跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.169) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/06 07:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:賴奕丞
研究生(外文):Yi-Tseng Lai
論文名稱:ESG評分對公司短期績效與長期價值之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of ESG Ratings on Short-Term Performance and Long-Term Value of Companies
指導教授:董澍琦董澍琦引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shuh-Chyi Doong
口試委員:葉宗穎林昆立
口試委員(外文):Chung-Ying YehKun-Li Lin
口試日期:2024-06-12
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:42
中文關鍵詞:ESG環境社會公司治理財務績效公司價值高階經理人薪酬
外文關鍵詞:ESGEnvironmentSocialGovernanceFinancial PerformanceFirm ValueExecutive Compensation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:71
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:27
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
近年來,隨著企業對於永續發展的投入不斷增加,企業不僅僅是追求獲利,更要將環境保護(E,Environmental)、社會責任(S,Social)以及公司治理(G,Governance)納入企業經營的策略,ESG也因此成為越來越重要的議題。本研究以2016~2022年台灣上市櫃公司為樣本,採用TEJ TESG永續資料庫中的ESG、環境、社會與公司治理構面分數,探討ESG分數對於公司短期財務績效(資產報酬率ROA、每股盈餘EPS)以及長期公司價值(Tobin’s Q)的影響,將樣本分為全樣本、高階經理人薪酬較高的公司和高階經理人薪酬較低的公司三個組別,比較影響程度是否不同,最後進一步探討高階經理人薪酬對企業ESG評分與短期財務績效、長期公司價值之調節效果。實證結果顯示,全樣本的ESG、環境、社會與公司治理構面分數對ROA、EPS及Tobin’s Q皆存在顯著的正相關,表示企業在環境、社會與公司治理各方面表現良好時,也會有更好的財務績效與公司價值,符合社會衝擊假說的觀點。高階經理人薪酬較高與薪酬較低的公司,其ESG分數與財務績效及公司價值皆存在顯著正相關,然而,在以下情況,高階經理人薪酬較高和薪酬較低的公司,其E、S、G與財務績效和公司價值間關係存在差異,對高階經理人薪酬較高的公司而言,社會分數(S)與ROA呈顯著正相關,環境分數(E)與EPS呈顯著正相關,公司治理分數(G)與Tobin’s Q呈顯著正相關,但在薪酬較低的公司中,這些相關性則不顯著。最後發現高階經理人薪酬會增強ESG與ROA及Tobin’s Q間的正向關係,說明高階經理人薪酬愈高的公司會能吸引和留住優秀人才,且能激勵高階經理人更有動機為了公司投入ESG,因此使ESG與ROA及Tobin’s Q之間的正向關係愈好,但對於ESG與EPS間的關係則沒有顯著影響。
In recent years, with increasing investment in sustainable development by companies, they are not only pursuing profits but also integrating Environmental (E), Social (S), and Governance(G) considerations into their business strategies. Consequently, ESG has become an increasingly important issue.This study discuss the impact of ESG scores on the short-term financial performance (ROA and EPS) and long-term firm value (Tobin’s Q) of companies listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) from 2016 to 2022. It utilizes ESG data from the TEJ TESG sustainability database. The sample is divided into three groups: the entire sample, companies with higher executive compensation, and companies with lower executive compensation. The study compares whether the impact varies across these groups. Additionally, it discuss the interaction between executive compensation and ESG and its relationship with short-term financial performance and long-term firm value.The empirical results indicate that there are significant positive correlations between ESG, environmental, social, and governance scores and both short-term financial performance and long-term firm value for the entire sample. It shows that when companies perform well in ESG, they also acquire better financial performance and firm value, consistent with the social impact hypothesis. Companies with higher executive compensation and those with lower compensation show a significant positive correlation between their ESG scores and financial performance as well as firm value. However, in the following condition, there are different relationships between environmental, social, and governance scores and financial performance and firm value for companies with higher and lower executive compensation. For companies with higher executive compensation, the social score is significantly positively correlated with ROA, the environmental score is significantly positively correlated with EPS, and the governance score is significantly positively correlated with Tobin’s Q. However, in companies with lower compensation, these correlations are not significant. Finally, it was found that higher executive compensation enhances the positive relationship between ESG and both ROA and Tobin’s Q. This indicates that companies with higher executive compensation are better able to attract and retain top talent, and can motivate senior executives to invest more in ESG initiatives for the company, so it strengthens the positive relationship between ESG and both ROA and Tobin’s Q. However, there is no significant impact on the relationship between ESG and EPS.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究架構 2
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說 4
第一節 ESG及三大構面對公司財務績效與公司價值的影響 4
第二節 高階經理人薪酬對ESG與財務績效、公司價值關聯性之影響 6
第三章 資料與研究方法 9
第一節 資料來源與樣本選擇 9
第二節 變數定義與衡量 10
第三節 實證模型 15
第四章 實證分析與結果 19
第一節 敘述性統計分析 19
第二節 相關係數分析 21
第三節 共線性分析 25
第四節 多元迴歸分析 28
第五章 結論 38
第一節 研究結論 38
第二節 研究限制與建議 39
參考文獻 40
一、中文部分
吳浩宇,2023,環境保護、社會責任與公司治理對企業財務績效之影響,國立中興大學財務金融學研究所。
溫素彬、方苑,2008,企業社會責任與財務績效關係的實證研究-利害關係人觀點的面板資料分析,中國工業經濟,2008(10), pp. 150-160。
陳櫻儒,2024,碳排放對公司經營績效之影響,國立政治大學國際金融碩士學位學程。
陳振遠、王健聰、洪世偉,2017,公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影響,中山管理評論,25卷1期, pp. 135~176。
林美金,2021,企業ESG表現與財務績效之關聯性分析,國立金門大學企業管理學研究所。
陳愛庭,2014,高階經理人薪酬對企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性的調節效果,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所。
黃耀德,2023,經理人薪酬結構與ESG對企業價值影響之研究,國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學研究所。
二、西文部分
Alareeni, B. A. and Hamdan, A. (2020), ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 1409-1428.
Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G. and Ergun, K. (2022), Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review Vol. 22, Supplement 2, December 2022, pp. 119-127.
Barnea, A. and Rubin, A. (2010), Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97, pp. 71–86.
Belhaj, S. and Belhaj, C. (2016), Corporate Governance Impact on Bank Performance: Evidence from Europe. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4-4), pp. 583-597.
Black, B. (2001), Does Corporate Governance Matter? A Crude Test Using Russian Data. University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 149, No. 6 (Jun., 2001), pp. 2131-2150.
Chen, Z., Liu, X. and Sun, B. (2023), Executive Compensation and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square.
Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y. and Young, J. (2019), Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 343.
Devers, C.E., McNamara, G., Wiseman, R. M. and Arrfelt, M. (2008), Moving Closer to the Action: Examining Compensation Design Effects on Firm Risk. Organization Science Vol. 19, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2008), pp. 548-566.
Dewi, Ida A. M. C., et al. (2019), Free Cash Flow Effect Towards Firm Value. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, 31 May. 2019, pp. 108-116.
Dowell, G., Hart, S. and Yeung B. (2000), Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards in Emerging Markets Create or Destroy Market Value. Management Science Vol. 46, No. 8 (Aug., 2000), pp. 1059-1074.
Ehie, I. C. and Olibe, K. (2010), The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Production Economics Vol. 128, Issue 1, November 2010, pp. 127-135.
Enekwe, C. I., Nweze, A. U. and Agu, C. I. (2015), The Effect of Dividend Payout on Performance Evaluation: Evidence of Quoted Cement Companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research Vol.3, No.11, pp. 40-59.
Flammer, C., Hong, B. and Minor, D.(2019), Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal 40(7), pp. 1097-1122.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Horváthová, E. (2012), The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits? Ecological Economics Vol. 84, December 2012, pp. 91-97.
Hou, C. T. (2018), The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm‐level evidence from Taiwan. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 2019, pp. 19-28.
Iqbal, U., Nadeem, M., Gull, A. A. and Kayani, U. N. (2022), Environmental innovation and firm value: The moderating role of organizational capital. Journal of Environmental Management Vol.316, 15 August 2022, 115253.
Isik, O.,Unal, E. A. and Ünal, Y. (2017), The Effect of Firm Size on Profitability: Evidence from Turkish Manufacturing Sector. Pressacademia 6(4), pp. 301-308.
Landi, G. and Sciarelli, M. (2019), Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 11-27.
Lazear, E. P. and Rosen, S. (1981), Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts. Journal of Political Economy Vol. 89, No. 5 (Oct., 1981), pp. 841-864.
Loderer, C. F. and Waelchli, U. (2010), Firm Age and Performance. MPRA Paper 26450, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Lundgren, T. and Zhou, W. (2017), Firm performance and the role of environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management Vol. 203, Part 1, 1 December 2017, pp. 330-341.
Nwude, E. C., Itiri, I. O., Agbadua, B.O. and Udeh, S. N. (2016), The Impact of Debt Structure on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Nigerian Quoted Firms. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2016, vol. 6, issue 11, pp. 647-660.
Preston, L. E. and O’Bannon, D. (1997), The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship. Business and Society, 36, pp. 419-429.
Rahman, J. M. and Yilun, L. (2021), Firm Size, Firm Age, and Firm Profitability: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management vol. 28 no. 1 (2021), pp. 101-115.
Velte, P. (2017), Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 169-178.
Zhou, P. and Ruland, W. (2006), Dividend Payout and Future Earnings Growth, Financial Analysts Journal 62(3), pp. 58-69.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊