跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.140.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/08 03:09
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:呂麗娟
研究生(外文):LU, LI-CHUAN
論文名稱:關係人交易與投資機會集對企業價值影響之實證研究
論文名稱(外文):An Empirical Study of the Influence of Related-Party Transactions and Investment Opportunity Set on Firm Value
指導教授:侍台誠
指導教授(外文):SHIH, TAI-CHENG
口試委員:楊孟萍葉鴻銘
口試日期:2024-07-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:會計學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:關係人交易投資機會集企業價值
外文關鍵詞:Related Party TransactionsInvestment Opportunity SetFirm Value
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本論文以2013年至2022年台灣上市(櫃)公司資料作為研究樣本,探討關係人交易與投資機會集對企業價值之影響,及投資機會集對關係人交易影響企業價值是否因而產生調節效果。過去研究指出關係人交易可能對公司價值產生正反兩種影響:若公司管理者有效運用關係人交易,降低資訊不對等所造成的交易成本讓公司利益最大化,能使企業價值提升,此為契約效率之觀點;倘若管理者因自身利益,以投機目的利用關係人交易獲取公司資源,危害利害關係人的利益,因而降低企業價值。投資機會集對企業價值亦具有正/負向影響,本論文係採用Baber, Janakiraman and Kang (1996 )提出之衡量方法,以投資密集度、資產市值成長率、研究發展費用對資產帳面價值比等三項變數,經因素分析法萃取得出IOS分數後,按十分位數轉換作為投資機會集之代理衡量變數,納入各類關係人交易對企業價值的影響進行迴歸估計;另亦探討投資機會集對關係人交易影響企業價值是否產生調節效果。
本論文結果實證顯示:(1)關係人交易對公司價值之影響,在應付關係人融資交易、關係人銷貨收入占資產總額比率,及應付關係人融資占資產總額比率等與企業價值呈顯著正相關。惟有無關係人交易、關係人進貨交易對企業價值有負面影響。(2)投資機會集與企業價值呈顯著正相關,顯示投資機會集愈大,公司成長性愈高,企業價值提升。(3)投資機會集對關係人交易影響企業價值具調節效果,呈負相關,且具統計顯著性,可能係因企業進行關係人交易基於自利欺騙目的,會危害股東利益,使企業整體價值降低。

This paper is based on the data of Taiwan's listed companies (OTC) from 2013 to 2022, to investigate the impacts of the related party transactions and the investment opportunity set on firm value, and whether the investment opportunity set moderates the influence of the related party transactions on firm value. The previous research indicates that the related party transactions may have both positive and negative impacts on the value of a company. From the perspective of contractual efficiency, the value of a company can be increased if the company's managers can effectively utilize the related party transactions to minimize the transaction costs caused by the information asymmetry and maximize the benefits of the company; if the managers utilize the related party transactions to acquire the corporate resources for speculative purposes and their own benefits; this will jeopardize the benefits of the related party, and thus reduce the firm value. The investment opportunity set also has both positive and negative impacts on firm value. This paper adopts the measurement method proposed by Baber, Janakiraman and Kang (1996), which uses three variables : investment intensity, market capitalization growth rate of assets, and research and development expenses to book value of assets, to extract IOS scores by factor analysis, and then converts them into proxy measures of the investment opportunity set by deciles, which are included in the regression estimation of the impacts of various types of the related-party transactions on firm value. In addition, the regression estimation of the impact of the related party transactions on firm value was also conducted to investigate whether the investment opportunity set moderates the impact of the related party transactions on firm value.
The empirical results of this paper indicate that: (1) The impact of the related party transactions on firm value is significantly positively correlated with firm value in terms of the financing payable to related parties, the ratio of sales revenue to total assets of the related parties, and the ratio of financing payable to total assets of the related parties. However, unrelated party transactions and related party purchase transactions had a negative impact on firm value. (2) The positive correlation between the set of investment opportunities and enterprise value indicates that the larger investment opportunities set, the higher company growth and the higher firm value. (3) The investment opportunity set has a moderating effect on the impact of the related party transactions on firm value, showing a negative correlation which is statistically significant. This may be due to the fact that companies engage in the related party transactions for self-interested and deceptive purposes, which jeopardizes the stockholders' benefits and reduces the overall firm value.

摘要 i
目錄 v
表次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究架構 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 關係人交易 3
第二節 投資機會集 5
第三節 企業價值 6
第三章 研究方法與假說 9
第一節 研究假說之建立 9
第二節 實證模型 13
第三節 變數定義 17
第四節 數據來源與樣本選取 22
第四章 實證結果分析 23
第一節 敘述性統計 23
第二節 相關係數分析 27
第三節 複迴歸分析 30
第四節 進一步測試 39
第五章 結論與建議 51
第一節 研究結論 51
第二節 研究限制與建議 52
參考文獻 53
附錄 變數定義表 60
台灣證券交易所股份有限公司與財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心,2022,關係人交易指南。
江淑玲與林麗容,2007,我國中小企業盈餘管理行為之探索性研究-德爾菲法之應用,東吳經濟商學學報,第57期:79–109。
李建然與林秀鳳,2013,大型會計師事務所之審計品質真的比非大型會計師事務所好嗎?從抑制盈餘管理的角度探討—控制自我選擇偏誤的重要 性,中華會計學刊,第9卷第1期:77-110。
李馨蘋與黃啟倫,2009,股權結構、關係人交易與公司績效。中華管理評論國際學報,第12卷第2期:1-31。
李馨蘋與黃啟倫,2009,股權結構、關係人交易與公司績效,中華會計學刊,第18卷第2期:167-206。
阮品嘉,2012,金融控股公司及其集團之規範與實務,台北:元照出版公司。
林穎芬、馮軒綾與洪鈺浩,2018,機構投資人、董事會結構、薪酬與關係人交易,中華會計學刊,第14卷第1期:1-29。
邱垂昌與黃秀姿,2006,自願設立獨立董事、關係人交易與公司價值關聯性之研究:代理理論與訊號發射理論之比較。管理及人文科學,第1卷第3 期:379-403。
邱瓊玲,2011,關係人交易對財務危機預測模式影響之探討。育達科大學,第26期:31-48。
陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,第2卷 第1期:127-151。
游竣淵,2016,關係人交易對公司租稅規避之影響:以台灣上市電子業為例
黃美祝與楊政霖,2022,關係人交易避稅對所得稅費用估計品質的影響,當代會計,第23卷第1期:71-96。
葉銀華、邱顯比與何憲章,1997,利益輸送代理問題和股權結構之理論與實證研究,中國財務學刊,第4卷第4期:47-73。
葉銀華、柯承恩與李德冠,2002,公司監理機制對於關係人交易的影響,2002年財務學術研討會暨博士研究生論壇,台灣財務金融學會。
葉銀華、蘇裕惠、柯承恩與李德冠,2003,公司治理機制對於關係人交易的影響。證券市場發展季刊,第15冊第4期:69-106。
劉倩妏,2014,關係人交易之利益衝突及規範面向,法學論著,第12卷第65期:69-91。
鄭儒鈺,2020,內部治理與外部監督機制對公司價值之影響,會計與公司治理,第15卷第2期:19-42。
鄭儒鈺與楊雪蘭,2020,內部治理與外部監督機制對公司價值之影響,會計與公司治理,第15卷第2期:19-41。
謝秉蓉、陳建志與王銀杏,2021,台灣企業社會責任報告書揭露品質與企業價值之關聯性探討,管理與系統,第28卷第1期:61-87。
張素政,2021,與進貨銷貨有關之關係人交易對公司價值的影響,淡江大學管理科學學系企業經營碩士在職論文。

Andersen, D., J. R. Francis, and D. J. Stokes. 1993. Auditing, dircctorships, and the demand for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 12:353-375.
Anthony, J. H., and K. Ramesh. 1992. Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2):203-227.
Baber, W. R., S. N. Janakiraman, and S. H. Kang. 1996. Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(3):297-318.
Balsam, S., R. H. Gifford, and J. Puthenpurackal. 2017. Related party transactions, corporate governance and CEO compensation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 44(5-6):854-894.
Brigham, E. F., and J. F. Houston. 2011. Fundamental of Financial Managemen-t.United States of America.Thomson South-Western.
Chang, S. J., and J. Hong. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management journal, 43(3):429-448.
Christie, A. 1989. Equity risk, the opportunity set, production costs and debt. Working Paper, University of Rochester.
Christie, A. A. 2002. Principles of organizational design. Chapter 2 in Solving Organization Design Problems Using Accounting. Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana State University.
Chung, K. H., and C. Charoenwong. 1991. Investment options, assets-in-place, and the risk of stocks. Financial Management, 20(3):21-33.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6):2741-2771.
Crane, A .D., S. Michenaud, and J. P. Weston. 2016. The effect of institutional ownership on payout policy: Evidence from index thresholds.In Review of Financial Studies, 29(6):1377-1408.
Dahya, J., O. Dimitrov, and J. J. McConnell. 2008. Dominant shareholders, corporate boards and corporate value: a cross-country analysis.Journal of Financial Economics, 87:73-100.
Dhaliwal, D., W. Heninger, and K. Hughes Jr. 1999. The investment opportunityset and capitalization vs. expensing methods of accounting Choice. Accounting and Finance, 39:151-175.
Elbadry, A., D. Gounopoulos, and F. Skinner. 2015. Governance quality and information asymmetry.Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 24(2-3):127-157.
Gaver, J., and K. Gaver. 1993. Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensationpolicies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16:125-160.
Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, and D. Palia. 2004. Related party transactions: Associations withcorporate governance and firm value. Working paper. Rutgers University.
Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, and D. Palia. 2004. Related party transactions and corporate governance. Advances in Financial Economics, 9(1):1-27.
Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, T. J. Louwers, and B. J. Reed. 2007. Auditing related party transactions: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizon, 21(1):81-102.
Hope, O. K., H. Lu, and S. Saiy. 2019. Director compensation and related party transactions.Review of Accounting Studies, 24:1392-1426.
Hwang, N. C. R., J. R. Chiou, and Y. C. Wang. 2013. Effect of disclosure regulation on earnings management through related-party transactions: Evidence from Taiwanese firms operating in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4):292-313.
James, T. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory.Journal of Money , Credit , and Banking, 1(February):15-29.
Jensen. M. C. 1986. Agenev costs of free cash fow, corporate finance, and takeovers American Economic Review, 76:323-329.
Jian, M., and T. J. Wong. 2004. Earnings management and tunneling through related party transactions: Evidence from Chinese corporate groups. Working Paper, Nanyang Technological University and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Jian, M., and T. J. Wong. 2010. Propping through related party transactions. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(1):70-105.
Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 2000. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? Ananalysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55(2):867-891.
Kim, J. B., and C. H. Yi. 2006. Ownership structure, business group affiliation, listing status, and earnings management: Evidence from Korea. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2):427-464.
Kohlbeck, M. J., and B. W. Mayhew. 2004. Related party transactions. Working paper.Wisconsin-Madison University.
McConnell, and Servaes. 1990. Additional Evidence on equity ownership and corporate value.Journal of Financial Economics, 27:596-612.
Miller, M. H., and F. Modigliani. 1961. Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares. The Journal of Business, 34:411-433.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An Empirical analysis.Journal of Financial Economics, 20:293-315.
Myers, S. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5:147-175.
Nugroho, T., and D. Patrisia. 2022. The effect of capital structure, and growth on firm value on real estate and property companies listed on BEI (2015-2019 period). Journal of Financial Management Studies, 2(1):67-78.
Peterson, P. P. 1983. Financial decisions and the life-cycle of corporations. The Financial Management Association Meeting:Florida State University.
Pizzo, M. 2013. Related party transactions under a contingency perspective. Journal of Management and Governance, 17:309-330.
Ryngaert, M., and S. Thomas. 2012. Not all related party transactions (RPTs) are the same: Ex ante versus ex post RPTs. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3):845-882.
Skinner, D. J. 1993. The investment opportunity set and accounting procedure choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(4):407-446.
Smith Jr, C. W., and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3):263-292.
Vickery, G., K. Sakai, I. Lee, and H. Sim. 2004. ICT, E-business and Smes. OCED Conference of Ministers Responsible for SMEs.46.
Villalonga, B., and R. Amit. 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2): 385-417.
Wang, H. D., C. C. Cho, and C. J. Lin. 2019. Related party transactions, business relatedness, and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 101:411-425.
Wang, W. K., W. M. Lu, Q. L. Kweh, and W. Y. Siao. 2020. Related‐party transactions and corporate performance following the adoption of international financial reporting standards in Taiwan. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(3):371-379.
Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1):131-156.
Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu, and Y. H. Su. 2012. Related-Party Transactions and Corporate Governance: The Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 20(5):755-776.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top