跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/03/19 19:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊昀庭
研究生(外文):YANG, YUN-TING
論文名稱:臺灣學生對於教師支持與教師熱忱的覺知與閱讀素養之關聯探討
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship among the Perceptions of Teacher Support, Teacher Enthusiasm, and Reading Literacy for Taiwan Students
指導教授:林素微林素微引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIN, SU-WEI
口試委員:洪素蘋凃柏原
口試委員(外文):HUNG, SU-PINTWU, BOR-YAUN
口試日期:2022-07-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:教育數位評量與數據分析碩士班
學門:教育學門
學類:教育測驗評量學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2022
畢業學年度:110
語文別:中文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:教師支持教師熱忱閱讀素養性別
外文關鍵詞:PISA 2018
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:274
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:74
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
師生關係是學校教育環境中重要的一部分,對於教育有著重要的意義,相關研究指出師生關係會影響教師的教學效果、學生的學習興趣及學習成就,因此建立良好的師生關係是班級經營的一項重點。本研究以PISA 2018學生問卷中關於師生關係之「教師支持」及「教師熱忱」量表來進行探討,由於在教師支持與教師熱忱量表中,學生對不同情況應會有程度或結構上之差異,因此決定使用潛在類別分析,根據學生的測驗反應情形進行分組,檢視學生覺知不同教師支持與教師熱忱分類後之組型與閱讀素養分數之關聯,並納入性別背景變項進行後續分析,進而提供臺灣教師培育學生的參考資訊。研究結果顯示以下:

(一)整體來說,臺灣學生覺知教師對其課業上有著高頻率的支持,對教師具有教學熱忱上也有高頻率的同意。
(二)學生覺知教師支持及熱忱組型在類別分為4類模式較為適配,根據此四類學生的作答機率組型分別命名為高
支持高熱忱(59.4%),高支持低熱忱(21.3%),低支持高熱忱(9.7%),(低支持低熱忱9.6%)。高
支持高熱忱類型的學生閱讀素養分數最高,而低支持低熱忱的學生閱讀素養分數最低。
(三)學生性別差異與覺知教師支持及教師熱忱之組型關聯並未達顯著差異。
(四)透過對應分析可發現無論教師的教學熱忱程度高低,教師如給予學生的學習幫助較少,則該類學生的閱讀素
養依舊相對較低。

The teacher-student relationship is an important part of the school's educational environment and for education it’s significant. Relevant studies have pointed out that the teacher-student relationship will affect the teaching effect of teachers, students' learning interests and learning achievements. Therefore, establishing a good teacher-student relationship is one of the important class management. The study focuses on reading literacy and students’ perception of teacher support and teacher enthusiasm in PISA 2018 Student Questionnaire. Since students should have differences in degree or structure in different situations in the Teacher Support and Teacher Enthusiasm Scale, therefore, decided to use Latent Category Analysis (LCA) to group students according to their test responses for analysis. The correlation between reading literacy scores and gender background variable is also included in the follow-up analysis in order that it can provide the related reference information for teachers in Taiwan to cultivate students. The results of the study showed the following:
(1) Overall, Taiwanese students perceive that teachers have high frequency of support for their schoolwork,
and high frequency of agreement with teachers in terms of teaching enthusiasm.
(2) Students perceive that the teacher support and enthusiasm group is more suitable in four categories.
According to the four types of students’ answering probability groups, they are named as high support
and high enthusiasm (59.4%), high support and low enthusiasm (59.4%). 21.3%), low support high
enthusiasm (9.7%), (low support low enthusiasm 9.6%). Students with high support and high enthusiasm
have the highest reading literacy scores, while students with low support and low enthusiasm have the
lowest reading literacy scores.
(3) There was no significant difference in the typological associations between students' gender and
perceived teacher support and teacher enthusiasm.
(4) Through the corresponding analysis, it can be found that regardless of the level of teaching enthusiasm
of teachers, if teachers give less help to students in schoolwork, the reading literacy of this kind of
students is still relatively low.

目 錄
摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
謝辭 iv
目錄 v
表次 vi
圖次 vii

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 5
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 教師、教師支持及教師熱忱對學生學習的關聯性及相關研究 8
第二節 師生互動與閱讀教育的性別差異 11
第三節 潛在類別模式之簡介 14
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 研究流程 16
第二節 研究對象 17
第三節 研究變項 17
第四節 資料分析方法 23
第四章 研究結果 25
第一節 臺灣學生覺知的教師支持及教師熱忱與閱讀素養表現情形 25
第二節 探討臺灣學生所覺知的教師支持及教師 30
第三節 不同性別和覺知教師支持及教師熱忱組型之關聯情形 35
第四節 不同教師支持及教師熱忱的組型的閱讀素養差異情形 36
第五節 不同教師支持及教師熱忱組型與閱讀素養水準的關聯情形 37
第五章 結論與建議 38
第一節 研究結論 39
第二節 研究限制 41
第三節 建議 42
參考文獻 43


王柏壽(2004)。班級裡的人際關係。教師之友,45(2),15-24。
王郁琮、溫福星(2011)。混合因素分析對群體異質性之探索:以國中生學業困擾二元資料為例。教育與心理研究,34(3),37-63。
王翌庭(2014)。臺中市國中學生知覺師生關係、學習態度與幸福感之相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學教育研究所。
石文宜(2006)。國中生人格特質、師生互動關係與偏差行為之關係〔未出版之碩士論文〕。政治大學教育研究所。
吳毓瑩、林原宏 (1996)。潛在類別分析取向的除法概念結構。測驗年刊,43,345-358。
沈怡伶(2019)。高中學生知覺教師與家長心理支持、成就目標與適應性學習行為之關係研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學教育研究所。
周菡苹、宋靜怡、吳玫瑩、謝齊莊(2020)。國小學童教師支持、學習態度及學習成效之相關性-以新北市某國小高年級生為例。管理實務與理論研究,14(1),33-49。
林小慧、曾玉村(2017)。科學多重文本閱讀理解能力之評量發展暨性別差異研究—以核四廠續建與停建爭議題本為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10(2),81-109。
林欣緣(2021)。台中市國中學生知覺師生關係、學習投入與幸福感之相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學教育研究所。
林素微(2018)。數學課室教師支持與學生數學素養關聯探討:以 PISA 2012臺灣資料為例。臺灣數學教師,39(1),1-17。
邱皓政(2008)。潛在類別模式:原理與技術。五南圖書。
施淑慎(2008)。學習情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究,31(2),1-26。
洪碧霞、鄒慧英、陸怡琮、林素微、林哲彥、江培銘、吳康民、王長勝(2021)。PISA 2018 臺灣學生的表現。心理出版社股份有公司。
范德鑫(1982)。教師關愛與國中學生學業成就的關係。教育心理學報,(15),195-203。
孫旻儀、石文宜、王鍾和(2007)。學生背景及人格特質與師生互動關係之研究。輔導與諮商學報,29(2),51-72。
孫旻暐、陳語箴(2013)。性別刻板印象與知覺重要他人意向對高中女生在科系選擇的影響與角色機制。教育與心理研究,36(2),57-85。
徐蓓蓓(1983)。教師個人特質、師生口語互動與學生對教師行為的知覺、學生學業成就之關係研究。教育心理學報,(16),99-114。
郭丁熒(2001)。臺灣小學教師角色知覺差距因應方式之探討--調查、內容分析、及潛在類別分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,11(1),93-112。
陳文長(2005)。國小體育教師教學熱忱、發展趨向及影響因素之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立體育學院體育研究所。
陳文長、周宏室(2007)。國小體育教師教學熱忱之研究。臺灣運動教育學報,2(1),1-21。
陳俊延(2019)。國小教師時間觀點、教學熱忱與士氣之關係研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所。
張玉茹、江芳盛(2013)。師生關係、學習動機與數學學業成就模式之驗證-以PISA2003資料庫為例。測驗統計年刊,21(2),91-121。
張郁雯、柯華葳(2019)。影響數位閱讀表現的學生與環境因素:PIRLS 2016 資料探討。教育心理學報,51(1),161-181。
許呈沅(2013)。影響學生閱讀成就因素之多層次分析:以PISA 2009臺灣資料為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中興大學。
黃秀雯、王采薇(2019)。男女有別,學習表現也有別?國際素養評量結果再思性別刻板印象威脅。學校行政,122, 154 – 170。
黃稚雯、陳棟樑、陳俐文(2019)。桃園市國中學童知覺教師支持、互動公平及人格特質對身心障礙同儕接納態度之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢,3(1),7-18。
黃毅志、陳怡靖(2005)。台灣的升學問題:教育社會學理論與研究之檢討。臺灣教育社會學研究,5(1),77-118。
黃輝雄(2000)。國民小學教師班級領導風格與學生成就動機關係之研究。屏東師院國民教育研究所論文集,5,285-318。
葉純華(2018)。國小高年級學生知覺教師吸引力、師生關係與學習投入關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所。
趙曼寧、王明泉、程鈺雄(2008)。國民小學特教教師教學熱忱之研究。東台灣特殊教育學報,(10),121-149。
鄭婉清(2017)。探討閱讀動機對閱讀行為、幸福感之影響—以桃園市國中學生為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。健行科技大學。
賴瑛娟(2010)。教師支持、數學自我效能及數學興趣對職業意向之影響。中華輔導與諮商學報,(28),1-27。
蘇美如、黃英哲(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係─應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報,14,33-50。
Ali, S. R., & McWhirter, E. H. (2006). Rural appalachian youth’s vocational/ educational postsecondary aspirations: Applying social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Development, 33(2), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845306293347

Ang, R. P. (2005). Development and validation of the Teacher-Student. Relationship Inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor. Analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.1.55-74

Barba, R., & Cardinale, L. (1991). Are females invisible students? An investigation of teacher-student questioning interactions. School Science and Mathematics, 91(7), 306-310. DOI:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12106.x

Caruso, V. M. (1982). Enthusiastic teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 53, 47-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1982.10629351

Cassidy, T. & Lynn, R. (1991). Achievement Motivation, Educational Attainment, Cycles of Disadvantage and Social Competence: Some Longitudinal Data. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00956.x

Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Farruggia, S., Bush, K., & Dong, Q. (2003). Beyond parents and peers: The role of important non-parental adults (VIPS) in adolescent development in China and the United States. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10068

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development: Self processes and development, 23, 43–77.

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563

Crosnoe, R. (2011). Fitting in, standing out: Navigating the social challenges of high school to get an education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David Bartholomew, Martin Knott, Irini Moustaki. (1999) Latent variable models and factor analysis. Kendall's library of statistics 7 (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold, London, UK.

Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Rueger, S. Y., Brown, S. E., & Summers, K.H. (2009). The role of youth's ratings of the importance of socially supportive behaviors in the relationship between social support and self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 13-28.

Doll, B., Zucker, S., & Brehm, K. (2004). Resilient classrooms: Creating healthy environments for learning. New York: Guilford Press.

Farmer, H. (1985). Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(3), 363-390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.32.3.363

Feeney, S., Christensen, D. & Maravick, E. (1991). Who am I in the lives of children. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130905

Gijsbert Stoet , David C. Geary (2013). Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data. PLoS ONE, 8(3). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0057988

Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E(1973). Looking in Classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.

Goodenow, C. (1993a). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431693013001002

Grolnick, W. S. & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Schooling: A Multidimensional Conceptualization and Motivation Model. Child Development, 65, 237-252.

Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131378

Hallinan, M. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students' attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100303

Jackson, D. L., Teal, C. R., Raines, S. J., Nansel, T. R., Force, R. C., & Burdsal, C. A. (1999). The dimensions of students’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(4), 580-596.

Kelly, S. & Zhang, Y. (2016). Teacher Support and Engagement in Math and Science: Evidence from HSLS. The High School Journal, 99, 141-165. doi: 10.1353/hsj.2016.0005

Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.

Košir & Tement (2014). Teacher–student relationship and academic achievement: A cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0205-2

Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011) Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2018). The relationship between teacher support and students’ academic emotions: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2288.

Lihong Ma, Haifeng Luo, Leifeng Xiao(2021).Perceived teacher support, self-concept, enjoyment and achievement in reading: A multilevel mediation model based on PISA 2018, Learning and Individual Differences. 85.

Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2009). Sex differences in reading achievement. Trames, 13(63/58), 3-13. doi:10.3176/ tr.2009.1.01

Ma, L. H., Du, X. F., Hau, K. T., & Liu, J. (2018). The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement in Chinese EFL context: A serial multiple mediation model. Educational Psychology, 38(5), 687–707.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multi-wave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.646

Montalvo, G. P., Mansfield, E. A., & Miller, R. B. (2007). Liking or disliking the teacher: Student motivation, engagement and achievement. Evaluation and Research in Education, 20(3), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.2167/eri406.0

Muller, C. (2001). The role of caring in the teacher-student relationship for at-risk students. Sociological Inquiry, 71, 241–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1475682X.2001.tb01110.x

Noddings, Nel. (1992). The Challenge to Care in Schools. New York: Teachers College Press, 2003, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.

Parson, M. (2001). Enthusiasm and feedback: A winning combination! PE. CENTRAL.
https://www.pecentral.org/climate/monicaparsonarticle.html

Patricia, S., & Jerry, G. (1986). Perceived instructor enthusiasm and student achievement. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises,13, 52-55.

Pianta R.C., Steinberg M.S., & Rollins K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295-312.

Quin, D., Heerde, J. A., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2018). Teacher support within an ecological model of adolescent development: Predictors of school engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 69 ,1–15.

Rampa, S. H. (2012). Passion for teaching: A qualitative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1281-1285. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.812

Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta- analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46, 239–261.

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.

Rosenshine, B. V. (1970). Enthusiastic teaching: A research review. The School Review, 78(4), 499- 514. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162610

Rubin, K.H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J.G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships and groups. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.). Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 619-700). New York: Wiley.

Wang, M. T. (2009). School climate support for behavioral and psychological adjustment: Testing the mediating effect of social competence. School Psychological Quarterly, 24, 240-251.

Wang, M. T., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). The trajectories of adolescents’ perceptions of school climate, deviant peer affiliation, and behavioral problems during the middle school years. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 40–53.

Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R.A., Smith, G.A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer press.

Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763.

Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131948

Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊