跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.181.180) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/14 12:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:紀羽庭
研究生(外文):JI, YU-TING
論文名稱:內部和外部企業社會責任對離職意圖的影響:分配正義的中介機制
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Internal and External Corporate Social Responsibility on Turnover Intention: The Mediating effect of Distributive Justice
指導教授:朱志傑朱志傑引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHU, CHIH-CHIEH
口試委員:朱志傑江家瑜陳信宏
口試委員(外文):CHU, CHIH-CHIEHCHIANG, CHIA-YUCHEN, FORRENCE HSIN-HUNG
口試日期:2024-07-26
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系國際企業經營管理碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:51
中文關鍵詞:內部企業社會責任外部企業社會責任分配正義離職意圖
外文關鍵詞:Internal Corporate Social ResponsibilityExternal Corporate Social ResponsibilityDistributive JusticeTurnover Intention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在社會與環境永續議題高漲的氛圍下,企業前仆後繼地投入企業社會責任的浪潮,然而卻未關注到企業社會責任面向的差異可能造成員工態度和行為結果不同,反到產生人員形成離職意圖的負面效果。因此,本研究將企業社會責任區分為內部和外部兩種不同維度,探討以分配正義中介內部企業社會責任與離職意圖間的關係,與外部企業社會責任是否會調節內部企業社會責任與分配正義間的關係,進一步瞭解上述關係對離職意圖的影響。本研究採實驗法與問卷調查方式來驗證假設。實驗方面,本研究採用2 (高與低內部企業社會責任)× 2(高與低外部企業社會責任),共四種情境進行實驗操弄。問卷內容共五大部分,分別為內部與外部企業社會責任操弄檢核、分配正義量表、離職意圖量表、社會讚許量表及人口統計背景。本研究採用SPSS與PROCESS驗證假設。本研究共收集來自民營企業現職員工246份問卷,扣除無效問卷、操弄失敗及年資不足6個月之樣本,實際以155份有效問卷進行分析。研究結果顯示: (1)相較低內部企業社會責任,當內部企業社會責任高時,在員工知覺的分配正義程度較高; (2)分配正義會中介內部企業社會責任與離職意圖。本研究貢獻為: (1)分配正義是作為內部企業社會責任與離職意圖間產生的員工心理機制; (2)補充不同維度企業社會責任對員工行為的影響,彌補過去研究偏向單一企業社會責任面向的不足; (3)本研究採用情境實驗的方式進行,較能降低過去多因受試者個人認知差異而產生的測量結果偏差。最後,本研究的管理意涵為: (1)企業應強化內部企業社會責任的推動,有助於降低員工離職意圖; (2)應關注員工對分配正義的感知。
In the face of growing concerns regarding social and environmental sustainability, companies are progressively adopting corporate social responsibility initiatives. However, the potential impact of different corporate social responsibility dimensions on employee attitudes and behaviors has been overlooked, leading to negative consequences such as employees developing intentions to leave. Therefore, this study aims to differentiate corporate social responsibility into internal and external categories, examining the relationship between internal corporate social responsibility, mediated by distributive justice, and turnover intentions. Additionally, it investigates whether external corporate social responsibility moderates the relationship between internal corporate social responsibility and distributive justice, providing further insights into the impact of these relationships on turnover intention. This research conducts experimental method via questionnaire to examine our hypotheses. In the experimental aspect, this study employs a 2 (high vs. low internal corporate social responsibility) × 2 (high vs. low external corporate social responsibility) design, using four scenarios for experimental manipulation. The questionnaire includes sections on manipulating internal and external corporate social responsibility, distributive justice scale, turnover intention scale, social desirability scale, and background information. Statistical tools such as SPSS and PROCESS software will be used for hypothesis testing. This study collected 246 questionnaires from employees working in private enterprises, 155 valid responses were used after excluding invalid questionnaires, manipulation failures, and samples with less than six months of tenure. The results indicate (1) compared to low internal corporate social responsibility, high internal corporate social responsibility results in higher levels of perceived distributive justice among employees; (2) distributive justice mediates the relationship between internal corporate social responsibility and turnover intention. The contributions will include (1) identifying distributive justice as a psychological mechanism between internal corporate social responsibility and turnover intentions; (2) supplementing previous research by examining the effects of different corporate social responsibility dimensions on employee behavior; (3) using a scenario-based experimental approach to reduce measurement bias arising from individual differences. Finally, the management implications of this study are (1) companies should enhance their internal corporate social responsibility activities to reduce employee turnover intention; (2) attention should be given to employees' perceptions of distributive justice.
摘要...I
ABSTRACT...II
目錄...III
表目錄...IV
第ㄧ章 緒論...1
第二章 文獻探討...3
第一節 內部和外部企業社會責任 (Internal and External Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR)...3
第二節 分配正義 (Distributive Justice)...3
第三節 離職意圖 (Turnover Intention)...4
第四節 內部企業社會責任與分配正義的關係...4
第五節 分配正義與離職意圖的關係...5
第六節 分配正義在內部企業社會責任與離職意圖間的中介效果...5
第七節 外部企業社會責任在內部企業社會責任與分配正義間的調節效果...6
第三章 研究方法...7
第一節 研究架構與假設...7
第二節 研究樣本...7
第三節 施測程序...8
第四節 研究工具...10
第五節 資料分析方法...14
第六節 操弄檢核...15
第四章 研究結果...17
第五章 結論...23
第一節 研究結果與討論...23
第二節 研究貢獻...24
第三節 管理意涵...24
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議...24
參考文獻...26
附錄一:高內部企業社會責任×高外部企業社會責任 問卷...32
附錄二:高內部企業社會責任×低外部企業社會責任 問卷...37
附錄三:低內部企業社會責任×高外部企業社會責任 問卷...42
附錄四:低內部企業社會責任×低外部企業社會責任 問卷...47

表目錄
表1-1 內部企業社會責任操弄檢核...8
表1-2 外部企業社會責任操弄檢核...9
表2-1 內部與外部企業社會責任量表...11
表2-2 分配正義量表...12
表2-3 離職意圖量表...13
表2-4 社會讚許量表...13
表2-5 前測操弄之樣本數統計...16
表3-1 正式問卷操弄之樣本數統計...17
表3-2 敘述性統計與相關係數矩...19
表3-3 不同程度內部企業社會責任在分配正義上之t檢定...20
表3-4 分配正義與離職意圖之迴歸分析結果...20
表3-5 分配正義對內部企業社會責任與離職意圖之中介效果...21
表3-6 內、外部企業社會責任之樣本數統計...21
表3-7 內、外部企業社會責任在分配正義上之ANOVA...21
表3-8 分配正義間接效果和外部企業社會責任條件間接效果關係...22
表3-9 不同程度外部企業社會責任在分配正義上之t檢定...22
表4-1 研究結果彙整表...23
一、 中文參考文獻
Alastair marsh (2020年7月26日)。【CSRone】ESG投資小心看!漂綠、漂藍、粉紅漂洗、彩虹漂洗…… (劉奕妏,Trans.)。CSR@天下。檢自https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41550
高宜凡 (2010年3月01日)。國內趨勢〉10大最新發展,從綠色意識到打造責任競爭力。ESG遠見。檢自
https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/568
曹萃栩 (1984)。我國企業界技術專業人員離職意願之探討。管理評論, 3(3), 52-57。
黃昭勇 (2023年9月25日)。明揚永續報告書兩大員工安全指標落後同業,屏東廠大火更凸顯Social Washing問題。CSR@天下。檢自
https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/43352
羅新興、周慧珍 (2006)。組織成員知覺主管支持對其離職傾向之影響-探討工作負荷與成就動機之干擾作用。人力資源管理學報, 6(4), 67-80。

二、英文參考文獻
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic Press.
Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational research methods, 17(4), 351-371.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968.
Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social justice research, 1, 177-198.
Al Afari, T. S., & Elanain, H. M. A. (2014). Procedural and distributive justice as mediators of the relationship between interactional justice and work outcomes: An empirical study of the UAE public health care sector. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 30(4), 1091-1108.
Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploringthe relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292-318.
Barakat, S. R., Isabella, G., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Mazzon, J. A. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on employee satisfaction. Management decision, 54(9), 2325-2339.
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in organizational Behavior, 32, 63-86.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness, in Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1997). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior. Journal of retailing, 73(2), (pp. 185-210)
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Byrne, Z. S., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). The history of organizational justice: The founders speak. Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice, 2(1), 3-26.
Carmeli, A., & Freund, A. (2009). Linking perceived external prestige and intentions to leave the organization: The mediating role of job satisfaction and affective commitment. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(3), 236-250.
Chatzopoulou, E. C., Manolopoulos, D., & Agapitou, V. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: Interrelations of external and internal orientations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 795-817.
Chen, L. F., & Khuangga, D. L. (2021). Configurational paths of employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 389-403.
Cordeiro, J. J., & Tewari, M. (2015). Firm characteristics, industry context, and investor reactions to environmental CSR: A stakeholder theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 833-849.
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of vocational behavior, 58(2), 164-209.
Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78.
DeConinck, J. B., & Johnson, J. T. (2009). The effects of perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and organizational justice on turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29(4), 333-350.
Deng, W., Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2023). How corporate social responsibility moderates the relationship between distributive unfairness and organizational revenge: a deontic justice perspective. Chinese Management Studies, 17(6), 1240-1258.
Deng, X., Long, X., Schuler, D. A., Luo, H., & Zhao, X. (2020). External corporate social responsibility and labor productivity: AS‐curve relationship and the moderating role of internal CSR and government subsidy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 393-408.
El Akremi, A., Gond, J. P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2018). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of management, 44(2), 619-657.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of applied psychology, 95(6), 1104.
Farid, T., Iqbal, S., Ma, J., Castro-González, S., Khattak, A., & Khan, M. K. (2019). Employees’ perceptions of CSR, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating effects of organizational justice. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(10), 1731.
Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of management journal, 60(3), 954-985.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Flammer, C., & Kacperczyk, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1243-1267.
Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 1, 143-159.
Glavas, A., & Kelley, K. (2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Business ethics quarterly, 24(2), 165-202.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.
Greenberg, J., & Cropanzano, R. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hameed, I., Riaz, Z., Arain, G. A., & Farooq, O. (2016). How do internal and external CSR affect employees' organizational identification? A perspective from the group engagement model. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 788.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335.
Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., & Stewart, A. L. (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and psychological measurement, 49(3), 629-636.
Jia, Y., Yan, J., Liu, T., & Huang, J. (2019). How does internal and external CSR affect employees’ work engagement? Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms and boundary conditions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(14), 2476.
Joy, V. L., & Witt, L. A. (1992). Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice distributive justice relationship. Group & Organization Management, 17(3), 297-308.
Jung, H. J., & Ali, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility, organizational justice and positive employee attitudes: In the context of Korean employment relations. Sustainability, 9(11), 1992.
Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277-302.
Kim, J., Milliman, J. F., & Lucas, A. F. (2023). Effects of internal and external CSR on supportive and harmful employee attitudes. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 64(1), 104-121.
Kim, B. J., Nurunnabi, M., Kim, T. H., & Jung, S. Y. (2019). Does a good firm breed good organizational citizens? The moderating role of perspective taking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1), 161.
Ko, S. H., Moon, T. W., & Hur, W. M. (2018). Bridging service employees’ perceptions of CSR and organizational citizenship behavior: The moderated mediation effects of personal traits. Current psychology, 37, 816-831.
Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of business research, 66(10), 1716-1724.
Loi, R., Hang‐Yue, N., & Foley, S. (2006). Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(1), 101-120.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
Mahony, D., Fitzgerald, S., Crawford, F., & Hnat, H. B. (2015). Organizational justice perceptions and their relationship to organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Journal of Higher Education Management, 30(1), 13-26.
Mallory, D. B., & Rupp, D. E. (2014). Good” leadership: Using corporate social responsibility to enhance leader-member exchange. The Oxford handbook of leader member exchange, 1-20.
Martínez, P., & Del Bosque, I. R. (2013). CSR and customer loyalty: The roles of trust, customer identification with the company and satisfaction. International journal of hospitality management, 35, 89-99.
Matta, F. K., & Van Dyne, L. (2020). Understanding the disparate behavioral consequences of LMX differentiation: The role of social comparison emotions. Academy of management review, 45(1), 154-180.
Mehmood, N., Norulkamar, U., Attiq, S., & Irum, S. (2018). Relationship between distributive justice, ethical leadership, and turnover intention with the mediating effects of ethical climate. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.29), 429-435.
Mensah, H. K., Asiamah, N., & Mireku, K. (2016). The effect of organizational justice delivery on organizational commitment: Controlling for key confounding variables. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(2), 196-209.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237.
Muzumdar, P. (2012). Influence of interactional justice on the turnover behavioral decision in an organization. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 5, 31-41.
Ng, T. W., Yam, K. C., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 107-137.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & society, 43(3), 296-319.
Pfeffer, J., & Lawler, J. (1980). Effects of job alternatives, extrinsic rewards, and behavioral commitment on attitude toward the organization: A field test of the insufficient justification paradigm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38-56.
Phayoonpun, T., & Mat, N. (2014). Organizational justice and turnover intention: The mediation role or job satisfaction. International Postgraduate Business Journal, 6(2), 1-21.
Rai, G. S. (2013). Impact of organizational justice on satisfaction, commitment and turnover intention: Can fair treatment by organizations make a difference in their workers’ attitudes and behaviors?. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 260-284.
Rosenman, R., Tennekoon, V., & Hill, L. G. (2011). Measuring bias in self-reported data. International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 2(4), 320-332.
Rosati, F., Costa, R., Calabrese, A., & Pedersen, E. R. G. (2018). Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1306-1319.
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and Turnover Among Hospital Employees, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Rupp, D. E., & Mallory, D. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 211-236.
Sarfraz, M., Qun, W., Abdullah, M. I., & Alvi, A. T. (2018). Employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility impact on employee outcomes: Mediating role of organizational justice for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability, 10(7), 2429.
Sobczak, A., Debucquet, G., & Havard, C. (2006). The impact of higher education on students' and young managers' perception of companies and CSR: an exploratory analysis. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 6(4), 463-474.
Suifan, T. S., Diab, H., & Abdallah, A. B. (2017). Does organizational justice affect turnover-intention in a developing country? The mediating role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Management Development, 36(9), 1137-1148.
Tamm, K., Eamets, R., & Mõtsmees, P. (2010). Relationship between corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction: The case of Baltic countries. The university of Tartu faculty of economics and business administration working paper, (76-2010).
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of business ethics, 85, 411-427.
Tziner, A., Oren, L., Bar, Y., & Kadosh, G. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, organizational justice and job satisfaction: how do they interrelate, if at all?. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 67-72.
Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of management studies, 43(8), 1703-1725.
Werther Jr, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Sage.
Zhou, Z., Luo, B. N., & Tang, T. L. P. (2018). Corporate social responsibility excites ‘exponential’positive employee engagement: The Matthew effect in CSR and sustainable policy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 339-354.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20290804)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊