跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.247.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/09 08:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王晨珉
研究生(外文):WANG,CHEN-MIN
論文名稱:老人憂鬱量表建構效度之檢驗
論文名稱(外文):Investigation of construct validity in the Geriatric Depression Scale
指導教授:邱恩琦邱恩琦引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHIU,EN-CHI
口試委員:邱尚志孫若馨邱恩琦
口試委員(外文):QIU,SHANG-ZHISUN,RUO-XINCHIU,EN-CHI
口試日期:2024-06-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北護理健康大學
系所名稱:長期照護研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:護理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:66
中文關鍵詞:老人憂鬱量表羅序分析建構效度收斂效度
外文關鍵詞:Geriatric Depression ScaleRasch analysisconstruct validityconvergent validity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:23
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
背景與目的:憂鬱是老年人口常見的心理疾病,根據衛福部111年老年人死因統計結果顯示,每十萬人口中有28.4位的老年人死因為自殺,其中又以70%為憂鬱症患者,顯示自殺與憂鬱症有高度關聯,可見老年憂鬱症除了影響生活機能,嚴重者還可能導致生命危險。透過良好的評估工具量表來評估老人憂鬱的程度,以正確判斷老人憂鬱情形。過去已驗證再測信度 (test-retest reliability)、內部一致性 (internal consistency)、區辨效度 (discriminative validity)。尚未有研究建構效度,因此本研究目的是老人憂鬱量表 (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS)驗證於老人的建構效度 (construct validity),包括收斂效度 (convergent validity),以確認量表之臨床應用價值,提供臨床專業人員在面對老人憂鬱或研究相關議題時,可使用本研究驗證過之老人憂鬱量表,迅速且正確判斷老人憂鬱情形。
研究方法:本研究收案200位65歲以上意識清楚的養護機構老人,並填寫3種憂鬱量表分別為: GDS完整版、貝克憂鬱量表第二版 (Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition, BDI-II)、流行病學研究中心之憂鬱量表 (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D)。使用羅序分析 (Rasch analysis),檢驗GDS之單向度建構 (unidimensionality),且GDS完整版及各短版,與BDI-II和CES-D之相關性,以確定GDS之收斂效度。
研究結果:本研究採用羅序分析兩個合適度統計值:近合適度 (infit mean square) 和遠合適度 (outfit mean square),檢驗GDS題目是否符合單向度建構,不符合判定標準之題目,則刪除。本研究顯示30題GDS數據中11題、16題、19題、22題、27題、29題,共6題不符合判定標準之題目,刪題後,繼續執行羅序分析,此24題符合單向度建構合適度統計值之標準0.5~1.5之間。而本研究顯示GDS 30題完整版、24題刪減版與各短版15題、10題、5題、4題與BDI-II及CES-D之收斂效度呈現中度相關 (r = 0.41~0.62)。
結論:根據本研究羅序分析之比較結果,GDS完整版量表刪題後24題量表符合單向度建構,此24題分數加總能代表老年人心理狀態。建議長期照護相關專業人員使用24題之GDS,以明確地評估老年人之憂鬱狀況。



Background and purpose:
Depression is a common mental illness among the elderly population. According to statistics on the causes of death among the elderly from the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2022, out of every 100,000 people, 28.4 elderly people died from suicide, and 70% of them were patients with depression, showing that suicide and depression are highly correlated. It seems that depression not only impacts life function, but can also be life-threatening for elderly people. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the degree of depression in elderly people through a good assessment tool. Some previous researches have verified the test-retest reliability, internal consistency and discriminative validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) but there is no research on the construct validity. The purpose of this study was to verify the construct validity of the GDS in the elderly, and certify the value of the GDS in clinical application. This research provides clinical professionals with a validated depression scale to quickly and accurately determine the degree of depression in elderly people or for conducting research on related issues.
Methods: This study enrolled 200 institutionalized elderly people over 65 years old and they each filled out three depression scales: the full version of the GDS, the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Rasch analysis was used to test the unidimensionality of the full version and each short-forms of the GDS, and to verify the convergent validity estimating correlations among the GDS, BDI-II, and CES-D.
Results: The study used two goodness of fit statistics from Rasch analysis: infit mean square and outfit mean square. The two methods were used to test whether each aspect of an item corresponded to the one-way construct and if the item did not meet the criteria, then it was deleted. This study showed 6 items in total, item 11 ,16 ,19 ,22, 27 and 29, did not correspond to the one way construct out of the 30 items of the GDS. After deleting the items, Rasch analysis was conducted again, showing that 24 items in total corresponded to the one way construct ranging between 0.5~1.5. This study demonstrates the complete 30-item GDS, the reduced 24-item version, and the shorter versions of 15, 10, 5, and 4 items had moderate correlations (r = 0.41~0.62) with the BDI-II and CES-D, showing moderate correlations.
Conclusion: According to the comparative results from Rasch analysis, the 24-item version of the GDS met the criteria for a one-way construct scale. The total score can represent the psychological status of elderly individuals. The 24-item GDS is recommended for clinical and institutional or community professionals, as it can provide a accurate analysis and evaluation of the elderly's depression status.

目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract iii
目次 v
表次 vii
圖次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與重要性 3
第三節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻查證 6
第一節 老人憂鬱介紹及現況 6
第二節 養護機構老人之心理狀況 10
第三節 老人憂鬱量表及其心理計量特性之內容與探討 14
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究對象 22
第二節 研究程序 23
第三節 研究工具 24
第四節 資料分析 26
第四章 研究結果 27
第一節 基本人口學之結果 27
第二節 分析結果 29
第五章 結論 38
第一節 討論 38
第二節 總結 42
參考文獻 43
中文文獻 43
英文文獻 47
附錄 51
附錄一:GDS授權同意證明 51
附錄二:CES-D授權同意證明 52
附錄三:BDI-II授權同意證明 53


中文文獻
古永利、林明燈(2022)。老人憂鬱症狀,生命意義及相關心理社會因素之探討:以榮家老年住民為例。台灣老年醫學暨老年學會雜誌,17(2),112-126。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.29461/TGGa.202205_17(2).0002
鄭偉伸、黃宗正、李明濱、廖士程(2016)。老人憂鬱症與自殺防治。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,11(1),16-30。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.29461/TGG.201602_11(1).0002
吳政航、王冠元、李純瑩、葉怡君(2017)。以身體症狀為主要表徵之非典型老年憂鬱症-個案報告。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,12(3),216-223。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.29461/TGG.201708_12(3).0006
林正祥、陳佩含、林惠生(2010)。臺灣老人憂鬱狀態變化及其影響因子。人口學刊,(41),67-109。https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6191/jps.2010.7
何曉婷、劉立凡、郭乃文(2016)。台灣南部地區老年憂鬱情緒之影響因子探討。台灣家庭醫學雜誌,26(2),100-108。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.3966/168232812016062602004
莊凱迪、蔡佳芬(2008)。老年人的憂鬱症。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌。3(4),239-247。
翁菁甫、林坤霈、詹鼎正(2014)。老人憂鬱與認知功能障礙。內科學誌,25(3),
158-164。https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6314/JIMT.2014.25(3).05
林美玲、曾紀芬、彭少貞(2014)。社區憂鬱老人自殺評估與篩檢指引之發展。慈濟技術學院學報,(22),1-18。
邱皓政(2019)。量化研究與統計分析: SPSS 與R 資料分析範例解析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
潘璦琬、許瑋玲(2008)。羅序模式檢定貝氏憂鬱量表第二版之建構效度。台灣醫學,12(3),284-291。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6320/FJM.2008.12(3).03
曾淑芬、張志娟、曾薔霓、劉立凡、陳惠芳(2011)。社區高齡者憂鬱傾向及認知功能狀況之探討-以台灣南部地區社區高齡者為例。嘉南學報(人文類),(37),351-364。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.29539/CNABH.201112.0007
林育陞(2017)。老人憂鬱症與治療。諮商與輔導,(380),2-5。
侯慧明、陳玉敏(2008)。長期照護機構老人孤寂感及其相關因素探討。實證護理,4(3),212-221。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6225/JEBN.4.3.212
盧孟良、車先蕙、張尚文、沈武典(2002)。中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版之信度和效度。Taiwanese J Psychiatry,16,301-310。
向肇英、李介至、林碧珠(2012)。影響老年人身心健康之相關因素探討。新臺北護理期刊,14(1),7-16。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6540/NTJN.2012.1.002
郭麗芳、王士華(2014)。運用生命回顧於一位老人憂鬱症患者之照護經驗。精神衛生護理雜誌,8(2),25-33。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6847/TJPMHN.201401_8(2).0004
黃怡靜、林恭宏、李柏森、唐世芬、謝清麟(2014)。精神分裂症研究常用之工具性日常生活活動評估工具之心理計量特性回顧。職能治療學會雜誌,32(1),35-64。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6594/JTOTA.2014.32(1).02
羅家倫(2017)。園藝治療與運動治療對於改善銀髮族憂鬱及自尊低落之成效研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,5(4),299-312。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6283/JOCSG.201712_5(4).299
張妤安、施以諾、郭佳慧(2021)。探討娃娃治療介入對長期照顧機構住民憂鬱程度之影響。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌,20(6),71-83。
廖以誠、葉宗烈、楊延光、盧豐華、張智仁、柯慧貞、駱重鳴(2004)。台灣老年憂鬱量表之編製與信、效度研究。台灣精神醫學,18,30-41。
劉正、齊力(2019)。臺灣高齡者的居住狀況與機構照顧的需求趨勢。國土及公共治理季刊,7(1),70-81。
曾嬿婷、張淑鈞、林碧珠(2023)。長照機構老人憂鬱與焦慮程度調查。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,27,1-24。
施麗紅(2010)。老人入住長期照顧機構行為初探-以自我決定理論析之。社區發展季刊,132,353-372。
龔玉齡、蔡明通、劉嘉蕙(2018)。長期照護機構住民行動能力對營養及憂鬱狀況之影響.健康管理學刊,16(1),23-42。
戎瑾如、吳佳珊、廖素絨(2018)。老年精神衛生護理師之角色與能力的發展。源遠護理,12(3),5-13。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6530/YYN.201811_12(3).0001
吳奇璋、黃惠滿、高家常、高碧凰(2010)。養護機構內老年人自主性及其相關因素之探討,長期照護雜誌,14(1),27-41。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6317/LTC.201004_14(1).0004
林欣妮(2023)。探討醫院護理人員區辨老年失智、譫妄及憂鬱症狀之知識及相關因素(未發表的碩士論文)。臺中市:國立臺中科技大學護理系研究所。
蔡璧徽(2016)。獨居長者孤寂感、焦慮與憂鬱的相關因子之探討—檢視社會支持網絡的緩衝作用(未發表的碩士論文)。臺北市:國立台北護理健康大學長期照護系研究所。
夏瀠鍹(2022)。發展一個長照機構老人簡易版的憂鬱和失智量表之信效度(未發表的碩士論文)。高雄市:輔英科技大學護理系研究所。
梁明皓、魏惠娟、郭書馨(2020)。高齡者自我效能,自尊對憂鬱傾向之影響:雲林縣兩沿海鄉鎮的現況。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,8(2),100-116。https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6283/JOCSG.202006_8(2).100
吳佳樺、黃千瑀、李士捷、陳佳琳、尤菀薈、謝清麟(2016)。姿勢控制量表應用於中風病人:羅序分析。職能治療學會雜誌,34(2),250-264。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6594/JTOTA.2016.34(2).06
國家發展委員會(2022年8月)。人口推估。
https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=D527207EEEF59B9B
中華民國內政部(2022年8月11日)。簡易生命表提要分析。
https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=17800
李幸嬪、王炳龍(2015)。臺灣中老年人婚姻狀況與罹患憂鬱風險之相關探討。臺中市:亞洲大學健康產業管理學系長期照護組碩士在職專班。
林亭利、毛慧芬、王素琴、胡名霞(2017)。護理之家老年住民心理社會適應歷程.長期照護雜誌,3(21),233-250。
https://doi-org.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/10.6317/LTC.21.233
李春香(2007)。社區老人日常生活功能, 自覺健康狀態, 憂鬱狀態與自殺意念之相關性探討(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄市:輔英科技大學
潘怡欣(2023)。腦中風病人之日常生活功能、溝通障礙嚴重程度、家庭功能與憂鬱相關探討(未發表的碩士論文)桃園市:長庚科技大學護理系研究所







英文文獻
American Psychiatric Association (2022),Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders , fifth edition (DSM-5), Washington ,DC.
https://doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 6, 217-238. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002
Bentler, P.M. and Chou, C. (1987) Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological
Methods and Research, 16, 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
Burn, D., Rowan, E. N., Allan, L. M., Molloy, S., O’ Brien , J. T., & McKeith, I. G. (2006). Motor subtype and cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson’s disease with dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,77(5), 585-589. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.081711
Burke , W.J., Roccaforte , W .H., Wengel , S . P.(1991).The short form of the geriatric depression scale: A comparison with the30-item form. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 4,173-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198879100400310
Cella, D., & Chang, C. H. (2000). A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Medical Care, II66-II72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200009002-00010
Chang, C.-C., Wu, C.-S., Tseng, H.-Y., Lee, C.-Y., Wu, I. C., Hsu, C.-C., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, Y.-F., &Hsiung, C. A. (2022). Assessment of incident frailty hazard associated with depressive symptoms in a Taiwanese longitudinal study. International Psychogeriatrics, 34(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610221000806
Chin, W. C., Liu, C. Y., Lee, C. P., & Chu, C. L. (2014). Validation of five short versions of the geriatric depression scale in the elder population in Taiwan. Taiwanese Psychiatry, 28(3), 156-163. https://www-airitilibrary-com.autorpa.ntunhs.edu.tw:8443/Common/Click_DOI?DOI=10.29478%2fTJP
Chiu, E. C., Lee, S. C., Kuo, C. J., Lung, F. W., Hsueh, I. P., & Hsieh, C. L. (2015).
Development of a performance-based measure of executive functions in patients
with schizophrenia. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142790
Chiu, E. C., Chen, Y. J., Wu, W. C., Chou, C. X., & Yu, M. Y. (2022). Psychometric comparisons of three depression measures for patients with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(4), 7604205140. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.049347
Chiu, E.C, & Lee, S.C. (2023). Validity of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Fourth
Edition in people with schizophrenia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,
77(5): 7705205140. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050158
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
D'Ath, P, Katona, P., Mullan, E., Evans, S., & Katona, C. (1994). Screening, detection and management of depression in elderly primary care attenders. I: The acceptability and performance of the 15 item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and the development of short versions. Family Practice, 11(3), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/11.3.260
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based nursing, 18(3), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
Hobart, J. C., Lamping, D. L., & Thompson, A. J. (1996). Evaluating neurological outcome measures: the bare essentials. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 60(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.60.2.127
Hoyl, M. T., Alessi, C. A., Harker, J. O., Josephson, K. R., Pietruszka, F. M., Koelfgen, M., & Rubenstein, L. Z. (1999). Development and testing of a five‐item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(7), 873-878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03848.x
Hammami, S., Hajem , S., Barhoumi, A., Koubaa, N., Gaha, L. & Laouani , C. K. (2012). Screening for depression in an elderly population living at home. interest of the mini-geriatric depression scale. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique , 60(4), 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2012.02.004
John, A., Patel, U., Rusted, J., Richards, M., & Gaysina , D. (2019). Affective problems
and decline in cognitive state in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 49(3), 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291718001137
Kline, P. (1999). The new psychometrics: science, psychology and measurement (1 st
ed.) Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315787817
Leyhe, T., Reynolds III, C. F., Melcher, T., Linnemann, C., Klöppel , S., Blennow , K., & Hampel, H. (2017). A common challenge in older adults: Classification, overlap, and therapy of depression and dementia. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 13(1), 59-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.007
Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1994). The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90384-0
Lotvonen, S., Kyngäs, H., Koistinen, P., Bloigu, R., & Elo, S. (2018). Mental well-being of older people in Finland during the first year in senior housing and its association with physical performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health, 15(7), 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071331
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut, 184.
Steffens, D. C., Skoog, I., Norton, M. C., Hart, A. D., Tschanz, J. T., Plassman, B.
L., & Breitner, J. C. (2000). Prevalence of depression and its treatment in an
elderly population: The Cache County study. Archives of General
Psychiatry, 57(6), 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.6.601
Van Marwijk, H. W., Wallace, P., de Bock, G. H., Hermans, J. O., Kaptein, A. A., &
Mulder, J. D. (1995). Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of
shortened versions of the geriatric depression scale. British Journal of General Practice, 45(393), 195-199.
Velozo, C. A., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. S. (1999). The use of Rasch analysis to produce
scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational
Therapy, 53(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.53.1.83
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1989). Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 70(12), 857-860.
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4

電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20290803)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top