跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.171) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/17 10:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:孫聿謙
研究生(外文):SUN, YU-CHIEN
論文名稱:平板電腦融入國中七年級生活科技教學之歷程與成效研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on the Process and Effects of Integrating Tablets into Seventh-grade Living Technology Instruction in Junior High Schools
指導教授:陳君瑜陳君瑜引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Chun-Yu
口試委員:林玄良林祖強
口試委員(外文):Hsuan-Liang LinTzu-Chiang Lin
口試日期:2024-07-03
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:工業科技教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:專業科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:107
中文關鍵詞:平板融入教學生活科技學習環境感受SAMR模型
外文關鍵詞:Integrating Tablets into InstructionLiving TechnologyPerceptions of the Learning EnvironmentSAMR Model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:7
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究為探討平板電腦融入國中七年級生活科技教學的歷程與成效。本研究採用設計本位研究,進行兩次課程的迭代(Iterative)實施,運用SAMR模型來檢視教師運用平板科技教學的層級。以教室觀察紀錄和教學省思札記、學習單、課後回饋評量、學習環境感受問卷以及SAMR檢核表等資料進行分析。研究對象為國中七年級兩個班共35位學生,課程內容主要為圖學及電腦軟體繪圖的應用。
研究結果顯示SAMR模型的四個層級在本次課程中都有展現,並將平板融入教學的策略歸類為「理論說明」、「創意與互動發想」、「實作活動」與「數位工具的整合」四項。研究者歸類在課程進行中遇到的困難包含:「硬體設備」、「學習者的狀況」、「教學設計問題」以及「耗時」四項。平板融入教學前後學生的學習環境感受,經統計結果分析並沒有達到統計上的顯著差異,但對於學習成效的部分就有達顯著差異的增加。據此研究結果,研究者對於現職教師以及未來研究者提出了相對應的建議。
This study explores the process and effectiveness of integrating tablets into seventh-grade living technology instruction. Using design-based research, two iterative course implementations were conducted, utilizing the SAMR model to assess levels of tablet integration. Data included classroom observation records, teaching reflection notes, worksheets, post-lesson feedback evaluations, learning environment perception questionnaires, and the SAMR checklist. The subjects were 35 seventh-grade students from two classes, focusing on graphics and computer software drawing applications.
Results showed all four SAMR levels were exhibited. Strategies for tablet integration were categorized into "theoretical explanation," "creative and interactive ideation," "practical activities," and "integration of digital tools." Challenges included "hardware issues," "learner conditions," "teaching design problems," and "time consumption." Although statistical analysis showed no significant differences in students' perceptions of the learning environment, there was a significant improvement in learning outcomes. The researcher offers recommendations for teachers and future researchers based on these findings.
目    錄
目    錄iii
表    次v
圖    次vi
第一章 緒  論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的6
第三節 名詞釋義7
第四節 研究範圍與限制9
第二章 文獻探討11
第一節 平板融入教學的模式與研究11
第二節 生活科技之平板教學實踐26
第三章 研究方法與步驟31
第一節 研究方法31
第二節 研究流程33
第三節 研究場域及參與者37
第四節 研究工具40
第五節 資料處理與分析45
第四章 研究結果與討論47
第一節 運用平板在圖學課程上的SAMR教學歷程47
第二節 學生學習環境感受71
第三節 學生學習成效74
第五章 結論與建議77
第一節 結論77
第二節 建議81
參考文獻83

附    錄
附錄一 教室觀察記錄及教學省思札記紀錄96
附錄二 學習單範本97
附錄三 課後評量範例99
附錄四 平板融入生活科技教學之學習環境感受問卷101
附錄五 「SAMR」專家意見彙整表104
 
表    次
表2-1  行動學習的定義12
表2-2  行動學習相關研究12
表3-1  專家名單42
表3-2  SAMR檢核表43
表3-3  資料編碼說明表45
表4-1  第一階段課程大綱與平板運用策略48
表4-2  第一階段SAMR檢核表整理52
表4-3  第二階段課程大綱與平板運用策略54
表4-4  第二階段SAMR檢核表整理57
表4 5  「平板融入生活科技教學之學習環境感受量表」各構面及總分之無母數成對樣本檢定分析72
表4 6  「平板融入生活科技教學之學習環境感受量表」經無母數成對樣本檢定後有顯著差異之題目73
表4 7  學生成績評量標準74
表4 8  學生成績之第一階段與第二階段之無母數成對樣本檢定分析74


 
圖    次
圖2-1  SAMR模型24
圖3-1  研究架構圖32
圖3-2  研究流程圖33
圖3-3  課程架構圖35
王亭之(2021)。偏鄉國民小學運用因材網教學成功案例之研究 ─以高雄市某國小為例〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-2412202116163735
王瑞婉、王慧婷、鈕文英、張正芬(2021)。平板電腦結合影片示範教學介入包裹對國中重度自閉症學生生活技能之成效。特殊教育研究學刊,46(1),29-57。
吳和堂(2021)。教育論文寫作與實用技巧(第六版)。高等教育文化事業有限公司。
李文獻、林美君、張俊彥、賴信志、林慧敏(2020)。運用數位科技於戶外教育場域之科學繪本教學設計─從教學者觀點探討。科學教育月刊,(428),11-31。
李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。心理出版社。
林家楠(2020)。運用平板於課室之教學歷程探討-以聽障中學生學習地理閱讀為例。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,141-156。
林家楠、洪儷瑜(2020)。聽覺障礙中學生運用平板學習地理閱讀之行動研究。特殊教育研究學刊,45(3),87-116。
林國欽(2020)。行動裝置融入體育線上教學之探究-以羽球教學為例。學校體育,(177),27-38。
邱晉昌(2023)。以 Quizizz 線上教學平台輔助國小數學教學之成效研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu202301264
洪祥偉、陳五洲(2016)。以平板電腦引導後設認知學習歷程對桌球學習成效之研究。臺灣運動教育學報,11(2),55-79。https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.2016.11(2).04
孫聿謙、陳君瑜(2024)。平板融入生活科技教學之學習環境感受量表發展。載於林玄良、張美珍(主編),2024科技教育研究與發展學術研討會論文集(頁159-173)。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
國中小自造教育及科技輔導中心(2023年10月13日)。設計圖繪製。國中小科技領域微課程。https://techminicourse.mail.nknu.edu.tw/%E5%9C%8B%E4%B8%AD%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80/%E4%B8%83%E5%B9%B4%E7%B4%9A/course9#h.ob0a8n1fufll


國家教育研究院(2019)。十二年國民基本教育國民中學暨普通型高級中等學校科技領域課程綱要手冊(定稿版)。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52
張弘毅(2023)。平板電腦應用於提升國小高年級學生學習動機與閱讀表現之行動研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺中教育大學。
張迺貞、周天(2015)。運用Kirkpatrick模式評估資訊法律課程在數位學習環境之學習成效。教育資料與圖書館學,52(4),417-450。
張基成、林冠佑(2016)。從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習-學習成效、心流體驗與認知負荷。科學教育學刊,24(3),221-248。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2016.2403.01
張靖敏、張道宜、劉雅萍、陳美瑩(2022)。因材網:教育部人工智慧知識結構分析診斷及適性學習平台之析論。台灣教育研究期刊,3(1),313-331。
教育部(2021)。班班有網路生生用平板-全面推動中小學數位學習精進方案(110年11月25)。教育部。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=9F7133D453CC16F2
許雅筑(2023)。生活科技八年級微課程實施歷程與成效之研究-以「廢材風力機械玩具」為例。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/e3hpr7。
陳立庭(2017)。3D繪圖軟體SketchUp融入生活科技展開圖學習活動之行動研究。科技與人力教育季刊,3(4),14-25。
陳怡婷(2021)。數位閱讀的浪潮:淺談科技融入高中閱讀教學。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(9),126-131。
陳威如(2020)。平板電腦融入教學之困境及其改善策略:以臺北市一所小學為例。﹝碩士論文。國立東華大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q2n264。
陳紀錚(2017)。班級氣氛量表之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(7),138-143。
陳斐卿(2021)。「生生用平板」的網絡效果:以國小數位寫作學習平臺為例。教育研究與發展期刊,17(4),33-67。
陳琦媛(2016)。「平板電腦補救教學計畫」執行情形之探討。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(2),113-140。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492016080902005
陳逸姍、范斯淳(2022)。以科技接受模式探討國小藝術才能專長線上教學實施之現況-以舞蹈班為例。工業科技教育學刊,(15),102-120。https://doi.org/10.6306/JITE.202211_(15).0006
陳閔琳(2023)。數位虛擬實境學習環境及學習順序對國中生英語情境學習成效、態度及動機之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301816
温富榮、李錫鑫(2018)一所高中翻轉教學紀實與分享。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(8),62-67。
黃直美(2023)。從[中小學數位學習精進方案]談行動學習應用於提升學生的英語學習成效。臺灣教育評論月刊,12(10),106-111。
楊凱悌、王子華、邱美虹(2011)。互動式電子白板教室環境感受量表之發展。數位學習科技期刊,3(4),1-18。
盧曉慧、林國賓(2017)。行動學習融入資優班合作式主題探索課程之行動研究。臺北市立大學特殊教育發展期刊,(63),57-68。
蕭顯勝、蔡福興、游光昭(2005)。在行動學習環境中實施科技教育教學活動之初探。生活科技教育,38(6),40-57。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2005.38(6).4
賴阿福、牟筱萍(2018)。行動APP融入國小英語差異化教學活動設計與省思。國教新知,65(4),21-42。https://doi.org/10.6701/TEEJ.201812_65(4).0003
謝宛庭(2020)。食物實作影片融入家政課程之討論。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(5),113-117。
藍宇君(2016)。國中生活科技運用合作學習與團體作業教學之探討。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p62u44。
顏佩如(2023)。國小師資生運用平板教學影響因素,專業能力與評估觀點之研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,12(8),121-126。
 


 
Abdous,M. H. (2019). Influence of satisfaction and preparedness on online students' feelings of anxiety. The Internet and Higher Education, 41,34-44.
Al-Huneini,H., Walker, S. A., & Badger, R. (2020). Introducing tablet computers to arural primary school: An activity theory case study. Computers &Education, 143, 103648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103648
Al-Khalidi,I., & Nizwa, O. (2021). Examining Teachers' Beliefs on Developing a DigitalPedagogical Framework Based on the SAMR Model for Undergraduate EnglishLanguage Learning. International Journal of English Language Education, 9(1),106-125.
Armstrong M, Dopp C, Welsh J (2018) Design-based research. In: Kimmons R(ed) The Students’ Guide to Learning Design and Research. EdTechBooks. 
https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/design-based_research
Asanov, I.,Flores, F., McKenzie, D., Mensmann, M., & Schulte, M. (2021).Remote-learning, time-use, and mental health of Ecuadorian high-school studentsduring the COVID-19 quarantine. World development, 138, 105225.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105225
Asim,S., Ponners, P. J., Bartlett, C., Parker, A., & Star, R. (2020).Differentiating Instruction: For Middle School Students in Virtual LearningEnvironments. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 86(3).
Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020).Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes. Learningand Instruction, 69, 101350.
Behnamnia,N., Kamsin, A., & Ismail, M. A. B. (2020). The landscape of research on theuse of digital game-based learning apps to nurture creativity among youngchildren: A review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37,100666.
Bernacki,M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning,and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobiletechnology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60,101827.
Blundell,C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of theapplication of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3,100093.
Buongiorno, D., Michelini, M., Pagotto, S., & Ricci, D. (2018).Alternanza scuola-lavoro nella prospettiva di ricerca con APP sul suono. Nuovimetodi e saperi, 391-400.
Criollo-C,S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021).Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. AppliedSciences, 11(9), 4111.
Davis,F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptanceof information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Deslauriers,L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019).Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to beingactively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257.
Dindar, M.,Alikhani, I., Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., & Seppänen, T. (2019). Examiningshared monitoring in collaborative learning: A case of a recurrencequantification analysis approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 100,335-344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.004
Fernández-Gutiérrez,M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in educationleading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish AutonomousCommunities. Computers & Education, 157, 103969.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
Fojtik,R. (2015). Ebooks and mobile devices in education. Procedia-Social andBehavioral Sciences, 182, 742-745.
Fraser,B. J. (1982). Assessment of Learning Environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) and My Class Inventory (MCI). Third Version.
Grant, M.M. (2019). Difficulties in defining mobile learning: Analysis, designcharacteristics, and implications. Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, 67, 361-388.
Haleem,A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role ofdigital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations andComputers, 3, 275-285.
Hamilton,E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitutionaugmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review andsuggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433-441.
Hammer, M.,Göllner, R., Scheiter, K., Fauth, B., & Stürmer, K. (2021). For whom dotablets make a difference? Examining student profiles and perceptions ofinstruction with tablets. Computers & Education, 166, 104147.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104147
Harry,D., Gordon, E., & Schmandt, C. (2012, February). Setting the stage forinteraction: a tablet application to augment group discussion in a seminarclass. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer supportedcooperative work (pp. 1071-1080).
Hu, P.J., Hui, W., Clark, T. H., Milton, J., Ma, W., & Tam, K. Y. (2005).Examininge-learning effectiveness, outcomes and learning style: A LongitudinalStudy. Retrieved from yu.edu/~wkma/ref/hu_hui_clark_milton_ma_tam.pdf.
Huang, Y.M., Liang, T. H., Su, Y. N., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Empowering personalizedlearning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary schoolstudents. Educational technology research and development, 60, 703-722.
Hughes,J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006, March). Assessing technologyintegration: The RAT–replacement, amplification, and transformation-framework.In Society for information technology & teacher educationinternational conference (pp. 1616-1620). Association for theAdvancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Jahnke,I., & Liebscher, J. (2020). Three types of integrated course designs forusing mobile technologies to support creativity in higher education. Computers& Education, 146, 103782.
Kang, B.(2021). How the COVID-19 pandemic is reshaping the education service. TheFuture of Service Post-COVID-19 Pandemic, Volume 1: Rapid Adoption of DigitalService Technology, 15-36.
Kim,J. H., & Park, H. (2019). Effects of smartphone-based mobile learning innursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian nursingresearch, 13(1), 20-29.
Krishan,I. Q., & Al-rsa'i, M. S. (2023). The Effect of Technology-OrientedDifferentiated Instruction on Motivation to learn Science. InternationalJournal of Instruction, 16(1).
Lennox, J.,Reuge, N., & Benavides, F. (2021). UNICEF’s lessons learned from theeducation response to the COVID-19 crisis and reflections on the implicationsfor education policy. International Journal of Educational Development,85, 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102429
Liebe,U., Glenk, K., Oehlmann, M., & Meyerhoff, J. (2015). Does the use of mobiledevices (tablets and smartphones) affect survey quality and choice behaviour inweb surveys?. Journal of choice modelling, 14, 17-31.
Liu,X. (2022). The Effects of Tablet Use on Student Learning Achievements,Participation, and Motivation at Different Levels. InternationalJournal of Technology-Enhanced Education (IJTEE), 1(1), 1-17.
MacLeod, J., Yang, H. H., Zhu, S., & Li, Y. (2018).Understanding students’ preferences toward the smart classroom learning environment: Development andvalidation of an instrument. Computers & Education, 122,80-91.
Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). An online questionnaire forevaluating students’ and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments.Research in Science Education, 35, 221-244.
Mutambara,D., & Bayaga, A. (2021). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance forSTEM education in rural areas. Computers & Education, 160,104010.
Nikolopoulou,K. (2020). Secondary education teachers’ perceptions of mobile phone and tabletuse in classrooms: benefits, constraints and concerns. Journal of Computersin Education, 7(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00156-7
Phillips,H. N. (2021). Re-imagining higher education: A cohort of teachers’ experiencesto face the ‘new normal’during COVID19. International Journal of EducationalResearch Open, 2, 100069.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100069
Prensky, M.(2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really thinkdifferently?. On the horizon, 9(6), 1-6.
Puentedura,R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/.
Puentedura,R. R. (2013). SAMR: Getting to transformation. Retrieved May, 31,265-283.
Rahali,E. A., Chikhaoui, A., Khattabi, K. E., & Ouzennou, F. (2023). Learning withTablets in the Primary School: Learners‟ Perceptions and Impact onMotivation and Academic Performance. International Journal ofInformation and Education Technology, 13(3).489-495.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects ofintegrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learningperformance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers &Education, 94, 252-275.
Szymkowiak,A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021).Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, andtechnology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65,101565.
Tirado-Morueta,R., Berlanga-Fernández, I., Vales-Villamarín, H., Guzmán-Franco, M. D.,Duarte-Hueros, A., & Aguaded-Gómez, J. I. (2020). Understanding theengagement of elementary school students in one-to-one iPad programs using anadaptation of self-system model of motivational development. Computers inHuman Behavior, 105, 106224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106224
Traxler, J.(2010). Students and mobile devices. Alt-j, 18(2), 149-160.
Tsai, C.-C. (2008). The preferencestoward constructivist Internet-based learning environments among university students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1),16-31.
Wahyuni,S., Mujiyanto, J., Rukmini, D., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020, June). Teachers’technology integration into English instructions: SAMR model. In InternationalConference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019) (pp.546-550). Atlantis Press.
Wang,A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning–Aliterature review. Computers & Education, 149,103818.
Wang,J., Tigelaar, D. E., Luo, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher beliefs,classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroomlearning environment: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 183,104501.
Xodabande,I., & Hashemi, M. R. (2023). Learning English with electronic textbooks onmobile devices: Impacts on university students’ vocabulary development. Educationand Information Technologies, 28(2), 1587-1611.
Yamaç,A., Öztürk, E., & Mutlu, N. (2020). Effect of digital writing instructionwith tablets on primary school students’ writing performance and writingknowledge. Computers & Education, 157, 103981.
Yang,J., Yu, H., Gong, C., & Chen, N. S. (2016). Students’ perceptions andbehaviour in technology-rich classroom and multi-media classroom. EurasiaJournal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3),621-647.

Zhang,Q., & Yu, Z. (2021). A literature review on the influence of Kahoot! Onlearning outcomes, interaction, and collaboration. Education andInformation Technologies, 26(4), 4507-4535.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊