|
英文文獻:
1.Adams, R. B. (2015). Myths and facts about female directors. IFC Private Sector Opinion, 37, 1-16.
2.Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
3.Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and The Environment, 23(4), 217-235.
4.Argenti, P. A. & Druckenmiller, B. (2004). Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4), 368-374.
5.Barako, D. G. & Brown, A. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 309-324.
6.Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
7.Bernardi, R. A., Bean, D. F., & Weippert, K. M. (2002). Signaling gender diversity through annual report pictures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(4), 609-616.
8.Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.
9.Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56.
48
10.Boehe, D. M., & Cruz, L. B. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, product differentiation strategy and export performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 325-346.
11.Bowen, F. E. (2000). Environmental visibility: a trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and The Environment, 9(2), 92-107.
12.Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility of The Businessman. New York: Harper and Row.
13.Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6-18.
14.Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97-116.
15.Campbell, K & Minguez, V. A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.
16.Carnegie, A. (1889). Wealth. The North American Review, 148(391), 653-664.
17.Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778.
18.Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
19.Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173-189.
20.Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Rusticus, T. O. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. Journal of Finance, 61(2), 655-687.
21.Cossin, D. & Metayer, E. (2015). How Strategic Is Your Board? The Strategy Guidebook, 45-60.
22.Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.
23.De Colle, S., Henriques, A., & Sarasvathy, S. (2014). The paradox of corporate social responsibility standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 177-191.
24.Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
25.Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465-480.
26.Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252-284.
27.Dowling, G. R. (2006). Communicating corporate reputation through stories. California Management Review, 49(1), 82-100.
28.Drucker, P. F. (1984). Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review (pre-1986), 26(2), 53-63.
29.Dyer Jr, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785-802.
30.Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and The Environment, 11(2), 130-141.
31.Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental Management: Readings and Cases, 7(1), 1-16.
32.Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637-664.
33.Farrell, K. A. & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 85-106.
34.Favier, J., Amar, L., & Gimenez-Roqueplo, A. P. (2015). Paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma: From genetics to personalized medicine. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 11(2), 1-11.
35.Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., Allred, C., & Magnan, G. (2009). Supply chain information-sharing: Benchmarking a proven path. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(2), 222-246.
36.Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. (2006). A Model of Corporate Philanthropy. Columbia University and University of Pennsylvania.
37.Flabbi, L., Macis, M., Moro, A., & Schivardi, F. (2019). Do female executives make a difference? The impact of female leadership on gender gaps and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 129(622), 2390-2423.
38.Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
39.Fombrun, C. J. (2005). A world of reputation research, analysis and thinking-building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 7-12.
40.Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach. Cambridge university press.
41.Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M.
(2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219-233
42.Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13, 32-33.
43.Fukukawa, K., Shafer, W. E., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and attitudes toward social and environmental accountability: A study of MBA students. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(4), 381-394.
44.Fülöp, G., Hisrich, R. D., & Szegedi, K. (2000). Business ethics and social responsibility in transition economies. Journal of Management Development, 19(1), 5-31.
45.Gao, S. S., Heravi, S., & Xiao, J. Z. (2005). Determinants of corporate social and environmental reporting in Hong Kong: A research note. Accounting Forum, 29(2), 233-242.
46.Gul, F. A., Hutchinson, M., & Lai, K. M. (2013). Gender-diverse boards and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 511-538.
47.Gunningham, N. A., Thornton, D., & Kagan, R. A. (2005). Motivating management: Corporate compliance in environmental protection. Law and Policy, 27(2), 289-316.
48.Haden, S. S. P., Oyler, J. D., & Humphreys, J. H. (2009). Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: An exploratory analysis. Management Decision, 47(7), 1041-1055.
49.Hafsi, T. & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463-479.
50.Harakeh, M., El-Gammal, W., & Matar, G. (2019). Female directors, earnings management, and CEO incentive compensation: UK evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 50, 153-170.
51.Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641-660.
52.Henderson, D. (2001). The case against 'corporate social responsibility'. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 17(2), 28-32.
53.Hendry, J. R. (2006). Taking aim at business: What factors lead environmental non-governmental organizations to target particular firms? Business and Society, 45(1), 47-86.
54.Hillenbrand, C. & Money, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 261-277.
55.Hillman, A. J. & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
56.Hillman, A. J., Cannella Jr, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747-763.
57.Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors' multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441-456.
58.Inayatullah, R. N. & Singh, A. (2015). Supply chain management practices in SMEs of India: Some managerial lessons from large enterprises. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 2(5), 256-269.
59.Isidro, H. & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1-19.
60.Jia, M. & Zhang, Z. (2012). Women on boards of directors and corporate philanthropic disaster response. China Journal of
Accounting Research, 5(1), 83-99.
61.Jia, M. & Zhang, Z. (2013). Critical mass of women on BODs, multiple
identities, and corporate philanthropic disaster response: Evidence from privately owned Chinese firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 303-317.
62.Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 1047-1067.
63.Jiraporn, P. & Withisuphakorn, P. (2015). The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): Do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, 23(4), 298-301.
64.Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61-72.
65.Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 194-207.
66.Ketola, T., Blombäck, A., & Wigren, C. (2009). Challenging the importance of size as determinant for CSR activities. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 20(3), 255-270.
67.Kojima, K., Choe, J. Y., Ohtomo, T., & Tsujinaka, Y. (2012). The Corporatist System and Social Organizations in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(3), 609-628.
68.Kotler, P. & Lee, N. (2005). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, “corporate social marketing” leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11(3-4), 91-103.
69.Levis, J. (2006). Adoption of corporate social responsibility codes by multinational companies. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(1), 50-55.
70.Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409-424.
71.Mallin, C. A. & Michelon, G. (2011). Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2), 119-144.
72.Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 53-72.
73.Maqbool, S. & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 84-93.
74.Mazurkiewicz, P. (2004). Corporate environmental responsibility: Is a common CSR framework possible. World Bank, 2, 1-18.
75.McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
76.McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
77.McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
78.Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2017). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian Securities Exchange listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 874-885.
79.Neef, D. (2012). Managing Corporate Reputation and Risk. Routledge. 80.Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal
of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167-180.
81.Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics.
San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
82.Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-68.
83.Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391-424.
84.Prasad, M., Mishra, T., & Bapat, V. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Evidence from India using energy intensity as an indicator of environmental sustainability. IIMB Management Review, 31(4), 374-384.
85.Pucheta Martínez, M. C., Bel Oms, I., & Olcina Semepre, G. (2017). Is board gender diversity a driver of CEO compensation? Examining the leadership style of institutional women directors. Asian Women, 33(4), 55-80.
86.Reiber, C. & Garcia, J. R. (2010). Hooking up: Gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 390-404
87.Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
88.Robinson, G. & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21-31.
89.Ross, W. T. & Robertson, D. C. (2003). A typology of situational factors: Impact on salesperson decision-making about ethical issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 213-234.
90.Schuler, D. A. & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social
performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for
consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540-558. 91.Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy.
Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195-211.
92.Servaes, H. & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social
responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness.
Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
93.Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes,
corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental
and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569-585. 94.Siegel, D. S. & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics
and Management Strategy, 16(3), 773-792.
95.Srinidhi, B. I. N., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and
earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5),
1610-1644.
96.Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., & Pasqualino, R. (2013). Performance
measurement of sustainable supply chains: A literature review and a research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(8), 782-804.
97.Thompson, R. (2006). Social Participation or Social Distancing: Agency, Personal and Community Leadership. meeting of Acrod National Conference on Social Participation, Sydney, Australia.
98.Tucker, L. & Melewar, T. C. (2005). Corporate reputation and crisis management: The threat and manageability of anti-corporatism.Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 377-387.
99.Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to
sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and
The Environment, 13(4), 246-260.
100.Van der Walt, N. & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the
influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 218-234.
101.Van Haastrecht, B. & Amiabel, M. (2010). The strategic importance of corporate social engagement. Journal of Sponsorship, 3(3),260-264.
102.Wagner, B. A., Fillis, I., & Johansson, U. (2003). E-business and e-supply strategy in small and medium sized businesses (SMEs). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(4),343-354.
103.Wahn, U., Bos, J. D., Goodfield, M., Caputo, R., Papp, K., Manjra, A., & Graeber, M. (2002). Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatrics, 110(1), 1-8.
104.Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Goh, M. (2018). Moderating the role of firm size in sustainable performance improvement through sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability, 10(5), 1654.
105.Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607-1616.
106.Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms' board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255-277.
107.Wehrmeyer, W. & McNeil, M. (2000). Activists, pragmatists, technophiles and tree-huggers? Gender differences in employees' environmental attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 211-222.
108.Wei, F., Ding, B., & Kong, Y. (2017). Female directors and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from the environmental investment of
Chinese listed companies. Sustainability, 9(12), 2292.
109.Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,
42(1), 1-10.
110.Wu, F. & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Organizational learning, commitment,
and joint value creation in interfirm relationships. Journal of Business
Research, 59(1), 81-89.
111.Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building
social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long
Range Planning, 43(2-3), 308-325.
112.Ze-jiang, Z. H. O. U. (2014). Do Female Directors Affect Corporate
Philanthropy? Empirical Research Based on Listed Companies in China. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 16(3), 78-85.
113.Organization for economic cooperation and development。Corporate governance. 檢索日:2020 年 9 月 2 日。檢自: http://www.oecd.org/corporate/
114.2020 Spencer Stuart Board Index。S&P 500 Boards: Trends over One, Five and 10 Years. 檢索日:2021 年 3 月 9 日。檢自:
https://www.spencerstuart.com/-/media/2020/december/ssbi2020/2020
_us_spencer_stuart_board_index.pdf
115.European Women on Boards Gender Diversity Index 。 Countries
ranking according to GDI. 檢索日:2021 年 4 月 26 日。檢自: https://europeanwomenonboards.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Gend
er-Equality-Index-Final-report-2020-210120.pdf
中文文獻:
116.金融監督管理委員會。108 及 107 年公開發行公司董事性別分析。
檢索日:2020 年 10 月 12 日。檢自:
https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?dataserno=202005140007&dtable =SexTarget&id=448&mcustomize=sextarget_view.jsp&parentpath=0 %2C7%2C446
117.CSR@天下。關於 CSR@天下。檢索日:2020 年 10 月 29 日。檢 自:https://csr.cw.com.tw/
118.中華民國自然生態保育協會。解讀永續發展。檢索日:2020 年 9 月 15 日。檢自:http://www.swan.org.tw/index.php
119.行政院環境保護署。我國循環經濟政策說明。檢索日:2020 年 9 月 15 日。檢自:https://smmdb.epa.gov.tw/circulation/index.
120.中華公司治理協會。新加坡上市公司女性董事比例提高。檢索日: 2021 年 3 月 9 日 。 檢 自 : https://www.cga.org.tw/f_2_01_news.aspx?news_aid=2323.
|