臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討大台南市國小教師知覺領導風格對教師集體效能感之影響以學校組織氣氛為中介變項，研究樣本方面，以大台南地區國小教師為研究對象，不包括代理教師、代課教師以及兼任教師，正式樣本方面，依據採取隨機立意抽樣，從大台南地區的18所學學校，抽取276名教師進行調查，有效回收問卷為269份，問卷回收率為97.4%。以SPSS統計軟體，進行描述性統計、信效度分析、迴歸分析等統計方法，本研究根據分析結果歸結以下重點：
ㄧ、國民小學校長領導風格中，由高至低依序為「公共關係取向」
、「權力運作取向」、「工作任務取向」、「願景創新取向」及
「人性關懷取向」。教師對國民小學校校長領導風格整體以及各層面知覺，均為「中上程度」。
二、教師集體效能感中，得分由高至低為「激勵與誘導學生行為」、「教學集體效能」。
三、學校組織氣氛中，得分由高至低依序為「開放型氣氛」、「投入型氣氛」、
「封閉型氣氛」及「疏離型氣氛」。
四、學校組織氣氛對校長領導風格與教師集體效能感之間有中介效果。
綜上所述，本研究提出未來建議，首先須建立良好溝通管道，營造和諧校園氣氛，此外，辦理領導知能研習，設立實務交流平台，增進校長領導知能，進而完善規劃及重視資源，以充分發展學校效能。

SUMMARY
This present study was to explore the degree to which the perceptual leadership style of primary school teachers in Tainan City determines the collective efficacy of teachers and to understand how this relationship is mediated by the school organizational climate. A total of 269 formal primary teachers from 18 schools in Tainan District were invited to complete the questionnaire. The descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, class regression analysis, and other statistical methods are carried out to profile the current status of the teachers’ perception of the leadership style of the principals, the sense of collective efficacy, and the school organizational climate. Data confirm that the organizational climate of the school has an intermediary effect on the leadership style of the principal and the collective efficacy of the teachers. The demographic variables have significant differences in teachers’ leadership style, organizational climate, and collective efficacy of principals. Based on the results of this study, the recommendations for practice are to establish a good communication channel, create a harmonious campus climate, manage the leadership of the study, set up a practical exchange platform, enhance the knowledge of the principal leadership, and then improve the planning and attention to resources, in order to fully develop the school efficacy.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
謝誌 vi
目 錄 vii
表 目 錄 ix
圖 目 錄 xi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 領導風格意涵與相關理論 7
第二節 學校組織氣氛意涵與相關理論 14
第三節 教師集體效能意涵與相關理論 22
第四節 變數之關係相關研究 27
第三章 研究方法 32
第一節 研究架構 32
第二節 研究假設 34
第三節 研究工具 35
第四節 研究對象 62
第五節 研究步驟 64
第六節資料分析方法 65
第四章 研究結果與討論 66
第一節 教師知覺校長領導風格、教師集體效能感及 66
學校組織氣氛之現況 66
第二節 探討以學校組織氣氛為中介變項之校長領導風格與教師集體效能之影響 75
第五章 結論與建議 80
第一節 研究結論 80
第二節 研究建議 82
參考文獻 84
一、中文 84
二、英文 86
附錄一 預試問卷 91
附錄二 正式問卷 95

一、中文
丁一顧（2011）。教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係模式驗證之研究。屏東教育大學學報，37，1-26。
王炯霖(2009)。國中教師知覺學校組織氣氛與工作投入關係之研究。國立嘉義大學碩士論文。
余秉祐(2017) 。教師集體效能感、情緒勞務與工作績效 -以國民中小學教師為例。亞洲大學經營理系碩士論文。
林新發（1993）。學校組織氣氛意義、層面與類型之探討。臺北師院學報，6，1-42。
紀乃文、王誼臻(2014) 。轉換型領導與部屬工作績效：探討部屬適配知覺的中介效果及部屬適應性特質的干擾效果。組織與管理，7卷2期，81-126。
洪福源、邱紹一、黃德祥（2012）。高中教師教學集體效能量表之編製與建構效度研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，28，35-58。
許原嘉（2002）。國民中學身心障礙資源班教師工作滿意度調查研究。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
張慶勳 (2001) 。學校組織行為。台北: 五南。
吳靜宜、 吳為聖. (2010). 學校組織氣氛, 教師權能, 教師集體效能與學校經營績效關係之研究: 以台中縣公立國中為例 (大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士班)。
蔡坤地(2014)。轉化型領導、交易型領導、動機觀點與組織公民行為關聯性之研究。勞資關係論叢，16卷1期，45-68。
嚴奇峰、卓明德、李粵強(2014)。領導者定位、領導行為與部屬對主管滿意度關係之研究－華人對偶關係之情境觀點。商略學報，6卷2期，105-132。
蘇筱婷(2017) 。大學生知覺教師正向領導、學生正念與其幸福感關係之研究。國立台北教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳俊瑋、吳璧如 (2014)。解析個人層次的教師集體效能感, 組織層次的教師集體效能感與教師自我效能感的關係。教育學報， 42(1) ，27-52。
陳俊瑋(2009)。 教師集體效能感之概念, 測量及其相關研究。教育實踐與研究， 22(2), 123-150。
洪福源、黃德祥、鄭光燦、李介至(2013)。校長轉型領導及教師自我效能之關係: 團體凝聚力及教師集體效能之中介效果評估。 國立屏東教育大學學報: 教育類第 40 期。
吳敏惠 (2009) 。國民小學校長領導風格, 學校組織氣氛與教師組織承諾之研究。中原大學教育究所學位論文，未出版，桃園縣。
林盈男 (2011)。 國民小學校長領導風格, 教師溝通滿足與學校效能關係之研究-以臺南市為例。長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA) 學位論文。
賴冠儒（2013）。國民小學校長道德領導對教師集體效能影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系，南投縣。
李淑瑜 (2013)。中部地區國小校長退休前行政決定與學校組織氣氛關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系，南投縣。
蔡惟中 (2014)。新北市國民小學校長領導風格與學校創新經營之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-178.
向家逸 (2010)。分佈式領導, 教師組織公民行為與教師集體效能感關係之研究: 以桃園縣國小為例。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
呂靜昀 (2010)。國民小學校長真誠領導, 組織公平與集體教師效能感關係之研究-以桃園縣為例。中原大學教育研究所學位論文, 1-259.
戴志璁、洪惠娟、張美瑤、陳信宏(2019)。學校組織氣氛與教師自我效能關係之研究-以高雄市立國民中學為例。數據分析, 14(1), 49-72.
陳藝滿 (2016)。工作壓力與校長領導風格、組織氣氛研究，健康產業管理期刊, 4(1), 49-59。
紀惠英、胡中平、范熾文(2018)。國小女性校長領導風格與學校組織氣氛之相關研究。學校行政，116，1-21.
蘇淑媛（2019）。臺中市國民小學教師知覺校長學習領導與組織氣氛關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系教育行政與管理碩論文，未出版，臺中市。
陳棟樑、陳俐文、郭育伶 (2020)。宜蘭縣國民小學教師職務分配公平知覺, 學校組織氣氛與工作滿意度關係之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢，4(1), 21-31.





 
二、英文
Aaker, D. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1979). Unobservable variables in structural equation models with an application in industrial selling. Journal of Marketing Research, 147-158.
Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence relatedness and growth: Human needs in organizational setting. New York: The free. press.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Bagozzi, R., Edwards, J. (1998). A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1). 45-87.
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp.269-289), Psychology Press.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bottery, M. (2012). Leadership, the logic of sufficiency and the sustainability of education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40, 449-463.
Briggs, N. (2006). Estimation of the standard error and confidence interval of the indirect effect in multiple mediator models. The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Burns., J. H. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 550-567.
Chen, C. Y., Chen, C. H. V., ＆ Li, C. I. (2013). The influence of leader's spiritual values of servant leadership on employee motivational autonomy and eudemonics well-being. Journal of Religion & Health, 52(2), 418-438.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22 (1), 7-16.
Churchill, G. A. Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
Compbell, J. P. et al. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dubrin, A.J. (2001). Leadership – Research finding, practices, and skills, Third Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company Boston New York.
Education, 13(3),315-324.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 467-476.
Goddard, R. D. (2002). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the measurement of collective efficacy: The development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 97-100.
Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Work Design, Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 195-170.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reaction to job characteristics, Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259-286.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Halpin, A. W., & Croft, D. B. (1962). The Organizational climate of school. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York: Harper & Row Inc.
House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In Hunt, J. G., & Salancilk, G. R. (1997). New Direction in Organizational Behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press.
Howell, J. M. & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680-694.
Hoy, K. H. & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Radom House.
Hoy, W. K., &Clover, S. I. R. (1986). Elementary school climate：A revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly,22(1),93-110.
Jackson, P. R., Toby, D. W., Martin, R., and Davids, K. (1993), “New Measurement of Job Control, Cognitive Demand, and Production Responsibility,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 5, 753-762.
Kaiser, H. F. & J. Rice. (1974). Little Jiffy Mark IV. Educational and Psychologic Measurement, 34, Spring, 111-117.
Kerlinger Fred N.& Lee Howard B. (2000). Foundation of Behavioral Research(4thed.). Harcourt College Publishers, 482-492.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Lewin (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lim, S., & Eo, S. (2014). The mediating roles of collective teacher efficacy in the relations of teachers' perceptions of school organizational climate to their burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 138-147.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction, in M.D. Dunnette (ed.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally.
Luckner. J. (1991). Mainstreaming hearing –impaired students. The Journal of Social
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
Marsh, H.., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire III (SDQIII): The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late-adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row Inc.
Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2006). Organizational behavior: Foundations, realities & challenges (5th ed.). Mason, OH: Southwestern/Thomson.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL：Richard D. Irwin.
Price, J. H. (1972). Handbook of organization measurement. Lexington. District of Columbia: Health & Company, 156-157.
Robbins, S. A. & Judge, T. A. (2009). Student value edition for essentials of organizational behavior (10th ed). Paperback, 352.
Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational Behavior, Concept, Controversies, and Application (7th ed.). New jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Seashore, S. E. & Taber, T.D. (1975). Job satisfaction and their correlations. American Behavior & Scientists, 18, 346.
Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & Keller, R. T. (1976). The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 19(3), 159-212.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.
Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10–74), San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents And Outcomes of Organizational Commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(1), 46-56.
Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Leader behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Columbus, Ohio: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University.
Turner, A. N., & Lawrence, P. R. (1965). Industrial jobs and the worker, Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
Weiss, D., Dawis, R., England, G., & Lofquist, L. (1967). Manual of the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire Minneapolis. Minn: University of Minnesota
West, S., Finch, J., & Curran, P. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wexley, N. W., & Yukl, G. A. (1977). Organizational behavior and personnel psychology. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23-51.
Zambo, R., & Zambo, D. (2008). The impact of professional development in mathematics on teachers: Ä individual and collective efficacy: The stigma of underperforming. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 159-168.