跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.140.218) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/26 01:30
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:朱士杰
研究生(外文):Shih-Chieh Chu
論文名稱:ESG揭露品質和銀行債務條款:以美國聯貸為例
論文名稱(外文):ESG Disclosure Quality and Bank Loan Contracting: Evidences from U.S. Syndicated Loan Market
指導教授:姚維仁姚維仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wei-Ren Yao
口試委員:張謙恆謝佩蓁
口試委員(外文):Chien-heng ChangPei-Chen Hsieh
口試日期:2023-06-17
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2023
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:61
中文關鍵詞:ESG 績效ESG 揭露品質債務契約
外文關鍵詞:ESG performanceESG disclosure qualityLoan contracting
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:87
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要探討 ESG 揭露品質與銀行債務條款(貸款利率、財務條款、擔 保品及貸款期間)之關聯。本研究樣本選自 2018 至 2022 年美國銀行聯貸,透過 觀察原始 ESG 分數和代表揭露品質更好的調整後 ESG 分數,了解 ESG 揭露品 質在銀行訂定債務條款契約中的關係。實證結果發現:第一、ESG 績效和 ESG 揭露品質都與貸款利率呈負向顯著關係,但銀行對於 ESG 揭露品質的貸款利率 會更加寬鬆;第二、ESG 績效與財務條款沒有顯著關係,但使用 ESG 揭露品質 更好的績效分數後,會與財務條款呈負向顯著關係;第三、ESG 績效和 ESG 揭 露品質都與擔保品呈負向顯著關係,但銀行對 ESG 揭露品質更好的擔保品需求 會更加寬鬆。
This study mainly explores the relationship between ESG disclosure quality and bank debt terms (loan interest rate, financial terms, collateral and loan period). The sample of this study is selected from syndicated loans of U.S. banks from 2018 to 2022. By observing the original ESG scores and the adjusted ESG scores that represent better disclosure quality, we can understand the relationship between ESG disclosure quality and the bank's debt terms and contracts. The empirical results show that: first, both ESG performance and ESG disclosure quality have a negative and significant relationship with loan interest rates, but banks will be more lenient in lending interest rates for ESG disclosure quality; second, there is no significant relationship between ESG performance and financial terms, but using After the performance scores with better ESG disclosure quality, there will be a negative and significant relationship with financial terms; Third, both ESG performance and ESG disclosure quality have a negative and significant relationship with collateral, but banks will have more relaxed demand for collateral with better ESG disclosure quality.
壹、緒論 1

貳、文獻回顧與假說發展 5
一、機制背景 5
二、企業 ESG 績效對債務契約條款之影響 10
三、ESG 揭露品質對債務契約條款之影響 13

參、研究方法 17
一、ESG 變數衡量方式 17
二、模型設計 18
三、資料來源 20

肆、實證結果 21
ㄧ、敘述性統計 21
二、相關性分析 22
三、實證模型之結果 23

伍、額外測試 29

陸、結論與未來建議 31
一、研究結論 31
二、研究限制及未來建議 31

參考文獻 33

附錄 41
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Zhang, C., 2019. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence. Manag. Sci. 65 (10): 4451–4469.

Ali Fatemi a, Martin Glaum b, Stefanie Kaiser c. 2018. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal 38 : 45-64

Allen N. Berger, Gregory F. Udell 1990. Collateral, loan quality and bank risk. Journal of Monetary Economics. 25(1): 21-42

Bae, K.-H., and V. K. Goyal. 2009. Creditor rights, enforcement, and bank loans. The Journal of Finance 64 (April): 823-860. (DOI: 10.1111/j.1540- 6261.2009.01450.x)

Bae, K.-H., El Ghoul, S., Gong, Z., Guedhami, O., 2021. Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Corp. Finan. 67, 101876 https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876.

Bharath, S. T., J. Sunder, and S. V. Sunder. 2008. Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review 83 (January): 1-28. (DOI: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.1)

Bofinger, Y., Heyden, K.J., Rock, B., 2022. Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misevaluation measures. J. Bank. Financ. 134, 106322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106322.

Boone, A.L., White, J.T., 2015. The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. J. Financ. Econ. 117, 508–533. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.008.

Cem Demiroglu, Christopher M. James 2010. The Information Content of Bank Loan Covenants .The Review of Financial Studies, 23(10):3700–3737, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq054

Chava, S. 2014. Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital. Management Science 60 (9): 2223–2247.

Cherry, M. A., 2014. The law and economics of corporate social responsibility and greenwashing. U.C. Davis Business Law Journal 14, 281–303.

Christensen, H., Hail, L., Luez, C., 2021. Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic anal- ysis and literature review. European Corporate Governance Institute, Working paper. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3427748

Costello, A. M., and R. Wittenberg-Moerman. 2011. The impact of financial reporting quality on debt contracting: Evidence from internal control weakness reports. Journal of Accounting Research 49 (March): 97-136. (DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00388.x)

Deegan C. 2002. Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3): 282–311.

Delmas, M.A., & Burbano, V.C. 2011. The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review. 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

Diamond, D.W., Verrecchia, R.E., 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 46 (4), 1325—1359.

Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., Xie, W., 2021. Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Financ. Econ. 141, 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2021.03.005.

Douglas W. Diamond 1984. Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring .The Review of Economic Studies,51(3):393–414, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430)

Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 59 (August): 1553-1583. (DOI: 10.1111/j.1540- 6261.2004.00672.x)

Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer, and M. O’Hara. 2002. Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? The Journal of Finance 57 (October): 2185-2221. (DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00493)

Edmans, A., Holderness, C.G., 2017. Blockholders: A survey of theory and evidence. In: The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 541–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hecg.2017.11.002.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C., et al., 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? J. Bank. Finance 35 (9), 2388–2406.

Flannery, M.J. 1986. Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice. The Journal of Finance, 41, 19-37.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04489

Freeman RE, McVea J. 2001. A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. Darden Business School Working Paper 01-02. http://ssrn.com/ abstract=263511 or 10.2139/ssrn.263511 [15 November 2015].

Friede, G., Busch, T., Bassen, A., 2015. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 5, 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.

Garel, A., Petit-Romec, A., 2021. Investor rewards to environmental responsibility: evidence from the COVID-19 crisis. J. Corp. Finan. 68, 101948 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101948.

Gianfranco Gianfrate , Mattia Peri ,2019 The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green bonds. Journal of Cleaner Production.Volume 219, 10 May 2019, Pages 127-135

Gillan, S.L., Koch, A., Starks, L.T., 2021. Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. J. Corp. Finan. 66, 101889 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889.

Graham, J. R., S. Li, and J. Qiu. 2008. Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting. Journal of Financial Economics 89 (July): 44-61. (DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.005)

Gunnar Friede,Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen 2015. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies.Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment . 5(4): 210-233 .https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Guo R, Tao L, Gao P (2014) The research on greenwashing brands’ rebuilding strategies and mechanism of brand trust after biochemical and other pollutions. Biotechnology 10(9):3270–3279

Hoepner, A.G.F., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L.T., Zhou, X., 2021. ESG Shareholder Engagement and Downside Risk. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2874252.

Jensen, M.C.; Meckling, W.H. 1976.Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3, 305–360.

Kim E, Lyon T 2015. Greenwash vs. Brownwash: exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organ Sci 26(3):705–723. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0949

Kim, J.-B., and B. Y. Song. 2011. Auditor quality and loan syndicate structure. AUDINTING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (November): 71-99. (DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-10144)

Kim, J.-B., J. S. L. Tsui, and C. H. Yi. 2011. The voluntary adoption of international financial reporting standards and loan contracting around the world. Review of Accounting Studies 16 (December): 779-811. (DOI: 10.1007/s11142-011-9148-5)

Kim, S., Li, Z., 2021. Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability 13, 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746.

Leftwich, R. 1983. Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review (58): 23-42.

Li, J., Zhang, X., Ali, S., et al., 2020. Eco-innovation and energy productivity: new determinants of renewable energy consumption. J. Environ. Manag. 271 (10), 111028.

Li, X., Lin, C., Zhan, X., 2019. Does change in the information environment affect financing choices? Management Science 65, 5676–5696.

Lins, K.V., Servaes, H., Tamayo, A., 2017. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. J. Financ. 72, 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505.

Lyon, T.P., & Maxwell, J.W. 2011. Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41.

Majláth M (2017) The effect of greenwashing information on ad evalua- tion. Eur J Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n3p92

Marquis C, Toffel M, Zhou Y 2016. Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: a global study of greenwashing. Organ Sci 27(2):483–504. https:// doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1039

McDonnell, M., King, B., 2013. Keeping up appearances: Reputation threat and pro-social responses to social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly 58(3), 387–419.

Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5 (November): 147-175. (DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0)

Myers, S.C. 2003. Financing of corporations. In: Constantinides, G.M., Harris, M., Stulz, R. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 1. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 215–253.

Neu, D., Warsame, H., Pedwell, K., 1998. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting Organizations and Society 23, 265-282.

Nicolae Gârleanu and Jeffrey Zwiebel 2009.Design and Renegotiation of Debt Covenants. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 749-781, 2009

Nielsen Media Research 2015. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/ reports/2015/the-sustainability-imperative.html. Accessed 26 June 2018

Porter ME, Kramer MR 2006. Strategy & society: the link between com- petitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Bus Rev 84:78–85

S. Niggol Se 2017.Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate change policy negotiations and future directions. Regional Science Policy & PracticeVolume 9, Issue 2 p. 121-140

Serena Fatica, Roberto Panzica 2021.Green bonds as a tool against climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment Volume 30, Issue 5 p. 2688-2701

Siano A, Vollero A, Conte F, Amabile S 2017. “More than words”: expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. J Bus Res 71:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.002

Smith, C. W., and J. B. Warner.1979. On Financial Reporting Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants. Journal of Financial Economics 7 (2):117-161

Raghuram Rajan and Andrew Winton 1995. Covenants and Collateral as Incentives to Monitor The Journal of Finance,50(4):1113-1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04052.x

Velte, P. 2017. Does ESG Performance have an impact on financial perfor- mance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8 :169–178.

Vollero A, Palazzo M, Siano A, Elving W 2016. Avoiding the greenwashing trap: between CSR communication and stakeholder engagement. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 10(2):120. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijisd.2016.075542

Walker K, Wan F 2011. The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. J Bus Ethics 109(2):227–242. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4

Yoon, B., Lee, J., & Byun, R. 2018. Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.

Zhang L, Li D, Cao C, Huang S 2018.The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: the mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern. J Clean Prod 187:740–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.201

Zhang, W., Luo, Q., Liu, S., 2022. Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China. Econ. Anal. Polic. 74 (6), 105–121.

Zhao, C., Yu, G., Jiahai, Y., Mengya, W., Daiyu, L., Yiou, Z., & Jiangang, K. 2018. ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from China’s Listed Power Generation Companies. Sustainability, 10, 2607–2826.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20260709)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top