adolescents’ capability of discerning bullying behaviors and prevent bullying on the internet and reality world. Moreover, adolescents also need to learn how to effectively help bullying victims. Finally, due to data restraints, the current study can not look into all dimensions of social concern , future research could continue theoretical discussion.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 社會關懷對偏差與犯罪行為之影響 9
第二節 霸凌行為與社會關懷之相關研究 16
第三節 目睹經驗之相關研究 18
第四節 家人支持之相關研究 21
第五節 小結 24
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究架構 25
第二節 研究問題與假設 26
第三節 研究樣本 28
第四節 研究工具與測量變項 29
第五節 資料處理與分析方法 37
第四章 研究結果 39
第一節 各變項之描述性統計結果 39
第二節 變項間之相關性 46
第三節 各變項對霸凌行為之羅吉斯迴歸分析 50
第四節 社會關懷於霸凌行為之中介效果 57
第五節 結果彙整 62
第五章 結論與建議 65
第一節 研究結論與討論 65
第二節 研究建議與限制 69
參考文獻 74
一、中文部份 74
二、英文部份 77

Agresti, A. (2003)。類別資料分析導論(劉應興編譯，初版)。台北市 : 華泰 (原著第一版出版於1996)
IBM(2017)。SPSS Statistics 25.0.0。羅吉斯迴歸。https://www.ibm.com/docs/zh-tw/spss-statistics/25.0.0?topic=regression-logistic
丁振豐(2000)。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。替代性學習教育大辭書名詞解釋。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1311323/
王文科(2000)。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。青年期教育大辭書名詞解釋。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1307086/
王爾暄, 李承傑, & 董旭英(2017)。國中生生活緊張要素、負向情緒調節能力與幸福感之相關研究—以臺南市國中生為例。教育理論與實踐學刊，35，31-61。DOI： 10.7038/JETP.201706_(35).0002
全國法規資料(2019年6月19日修正)。少年事件處理法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=C0010011
全國法規資料(2020年7月21日修正)。校園霸凌防治準則。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0020081
李惠加(1997)。青少年發展。台北市 : 心理。
林朝夫(1995)。偏差行為輔導與個案研究。台北 : 心理。
吳武典(1997)。國中偏差行為學生學校生活適應之探討。教育心理學報，29，25-50。 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.19970901.2
邱浩政(2015)。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術。臺北市：雙葉書廊(初版2005)。
兒童福利聯盟(2020)。2020台灣學生網路霸凌現況調查。https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/446
兒童福利聯盟(2018)。2018台灣校園霸凌防制現況調查。https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/2237
施琮仁(2017)。台灣青少年網路霸凌現況、原因與影響。中華傳播學刊，32，203-224。DOI: 10.6195/cjcr.2017.32.06
張春興(2007)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐（修訂二版）。台北市：東華(初版1991)。
張楓明、譚子文(2012)。學業控制要素、學業自我效能及學業緊張要素與國中生初次作弊行為之關聯性分析。教育研究集刊，58(4)，51-89。DOI: 10.3966/102887082012125804002
陳建安、吳芝儀、李奉儒(2001)。一般少年與不同犯罪類型少年間道德認知發展之比較研究。犯罪學期刊，8，127-176。
郭芳君、譚子文、董旭英(2011)。內在性自我控制、復原力對不同類型青少年偏差行為之交互作用效應。教育與社會研究，22，1-37。DOI: 10.6429/FES.201106.0001
詹宜華、張楓明、董旭英(2012)。國中生接觸偏差同儕在其衝動性格、知覺父母監督與偏差行為間關聯性之中介效果。犯罪與刑事司法研究，18，89-123。DOI: 10.29861/CCJI.201203.0004
蔡德輝、楊士隆(2017)。犯罪學，增訂第七版。臺北市 : 五南。
賴相如(2000)。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。社會支持教育大辭書名詞解釋。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1306759/
賴慧敏、鄭博文、陳清檳(2017)。臺灣青少年憂鬱情緒與偏差行為之縱貫性研究。教育心理學報, 48(3), 399-426。DOI: 10.6251/BEP.20160308
謝意苹(2017)。網路惡勢力：青少年網路霸凌之多面向研究(E10143)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI: 10.6141/TW-SRDA-E10143-1
譚子文、范書菁(2010)。附屬關係、參與傳統活動、社會緊張要素與台灣地區青少年外向性偏差行為及內向性偏差行為關聯性之研究。輔導與諮商學報， 32(1)，17-42。DOI: 10.7040/JGC.201005.0017
譚子文、張楓明(2012)。緊張要素、接觸偏差同儕及低自我控制與青少年偏差行為關聯性之研究。臺中教育大學學報，26(1)，27-50。DOI: 10.7037/JNTUMST.201206.0027
譚子文、張楓明(2013)。附屬關係、低自我控制及接觸偏差同儕與青少年偏差行為關係之研究。當代教育研究季刊，21(4)，81-120。DOI: 10.6151/CERQ.2013.2104.03
譚子文、董旭英(2010)。自我概念與父母教養方式對臺灣都會區高中生偏差行為之影響。教育科學研究期刊，55(3)，203-233。
Agnew, R. (2011). Toward a Unified Criminology: Integrating Assumptions about Crime, People and Society. New York: New York University Press.
Agnew, R. (2014). Social Concern and Crime: Moving Beyond the Assumption of Simple Self-Interest. Criminology, 52(1), 1-32. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12031
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 3(3), 193-209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. J. B. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128-1135. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
Center, P. S. N. B. P. (2021). Cyberbullying. Retrieved from https://www.pacer.org/bullying/info/cyberbullying/
Chouhy, C., Hochstetler, S. T., & Cullen, F. T. (2016). Social Concern and Delinquency: An Empirical Assessment of a Novel Theory. Deviant Behavior, 38(1), 94-117. doi:10.1080/01639625.2016.1196949
Churchill Jr, G. A. J. J. o. m. r. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. 16(1), 64-73.
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the Empathy- Altruism Relationship: When One Into One Equals Oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481-494.
Cobb, S. (1976). Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300-314.
Coleman, J. M. (1996). Emotional and behavioral disorders. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(4), 419-426. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.504
Cornell, D., & Limber, S. P. (2015). Law and policy on the concept of bullying at school. Am Psychol, 70(4), 333-343. doi:10.1037/a0038558
Craig, J. M. (2017). The Effects of Social Concern on White-Collar Offending. Deviant Behavior, 38(7), 837-854. doi:10.1080/01639625.2016.1197703
Cressey, D. R. (1960). The Theory of Differential Association: An Introduction. Social Problems, 8(1), 2-6.
Cross, D., Lester, L., & Barnes, A. (2015). A longitudinal study of the social and emotional predictors and consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimisation. Int J Public Health, 60(2), 207-217. doi:10.1007/s00038-015-0655-1
Demming, C. L., Jahn, S., & Boztug, Y. (2017). Conducting Mediation Analysis in Marketing Research. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 76-98. doi:10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76
Donegan, R. (2012). Bullying and Cyberbullying:History, Statistics, Law, Prevention and Analysis. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(1), 33-42.
Eşkisu, M. (2014). The Relationship between Bullying, Family Functions and Perceived Social Support Among High School Students. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 492-496. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.412
Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168-181. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
Farrington , D. P. (1993). Understanding and Preventing Bullying. Crime and Justice, 17, 381-458.
Feshbach, N. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 25-30. doi:10.1177/001100007500500207
Hay, C., Meldrum, R., & Mann, K. (2010). Traditional Bullying, Cyber Bullying, and Deviance: A General Strain Theory Approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 130-147. doi:10.1177/1043986209359557
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling[White paper. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdf.
Hayes, A. F. (2021). The PROCESS Macro for SPSS, SAS, and R. Retrieved from https://www.processmacro.org/index.html
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2019). Summary of Our Cyberbullying Research (2007-2019). Retrieved from https://cyberbullying.org/2019-cyberbullying-data
Hirschi, T. (1969a). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hirschi, T. (1969b). Key idea: Hirschi’s social bond/social control theory. In Key Ideas in Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 55-69).
Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2013). An Assessment of the Current State of Cybercrime Scholarship. Deviant Behavior, 35(1), 20-40. doi:10.1080/01639625.2013.822209
House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and Processes of Social Support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318.
Hutson, E. (2016). Cyberbullying in adolescence: A concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science, 39, 60-70. doi:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000104
Li, Q. (2010). Cyberbullying in High Schools: A Study of Students' Behaviors and Beliefs about This New Phenomenon. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19(4), 372-392. doi:10.1080/10926771003788979
Lindfors, P. L., Kaltiala-Heino, R. , Rimpelä A. H. (2012). Cyberbullying among Finnish adolescents – a population-based study. BMC Public Health, 12, 1027-1031.
Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. J. A. o. M. R. (1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. 6(1), 105-113.
Marinović, V., & Träuble, B. (2018). Vicarious social exclusion and memory in young children. Developmental Psychology, 54(11), 2067-2076. doi:10.1037/dev0000593
McCullagh , P. (1980). Regression Models for Ordinal Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 42(2), 109-142.
Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychol Health Med, 22(sup1), 240-253. doi:10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602-611. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
Moon, B., & Alarid, L. F. (2015). School bullying, low self-control, and opportunity. J Interpers Violence, 30(5), 839-856. doi:10.1177/0886260514536281
Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Sly, P. D., Whitehouse, A. J., Zubrick, S. R., & Scott, J. (2014). Adolescent peer aggression and its association with mental health and substance use in an Australian cohort. J Adolesc, 37(1), 11-21. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.10.006
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York McGraw-Hill.
O'Connell , P., Pepler , D., & Craig , W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying : insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-452.
Olweus, D. (2010). Bullying in schools:facts and intervention. Kriminalistik, 64(6), 1-29.
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 9, 751-780. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516
Paullet, K., Pinchot, J. . (2014). Behind the Screen Where Today’s Bully Plays: Perceptions of College Students on Cyberbullying. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(1), 63-69.
Pepler, D., Jiang, D., Craig, W., & Connolly, J. (2008). Developmental Trajectories of Bullying and Associated Factors. Child Development, 79(2), 325 – 338.
Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five‐year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 643-671. doi:10.1080/01411920903071918
Scott, J. G., Moore, S. E., Sly, P. D., & Norman, R. E. (2013). Bullying in children and adolescents: A modifiable risk factor for mental illness. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(3), 209-212. doi:10.1177/0004867413508456
Shadmanfaat, S. M., Choi, J., Kabiri, S., & Lee, J. (2020). Impact of Social Concern on Cyberbullying Perpetration in Iran: Direct, Indirect, Mediating, and Conditioning Effects in Agnew’s Social Concern Theory. Deviant Behavior, 1-22. doi:10.1080/01639625.2020.1753152
Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. J. I. j. o. m. e. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ., 2, 53. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
TenEyck, M., & Barnes, J. C. (2018). A Preliminary Test of the Association between Agnew’s Social Concern and Criminal Behavior: Results from a Nationally Representative Sample of Adults. Deviant Behavior, 40(2), 187-204. doi:10.1080/01639625.2017.1420457
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058-1069. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058
Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Social Exclusion and the Deconstructed State: Time Perception,Meaninglessness, Lethargy, Lack of Emotion, and Self-Awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 409–423.
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence: Gender Differences in Development and Links with Empathy. J Youth Adolesc, 47(5), 1086-1099. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
Will, G. J., Crone, E. A., van den Bos, W., & Guroglu, B. (2013). Acting on observed social exclusion: Developmental perspectives on punishment of excluders and compensation of victims. Dev Psychol, 49(12), 2236-2244. doi:10.1037/a0032299
Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015a). Scientific research on bullying and cyberbullying: Where have we been and where are we going. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 188-198. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.015
Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015b). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001