跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.171) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 08:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張幼青
研究生(外文):You-Qing Zhang
論文名稱:以自我效能感和工作形塑為雙中介效應探討工作自主性以及自我覺知就業力的關聯性
論文名稱(外文):The serial mediation effect of self-efficacy and job crafting in the relationship of job autonomy and self-perceived employability
指導教授:陳世哲陳世哲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen,Shyh-Jer
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理全英語碩士學位學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:英文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:工作形塑工作自主權自我覺知就業能力連續中介模型自我效能感員工發展組織效能
外文關鍵詞:job autonomyself-perceived employabilityself-efficacyjob craftingserial mediation modelquantitative researchemployee developmentorganizational effectiveness
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
中文摘要
自我覺知就業力的議題,近來引起許多組織的關切,尤其在這變化快速且相當競爭的職場環境中,用人以及留才成了企業高度重視的議題。
本研究主要探討(1)工作自主性和自我覺知就業力之間的關係;(2)自我效能感是否對自我覺知就業力以及工作自主性產生中介效果;(3)同時也探究工作形塑是否對工作自主性以及自我覺知就業力帶來中介效果:(4)自我效能感和工作形塑在工作自主性以及自我覺知就業力之間,是否產生雙中介效果。本研究使用連續雙中介模型並且採用問卷調查法進行定量分析,在知名社群媒體平台中發送電子問卷,最後在回收350份問卷中,篩選出324份有效問卷(n = 324)。最終結果發現:(1)工作自主性對自我覺知就業力有顯著關聯性;(2)自我效能感在工作自主性和自我覺知就業力之間的關係中,無中介效果;(3)工作形塑在工作自主性和自我覺知就業力的關係中,存在著中介效果;(4)自我效能感和工作形塑在工作自主性和自我覺知就業力的研究模型中,有雙中介效果。此研究結果呼應現今變化快速的就業環境中的議題,例如:員工留任、員工發展和組織效能。
關鍵字:工作形塑、工作自主權、自我覺知就業能力、連續中介模型、自我效能感、員工發展、組織效能
Abstract
Self-perceived employability has recently received a remarkable attention in organizations due to the dynamics in the workplace. This study concentrated on (1) analyzing the relationship between job autonomy and self-perceived employability; (2) exploring whether self-efficacy mediates the link between job autonomy and self-perceived employability; (3) also exploring whether job crafting mediates the link between job autonomy and self-perceived employability; (4) finally examining whether the relationship between job autonomy and self-perceived employability is sequentially mediated by self-efficacy and job crafting. To achieve these goals, this study used a serial mediation model and conducted a quantitative research using survey method and electronic questionnaire instrument to deliver the electronic questionnaire via various social media platforms, finally this study generated the data of 350 and 324 valid data at hand (n = 324). The results demonstrated that (1) job autonomy has significant effect on self-perceived employability; (2) self-efficacy does not have mediation effect upon the relationship between job autonomy and self-perceived employability; (3) job crafting has a mediating effect upon the relationship between job autonomy and self-perceived employability; (4) the relationship between job autonomy and self-perceived employability is sequentially mediated by self-efficacy and job crafting. These results have insightful meaning to the recent organizational behavior literature that can address the nowadays volatile working environment to retain employees and enhance employee development and organizational effectiveness.


Keywords: job autonomy, self-perceived employability, self-efficacy, job crafting, serial mediation model, quantitative research, employee development, organizational effectiveness
Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
table of contents iv
Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 research background and motivation 1
1.2 research gap and objectives 3
1.3 research scope 5
Chapter II. LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Job autonomy 6
2.2 Self-perceived employability 8
2.3 Job autonomy and self-perceived employability 10
2.4 The mediator: self-efficacy 12
2.5 The mediator: job crafting 14
2.6 A serial and double-mediation effect 18
Chapter III. RESEARCH METHODS 20
3.1 Research model 20
3.2 Research design and procedures 21
3.3 Research sampling and data collection 22
3.4 Measurement of variables 22
3.4.1 Dependent variable: self-perceived employability 23
3.4.2 Independent variable: job autonomy 23
3.4.3 Mediator: self-efficacy 24
3.4.4 Mediator: job crafting 24
Chapter IV. DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 26
4.1 Descriptive statistics and analysis 26
4.2 first order factor assessment – reliability and validity 30
4.3 discriminant validity 33
4.4 Second order factor – reliability and validity 35
4.5 assessment of the r-square, r-square adjusted, and q-square predict 35
4.6 the measurement of f-square 37
4.7 path coefficient result 37
4.8 hypotheses testing 39
4.9 common method variance 42
Chapter V. CONCLUSION 44
5.1 Summary and interpretation of findings 44
5.2 implications 48
5.2.1 Theoretical implication 48
5.2.2 practical implication 48
5.3 suggestions and future research 50
refferences 52
appendix 58

Table of Figures
figure 1.1 meta-analysis by rudolph et al., 2017 15
figure 2.1 theoretical framework 20
figure 3.1 theoretical framework demonstrating path coefficient and p value 39

Table of Tables
table 4.1 descriptive analysis (n=324) 29
table 4.2 first order factor 31
table 4.3 the fornell-larker (1981) criterion-discriminant validity 33
table 4.4 discriminant validity – cross loadings 34
table 4.5 second order factor – reliability and validity 35
table 4.6 r-square, r-square adjusted and q-square predict 36
table 4.7 f-square 37
table 4.8 path coefficient result 38
table 4.9 hypotheses testing result 42
REFERENCES
Abowd, J. M., & Kramarz, F. (2003). The costs of hiring and separations. Labor Economics, 10(5), 499-530.
Ahuja, M. K., Chudoba, K. M., Kacmar, C. J., McKnight, D. H., & George, J. F. (2007). IT road warriors: Balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. MIS Quarterly, 1-17.
Aggarwal, U., & Bhargava, S. (2009). Reviewing the relationship between human resource practices and psychological contract and their impact on employee attitude and behaviors: A conceptual model. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(1), 4-31.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 389-411.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586.
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871-915.
Berntson, E., & Marklund, S. (2007). The relationship between perceived employability and subsequent health. Work & Stress, 21(3), 279-292.
Bozeman, B., & Crow, M. (1990). The environments of US R&D laboratories: political and market influences. Policy Sciences, 23(1), 25-56.
Cohen, L. H., Towbes, L. C., & Flocco, R. (1988). Effects of induced mood on self-reported life events and perceived and received social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 669.
Das, B. L., & Baruah, M. (2013). Employee retention: A review of literature. Journal of Business and Management, 14(2), 8-16.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580.
De Cuyper, N., De Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 25-51.
Dekker, J., Stauder, A., & Penedo, F. J. (2017). Proposal for an update of the definition and scope of behavioral medicine. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 1-4.
Thi-Ngoan Dinh. Perceived employability and job crafting: three sequential studies on Vietnamese young professionals. Business administration. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I, 2023. English.
Dodd, N. G., & Ganster, D. C. (1996). The interactive effects of variety, autonomy, and feedback on attitudes and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 329-347.
Dong, B., Sivakumar, K., Evans, K. R., & Zou, S. (2016). Recovering coproduced service failures: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators of locus of recovery. Journal of Service Research, 19(3), 291-306.
Dries, N., Forrier, A., De Vos, A., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Self-perceived employability, organization-rated potential, and the psychological contract. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 565-581.
Duggal, H. K., Lim, W. M., Khatri, P., Thomas, A., & Shiva, A. (2024). The state of the art on self‐perceived employability. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(4), 88-110.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gellatly, I. R., & Irving, P. G. (2001). Personality, autonomy, and contextual performance of managers. Human Performance, 14(3), 231-245.
Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485.
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). 7 redesigning work design theories: the rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317-375.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hakanen, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands-resources model to predict engagement: Analysing a conceptual model. Work engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 2(1), 85-101.
Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918-1927.
Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: developing a framework for policy analysis (Vol. 107). London: DfEE.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307-324.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (2015). The social psychology of organizations. In Organizational Behavior 2 (pp. 152-168). Routledge.
Kaur, S. P. (2013). Variables in research. Indian Journal of Research and Reports in Medical Sciences, 3(4), 36-38.
Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 934.
Lin, J. T. P., & Ping, N. C. L. (2016). Perceived job autonomy and employee engagement as predictors of organizational commitment. The Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 29(1), 1-to.
Le, H., Schmidt, F. L., & Putka, D. J. (2009). The multifaceted nature of measurement artifacts and its implications for estimating construct-level relationships. Organizational Research Methods, 12(1), 165-200.
Mäkikangas, A., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Antecedents of daily team job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(3), 421-433.
Maria, A. D., Yulianto, H., Palupiningtyas, D., & Usodo, H. (2022, February). Relationship between transformational leadership, proactive personality, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity at food processing SMEs in Indonesia. In Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship (Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 257-274). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
Nauta, A., Van Vianen, A., Van der Heijden, B., Van Dam, K., & Willemsen, M. (2009). Understanding the factors that promote employability orientation: the impact of employability culture, career satisfaction, and role breadth self‐efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(2), 233-251.
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.
Park, R. (2018). The roles of OCB and automation in the relationship between job autonomy and organizational performance: a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(6), 1139-1156.
Purwanto, B. M. (2002). The effect of salesperson stress factors on job performance. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 17(2), 150-169.
Qenani, E., MacDougall, N., & Sexton, C. (2014). An empirical study of self-perceived employability: Improving the prospects for student employment success in an uncertain environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(3), 199-213.
Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5(1/2), 52-63.
Ressia, S., & Shaw, A. (2022). Employability outcomes of human resource management and employment relations graduates. Labour and Industry, 32(2), 178-193.
Rothwell, A., & Arnold, J. (2007). Self‐perceived employability: Development and validation of a scale. Personnel Review, 36(1), 23-41.
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112-138.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Saragih, S. (2011). The effects of job autonomy on work outcomes: Self efficacy as an intervening variable. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 4(3), 203-215.
Saragih, S., Margaretha, M., & Anantyanda, L. (2021). JOB AUTONOMY, JOB CRAFTING AND EMPLOYEES’WELL-BEING DURING WORKING FROM HOME. Journal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 23(2), 177-185.
Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2).
Sok, J., Blomme, R., & Tromp, D. (2013). The use of the psychological contract to explain self-perceived employability. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 274-284.
Timming, A. R., Carpini, J. A., Hirst, T. M., Tian, A. W., & Notebaert, L. (2024). Experienced incivility undermines the positive effects of job autonomy on mental and physical health. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(4), 563-586.
Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-9.
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186.
Tims, M., B. Bakker, A., & Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490-507.
Wang, G., & Netemyer, R. G. (2002). The effects of job autonomy, customer demandingness, and trait competitiveness on salesperson learning, self-efficacy, and performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 217-228.
Wang, H., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). A review of job-crafting research: The role of leader behaviors in cultivating successful job crafters. Proactivity at Work, 95-122.
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44(1), 352-386.
Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477-514.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20270819)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊