臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究探討「碳纖維複合材料標準拉伸試片製造流程」中各個流程可能發生的失效模式，應用失效模式與影響分析FMEA為一風險評估技術，找出對應各個流程的失效模式，並結合決策科學方法中的兩個多準則決策MCDM技術，包括最佳最差法BWM及理想解類似度順序偏好法TOPSIS來改善傳統FMEA模型缺點，其中BWM幫助尋找各個風險因子RPN之權重，TOPSIS則應用於最後排序失效模式，尋找改善失效模式之優先順序。透過數學模型，本研究計算出四項最優先改善失效模式，依序分別為「C1，標準試片提早破壞 (模具清理過程未注意)」>「T1，應變規在拉伸試驗與擷取數據過程，產生失效狀況」>「C3，標準試片提早破壞 (預浸布疊貼過程未注意)」>「G7，纖維斷裂，GFRP護片無法使用」。在最終解決方案部分，Infrared Thermography和Image Processing方法適合解決C1失效模式；SIM和ECT方法適合解決T1失效模式；LIT和CR-PT方法適合解決C3失效模式；HHG和AE方法適合解決G7失效模式。

This study discusses the possible failure modes of each process in the "Manufacturing Process of Standard Tensile Specimens of Carbon Fiber Composite Materials", and applies the failure mode and effect analysis FMEA as a risk assessment technology to find out the failure mode corresponding to each process, and combines decision science Two multi-criteria decision-making MCDM techniques in the method, including the best worst method BWM and the ideal solution similarity order preference method TOPSIS to improve the shortcomings of the traditional FMEA model, in which BWM helps to find the weight of each risk factor RPN, TOPSIS is used in the final Sort failure modes and find priorities for improving failure modes. Through the TOPSIS method, this study calculates the four highest priority failure modes for improvement, which are in order "C1, early failure of the standard test piece (no attention during mold cleaning)" > "T1, strain gauge in tensile test and captured data. process, resulting in a failure state” > “C3, the standard test piece failed prematurely (the prepreg was not paid attention to during the lamination process)” > “G7, the fiber was broken, and the GFRP protective sheet could not be used”. In the final solution part, Infrared Thermography and Image Processing methods are suitable for solving C1 failure mode; SIM and ECT methods are suitable for solving T1 failure mode; LIT and CR-PT methods are suitable for solving C3 failure mode; HHG and AE methods are suitable for solving G7 failure mode.

目錄

中文摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景及動機 1
1.2研究目的 4
1.3研究方法與流程 5
1.4研究範圍限制 8
第二章文獻回顧 10
2.1複合材料 10
2.1.1玻璃纖維複合材料 13
2.1.2碳纖維複合材料 14
2.2風險管理 16
2.3失效模式與影響分析 (FMEA) 17
2.4最佳最差法 (BWM) 19
2.5理想解類似度順序偏好法 (TOPSIS) 21
第三章研究方法 23
3.1風險因子評估選擇 23
3.1.1嚴重性 (S) 24
3.1.2發生機率 (O) 25
3.1.3可測性 (D) 26
3.1.4預期成本 (E) 27
3.2最佳最差法 (BWM) 介紹 28
3.3理想解類似度順序偏好法 (TOPSIS) 介紹 31
第四章實證分析 34
4.1個案敘述 34
4.2問卷統整 37
4.3 TOPSIS計算 40
第五章結果討論 42
5.1失效模式之排序 42
5.2失效模式之改善建議 44
5.3模型比較 48
5.4最終解決方案 49
第六章結論與未來建議 52
6.1結論 52
6.2未來建議 54
參考文獻 55
附錄 59
附錄A：問卷 59
附錄B：專家背景資料 67
附錄C：專家填寫之原始資料 68
附錄D：碳纖維標準拉伸試片製造簡易流程圖 72

表目錄

表 1基材之分類 11
表 2風險因子嚴重性 (S) 評估尺度 24
表 3風險因子發生機率 (O) 評估尺度 25
表 4風險因子可測性 (D) 評估尺度 26
表 5風險因子預期成本 (E) 評估尺度 27
表 6碳纖維複合材料標準拉伸試片製造流程之失效模式與定義 35
表 7十二位專家評量分數之平均 37
表 8正規化矩陣 38
表 9風險因子權重數值 39
表 10加權正規化矩陣 39
表 11 PIS、NIS值 40
表 12失效模式排序 (RANK) 41
表 13最優先四項失效模式排序 43
表 14失效模式風險因子個別排序比對 47
表 15本研究模型與傳統FMEA模型比較 48
表 16最終解決方案之文獻參考 51

圖目錄

圖 1研究流程圖 7
圖 2碳纖維複合材料標準拉伸試片實體圖 9

[1].Ahmet Can Kutlu, Mehmet Ekmekçiog˘lu, Elifcan Göçmen, Müfide Narlı, Ali Kokangül, “Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.39 pp.61-67(2012).
[2].Ali Maghami, Meshkat Salehi, Matt Khoshdarregi, “Automated vision-based inspection of drilled CFRP composites using multi-light imaging and deep learning,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol.35 pp.441-453(2021).
[3].Ashutosh Sharma, Anchal Awasthi, Tej Singh, Raj Kumar, Ranchan Chauhan, “Experimental investigation and optimization of potential parameters of discrete V down baffled solar thermal collector using hybrid Taguchi-TOPSIS method,” Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.209,118250(2022).
[4].Azzam Ahmed, Md Zillur Rahman, Yunfu Ou, Sai Liu, Barzin Mobasher, Shuaicheng Guo, Deju Zhu, “A review on the tensile behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer composites under varying strain rates and temperatures,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.294,123565(2021).
[5].Behzad Masoomi, Iman Ghasemian Sahebi, Masood Fathi, Figen Yıldırım, Shahryar Ghorbani, “Strategic supplier selection for renewable energy supply chain under green capabilities (fuzzy BWM-WASPAS-COPRAS approach),” Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol.40,100815(2022).
[6].BHAGWAN D. AGARWAL, LAWRENCE J. BROUTMAN, K. CHANDRASHEKHARA, Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites, 4th Edition, Wiley, pp.50-100(1990).
[7].Cansu Dag˘suyu, Elifcan Göçmen, Müfide Narlı, Ali Kokangül, “Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol.101 pp.286-294(2016).
[8].Chandrachur Banerjee, Vimal Kumar Chandaliya, Pratik Swarup Dash, “Recent advancement in coal tar pitch-based carbon fiber precursor development and fiber manufacturing process,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, Vol. 158,105272(2021).
[9].Donald F. Adams, Leif A. Carlsson, R. Byron Pipes, Experimental Characterization of Advanced Composite Materials, CRC Press, pp.50-70(2003).
[10].Fei Wang, Junyan Liu, Lixia Liu, Lixia Xu, Yonghui Wang, Mingjun Chen, Yang Wang, “Quantitative non-destructive evaluation of CFRP delamination defect using laser induced chirp-pulsed radar photothermal tomography,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol.149,106830(2022).
[11].Georges Dionne, “RISK MANAGEMENT: HISTORY, DEFINITION, AND CRITIQUE,” Risk Management and Insurance Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.147-166(2013).
[12].Haoze Chen, Zhijie Zhang a, Wuliang Yin, Quan Wang, Yanfeng Li, Chenyang Zhao, “Surface defect characterization and depth identification of CFRP material by laser line scanning,” NDT and E International, Vol.130,102657(2022).
[13].Hiluf Reda, Akshay Dvivedi, “Decision-making on the selection of lean tools using fuzzy QFD and FMEA approach in the manufacturing industry,” Expert Systems With Applications, Vol.192,116416(2022).
[14].Huai-Wei Lo, James J.H. Liou, “A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk Assessment,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, Vol.73 pp.684–696(2018).
[15].Huai-Wei Lo, James J.H. Liou, Chun-Nen Huang, Yen-Ching Chuang, “A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.183 pp.173–183(2019).
[16].Hu-Chen Liu, Long Liu, Nan Liu, “Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.40 pp.828–838(2013).
[17].Imad Shakir Abbood, Sief aldeen Odaa, Kamalaldin F. Hasan, Mohammed A. Jasim, “Properties evaluation of fiber reinforced polymers and their constituent materials used in structures – A review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 43, pp.1003–1008(2021).
[18].Jafar Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega, Vol.53 pp.49-57(2015).
[19].Jafar Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model,” Omega, Vol.64 pp.126-130(2016).
[20].Jalal Chafiq, Ilham Oucht, Mohammed Ait El Fqih, “Investigations of tensile behavior of basalt/glass/carbon/hybrid fiber Composite,” Materials Today: Proceedings. Vol. 52, pp.53-59(2022).
[21].Jia Huang, Jian-Xin You, Hu-Chen Liu, Ming-Shun Song, “Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.199,106885(2020).
[22].Jiancheng Gu, Shigeki Unjoh, “Image processing methodology for detecting delaminations using infrared thermography in CFRP-jacketed concrete members by infrared thermography,” Composite Structures, Vol.270,114040(2021).
[23].Jie Xu, Weixin Wang, Qinghua Hana, Xuan Liu, “Damage pattern recognition and damage evolution analysis of unidirectional CFRP tendons under tensile loading using acoustic emission technology,” Composite Structures, Vol.238,111948(2020).
[24].Kok Chin Chai, Chian Haur Jong, Kai Meng Taya, Chee Peng Lim, “A perceptual computing-based method to prioritize failure modes in failure mode and effect analysis and its application to edible bird nest farming,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol.49 pp.734-747(2016).
[25].Kuei-Hu Chang, “Generalized multi-attribute failure mode analysis,” Neurocomputing, Vol.175 pp.90-100(2016).
[26].Lunan Wei, Jun Chen, “Characterization of delamination features of orthotropic CFRP laminates using higher harmonic generation technique: Experimental and numerical studies,” Composite Structures, Vol.285,115239(2022).
[27].Na Zhang, Lei Peng, Xinchen Tao, Chaofeng Ye, “Flexible ECT probe with front-end differential setting for inspection of curved CFRP structures,” Composites Part B, Vol.227,109404(2021).
[28].Omar Najm, Hilal El-Hassan, Amr El-Dieb, “Optimization of alkali-activated ladle slag composites mix design using taguchi-based TOPSIS method,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.327,126946(2022).
[29].Philip Bromiley, Michael McShane, Anil Nair, Elzotbek Rustambekov, “Enterprise Risk Management: Review, Critique, and Research Directions,” Long Range Planning, Vol.48 pp.265-276(2015).
[30].Rachid Hsissou, Rajaa Seghiri, Zakaria Benzekri, Miloudi Hilali, Mohamed Rafik, Ahmed Elharfi, “Polymer composite materials: A comprehensive review,” Composite Structures, Vol.262,113640(2021).
[31].Ronald F. Gibson, Principles of Composite Material Mechanics, CRC Press, pp.110-160(2016).
[32].S.S. Godara, Abhishek Yadav, Bharat Goswami, R.S. Rana, “Review on history and characterization of polymer composite materials,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol.44 pp.2674–2677(2021).
[33].Shaohua Zhang, Colin Caprani, “Mechanical properties of pultruded GFRP at intermediate strain rates,” Composite Structures, Vol.278,114699(2021).
[34].Sina Bahrami, Mohammad Rastegar, “Security-based critical power distribution feeder identification: Application of fuzzy BWM-VIKOR and SECA,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol.134,107395(2022).
[35].Tessaleno Devezas, “Trends in aviation: rebound effect and the struggle composites x aluminum,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 160,120241(2020).
[36].Ting Kuo, “A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.260 pp.152–160(2017).
[37].Yakup Çelikbilek & Fatih Tüysüz, “An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis,” Journal of Management Analytics, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp.281–300(2020).
[38].Yiyin Su, Jianwei Yang, Yaozhong Liao, Pengyu Zhou, Lei Xu, Li-min Zhou, Zhongqing Su, “An implantable, compatible and networkable nanocomposite piezoresistive sensor for in situ acquisition of dynamic responses of CFRPs,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol.208,108747(2021).