中文部分
1.方沛晶（2021）。不只世界第一 更是全球唯一 打造台灣紡織矽谷 把夕陽變朝陽。臺灣精品品牌協會官網。https://teba.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/001.pdf（2024年6月14號）
2.吳怡萱（2009, 6月18號）。金融海嘯下，去年營收逆勢增加兩成交貨快一倍 旭寬成長超越同業股王。商業週刊https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/Archive/Article?StrId=36992&rf=google（2024年1月6號）
3.北美智權報（2020, 10月14號）。台灣製造業數位轉型調查：電子業最積極、金屬和紡織業最保守。北美智權報官網。http://www.tpcc.org.tw/topic_detail.php?id=fc00bad480a232ad （2024年1月6號）
4.財團法人中華民國紡織業拓展會（2023, 6月）。2022 年臺灣紡織工業概況。紡拓會官網https://ttf.textiles.org.tw/TTF/main/content/ContentDesc.aspx?menu_id=95（2024年1月6號）
5.李水蓮。（2022, 2月16號）。我國產業創新與數位轉型－紡織雲世代供應鏈服務與ESG數位力。工商時報。https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20220216700556-431203（2024年6月10號）
6.李傳楷、馬鈺欣（2023）。「突破性技術創新的制度化：建立一個整合性的概念框架」。中山管理評論，31(3)，403-446。
7.沈柏延（2022）。從動態能力的觀點探討企業的數位轉型〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所。8.林佩璇（2000）。質的研究方法。麗文文化事業機構。
9.林孟志（2021，10月28號）。打造紡織矽谷平台：以智慧製造，領航雲世代。流亞科技股份有限公司。https://www.filaweaving.org.tw/show/show-1125016.htm。（2024年1月6號）
10.林宗霖（2024）。製造業數位轉型之關鍵成功因素分析—以新飛輪效應策略探討「旭榮集團」為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理學系。
11.姚興川（2011）。「我國一百年來的紡織產業及科技發展」。科學發展月刊，457，43-46。
12.洪世章、曾詠青、賴俊彥（2016）。「科技管理三重奏：策略視角的分析與評論」。臺大管理論叢，26(3)，257-300。
13.涂敏芬（2012）。「對抗制度的創新：策略行動者的能動性實踐」。臺大管理論叢，22(2)，87-118。
14.涂敏芬（2019）。「制度工作可行嗎？去制度化前緣的能動性解析」。中山管理評論，27(1)，101-138。
15.涂敏芬、洪世章（2012）。「「有」中生「有」：工研院如何運用B.B.C.策略改造科專制度」。管理學報，29(3)，229-254。
16.翁芊儒（2019，8月2號）。【業界觀點：紡織產業綜合研究所】臺灣紡織業者要走向智慧製造，數位化產程資料是關鍵。iThome。https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/132070（2024年1月26號）
17.產業價值鏈資訊平台（2024）。臺灣證券交易所網站。紡織產業鏈簡介。https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=O000 （2024年1月21號）
18.許瑋芳（2015）。經濟全球化下台灣紡織產業競爭力之探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東吳大學國際經營與貿易學系。19.陳昕宜（2023, 8月2號）。自動化工廠神助攻 「智」造產業加速邁進。經貿透視雙周刊。https://www.trademag.org.tw/page/itemsd/?id=7886761&no=19（2024年
1月21號）
20.陳俊忠、姚政文、呂炯緯（2008，8月）。旭榮集團。哈佛商業評論。https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/case-study-tmcc/10821/hbr-article（2024年6月10號）
21.陳暐仁（2024）。協助紡織業低碳化實務與解決方案分享。流亞科技股份有限公司。https://is.gd/NbZmds（2024年1月6號）
22.賀桂芬、黃亦筠（2015.1.7）。德國的章魚戰略：工業4.0。天下雜誌，564，111-115。
23.楊仁壽、卓秀足（2017）。組織理論與管理：個案、衡量與產業應用。雙葉書廊有限公司。
24.經濟日報。（2023，10月18號）台灣八大紡織廠與設計品牌合作 共創「永續勁時尚」。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/7514646（2024年6月10號）
25.詹文男、沈柏延（2020.7.30）。不只是導入資訊系統與流程改善，七大構面檢驗數位轉型。哈佛商業週刊，168，38-45。
26.劉麗惠（2020, 6月）。貿易戰、疫情兩大黑天鵝襲擊：三大影響全球經貿進入新格局。貿易雜誌。https://www.ieatpe.org.tw/magazine/ebook348/storypage02.html（2024年1月6號）
27.潘淑滿（2022）。質性研究：理論與應用（2版）。心理出版社。
28.鄭凱方（2023）。2024紡織產業逆風前行。財團法人中華民國紡織業拓展會。https://www.tnet.org.tw/Article/Detail/37759 （2024年6月7號）
29.蕭瑞麟（2020）。不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辯脈絡（5版）。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
30.賴言曦（2022，10月15號）。「高通膨影響消費，紡織業：2023是產業調整年」。中央社。https://www.textilesinfo.tw/mod/news/index.php?REQUEST_ID=75d9f35204bd83598ebc3de0e835f5a541729f8a336b57351a40d002b334f214（2024年1月26號）
31.簡立宗（2022，10月17號）。台灣企業數位轉型有法寶 TDX 調查有一套。商傳媒。https://news.owlting.com/articles/194395（2024年1月25號）
英文部分
1.Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995) Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe. Oxford university press.
2.Aydin, U. (2021). Rule‐takers, rule‐makers, or rule‐promoters? Turkey and Mexico's role as rising middle powers in global economic governance. Regulation & Governance, 15(3), 544-560.
3.Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
4.Battilana, J. B., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. V. A. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annuals, 3(1), 65-107.
5.Beckers, S. F., Van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2018). Good, better, engaged? The effect of company-initiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 366-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0539-4
6.Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization studies, 20(5), 777-799.
7.Bonnet, D., & Ferraris, P. (2012). Digital Transformation Benchmark-2012: Insights for the Manufacturing Industry. Capgemini Consulting. https://reurl.cc/nNQYRl. (2024, January 6)
8.Brouthers, K., Brouthers, L., & Werner, S. (2008). Resource-based advantages in an international context. Journal of Management, 34(2), 189-217.
9.Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
10.Christensen, C. M., Bartman, T., & Van Bever, D. (2016). The hard truth about business model innovation. Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 30-40.
11.Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), 45-56.
12.Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. (1994). The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59 (4), 547-570.
13.DiMaggio, P. (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (ed.), Institutional patterns and culture. Cambridge (pp.3-32). Ballinger.
14.DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147-160.
15.Dobbin, F., & Dowd, T. J. (1997). How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 501-529.
16.Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26 (3), 385-41.
17.Dyer Jr, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279492
18.Eggers, J. P., & Park, K. F. (2018). Incumbent adaptation to technological change: The past, present, and future of research on heterogeneous incumbent response. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 357-389.
19.Farjoun, M. (2002). The dialectics of institutional development in emergent and turbulent fields: The history of pricing conventions in the on-line database industry. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5), 848-874.
20.Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Harvard University Press.
21.Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of the Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214.
22.Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035-1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903087696
23.Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science, 4(4), 595-616. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2635082
24.Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional com plexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371.
25.Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3
26.Guo, X., Li, M., Wang, Y., & Mardani, A. (2023). Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113868
27.Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
28.Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716-749.
29.Hargrave, T. J., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 864-888.
30.Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1606-1651.
31.Hirsch, P. M. (1986). From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 800-837.
32.Hoffman, A. J. (1997) From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. New Lexington Press.
33.Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
34.Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 398-422.
35.Hudson, R. (1992). Institutional change, cultural transformation and economic regeneration: myths and realities from Europe's old industrial areas. Occasional publications.
36.Huber, G., & Daft, R. (1987). The Information Environment of Organizations, In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 130-164). Sage Publications.
37.Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2014). Digital Ubiquity. How Connections, Sensors, and Data Are Revolutionizing Business. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 90-99.
38.Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. Cambridge University Press.
39.Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review.
40.Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organization change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812-836.
41.Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
42.Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146-172.
43.Lavenex, S., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 791-812.
44.Lavenex, S., Serrano, O., & Büthe, T. (2021). Power transitions and the rise of the regulatory state: Global market governance in flux. Regulation & Governance, 15(3), 445-471.
45.Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25 (2), 161-187.
46.Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I., & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624-644.
47.Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. Radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 333-363.
48.Liu, Y., Peng, M. W., Wei, Z., Xu, J., & Xu, L. C. (2022, April). Resources, institutions, and cultures behind frm survival and growth during COVID-19. Policy Research Working Paper. https://reurl.cc/8vrvrM (2024, January 24)
49.Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149-157.
50.Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679.
51.North, D. C. (1978) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
52.Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19-25.
53.McMillan, J. (2007). Market institutions. In L. Blume & S. Durlauf (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Palgrave.
54.Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
55.Narayanan, V. K., & Fahey, L. (2005). The relevance of the institutional underpinnings of Porter's five forces framework to emerging economies: An epistemological analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 207-223.
56.Ng, I. C., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. (2017). The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 3-21.
57.Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 257-292.
58.Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145-179.
59.Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563-588.
60.Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 679-713.
61.Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476.
62.Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974-1010.
63.Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company.
64.Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(1), 63-77.
65.Peng, M. W., & Delios, A. (2006). What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 385-405.
66.Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492-528.
67.Peng, M. W., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. Journal of management Studies, 47(2), 253-273.
68.Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63-81.
69.Peng, M. W., Wang, J. C., Kathuria, N., Shen, J., & Welbourne Eleazar, M. J. (2023). Toward an institution-based paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(2), 353-382.
70.Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring business excellence, 1(2), 12-17.
71.Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. 2000. Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, (Vol. 22, PP. 237-281). JAI Press.
72.Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.
73.Shah, D., Rust, R. T., Parasuraman, A., Staelin, R., & Day, G. S. (2006). The path to customer centricity. Journal of Service Research, 9(2), 113-124.
74.Sine, W. D., & David, R. J. (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32(2), 185-207.
75.Sklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., & Sörhammar, D. (2019). Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Research, 104, 450-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.012
76.Stoney, C., Asquith, A., Kipper, K., McNeill, J., Martin, J., & Spano, A. (2023). Policy‐making, policy‐taking, and policy‐shaping: Local government responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82(4), 440-461.
77.Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
78.Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35-67.
79.Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239-254.
80.Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K., & Irvin, V. (2019). Digital transformation is not about technology. Harvard Business Review, 13(3), 1-6.
81.Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
82.Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford University Press.
83.Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81-101.
84.Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. OUP Oxford.
85.Tina Dacin, M., Goodstein, J., & Richard Scott, W. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45-56.
86.Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253-266.
87.Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
88.Verhoef, P. C., Stephen, A. T., Kannan, P. K., Luo, X., Abhishek, V., Andrews, M., ... Zhang, Y. (2017). Consumer connectivity in a complex technology-enabled, and mobile-oriented world with smart products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.06.001
89.Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic, 28, 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
90.Weng, D. H., & Peng, M. W. (2018). Home bitter home: How labor protection influences firm offshoring. Journal of World Business, 53, 632-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.03.007
91.Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58-65.
92.Yiu, D.W., Lam, L.W., Gaur, A.S., Lee, S. and Wong, C.S. (2018). Asian relevance, global impact: Asian management research entering a new era. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9606-8.
93.Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189-221.
94.Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234-254.
95.Zilber, T. B. (2007). Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: The case of Israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1035-1054.
96.Zilber, T. B. (2024). Narrating institutional logics into effect: Coherence across cognitive, political, and emotional elements. Administrative Science Quarterly, 69(1), 172-221.