臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　國防安全是整個國家發展與生存之命脈，而軍隊後勤的整補優劣也將影響著整體國防戰力之關鍵。而國軍近幾年在國防事務發展上，不斷重整戰備整備任務，從精實案、精進案、精粹案及勇固案等四項政策推動國防資源重整，而組織不斷的整合及精簡下，在限有的人力發展下，還兼固生產製造能力與產品品質，才有助於組織績效的提升。本研究問卷針對國軍某兵工廠員工為研究對象進行隨機抽樣，以問卷發放方式來分析研究成果的驗證，研究方法資料主要以描述性分析、因素分析、信度分析、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、相關分析及迴歸分析等方法進行研究，來探討生產製造能力、產品品質與組織績效關係研究之關係。
　　本研究結果顯示(1)生產製造能力對組織績效具有正向顯著的影響；(2)產品品質對組織績效具有正向顯著的影響；(3)性別對生產製造能力呈現顯著差異；年齡、教育程度、職業屬性、負責工作、服務年資對生產製造能力則無顯著差異；(4)性別、年齡、教育程度、職業屬性、負責工作、服務年資對產品品質均無；(5)服務年資對組織績效呈現顯著差異；性別、年齡、教育程度、職業屬性、負責工作對組織績效則無顯著差異。

　　National defense security can be a lifeline for the development and survival of an entire country, and the advantages of military logistics can also be the important key affecting the overall national defense forces. In recent years, national armed forces have continuously reorganized the tasks of combat readiness to develop national defense, along with pushing four reorganization policies of national defense resources including force simplification, force refinement, force reformation and force stabilization. Under such limited development of manpower through continuous organization integration and streamlining, military logistics can still consolidate manufacturing capability and product quality, which will be indeed conducive to the improvement of organizational performance. Therefore, this study randomly samples the employees in a military arsenal as research subject, and conducts questionnaire method to verify the analysis of research results. Research data proceeds with statistic analysis, including descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, independent-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis and regression analysis, to further explore the relationships of manufacturing capability and product quality to organizational performance.
　　Research findings are shown as follows: (1) manufacturing capability has the positive and significant influence on organizational performance; (2) product quality has the positive and significant influence on organizational performance; (3) gender demonstrates significant difference to manufacturing capability, while age, education, occupation, job responsibility and length of service appear no significant differences to manufacturing capability; (4) gender, age, education, occupation, job responsibility and length of service all appear no significant differences to product quality; (5) length of service demonstrates significant difference to organizational performance, while gender, age, education, occupation and job responsibility appear no significant differences to organizational performance.

摘要　I
中文摘要　II
Abstract　III
目錄　V
表目錄　VII
圖目錄　IX

第壹章　緒論　1
　第一節　研究背景與動機　1
　第二節　研究目的　2
　第三節　研究流程　3
　第四節　研究範圍　4
　第五節　名詞釋義　5
第貳章　文獻探討　6
　第一節　生產製造能力　6
　第二節　產品品質　9
　第三節　組織績效　12
第參章　研究方法　15
　第一節　研究架構　15
　第二節　研究假設　16
　第三節　操作性定義及問卷設計　18
　第四節　研究對象與問卷回收　22
　第五節　資料分析方法　23
第肆章　研究結果與分析　25
　第一節　敘述性統計資料　25
　第二節　信度分析　27
　第三節　現況分析　28
　第四節　差異性檢定　32
　第五節　相關分析　39
　第六節　迴歸分析　40
第伍章　結論與建議　41
　第一節　研究結論　41
　第二節　管理意涵　45
　第三節　研究建議　46
參考文獻　48
　一、中文文獻　48
　二、英文文獻　49
附錄　研究問卷　52

一、中文文獻
吳萬益（2015）。企業研究方法。臺北市：華泰圖書。
李勝雄（2004）。經營策略、執行力與平衡計分卡導向經營績效之研究-以橡膠產業為例（未出版之碩士論文）。義守大學，高雄市。
邱晧政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南文化。
高福成（19941）。TPM全面生產保養推進實務。臺北市：中衛發展中心。
張錫惠（1997）。績效管理。臺北市：洪健全基金會。
許士軍（2001）。管理學。臺北市：東華書局。
曾千芬（2017）。行銷通路夥伴關係、研發能力、產品品質、服務創新與生產製造能力對組織績效的關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
黃喜玲（2007）。領導型態、組織文化、全面品質管理對組織績效之影響－以台糖公司各事業部為例的實證研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學，高雄市。
楊泰典（2019）。產品品質、服務品質、品牌形象與顧客滿意度、顧客忠誠度關係之研究-以小農自產自銷農特產品為例（未出版之碩士論文）。遠東科技大學，臺南市。
榮泰生（2011）。企業研究方法。臺北市：五南文化。
潘家軺（2011）。現代生產管理學。臺北市：清華大學出版社。
鄭珮君（2018）。服務品質、產品品質與顧客期望對滿意度關聯性之研究：國軍餐廳為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。
鄭凱若（2006）。運用結構方程模式探討產品品質、服務品質、顧客滿意度、商店形象與顧客購買意願之關係－以咖啡連鎖店為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。

二、英文文獻
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York : Free Press.
Ambler, T. (1997). Do brands benefit consumers, International Journal of Advertising, 16(3), 167-195.
Arthur, J. B. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Review, 488-506.
Bhuian, S. N. (1997). Marketing cues and perceived quality: Perceptions of saudi consumers toward products of The U.S., Japan, Germany, Italy, U.K. and France. Journal of Quality Management, 2(2), 217-235.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: the meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
Choi, F., & Mueller, G. (1992). International Accounting (2nd ed), Prentice-Hall International.
Dierckx, L., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset tock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1513.
Greffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48, 37-70.
Hsu, C. W., Chen, H. & Jen, L. (2008). Resource linkages and capability development. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(6), 677-685.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Edition.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Prentice- Hall Inc.
Miler, S. M. (1990). The strategic management of technological R&D – An ideal process for the 1990’s. International Journal of Technology Management Journal, 40(1), 88-171.
Parsons, A. L. (2002). What determines buyer-seller relationship quality? An investigation from the buyer’s perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(2), 4-12.
Pelham, A. M. (1999). Influence of environment, strategy, and market orientation on performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 33-46.
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open system. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Steenkamp, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process, Journal of Business Research, 21, 309-333.
Richardson, P., Dick, A. S. & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of sstore brand quality, Journal of Marketing, 58, 28-36.
Rao, A. R., ＆ Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review, 36(1), 87-97.
Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approach, Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A. & Mavondo, F. T. (1999). Innovation index and its implications on organizational performance: A study of australian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(5), 495-503.