臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究在於探討技術型高中學生未來觀與自我調節學習之關聯，以資訊素養能力為中介變項時，這三者的關聯性及影響。
為達上述目的，本研究先透過文獻探討，建立研究架構理論基礎。採用問卷調查法，以便利抽樣方式做問卷調查，總共發出430份問卷，回收407份有效問卷。本研究問卷回收彙整後，採用SPSS軟體，進行資料分析。
依據研究目的，獲得研究結果如下：
一、未來觀對自我調節學習具有正向影響作用。
二、未來觀對資訊素養能力具有正向影響之作用。
三、資訊素養能力對自我調節學習具有正向影響作用。
四、資訊素養能力在未來觀對自我調節學習呈現部分中介效果。
最後，依據研究結論提出加強資訊素養能力以增進自我調節學習成效之建議。

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between future time perspective and self-regulated learning, especially we further examine the mediation role of information literacy. As the cases of remote learning has have been gradually increasing, the self-regulated learning plays an important role. Future time perspective not only enables the visions of career, but also enhances the responsibility of students. Therefore, this study focuses on students’ time perspective and self-regulated learning and probes the mediation effect of information literacy between future time perspective and self-regulated learning.
In the study, survey method was used to measure vocational high school students’ attitudes. A total of 407 effective questionnaires were obtained.
The results are as follows：(1) future time perspective is positively associated with self-regulated learning (2) future time perspective has a positive relationship with information literacy (3) information literacy and self-regulated learning are positively correlated (4) information literacy partially mediates the positive relationship between future time perspective and self-regulated learning.
The finding of this study suggests that schools should enhance the information literacy of students to boost the performance of self-regulated learning.

摘要...... I
Abstract...... III
謝誌...... V
目次...... VII
表次...... IX
圖次...... XI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 待答問題 4
第四節 研究方法與步驟 5
第五節 名詞釋義 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 未來觀內涵與相關研究 9
第二節 自我調節學習內涵及相關研究 12
第三節 資訊素養能力、未來觀及自我調節學習之關聯研究 17
第三章 研究設計與實施 21
第一節 研究架構與假設 21
第二節 研究對象 23
第三節 研究工具 25
第四節 研究實施 26
第五節 資料處理 27
第四章 資料分析與討論 29
第一節 樣本基本資料描述 29
第二節 項目分析與因素分析 32
第三節 皮爾森相關分析 40
第四節 階層迴歸分析之結果 42
第五節 綜合討論 45
第五章 研究結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結論 47
第二節 研究建議 48
參考文獻 51
壹、中文部分 51
貳、英文部分 55
附錄 63
附錄一 正式量表 63

壹、中文部分
王雅奇（2019）。自我調節學習在才能發展上的應用。資優教育論壇，17(2)，65-80。
王梅玲（2005）。能力本位教育應用於資訊素養網路課程設計與評鑑。中華民國圖書館學會會報，74，95-118。
台中家商108課綱資訊網（2019年）。12年國教/課程綱要-108課綱重點。取自https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php。
田耐青(譯) (2002) 。統整多元智慧與學習風格(原作者：H. Silver, R. W. Strong, & M. J. Perini)。臺北市:遠流出版社。
李德竹（2000）。資訊素養的意義、內涵與演變。圖書與資訊學刊，35，1-25。
李德治、童惠玲（2009）多變量分析-專題及論文常用的統計方法。台北，雙葉書廊。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2014）。SPSS與統計應用分析-因素分析。台北，五南。
林建平（2005）。自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知，52（2），8-25。
林宴瑛（2006）。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調節學習策略之關係及潛在改變量分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立成功大學教育研究所，台南市。
林清山（1995）。國中生自我調節學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學系教育心理學報，28，15-58。
林清文（2002）。自我調整課業學習模式在課業學習諮商的應用。彰化師大輔導學報，23，229-275。
林清文（2008）。高中高職學生基礎學科自我調整課業學習策略研究。中華輔導學報，13，1-44。
周淑楓（2007）。未來取向之自我調節學習歷程分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學教育研究所，台南市。
吳淑禎（2017）。高中（職）學生學習與讀書策略量表修訂之研究。測驗學刊，64(2)，155-181。
胡立耘（2005）。論資訊素養的結構與意義。教育資料與圖書館學，42(4），471-480。
洪詠善、林佳慧、 楊惠娥（2018）。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動，(15)，1-9。
洪褔源(2000) 。自我調節學習在教學上的應用。國教輔導，39(6)，49-53。
陳李綢（1995）。有效學習策略的研究與應用。教育部訓委會學生輔導雙月刊，41，30-33。
陳柏霖、劉佩雲（2015）。大學生後設認知策略、網路學習行為與心理學學習成效之關係。南台人文社會學報，14，35-70。
教育部（2004年6月8日）。追求卓越技職教育的具體措施。教育報告書-技職教育白皮書。取自http://www.tve.edu.tw/data/技職教育白皮書0718/第四部分-追求卓越技職教育的具體措施、結語.htm。
讀墨（2020年）。自發，愛上學習。取自https://readmoo.com/book/220123986000101。
張芳全、洪筱仙 (2019)。 澎湖縣國中生未來時間觀，自律學習與學習成就之研究。Journal of University of Taipei Education Vol，50(2)，1-32。
張新仁（1989）。學習策略訓練之初探。教育文粹，18，86-94。
程炳林、林清山（2001）。中學生自我調節學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，48(1)，1-41。
程炳林（2002）。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調節學習策略之關係。教育心理學報，33（2），79-102。
程炳林（2003）。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報，48（1），39-58。
彭淑玲 (2017)。 未來取向之自我調整學習模式考驗暨檢驗課室目標結構的調節效果。教育心理學報，48(3)， 371-397。
楊岫穎（2003）。國中生自我設限的情境及歷程因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學教育研究所，台南市。
黃如意、蔡銘修 (2019)。 自我調節學習理論協助技術型高中學生國語文寫作。臺灣教育評論月，8(2)，56-59。
黃珮婷（2012）。大學生未來時間觀、知覺工具性及自我調整學習之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系，台北市。
劉佩雲（2000）。自我調節學習模式之驗證。國立政治大學教育與心理研究，23，173-206。
貳、英文部分
Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 19-154.
Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). Information literacy competency standardsfor higher education. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
American Library Association (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy. Final report. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.htm.
Avci, S. (2013). Relations between self regulation, future time perspective and the delay of gratification in university students. Education, 133(4), 525-537.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Academic delay of gratification, future goals, and self-regulated leanring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American.
Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychological Review, 16(1), 35-57.
Bernardo, G., Gonzalo, A., Jesus, M. S. R., & Eloina, G. F.(2012).Learning strategies in excellent and average university students.Their evolution over the first year of the career.E-Journal of educational Research, Assessment and Evaluation, 18(2), 1-21.
Boekaerts, M. (1997).Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
Boekaerts, M. (l999). Self-regulated l earning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
Chamot A. U., Barnhardt S., EI-Dinary P. B. & Robbins J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York.
De Vellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications, 26.
De Volder, M., & Lens, J. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
Eren, A. (2009). Exploring the effects of changes in future time perspective and perceived instrumentality on graded performance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(3), 1217-1248.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall, 5(3), 207-219.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological measurement, 66(3), 393-416.
Husman, J., & Lens, J. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 113-125.
Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning & Individual Differences, 18(2), 166-175.
Hwang, M. H., Lee, D., Lim, H. J., Seon, H. Y., Hutchison, B., & Pope, M. (2014). Academic underachievement and recovery: Student perspectives on effective career intervention.The Career Development Quarterly, 62, 81-94.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Kardash, C. M., & Amlund, J. T. (1991).Self-reported learning strategies and learning from expository text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 117-138.
Malcolm, B. (2009). Learning, labour and employability. Studies in the Education of Adults, 41(1), 39-52.
McClure. C. R. (1994). Network literacy: A role for libraries? Information Technology and Libraries, 13(2), 117.
Mello, Z. R., & Worrell F. C. (2015). The past, the present, and the future: A conceptual model of time perspective in adolescence. In M. Stolarski, F. Nicolas, & V. B. Wessel (Eds.), Time perspective theory: Review, research and application (pp. 115-130). New York, NY: Springer.
Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2003). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Paper presented as part of a symposium at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research, Chicago, IL.
Miller R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychological Review, 16(1), 9-33.
Nuttin, J., & Lens, J. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Leuven & Hillsdale, NJ: Leuven University Press & Erlbaum.
Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contests that support it. Journal of educational psychology, 90(4),715-729.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self - regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Peetsma, T. T. D. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment: Scandinavian.Journal of Educational Research, 44(2), 177-192.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy. (2011). The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy – Core Model For Higher Education. Retrieved June 26, 2013, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf.
Seginer, R., & Lens , W. (2015). The motivational properties of future time perspective futer orientation: Different approaches, different cultures. In M. Stolarski, F. Nicolas, & V. B. Wessel (Eds.), Time perspective theory: Review, research and application (pp. 287-304). New York, NY: Springer.
Silver.H.Strong, R. W., & Perini, M. J. (1 997). Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership, 55 (1), 22-27.
Stoeger, H., Fleischmann, S. & Obergriesser, S. (2015). Self-regulated learning(SRL) and the gifted learner in primaryschool: The theoretical basis and empirical findings on a research programdedicated to ensuring that all students learn to regulate their own learning.Asia Pacific Education Review, 16,257-267.
Taherdoost, H. A. M. E. D., Sahibuddin, S. H. A. M. S. U. L., & Jalaliyoon, N. E. D. A. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis: Concepts and theory. Advances in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 375-382.
Wang, C.S., & Li, C.C. (2000,November). An assessment framework for information technology integrated instruction. Paper presented at the conference on International Conference of Computers in Education, ICCE and Computer-Assisted Insturction, ICCAI, Taipei, Taiwan.
Winne P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 173-187.
Zimmerman,B. J. ,(1989).Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H.Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.1-25). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation :an analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (eds.), Self-regulated learning: form teaching to se1f-reflective.New York: Guilford Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M.Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002).Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimbardo,P. G., & Boyd,J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid,reliable individual-differences metric.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.