跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/11 02:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡明翰
研究生(外文):Ming-Han Tsai
論文名稱:員工離職率對過度自信經理人與財務績效關聯之中介效果
指導教授:黃承祖黃承祖引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cheng-Tsu Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:50
中文關鍵詞:過度自信經理人員工離職率財務績效
外文關鍵詞:overconfident CEOturnover ratefinancial performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:12
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討員工離職率對過度自信經理人與財務績效之中介效果。具
備過度自信特質的經理人,在資本支出方面會有超出同產業平均之傾向,進而使企業之財務績效有顯著影響。然而,考量員工滿意度是當代社會企業與公司治理聲浪興起下企業所著重之重要參考指標,而員工滿意度會反應在員工離職率指標上,且離職率指標不僅會受到經理人管理特質所影響,也會影響著企業之財務績效。因此,本研究首先探討具備過度自信特質的經理人是否會影響企業之財務績效,結果顯示過度自信經理人對當年度與下一年度之企業財務績效皆有正向顯著性。而後檢測過度自信經理人與員工離職率之關聯,結果顯示,過度自信經理人對下一年度之員工離職率具有正向顯著性。再針對員工離職率與企業之財務績效進行分析,結果表明,員工離職率對財務績效具有負向顯著性。最後,本研究著重探討員工離職率是否對過度自信經理人與財務績效有中介效果,研究結論表明,當財務績效指標為資產報酬率與權益報酬率時,員工離職率具有顯著中介效果,當財務績效指標為Tobin’s Q時,員工離職率不具有顯著中介效果。
This study aims to explore the mediating effect of employee turnover rate on overconfident CEO and financial performance. CEO with overconfidence traits tend to exceed the industry average in capital expenditure, which in turn has a significant impact on the financial performance of the enterprise. However, considering employee satisfaction is an important indicator that enterprises attach great importance to under the rise of corporate governance in contemporary society. Employee satisfaction is reflected in the employee turnover rate indicator, and the turnover rate indicator is not only influenced by the management characteristics of managers, but also affects the financial performance of enterprises. Therefore, this study first explores whether CEO with overconfident traits will affect the financial performance of a company. The results show that overconfident managers have a positive and significant impact on the financial performance of both the current and next years. Then, the association between overconfident managers and employee turnover rate was tested, and the results showed that overconfident managers had a positive and significant impact on the next year's employee turnover rate. Further analysis was conducted on the relationship between employee turnover rate and financial performance of the enterprise, and the results showed that employee turnover rate has a negative significance on financial
performance. Finally, this study focuses on exploring whether employee turnover rate has a mediating effect on overconfident managers and financial performance. The
research conclusion shows that when the financial performance indicators are Return on Assets and Return on Equity, employee turnover rate has a significant mediating
effect. When the financial performance indicator is Tobin's Q, employee turnover rate does not have a significant mediating effect.
第一章、緒論 ........................................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ..................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的 ................................................................................................................. 3
第三節 研究架構 ................................................................................................................. 4
第二章、文獻探討 ................................................................................................................... 5
第一節 文獻蒐集 ................................................................................................................. 5
第二節 研究假說 ............................................................................................................... 10
第三章、研究方法 ................................................................................................................. 12
第一節 資料來源與樣本篩選 ........................................................................................... 12
第二節 過度自信經理人衡量方法 ................................................................................... 13
第三節 研究方法與模型 ................................................................................................... 15
第四章、實證結果 ................................................................................................................. 21
第一節 敘述性統計 ........................................................................................................... 21
第二節 相關性分析 ........................................................................................................... 24
第三節 迴歸結果 ............................................................................................................... 26
第四節 Sobel test中介效果檢定 ...................................................................................... 34
第五章、結論與建議 ............................................................................................................. 35
第一節 研究結論 ............................................................................................................... 35
第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 ........................................................................................... 37
第三節 研究建議 ............................................................................................................... 38
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................. 39
1.Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The journal of finance, 60(6), 2661-2700.
2.Ben-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2007). Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies (No. w13711). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of business, 197-216.
4.Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44.
5.Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective. Journal of applied psychology, 95(2), 395.
6.Goel, A. M., & Thakor, A. V. (2008). Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. the Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2737-2784.
7.Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management science, 39(1), 17-31.
8.Vitanova, I. (2021). Nurturing overconfidence: The relationship between leader power, overconfidence and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(4), 101342.
9.Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32(2), 311.
10.Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?. Acta psychologica, 47(2), 143-148.
11.Meikle, N. L., Tenney, E. R., & Moore, D. A. (2016). Overconfidence at work: Does overconfidence survive the checks and balances of organizational life?. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 121-134.
12.Kim, J., & Lee, J. C. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on preferences for private dining facilities in restaurants. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 67-70.
13.Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(10), 1284-1296.
14.Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80.
15.Li, Q., Lourie, B., Nekrasov, A., & Shevlin, T. (2022). Employee turnover and firm performance: Large-sample archival evidence. Management Science, 68(8), 5667-5683.
16.Park, T. Y., & Shaw, J. D. (2013). Turnover rates and organizational performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 98(2), 268.
17.Ostroff, C., Shin, Y., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Multiple perspectives of congruence: Relationships between value congruence and employee attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(6), 591-623.
18.Reyes, T., Vassolo, R. S., Kausel, E. E., Torres, D. P., & Zhang, S. (2022). Does overconfidence pay off when things go well? CEO overconfidence, firm performance, and the business cycle. Strategic Organization, 20(3), 510-540.
19.Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?. The journal of finance, 67(4), 1457-1498.
20.Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of financial Economics, 89(1), 20-43.
21.Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2013). Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of financial economics, 109(1), 103-121.
22.Malmendier, U., Tate, G., & Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early‐life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. The Journal of finance, 66(5), 1687-1733.
23.Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative science quarterly, 103-127.
24.Zhang, Y. B., Lin, M. C., Nonaka, A., & Beom, K. (2005). Harmony, hierarchy and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication research reports, 22(2), 107-115.
25.Titman, S., Wei, K. J., & Xie, F. (2004). Capital investments and stock returns. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4), 677-700.
26.陳柏錩. (1999). 上市公司資本支出, 成長機會與股東財富之關係, 國立中正大學, 財務金融研究所碩士論文.
27.Lin, Y., Yang, H., & Liou, D. (2012). The impact of family involvement and ownership concentration on the performance and risk-taking of Taiwanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 923-940.
28.Reyes, T., Vassolo, R. S., Kausel, E. E., Torres, D. P., & Zhang, S. (2020). Does overconfidence pay off when things go well. CEO overconfidence, firm performance, and the business cycle. Strateg. Organ. 1476127020930659. doi, 10(147612702), 0930659.
29.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
30.Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊