臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討倫理領導與建設性偏差之關係、倫理領導與利組織的不道德行為之關係以及真誠跟隨的中介效果。以「自我決定理論」作為研究之理論基礎。本研究以實務企業界之現職工作者為研究對象，有效問卷共210份，以敘述性統計分析、驗證性因素分析、皮爾森相關分析及迴歸分析進行探討。
研究結果發現：真誠跟隨與利組織的不道德行為呈負向關係；真誠跟隨中介倫理領導與利組織的不道德行為之間的關係。然而，真誠跟隨與倫理領導具有正向關係，但與組織構面的建設性偏差則是負向關係。
未來研究建議，組織應重視倫理之重要性，樹立榜樣讓員工得以跟隨主管，為組織達成貢獻。倫理領導會透過真誠跟隨進而影響組織成員的行為表現，主管重視倫理能夠避免做出利組織的不道德行為，造成組織負面的影響。

This study aims to investigate the relationship between ethical leadership and constructive deviance, the relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior, and the mediating effect of authentic followership. The self-determination theory was adopted to be the theoretical framework.
This research invited the current workers to participate in the research survey, and there are 210 valid questionnaires in total. The questionnaire data are analyzed by using descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, hieratical regression analysis.
The results of the study found that authentic followership has a negative relationship with unethical pro-organizational behavior. Authentic followership mediates the relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior. However, authentic followership is positively related to ethical leadership but negatively related to constructive deviance toward organizations.
The present research suggests that organizations should pay attention to the importance of ethics and set an example for their employees. Ethical leaders affect the behavior of organizational members through authentic followership. The supervisor's emphasis on ethics can promote authentic followership and avoid unethical pro-organizational behavior.

摘 要 I
Abstract II
誌 謝 IV
目 錄 V
表目次 VII
圖目次 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 名詞釋義 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 理論基礎：自我決定理論 7
第二節 倫理領導 9
第三節 真誠跟隨 10
第四節 倫理領導與真誠跟隨 12
第五節 建設性偏差 13
第六節 真誠跟隨與建設性偏差行為 15
第七節 利組織的不道德行為 16
第八節 真誠跟隨與利組織的不道德行為 18
第九節 真誠跟隨的中介效果 19
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究架構與假設 21
第二節 研究對象 22
第三節 研究工具 22
第四節 調查實施 25
第五節 資料分析 25
第四章 研究結果 27
第一節 樣本描述 27
第二節 驗證性因素分析 29
第三節 皮爾森相關分析 36
第四節 迴歸分析 38
第五章 結論與建議 43
第一節 研究發現 43
第二節 研究結論 44
第三節 研究建議 46
第四節 研究限制 49
參考文獻 51
附錄 59
附錄一 60
附錄二 65
附錄三 69

表目次
表4 1填答者樣本特性表 28
表4 2整體驗證性因素分析 30
表4 3驗證性因素分析結果 35
表4 4各變項敘述性統計及相關係數表 37
表4 5倫理領導→真誠跟隨→建設性偏差之中介效果迴歸 39
表4 6倫理領導→真誠跟隨→利組織的不道德行為之中介效果迴歸 42
表5 1研究假設檢驗結果彙整表 43

圖目次
圖1-1 研究流程圖 4
圖3-1 研究架構圖 21
圖4 2 CFA圖 34

Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 1-52.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ7 Prentice-Hall.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.
Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
Cha, S. E., Hewlin, P. F., Roberts, L. M., Buckman, B. R., Leroy, H., Steckler, E. L., ... & Cooper, D. (2019). Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 633-671.
Chapman III, T. R. (2016). Authentic leadership and job satisfaction: A quantitative examination of the mediating effects of authentic followership in the US registered nursing community. Capella University.
Crippen, C. (2012). Enhancing authentic leadership− followership: Strengthening school relationships. Management in Education, 26(4), 192-198.
de Zilwa, D. (2016). The strengths and capacities of authentic followership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(3), 310–324..
de Zilwa, D., Lapierre, L., & Carsten, M. (2014). A new conceptual framework for authentic followership. Followership: What is it, and why do people follow, 47-72.
Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40(1), 1.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 4, 19-43.
Frömmer, D., Hollnagel, G., Franke-Bartholdt, L., Strobel, A., & Wegge, J. (2021). Linking authentic leadership, moral voice and silence—A serial mediation model comprising follower constructive cognition and moral efficacy. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(4), 436-466.
Galperin, B. L. (2012). Exploring the nomological network of workplace deviance: Developing and validating a measure of constructive deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 2988-3025.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.
Gill, C., & Caza, A. (2018). An investigation of authentic leadership’s individual and group influences on follower responses. Journal of Management, 44(2), 530-554.
Gottlieb, J. Z., & Sanzgiri, J. (1996). Towards an ethical dimension of decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1275-1285.
Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 223-241.
Hudson, J. (1997). Ethical leadership: The soul of policy making. Journal of School Leadership, 7(5), 506-520.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in experimental social psychology, 38, 283-357.
Kouzes, J. M. & B. Z. Posner. (1993). Credibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L. (2015). Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1677-1697.
Liu, Y., & Qiu, C. (2015). Unethical pro-organizational behavior: Concept, measurement and empirical research. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 3(03), 150.
Mertens, W., Recker, J., Kummer, T. F., Kohlborn, T., & Viaene, S. (2016). Constructive deviance as a driver for performance in retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 193-203.
Newton, T. (2016). The Power of Positive Deviance: How unlikely innovators solve the world's toughest problems. InterAction, 8(1), 98.
Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533-547.
Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2‐3), 259-278.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Sackett, P. R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International journal of selection and assessment, 10(1‐2).
Seidman, W., & McCauley, M. (2008). Positive deviants rule!. Cutter IT Journal, 21(7), 16.
Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), 69-81.
Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621-640.
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769.
Vadera, A. K., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). Love, hate, ambivalence, or indifference? A conceptual examination of workplace crimes and organizational identification. Organization Science, 24(1), 172-188.
Vadera, A. K., Pratt, M. G., & Mishra, P. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations: Integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1221-1276.