臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現今隨著金融及科技日益成熟與發達，消費支付方式越發多元及便捷，人們不需隨身攜帶足夠的金額貨幣也能夠完成交易，網際網路結合行動裝置的普及，使行動支付帶來商機。台灣現代科技發展下，可見人手一機，配備了行動支付所需的工具，但部分的人還是堅持使用實體貨幣執行交易，是否因支付工具存在安全疑慮？科技雖帶來了便利性，但也潛藏未知的交易風險；因此本研究將針對台灣行動支付市場中，探討消費者行動支付使用意圖，利用科技接受模型結合知覺風險構面，探討消費者使用行動支付的影響。
本研究針對消費者行動支付使用意圖，透過『科技接受模式』作為基礎建構研究模式，進行使用者之『行為意圖』分析探討。本研究以網路問卷方式蒐集資料，再運用 SPSS 及Smart PLS 3.0軟體分析本研究所提出之假說及分析變數間之因果關係，研究結果顯示，在科技接受模式、知覺風險及主觀規範的六個構面中，消費者對於行動支付的使用意圖上，的確對於行為意向影響非常顯著。除了消費者的親朋好友會影響其使用意圖，因行動支付類型多元、方便性及便利性高，也是重要的促成條件，使得消費者對於行動支付之使用意圖日益增高。

Nowadays, with the increasing maturity and development of finance and technology, consumer payment methods are becoming more and more diverse and convenient. People do not need to carry enough money to complete transactions. The Internet combined with the popularity of mobile devices brings business opportunities to mobile payment. With the development of modern technology in Taiwan, it can be seen that each person is equipped with the tools required for mobile payment, but some people still insist on using physical currency to perform transactions. Is there any security concern due to payment tools? Although technology brings convenience, it also contains unknown transaction risks. Therefore, this research will focus on Taiwan's mobile payment market, explore the use intention of consumers' mobile payment, and use the technology acceptance model to combine the perceived risk dimension to explore consumer use behavior. payment impact.
In this study, aiming at the use intention of consumers' mobile payment, through the "technology acceptance model" as the basic construction research model, the analysis and discussion of the user's "behavioral intention" is carried out. This study collects data by means of an online questionnaire, and then uses SPSS and Smart PLS 3.0 software to analyze the hypothesis proposed in this study and analyze the causal relationship between variables. In the aspect, consumers' intention to use mobile payment does have a significant impact on behavior intention. In addition to the influence of consumers' relatives and friends on their use intentions, the diversity of mobile payment types, convenience and convenience are also important enabling conditions, making consumers' use intentions for mobile payment increasing day by day.

摘 要 I
Abstract III
謝 誌 V
目 錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 X
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究流程 6
第四節 論文架構 7
第貳章 文獻探討 8
第一節 行動支付 8
第二節 科技接受模式 12
第三節 知覺風險 15
第參章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究架構 18
第二節 研究假說之推論 19
第三節 研究相關構面和操作性定義與衡量 22
第四節 問卷設計 27
第肆章 資料分析與統計檢定 31
第一節 問卷發放及回收狀況 31
第二節 樣本敘述性統計分析 32
第三節 信效度分析 36
第四節 路徑係數分析及假說檢定 42
第伍章 結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結果與結論 47
第二節 研究貢獻 52
第三節 未來研究之建議 53
參考文獻 55

林秀英. (2015). 風起雲湧的行動支付競賽. 臺灣經濟研究月刊, 38(5), 55-63.。
許嘉琤. (2013). 行動支付可用性相關因素探討.。
翁世吉、田育任(2014)。行動商務支付應用發展趨勢.。
陳啓英. (2008). 從網路購物者風險知覺及購買意願探討臉部辨識之應用. 明道學術論壇, 4(1), 45-60.。
林志偉. (2008). 影響消費者對使用網路銀行關鍵因素之研究.。
許傳勇. (2017).以延伸科技接受模式探討消費者使用行動支付意圖(Doctoral dissertation, 撰者).。
梁世安, & 余國瑋. (2005). 以科技接受模式探討二輪式電動代步車消費者接受程度. 行銷評論, 2(2), 135-148.。
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960. American Marketing Association.
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS quarterly, 237-246.
Dewan, S. G., & Chen, L. D. (2005). Mobile payment adoption in the US: A cross-industry, crossplatform solution. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 1(2), 4-28.
Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., & Zmijewska, A. (2008). Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review. Electronic commerce research and applications, 7(2), 165-181.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Engel, JF, Blackwell, RD, & Miniard, PW (1993). Consumer Behavior, The Dryden Press. Chicago, IL .
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).

Gerpott, T. J., & Kornmeier, K. (2009). Determinants of customer acceptance of mobile payment systems. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 3(1), 1.
Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & management, 39(8), 705-719.
Ghezzi, A., Renga, F., Balocco, R., & Pescetto, P. (2010). Mobile Payment Applications: offer state of the art in the Italian market. Info.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 51-90.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of electronic commerce, 1(2), 59-88.
Karnouskos, S. (2004). Mobile payment: a journey through existing procedures and standardization initiatives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 6(4), 44-66.
Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision support systems, 29(3), 269-282.
Lin, J. C. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International journal of information management, 20(3), 197-208.
Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413-432.
Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business research, 59(10-11), 1160-1166.
Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of consumer research, 2(1), 29-37.
Shih, H. P. (2004). Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & management, 41(6), 719-729.
Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860-873.
Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 434-446.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & management, 40(6), 541-549.
Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & management, 42(5), 719-729.
Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, H., & Yu, B. (2015). Understanding perceived risks in mobile payment acceptance. Industrial Management & Data Systems.