臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

目的：本研究目的分析探討107~110 學年度四強球隊在勝敗隊的攻守數據 (成功進球、不成功進球、無效進攻、進攻區域的次數、抄截快攻、防守籃板快攻、端線快攻、組織戰[系統戰、機遇戰]；防守區域的次數、全場盯人、全場區域、半場盯人、半場區域) 之間的差異性。方法：本研究以影片標記的方式進行，分析對象是以 107~110 學年度臺灣大專院校籃球聯賽 (University Basketball Association, UBA) 公開男一級四強球隊決賽，計107學年度臺灣師大、國立體大、健行科大、義守大學，4場比賽；計108學年度臺灣師大、中州科大、健行科大、輔仁大學，4場比賽；計109學年度政治大學、世新大學、健行科大、義守大學，4場比賽 ; 計110學年度健行科大、政治大學、世新大學、萬能科大，4場比賽，共計有16場比賽，賽事影片來源YouTube裡的SSUtv Sports頻道，下載至電腦後使用Dartfish 10 pro軟體 (Dartfish Inc., Fribourg, Switzerland) 進行影片標記分析。本研究數據資料使用 SPSS for IBM 26.0 版套裝軟體進行資料的統計分析，以獨立樣本t考驗檢定勝敗隊，成功進球、不成功進球、無效進攻、進攻區域的次數、抄截快攻、防守籃板快攻、端線快攻、組織戰[系統戰、機遇戰] ；防守區域的次數、全場盯人、全場區域、半場盯人、半場區域之間的差異性。統計考驗顯著水準訂為 α= 0.05。此外，計算勝隊和敗隊之間差異的效果量。結果：只有成功進球與不成功進球達顯著差異 (p<0.05)，其他未達顯著差異。結論：在進攻方面實際兩分球、三分球和罰球命中率的重要性比其他的攻守數據來的更重要。
關鍵詞：籃球、進攻、防守、影像、數據

Purpose: This study analyzed and explored the difference of the offensive and defensive data on (successful goals, unsuccessful goals, ineffective offenses, the number of offensive areas, steals fast break, defensive rebound fast break, end line fast offensive, organizational warfare [system warfare, opportunity warfare]; the number of defensive areas, full-court man-marking, full-court area, half-court man-marking, half-court area) between the winning and losing teams of the top four teams in the 107-110 academic year. Methods: This research was conducted in the way of film marking. The analysis objects were teams of the top four teams of the university basketball association (UBA) of Taiwan in the 107~110 academic year. Four games among National Taiwan Normal University, National Taiwan Sport University, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and I-SHOU University in the 107 academic year, four games among National Taiwan Normal University, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and Fu Jen Catholic University in the 108 academic year, four games among National Chengchi University, Shih Hsin University, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and I-SHOU University in the 109 academic year, four games among National Chengchi University, Shih Hsin University, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology and University of Engineering and Technology in the 110 academic year, sixteen games in total were analyzed. The videos of the games were downloaded from YouTube and SSUtv Sports channels. After downloading to the computer, the Dartfish 10 pro software (Dartfish Inc., Fribourg, Switzerland) was used for video tagging analysis. The data of this study were statistically analyzed using the SPSS for IBM version 26.0 software package, and an independent sample t-test was used to determine the difference on successful goals, unsuccessful goals, ineffective offenses, the number of offensive areas, steals fast break, defensive rebound fast break, end line fast offensive, organizational warfare [system warfare, opportunity warfare]; the number of defensive areas, full-court man-marking, full-court area, half-court man-marking, half-court area between the winning and losing teams. The statistical test significance level is set as α= 0.05. In addition, the effect size of the difference between winning and losing teams was calculated. Results: The winning team's performance ratio of successful goals and shots in the offensive area A5 were significantly greater than that of the losing team; the losing team's unsuccessful goals was significantly greater than the winning team (p<0.05). The rest of the variables did not show significant difference. Conclusion: On offense actual 2-point, 3-point and free throw percentages were more important than other offensive and defensive stats.
Key words: basketball, offensive, defend, image, data

摘要 3
Abstract 5
謝誌 6
表次 10
圖次 12
第壹章 緒論 13
第一節、 問題背景 15
第二節、 研究目的 16
第三節、 研究假設 16
第四節、 研究範圍與限制 17
第五節、 研究重要性及特殊性 17
第六節、 名詞操作性定義 18
第貳章 文獻探討 19
第一節、 快攻分析研究之探討 22
第二節、 組織進攻分析研究之探討 27
第三節、 防守分析研究之探討 32
第參章 研究方法 33
第一節、 研究設計 33
第二節、 研究對象 36
第三節、 實驗時間與地點 37
第四節、 研究工具 37
第五節、 實驗步驟 39
第六節、 實驗資料擷取 50
第七節、 實驗資料分析處理 50
第八節、 統計分析 51
第肆章 結果 52
第一節、 得分分析 52
第二節、 進攻區域分析 53
第三節、 防守區域分析 54
第四節、 組織戰分析 54
第五節、 防守分析 55
第六節、 快攻分析 56
第七節、 區域投籃表現比 57
第八節、 區域出手率 58
第九節、 區域命中率 59
第十節、 官方成績攻守記錄 68
第伍章 討論 69
第一節、 得分 69
第二節、 進攻區域 70
第三節、 防守區域 70
第四節、 組織戰 71
第五節、 防守 72
第六節、 快攻 73
第七節、 區域投籃表現比 73
第八節、 官方數據分析 74
第陸章 結論與建議 75
第一節、 結論 75
第二節、 建議 75
參考文獻 76
中文文獻 76
英文文獻 79

劉有德 (2019) 籃球得分動作在時間與空間的應用。中正體育學刊 ，(8)。
藍于青、劉有德 (2017) 以空間訊息探討籃球的進攻結構型態。運動教練科學，(47)，57-68。
龔闖、李征、徐校飛 、朱志勇 、薛可 (2020) 2019 年男籃世界盃比賽表現深度分析及對中國男籃技戰術發展的啟示。瀋陽體育學院學報，39(6)， 72-80。
Álvarez, A., Ortega, E., Gómez, M. Á., & Salado, J. (2009). Study of the defensive performance indicators in peak performance basketball. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18(3), 379-384.
Carballo Iglesias, Ó., & Dopico Calvo, J. (2005). Perspectivas de análisis en los deportes de equipo. Un caso práctico en baloncesto.
Cárdenas, D., Moreno, M.I., & Almendral, P. (1995). Análisis de los factores que inciden en laeficacia del contraataque en baloncesto. Revista de entrenamiento deportivo, 9(4), 11-16.
Cárdenas, D., Ortega, E., Llorca, J., Courel, J., Sánchez-Delgado, G., & Isabel Piñar, M. (2015). Motor characteristics of fast break in high level basketball. Kinesiology, 47(2.), 208-214.Cohen J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Fotinakis, P., Karipidis, A., & Taxildaris, K. (2002). Factors characterising the transition game in European basketball. Journal of human movement studies, 42(4), 305-316.
Frohman, D. (1993) ‘Shooting to win’, Scholastic Coach (p. 60), December 1993.
García, A., Parejo, I., De la Cruz, E., Domínguez, A. M., & Saavedra, J. M. (2007). Differences in basketball game statistics between winning and losing teams in the Spanish EBA league. Iberian Congress on Basketball Research, 4, 76-78
George, M., Evangelos, T., Alexandros, K., & Athanasios, L. (2009). The inside game in World Basketball. Comparison between European and ΝΒΑ teams. International Jour- nal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(2), 157-164.
Gómez, M. Á., Battaglia, O., Lorenzo, A., Lorenzo, J., Jiménez, S., & Sampaio, J. (2015). Effectiveness during ball screens in elite basketball games. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(17), 1844-1852.
Gómez, M. A., Lorenzo, A., Ibáñez, S. J., Ortega, E., Leite, N., & Sampaio, J. (2010). An analysis of defensive strategies used by home and away basketball teams. Perceptual and motor skills, 110(1), 159-166.
Hopkins, W., Marshall, S., Batterham, A., & Hanin, J. (2009). Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine+ Science in Sports+ Exercise, 41(1), 3.
International Basketball Federation [FIBA] (2020)
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 863.
McGee, K. (2007). Coaching basketball technical and tactical skills. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Monteiro, I., Tavares, F., & Santos, A. (2013). Comparative study of the tactical indicators that characterize the fast break in male and female under-16 Basketball teams. Revista de psicología del deporte, 22(1), 239-244.
Monteiro, I., Tavares, F., & Santos, A. (2013). Comparative study of the tactical indicators that characterize the fast break in male and female under-16 Basketball teams. Revista de psicología del deporte, 22(1), 239-244.
Nelson, N. (1989). 4 keys to high percentage shooting. Scholastic Coach 58(6): Jan. 1989, 12-14.
Ortega Toro, E., Palao, J. M., Sainz de Baranda Andújar, P., & García López, L. M. (2009). Preferencias y nivel de satisfacción en acciones técnico-tácticas, y en tipo de ataque y defensa utilizado en la competición en jóvenes jugadores de baloncesto. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, vol 9, Suplemento, 2009.
Ortega, E., Palao, J. M., de Baranda, P. S., & García, L. M. (2009). Preferences and levels of satisfaction in technical and tactical actions and in type of offense and defense utilized in competition by youth basketball players. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18(3), 343-348.
Ortega, E., Palao, J. M., Gómez, M. Á., Lorenzo, A., & Cárdenas, D. (2007). Analysis of the efficacy of possessions in boys' 16-and-under basketball teams: differences between winning and losing teams. Perceptual and motor skills, 104(3), 961-964.
Parra, J. (2010). El contraataque: un análisis comparativo ABC-Mundial 06. Consulted 21 de Julho de 2010, in http://www.aeeb.es/v2/pizarra/docs/2b_0108.pdf
Rabaz, F. (1990). Baloncesto básico. Madrid: Alhambra.
Refoyo, I., Romarís, I. and Sampedro, J. (2009). Análisis de las características de los contraatques en baloncesto masculino y femenino. V Congresso Ibérico de Baloncesto. Cartagena: Universidade Catolica San Antonio.
Refoyo, I., Romarís, I. U., & Sampedro, J. (2009). Analysis of men's and women's basketball fast-breaks. Revista de Psicología del deporte, 18(3), 439-444.
Rodriguez, G., & Elo, I. (2003). Intra-class correlation in random-effects models for binary data. The Stata Journal, 3(1), 32-46.
Sampaio, J., Leser, R., Baca, A., Calleja-Gonzalez, J., Coutinho, D., Gonçalves, B., & Leite, N. (2016). Defensive pressure affects basketball technical actions but not the time-motion variables. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5(3), 375-380.
Tsamourtzis, E., Karypidis, A., & Athanasiou, N. (2005). Analysis of fast breaks in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(2), 17-22.
Tsamourtzis, E., Salonikidis, K., Siskos A., & Athanailidis, I. (2003). The effectiveness of different types of basket shots in basketball as related to the position of their execution. Leis- tungssport, 33(2), 39-44.