臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以探討國際性社團與商會組織會員持續參與意願與組織認同、轉換型領導、信任、知識分享之關聯性的現況為研究目的。針對有參與國際性社團、商會組織之會員為研究主體，透過問卷調查法取得樣本258份，扣除填答資料不完整、明顯敷衍選答等，有效問卷回收各為227份以描述性統計、信效度分析、因素分析、回歸分析進行實證，研究結果發現：
1、組織認同對國際性社團與商會組織會員持續參與意願無顯著正向影響。
2、轉換型領導對國際性社團與商會組織會員持續參與意願有顯著正向影響。
3、信任對國際性社團與商會組織會員持續參與意願有顯著正向影響。
4、知識分享對國際性社團與商會組織會員持續參與意願有顯著正向影響。
以上研究結果簡述如上，期俾提供國際性社團、商會組織發展、會員續約、持續參與之參考。

The purpose of this study is to discuss the current situation about the relevance between the willingness to continue participating and organizational identification, transformational leadership, trust, and knowledge sharing of members in international associations and chambers. It focuses on those who are participated in international associations and chambers, with questionnaire survey receiving 258 samples. Eliminating the incomplete and perfunctory answers, there are 227 effective samples. Through descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analysis, factor analysis and regression analysis to investigate then obtains the following results:
1.Organizational identification has no significant positive effect on the willingness to continue participating of the members of international associations and chambers.
2.Transformational leadership has a significant positive effect on the willingness to continue participating of the members of international associations and chambers.
3.Trust has a significant positive effect on the willingness to continue participating of the members of international associations and chambers.
4.Knowledge sharing has a significant positive effect on the willingness to continue participating of the members of international associations and chambers.
The result of this study was briefly stated as above in hopes of providing the guideline of the development, membership renewal and continuous participation of international associations and chambers.

摘要....................................III
誌謝....................................VI
目錄....................................VII
第一章 緒論..............................1
1.1研究背景與動機.........................1
1.2 研究目的.............................2
1.3 研究範圍、對象與限制...................2
1.4 研究流程.............................3
第二章 文獻探討...........................4
2.1 在台之國際性社團、商會組織現況探討........4
2.2 持續參與意願之意涵.....................12
2.3 組織認同之意涵........................13
2.4 轉換型領導之意涵.......................13
2.5 信任之意涵............................15
2.6 知識分享之意涵.........................16
第三章 研究方法............................18
3.1 研究架構..............................18
3.2 研究假說..............................19
3.3 研就變數與操作型定義....................19
3.4問卷設計...............................22
第四章 實證結果分析.........................23
4.1 敘述性統計分析.........................23
4.2 信度分析..............................25
4.3 效度分析..............................25
4.4 因素分析..............................26
4.4 迴歸分析..............................27
第五章 結論與建議..........................29
5.1 研究結論..............................29
5.2 研究建議..............................29
參考文獻..................................31
中文部分..................................31
英文部分..................................33
網路部分..................................37
附錄.....................................38
問卷調查..................................38

看雜誌 鄭少凡 借助國際商業力，十萬人改變台灣。
沈寶仁 早起，把你的生意做大。
天下雜誌.2011。
王佳玉(1999)，「轉換型領導與領導效能關聯之研究-以台北市政府為個案分析」，國立政治大學公共行政學研究所碩士論文。
黃世齊(2014)，「信任關係、知識分享意圖及知識分享行為關聯性研究以創新組織氣候為調節變數」，國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
喻雅均(2011)，「領導風格與知識分享關係之探討：個人及環境因素之調節作用」，國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系(所) 碩士論文。
李秉昆(2018)，「非營利組織之組織承諾、領導風格與退會傾向之研以中華民國青商會為例」，南開科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文。
李韋廷(2017)，「以期望確認理論探討遊客對東部海域遊憩活動持續參與意願影響之研究」，國立臺東大學師範學院休閒事業管理碩士論文。
黃威智(2002)，「信任與關係承諾對供應鏈組織耦合度的影響：資訊產業為例」，國立清華大學碩士論文。
黃美珠(2012)。成功賽會幕後推手:大型運動賽會志工人力資源管 理之個案研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報，12(4)，285-309。 doi:10.6547/tassm.2012.0014
劉珮麟(2018)，「以自我決定理論探討醫療志工持續參與意願」，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文。
葉娗鬲文(2015)。非營利組織志工管理之研究-以嘉義市城隍廟為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學，嘉義縣
林正祥(2011)，「志工參與動機、參與滿意度與持續參與意願之研究-以雲林縣義勇消防隊員為例」，國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所碩士論文。
羅世文(2016)，「合氣道參與者之人格特質、休閒效益、休 閒涉入對持續參與意願之影響」，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
尤鼎傑(2013)，「武術散打學員參與動機、休閒滿意度與持續參與意願之研究」，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文。
陳修戎(2017)，「高參與度志工參與動機、持續參與因素之研究 -以新營捐血室為例」，南華大學企業管理學系非營利事業管理碩士班碩士論文。
陳正怡(2016)，「國際獅子會會員參與動機、組織承諾 與組織效能關係之研究」，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所組織發展與領導在職進修專班碩士論文。
吳惠敏(2020)，「行銷活動對知覺價值、品牌形象、組織認同與 忠誠度之影響-以台灣公益團體為例」，輔仁大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
林冠宏(2003)，「轉換型領導、組織認同、組織溝通對領導效能影響之研究-以台南縣政府組織變革為例」，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
徐凡可(2019)，「轉換型領導與留任關係之研究-以北部打擊旅為例」，國立政治大學社會科學學院行政管理碩士論文。
蔡英美、王俊明(2006)。中年人運動參與動機、自我效能、知覺 運動障礙及運動行為之關係。臺灣運動心理學報。9，109-131。
尤鼎傑(2014)。武術散打學員參與動機、休閒滿意度與持續參與意願之研究。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文。
葉怡矜、吳崇旗、王偉琴、顏伽如、林禹良(2005)。休閒遊憩概論:探索生命中的休閒。臺北市:品度。

1.Bass, B.，1985，Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations New York: Free Press.
2.Bass, B.，1990，From Transactional to Transformational Leadership:Learning to Share the Vision, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.18, No. 3, pp. 19-31.
3.Bass, B. & Avolio, B.，1994，Improving Organization Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership, Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publications.
4.Bennis, W. & Nannus, B.，2000，Leaders:The Strategies for Taking Charge New York: Harper & Row.
5.Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim Y.G., & Lee J.N.(2005).Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate, MIS Quarterly,29(1), 87-112.
6.Burns, J. M. (1978). “Leadership”. New York: Harper & Row.
7.Cuieford, J. P. (1965), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: McGraw Hill.
8.Davenport, T. H. and Prusak ,L. (1998), Working knowledge: Managing what your organization knows , Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9.Davenport, T., & Prusak. L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston,MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10.Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working knowledge: Managing what your organization knows , Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11.Dixon, N. M. (2000), Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know, Harvard Business Press.
12.Doney, P.M., Cannon J.P. & Mullen, M.R. (1998), “Understanding the Influence of Naitonal Culture on the development of Trust ”Academy of Management of Review, Vol.23, No.3, pp.601-620.
13.Gächter, S., et al. (2004),” Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization ,55(4): 505-531.
14.Hall, A. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organ- izational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 176-190.
15.Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Customer-Oriented Behaviour Scale in the Health Tourism Hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771-775.
16.Hendriks, P. (1999),” Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing,” Knowledge and process management, 6(2): 91-100.
17.Holtshouse, D. (1998),”Knowledge Research Issues,” California management review ,40(3).
18.Lewis, J.D.& Weigert,A.(1985).Trust as a social reality.Social Force,63 (4),967- 985.
19.Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of thereformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 103-123.
20.March, James G. and Simon, Herbert A., Organizations (1958). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496194
21.Mayer,R.C.,Davis,J.H.,&Schoorman, F. D.(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review,20 (3),709 -734.
22.Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis & F. David Schoorman, An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No.3, pp.709-734, 1995.
23.McIntyre (1989). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle‐based campers. An Interdisciplinary Journal,14(1),3-15.
24.Mellinger,G.D.(1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology,52,304 -309.
25.Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996), Swift Trust and Temporary Groups, Trust in Organizations, Sage Publications, pp.166-195.
26.Moore, Kevin R., Trust and Relationship Commitment in Logistics Alliances: A Buyer perspective, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Winter, pp.24-37, 1998.
27.Patchen, M. ,1970,Participation, Achievement, and Involvement on the job, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice Hall。
28.Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist,35,1-7.
29.Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. & Camerer, C. (1998), “ Not so Different after all : A Cross-Discipline View of Trust ” Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.3, pp.393-404.
30.Wijnhoven, F. (1998). Knowledge logistic in business contexts: Analyzing and diagnosing knowledge sharing by logistics concepts. Knowledge and Process Management, 5,143-157.
31.Zand, D.E. (1972), “ Trust and Managerial Problem Solving ” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, No.2, pp.229-239.
32.Zucker,L.G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920. In B.M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.