跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(100.28.0.143) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/13 16:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡孟庭
研究生(外文):Tsai, Meng-Ting
論文名稱:聯合國永續發展目標與共享價值之探索性研究:服務主導邏輯下的個案研究
論文名稱(外文):An Exploration of Sustainable Development Goals and Shared Value: A Case Study from Service Dominant Logic
指導教授:周信輝周信輝引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chou, Hsin-Hui
口試委員:柯乃熒周信輝方世杰
口試委員(外文):Ko, Nai-YingChou, Hsin-HuiFang, Shih-Chieh
口試日期:2023-06-21
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2023
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:71
中文關鍵詞:聯合國永續發展目標價值共創服務主導邏輯質性研究
外文關鍵詞:United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs)Value co-creationService-Dominant LogicQualitative Research
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:191
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:77
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
如何透過聯合國永續發展目標(SDGs)之實踐達到全球永續發展,已受到學界與實務界的高度重視。本研究以服務主導邏輯(SDL)作為SDGs發展的核心理論基礎,強調SDGs發展有賴利害關係人之間的資源整合,進而透過服務交換來促成永續發展目標上的價值共創。本研究選擇以成大護理學系之SDGs的發展歷程為個案,來進行實證上的探究,並且試圖回答此研究問題:在服務主導邏輯的視角下,組織如何運用聯合國永續發展目標(SDGs)與利害關係人共創價值?本研究以SDL觀點深化了SDGs發展上的兩個核心構念:1)永續目標之間的相互關聯性;以及2)行動者的包容性。
How to achieve sustainable global development via the United Nations SDGs has attracted increased attention from educators, scholars, and practitioners. This research adopts service-dominant logic to lay the SDGs development’s theoretical foundation. We contend that SDGs’ implementation relies on resource integration among participating stakeholders, which allows the co-creation of SDGs value via service exchange. This research employs a qualitative approach and selects the Department of Nursing at NCKU as the case organization to empirically investigate the following research question: How does an organization co-create value with stakeholders via SDGs’ implementation? The case findings enable us to tight a theoretical linkage between service-dominant logic and SDGs literature by elaborating the concepts of the interconnection of SDGs goals and the inclusiveness of actors.
摘要 I
誌謝 VI
目錄 VII
表目錄 IX
圖目錄 X
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 研究內容與流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 聯合國永續發展目標之相關研究 5
壹、聯合國永續發展目標的定義與發展 5
貳、共享價值:組織永續發展 7
第二節 服務主導邏輯 14
壹、服務主導邏輯之定義與發展 14
貳、服務主導邏輯之服務與資源 15
參、服務主導邏輯之價值與價值主張 16
肆、由服務主導邏輯發展的價值共創 17
第三節 文獻小結 20
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究方法 21
第二節 個案研究 22
壹、個案研究法 22
貳、個案選擇與理論抽樣 24
第三節 研究資料蒐集 28
第四節 研究資料分析 32
第四章 個案研究與發現 35
第一節 階段一:一片不看好的聲浪中,踏出永續發展第一步 36
第二節 階段二:資源鏈結下的國際護理人才培育制度與策略 42
第三節 階段三:國內、外組織攜手,共筑國際學術資源平台 47
第四節 階段四:在集體共創行動中創造國際護理教育永續發展的價值 52
第五章 討論、意涵與結論 58
第一節 研究討論 58
第二節 研究貢獻 61
第三節 研究結論 65
參考文獻 67
田瀨和夫、永續發展夥伴有限公司(2022)。2030永續企業革命:全方位ESG永續實戰攻略(第一版)。台北市:商業周刊 。
李明機 (2010)。 推動上市上櫃公司履行企業社會責任。
李長晏、陳建仁、許書銘、徐偉傑(2020)。 臺中市地方創生社會責任與聯合國SDGs 協作治理機制規劃研究。取自 https://rdnet.taichung.gov.tw/media/637863/%E8%87%BA%E4%B8%AD%E5%B8%82%E5%9C%B0%E6%96%B9%E5%89%B5%E7%94%9F%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E8%B2%AC%E4%BB%BB%E8%88%87%E8%81%AF%E5%90%88%E5%9C%8Bsdgs-%E5%8D%94%E4%BD%9C%E6%B2%BB%E7%90%86%E6%A9%9F%E5%88%B6%E8%A6%8F%E5%8A%83%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6.pdf
林宇廷、許恆銘、黃敏柔(2016, 4月12日)。 SDGs 專欄/世界正在翻轉!認識聯合國永續發展目標。取自 https://npost.tw/archives/24078
胡幼慧 (1996)。 多元方法: 三角交叉檢視法。質性研究: 理論, 方法及本土女性研究實例. 臺北: 巨流圖書,頁 271-285。
唐鳳(2019, 8月6日)。 從大學社會責任實踐計畫與聯合國永續發展目標連結看未來發展趨勢與策略。取自 https://usr.moe.gov.tw/tw/report/blog/210
國立成功大學新聞中心(2017, 6月5日)。 成大護理系顏妙芬教授 獲國際護理協會「政策創新貢獻獎」。取自 https://web.ncku.edu.tw/p/404-1000-166979.php?Lang=zh-tw
許玉雲、張瑩如、顏妙芬、王靜枝、柯乃熒 (2020)。 國際護理教育的社會影響力。護理雜誌, 67(2),頁 22-26。
陳泓維、林福仁 (2021)。 服務主導邏輯觀點下的大學社會實踐價值共創: 社會投資報酬率指標評量機制雛型。Management Review, 29(3),頁 417-466。
葉偉恩(2019)。 唐鳳:全世界共同的目標-SDGs。取自 https://usr.moe.gov.tw/blog/25407
鄭怡世 (2002)。 個案研究法之介紹兼論其在社會工作實務研究中的運用。
蕭瑞麟(2020)。不用數字的研究: 質性研究的思辯脈絡。:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
謝明彧(2022, 3月31日)。 成大撒下USR種子 讓台灣高教遍地開花。取自 https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/88500
Airike, P.-E., Rotter, J. P., & Mark-Herbert, C. (2016). Corporate motives for multi-stakeholder collaboration–corporate social responsibility in the electronics supply chains. Journal of cleaner production, 131, 639-648.
Babbie, E. (2016). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.
Berrone, P., Rousseau, H. E., Ricart, J. E., Brito, E., & Giuliodori, A. (2023). How can research contribute to the implementation of sustainable development goals? An interpretive review of SDG literature in management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(2), 318-339.
Camacho, L. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: kinds, connections and expectations. Journal of global ethics, 11(1), 18-23.
Chou, H.-H., Huang, C.-C., & Tu, P.-Y. (2023). Towards becoming a service-dominant enterprise: an actor engagement perspective. Service Business, 1-26.
Chou, H.-H., & Zolkiewski, J. (2012). Decoding network dynamics. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(2), 247-258.
Constantin, J. A., & Lusch, R. F. (1994). Understanding Resource Management: How to Deploy Your People, Products, and Processes for Maximum Productivity.
Dyer Jr, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of management review, 16(3), 613-619.
Ebner, D. (2007). Assessing corporate social responsibility: CSR-SCAN. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, Leeds, UK,
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), 1222.
Fiandrino, S., Scarpa, F., & Torelli, R. (2022). Fostering Social Impact Through Corporate Implementation of the SDGs: Transformative Mechanisms Towards Interconnectedness and Inclusiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 959-973.
Fraser, J. (2019). Creating shared value as a business strategy for mining to advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(3), 788-791.
Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Payne, A. (2016). Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 24-39.
George, C., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling
societal grand challenges through management research. In Acad. Manag. J (Vol. 59, pp. 1880-1895). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of business ethics, 127, 297-316.
Hanafin, S., Dwan, B., Lynch, C., & Hanafin, P. (2017). Indicative baseline assessment of corporate social responsibility in Ireland. In.
International Council of Nurses, I. (2017). Kim Mo Im Policy Innovation and Impact Award. Retrieved from https://www.icn.ch/what-we-do/awards/kim-mo-im-policy-innovation-and-impact-award
Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176-187.
Levitt, T. (2004). Marketing Myopia. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2004/07/marketing-myopia
Lozano, R. (2012). Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 14-26.
Lu, J., Liang, M., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Guan, H., Mazeikaite, K., & Streimikis, J. (2021). Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 686-703.
Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (2006). Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for a General Theory. In (pp. 406-420).
Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of retailing, 83(1), 5-18.
Macht, S. A., Chapman, R. L., & Fitzgerald, J. A. (2020). Management research and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(6), 917-928.
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & Kasteren, Y. v. (2012). Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of service research, 15(4), 370-389.
Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527-556. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222333
Mori Junior, R., Fien, J., & Horne, R. (2019). Implementing the UN SDGs in universities: Challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 12(2), 129-133.
Myers, M. D. (2019). Qualitative research in business and management. Qualitative research in business and management, 1-364.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth's Future, 5(11), 1169-1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632
Rixen, M., Böbel, I., Chailan, C., & Carlo, M. (2013). Creating Shared Value on A Global Scale: Possibilities for the United Nation‟ s Engagement. Journal of Competitiveness and Strategy, 6, 01-14.
Sawhny, V. (2008). Analyzing corporate social responsibility measurement parameters. Retrieved from https://instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/SawhnyKEPRRA_Award.pdf
Schina, D., Esteve-González, V., Usart, M., Lázaro-Cantabrana, J.-L., & Gisbert, M. (2020). The integration of sustainable development goals in educational robotics: A teacher education experience. Sustainability, 12(23), 10085.
Sebhatu, S. P., & Enquist, B. (2022). Values and Multi-stakeholder Dialog for Business Transformation in Light of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 1059-1074.
Smith, A. (2000). The Wealth of Nations (1776). New York: The Modern Library.
Stake, R. E., Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (Eds.), 244.
Sukoharsono, E. G., & Hariadi, B. (2020). The Meaningful practice creating shared value as a contribute to sustainable development goals: Case study at Pt Pupuk Kaltim. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 9(7), 222-232.
Tyre, M. J., & Von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization science, 8(1), 71-83.
UN, U. N. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
van Tulder, R. (2018). Business & the sustainable development goals: A framework for effective corporate involvement. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315-332.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004a). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004b). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of service research, 6(4), 324-335.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 44, 5-23.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152.
Vargo, S. L., & Morgan, F. W. (2005). Services in society and academic thought: an historical analysis. Journal of macromarketing, 25(1), 42-53.
WHO. (2006). The world health report 2006: working together for health. World Health Organization.
WHO. (2020, 4月7日). WHO and partners call for urgent investment in nurses. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news/item/07-04-2020-who-and-partners-call-for-urgent-investment-in-nurses
Wickert, C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility research in the Journal of Management Studies: A shift from a business‐centric to a society‐centric focus. In (Vol. 58, pp. E1-E17): Wiley Online Library.
Yakovleva, N., Kotilainen, J., & Toivakka, M. (2017). Reflections on the opportunities for mining companies to contribute to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in sub–Saharan Africa. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(3), 426-433.
Yang, J. C.-C. (2022). University and Community: Social Responsibility Practices and International Cases. Journal of Education Research(335), 67-81.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications : design and methods (Sixth ed.). SAGE.
Yin, R. K., & Davis, D. (2007). Adding new dimensions to case study evaluations: The case of evaluating comprehensive reforms. New directions for evaluation, 2007(113), 75-93.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊