臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

身心障礙者於就業時 ，時常存在職務再設計需求 需由專業人員運用職務再設計職能來為其提供 合適的職務再設計措施 以 增進 其 就業穩定 。 本研究目的旨在了解 就業服務員職務再設計服務核心職能現況， 期待作為提供培訓或繼續教育 就業服務 員之課程規劃參考。 研究者參考國內外文獻 自編就業服務員 職務再設計核心職能調查問卷 ，問卷內容包含21題專業知識與14題專業技能，每一題皆包括重要程度與自覺具備程度的兩類量表， 皆以李克氏五點量表 評分， 就重要程度量表而言，一分為很不重要，兩分為不重要，三分為普通，四分為重要，五分為很重要分數越高則表示就業服務員認為其職能越重要就自覺具備程度而言，一分為一點也不具備，兩分為不太具備，三分為普通，四分為具備，五分為完全具備，分數越高則表示就業服務員自覺其職能具備度越高 。
調查問卷經八位專家進行審查建立專家效度， 採極端組檢驗法進行項目分析及內部一致性檢驗 ，使用 Chronbach α係數進行信度分析後保留全數題項。問卷採電子問卷發放給勞動部勞動力發展署之身心障礙者職業重建專業人員管理應用系統中的就業服務員 。 共計回收89份問卷，有效問卷 83份回收率為 26.9%。 以描述性統計了解就業服務員對職務再設計核心職能的重要性看法與自覺具備程度，以斯皮爾曼等級相關係數了解重要性看法與自覺具備程度的相關性，以及使用獨立樣本 t檢定分析就業服務員現職職稱、現職工作年資、近十年與職業重建服務相關工作職稱及從事職業重建服務總年資的基本資料變項對核心職能重要性看法及自覺具備程度上的差異 。
研究結果顯示就業服務員在職務再設計核心職能專業知識重要程度平均為 4.06，自覺具備程度平均為 3.55 兩者呈現低度正相關， 專業技能重要程度平均為 4.27，自覺具備程度平均為 3.58 兩者呈現低度正相關 。 在基本資料變項中， 支持性就業服務員在「職務再設計應用」及「資源連結」自覺具備程度高於庇護性就業服務員 從事過支持性就業服務員經驗者在「職務再設計理論礎」、「職務再設計應用」 及 「資源連結」III自覺具備程度高於無從事經驗者，自覺具備程度高於無從事經驗者，從事從事就業服務員就業服務員5年以上者在「分析年以上者在「分析評估」自覺具備程度評估」自覺具備程度高於未滿高於未滿5年者，從事職業重建年者，從事職業重建服務服務總年資總年資5年以年以上者在「職務再設計理論基礎」自覺具備程度高於未滿上者在「職務再設計理論基礎」自覺具備程度高於未滿5年者。年者。九九成成以以上的上的研究參與者研究參與者皆有皆有提供提供職務再設計服務之經驗，職務再設計服務之經驗，但研究顯示但研究顯示就業服務就業服務員員對於職務再設計對於職務再設計核心職能存在需求核心職能存在需求。就業服務員普遍認為，就業服務員普遍認為，相關單位相關單位舉辦職務再設計核心職能繼續教育課程，建立職務再設計服務網路資料舉辦職務再設計核心職能繼續教育課程，建立職務再設計服務網路資料庫，庫，就業服務員就業服務員應藉由個別督導、與資深應藉由個別督導、與資深就業服務員就業服務員工作經驗交流、善工作經驗交流、善用網路資料庫及用網路資料庫及觀摩觀摩職務再設計創意競賽得獎作品等方式提升職務再設職務再設計創意競賽得獎作品等方式提升職務再設計核心職能。計核心職能。

People with disabilities need job accommodation often when they work, and the professionals give them suitable job accommodation using the core competency of the job accommodation for stable working. The purpose of this study was to investigate the core competency of job accommodation among employment specialists and the result could be the reference for the design of continuing education programs.
Methods: The author designed the Core Competency of the Job Accommodation Importance and Preparedness Questionnaire, which includes 21 items for professional knowledge and 14 items for professional skill. Each item includes importance rank and preparedness rank using a 5-point Likert scale. For importance rank, 1 is not important at all, 2 is unimportant, 3 is average, 4 is important, 5 is very important, the higher the score is, the more important the rank is. For preparedness rank, 1 is not possessing at all, 2 is not quite possessing, 3 is average, 4 is possessing, 5 is fully possessing; the higher the score is, the fuller possessing rank is.
The expert validity was examined by 8 professionals from the job accommodation area; the internal consistency of the questionnaire was examed by comparisons of extreme responses. All items passed an examination and were retained.
The questionnaire was disseminated through the web survey to the employment specialists registered on the Information Management and Application System of Vocational Rehabilitation Professionals established by the Workforce Development Agency, Ministry of Labor, Taiwan. A total of 89 employment specialists responded to the survey, and 83 responded questionnaires were valid. The valid response rate was 26.9%. The statistical analysis used included descriptive statistics, Spearman rank V correlation, and independent-sample t-test to answer the research questions.
All statistics were analyzed with SPSS 23.0 statistical software package. The criteria of statistical significance were set at p < .05.
Result/Finding: The average ranked of importance of the core competency of job accommodation is 4.06 and the average ranked of preparedness is 3.55. The importance and preparedness showed a low positive correlation. The supported employment specialist ranked the preparedness of “using for job accommodation” and “connecting for resource” higher than sheltered employment specialists. The employment specialists who worked as specialists for more than 5 years ranked the preparedness of “theory of job accommodation”, ”using job accommodation”, ” resource connection” and “analyzing and assessment” higher than those who worked for less than 5 years. This study found that over 90% of the participants had used the job accommodation service, but they still need training of the core competency of the job accommodation
Conclusions/Implications: The study showed that employment specialists considered that it is necessary to hold the continuing education curriculum about the core competency of job accommodation, build the network database for job accommodation, and employment specialists could improve their core competency of job accommodation by individual supervision and discussion with the supervisor or other senior employment specialists, making good use of the existing job accommodation database, and observing the creative competition affairs of job accommodation.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 職務再設計的理論內涵 8
第二節 職務再設計對身心障礙者就業的影響 14
第三節 職務再設計的核心職能 23
第三章 研究設計與實施 34
第一節 研究架構 34
第二節 研究程序 35
第三節 研究對象 37
第四節 研究工具 38
第五節 資料處理與統計分析 46
第四章 研究結果與討論 47
第一節 樣本基本資料 47
第二節 就業服務員對職務再設計服務核心職能重要性看法及自覺具備程度 50
第三節 就業服務員職務再設計服務核心職能重要性看法與自覺具備程度相關 55
第四節 就業服務員基本資料變項對職務再設計核心職能的影響 57
第五節 綜合討論 81
第五章 結論與建議 95
第一節 就業服務員職務再設計核心職能現況 95
第二節 建議 97
第三節 研究限制與後續研究者建議 100
參考文獻 103
附錄一 職務再設計核心職能調查問卷(初稿) 111
附錄二 專家審查意見彙整 116
附錄三 就業服務員職務再設計服務核心職能調查問卷(預試問卷/正式問卷) 121

中文文獻
王國羽(2008)。聯合國身心障礙者權利公約對我國的啟示。社區發展季刊，123，106-116。https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=181&pid=1497
吳明宜(2017)。支持性就業服務員使用小額職務再設計的現況分析。勞動部勞動力發展署。https://kppvrrc.heart.net.tw/career_redesign_download_data.php?action=view_file&show_dod_no=1521093019
吳明宜(2019年2月18日)。目標導向的督導模式：以支持性就業服務員為例。勞動部勞動力發展署。https://ws.wda.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMzEyL3JlbGZpbGUvOTE0Ny8yMDA2L2RlODAzZGUzLTBkMDUtNDU0OC1hNmY0LTVjN2QxYmRlMmExZS5wZGY%3D&n=MTA35bm055uu5qiZ5bCO5ZCR55qE552j5bCO5qih5byP77ya5Lul5pSv5oyB5oCn5bCx5qWt5pyN5YuZ5ZOh54K65L6LLnBkZg%3D%3D
身心障礙者職業重建服務專業人員遴用與培訓準則(2019年11月12日)。
身心障礙者權益保障法(2021年1月20日)
林千惠(1996)。臺灣地區身心障礙者就業能力與意願之調查研究。台灣省政府勞工處。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
林君毅、張瑞昆、劉耀宗、王敏行(2013)。脊髓損傷就業者職務再設計與工作適應相關探討。復健諮商，6，25-52。https://doi.org/10.30123/RC
林廷威（2017）。支持性就業服務員的職能分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rq5884
林真平(2019)。身心障礙者職業重建個案管理員與支持性就業服務員的專業知識重要性及具備程度。特殊教育研究學刊，44，31-58。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201903_44(1).0002
林萬億、劉燦宏(2014)。台灣身心障礙者權益與福利。五南。
邱大昕(2011)。誰是身心障礙者—從身心障礙鑑定的演變看「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統」(ICF)的實施。社會政策與社會工作學刊，15，187-213。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201112.0189
邱滿艷(2001)。身心障礙者取向的職務再設計--探討身心障礙者工作環境改善之經驗(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
邱滿艷（2004)。以身心障礙者為本位的職務再設計。就業安全半月刊，3(1)，20-24。
邱滿艷、韓福榮(2007)。從使用者與提供者觀點探討我國身心障礙者職務再設計措施之研究。復健諮商，1，47-64。https://doi.org/10.30123/RC.200706.0004
建築物無障礙設施設計規範(2019年7月1日)。
紀佳芬(2003)。身心障礙者職務再設計與工作改善。五南。
國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系暨復健諮商研究所職務再設計專題研究課程綱要(2019)。108學年第2學期課程綱要。https://courseap2.itc.ntnu.edu.tw/acadmOpenCourse/SyllabusCtrl?year=108&term=2&courseCode=RCM0010&courseGroup=&deptCode=EM17&formS=&classes1=&deptGroup=
國立高雄師範大學諮商心理與復健諮商研究所復健諮商組職務再設計與輔助科技研究課程綱要(2020)。109年第1學期教學大綱。https://sso.nknu.edu.tw/Stu/18weeksSyllabusForEnro.aspx?SyllabusNo=1091000959
國立彰化師範大學復健諮商研究所輔助科技與職務再設計課程綱要(2021)。110學年度第1學期課程大綱暨教學計畫表。http://webap0.ncue.edu.tw/DEANV2/UploadDEAN/SUBJECT/1101/14016_1EDRC2128530.pdf
張玉山(2013)。職務再設計的輔具應用對肢體障礙者工作狀況之影響：以手工業為例。特殊教育研究學刊，38(2)，77-97。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201307.3802004
張芳全(2008)。問卷就是要這樣編。心理。
推動職務再設計服務計畫(2020年3月26日)。
教育部國民及學前教育署(2019年7月)。高級中等教育階段學校集中式特殊教育班服務群科課程綱要。https://sencir.spc.ntnu.edu.tw/GoWeb/include/GetDBfilePDF.php?KeyID=6817494095d303731640a9-f01
郭峰誠、張恆豪(2011)。保障還是限制？定額進用政策與視障者的就業困境，台灣社會研究季刊，83，95-136。https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.201108.0004
勞動部勞動力發展署(2014)。桃園縣身心障礙者職務再設計服務成效分析研究計畫成果報告。國立台灣師範大學復健諮商研究所。
勞動部勞動力發展署(2016年01月31日)。身心障礙者從庇護工場轉銜到一般職場輔導工作手冊。https://vrrc.heart.net.tw/download.php?action=view&dod_no=1602582765&dom_no=1371781967
勞動部勞動力發展署雲嘉南分署(2018年12月)。庇護工場現況調查：以雲嘉南為例。成功大學。https://www.taiwanjobs.gov.tw/upload/108/19ddff81-3c85-4df9-a153-3a3349b7f514.pdf
葉忠、李明賢、蕭堯仁、劉浚明、陳正芳、鄭豐聰、盧銘勳、吳美芳(2009)。工業工程與管理。普林斯頓國際有限公司。
潘裕豐(2002)。職務再設計。中華民國輔助科技促進職業重建協會。
 
英文文獻
Akkermans, J., Schaufeli, W. B., Brenninkmeijer, V., & Blonk, R. W. B. (2013). The role of career competencies in the Job Demands — Resources model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 356-366.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.011
Baldridge, D. C., & Swift, M. L. (2013). Withholding Requests for Disability Accommodation:The Role of Individual Differences and Disability Attributes. Journal of Management, 39(3), 743-762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310396375
Barnes, C. (2000). A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st century. Critical Social Policy, 20(4), 441-457.https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830002000402
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare:challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005055669
Blank, W. (1982). Handbook for developing competency-based training programs. Prentice-Hall.
Blustein, D. L. (2008). The role of work in psychological health and well-being: a conceptual, historical, and public policy perspective. American Psychologist, 63(4), 228.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.228
Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Corbière, M., Brouwers, E., Lanctôt, N., & van Weeghel, J. (2014). Employment specialist competencies for supported employment programs. Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 24(3), 484-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9482-5
Dawis, R. V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(1), 7.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.1.7
Dawis, R. V. (2005). The Minnesota theory of work adjustment. Career Development, 1.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499.
Dobren, A. A. (1994). An ecologically oriented conceptual model of vocational rehabilitation of people with acquired midcareer disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37(3), 215-228.
Edna Mora Szymanski, Randall M. Parker(2013). 工作與身心障礙：促進身心障礙者就業成效的背景因素、議題與策略。(王華沛、王敏行、邱滿艷、賴陳秀慧、鳳華、吳明宜、黃宜君、吳亭芳、陳靜江譯)。心理。(原著出版於2010年)。
Fassinger, R. E. (2008). Workplace diversity and public policy: Challenges and opportunities for psychology. American Psychologist, 63(4), 252.
Federici, S., Scherer, M. J., & Borsci, S. (2014). An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technology and Disability, 26, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140402
Glover, C. M., & Frounfelker, R. L. (2013, 2013/06/01). Competencies of More and Less Successful Employment Specialists. Community mental health journal, 49(3), 311-316.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-011-9471-0
Gower, W. S., Rudstam, H., & Young, J. Elements of Effective Job Placement: Environmental Context, Employer Relationships, and Understanding the Job Seeker. In D. R. Strauser (Ed.), (pp. 297-324). Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826195647.0018
Hedge, A. (Ed.). (2017). Ergonomic Workplace Design for Health, Wellness, and Productivity. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315374000
Hoffmann, T. (1999). The meanings of competency. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 275-286.
https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599910284650
Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, D. E. (1990). Work motivation: Theory and practice. American Psychologist, 45(2), 144.
Ray, P. K., & Maiti, J. (Eds.). (2017). Ergonomic Design of Products and Worksystems-21st Century Perspectives of Asia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5457-0
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence.". American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
Mégret, F. (2008). The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?Human Rights Quarterly,30(2), 494-516. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072851
Morgan, R. L., Ames, H. N., Loosli, T. S., Feng, J., & Taylor, M. J. (1995). Training for Supported Employment Specialists and Their Supervisors: Identifying Important Training Topics. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30(4), 299-307. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879226
Namba, s., & Kuwano, S. (1999). Chapter 3 - Human Engineering for Quality of Life. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human Performance and Ergonomics (pp. 69-86). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012322735-5/50004-X
Noll, A., Owens, L., Smith, R. O., & Schwanke, T. (2006). Survey of state vocational rehabilitation counselor roles and competencies in assistive technology. Work, 27, 413-419.
Purnomo, H., Giyono, E., & Apsari, A. E. (2017). The use of macro-ergonomic work system designs to reduce musculoskeletal disorders and injury risk in training. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 28(1), 47-56. http://doi.org/10.7166/28-1-1600
Rogan, P., Hagner, D., & Murphy, S. (1993). Natural Supports: Reconceptualizing Job Coach Roles. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18(4), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699301800410
Rumrill, P. D., Fraser, R. T., & Johnson, K. L. (2013). Employment and workplace accommodation outcomes among participants in a vocational consultation service for people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 39(2), 85-90.
http://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-130646
Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2005). Assistive technology outcomes in work settings. Work, 24(2), 195-204.
Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management review, 31(4), 889-913. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527462
Stuart, H. (2006). Mental illness and employment discrimination. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 19(5), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yco.0000238482.27270.5d
Tremblay, C. H. (2011). Workplace accommodations and job success for persons with bipolar disorder. Work, 40(4), 479-487.
https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2011-1259
Winter, D. G. (1996). Personality: Analysis and interpretation of lives. McGraw-Hill.
Wirstad, J. (1980). Human engineering. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 13(12), 462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)69477-1
Woodruffe, C. (1993). What Is Meant by a Competency? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb053651
World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY. World Health Organization.