臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

基隆港作為我國重要的海港之一，因天然地形阻礙、腹地狹小等因素，需仰賴內陸貨櫃集散站解決港區貨櫃儲放等問題，為解決港口貨櫃集散站容量不足，周邊地區設立了11家內陸貨櫃集散站，主要集中在瑞芳、五堵和汐止區域。為探討內陸貨櫃集散站轉型對基隆港營運走向的影響與方針，本研究以質性分析，提出政策法規、經濟發展、社會責任、技術轉型為四大構面，提出十五個評估指標，為解決PEST分析方法缺少量化分析，與撇除問卷填寫者在填寫問卷時的模糊和不確定性與增加決策的準確程度，故本研究建立一套多準則的模糊層級結構，探討各種因素對於港口營運的複雜影響，本研究以模糊層級分析法（Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process，FAHP）為研究方法，以了解內陸貨櫃集散站轉型對基隆港營運的實質影響。經研究結果發現，基隆港之港口作業，港口貨櫃集散站占總體作業48%、內陸貨櫃集散站占52%，其中內陸集散站短期受捷運規劃影響約為30.7%、中長期受地價影響約為60.0%。考量到內陸貨櫃集散轉型對於貨物之影響，貨主若以成本為考量，傾向選擇未受影響的集散站，若以服務品質為考量，本研究提出十五個評估準則，根據FAHP結果，短期內建議穩定貨櫃量、發展多元服務、推動智慧物流和資訊平台，中長期則重點在城市經濟、國際合作、自動化碼頭、通關便利、就業機會、公路規劃等方面，以上之短、中長期準則方針建議，期許研究結果可為港務公司、政府機構以及相關利害關係者提供了有價值的參考，促使更有效的港口管理和決策。

Keelung Port, as one of the important seaports in our country, faces challenges such as natural terrain obstructions and limited hinterland. To solve the issue of container storage in the port area, it relies on inland container depots. To address the insufficient capacity of port container depots, 11 inland container depots have been established in the surrounding areas, mainly concentrated in Ruifang, Wudu, and Xizhi areas. This study employs qualitative analysis to explore the impact and policies of the transformation of inland container depots on the operation of Keelung Port. It proposes four major dimensions: policy and regulations, economic development, social responsibility, and technological transformation, along with fifteen evaluation indicators. To address the lack of quantitative analysis in the PEST method and to eliminate the ambiguity and uncertainty of respondents when filling out questionnaires, thereby increasing the accuracy of decision-making, this study establishes a multi-criteria fuzzy hierarchical structure to explore the complex impacts of various factors on port operations. The research method used is the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to understand the substantial impact of the transformation of inland container depots on the operation of Keelung Port.
The study found that port operations in Keelung Port involve 48% of port container depot operations and 52% of inland container depot operations. The short-term impact of MRT planning on inland depots is approximately 30.7%, and the medium to long-term impact of land prices is about 60.0%. Considering the impact of the transformation of inland container depots on cargo, shippers tend to choose unaffected depots if cost is the consideration. If service quality is the consideration, this study proposes fifteen evaluation criteria. Based on the FAHP results, it is recommended to stabilize container volume, develop diversified services, and promote smart logistics and information platforms in the short term. In the medium to long term, the focus should be on urban economy, international cooperation, automated terminals, customs clearance facilitation, employment opportunities, and highway planning. These short, medium, and long-term guideline suggestions are expected to provide valuable references for port companies, government agencies, and related stakeholders, thereby promoting more effective port management and decision-making.

謝辭 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 IV
圖次 VI
表次 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 7
1.3研究範圍 7
1.4研究流程 8
第二章 文獻回顧 9
2.1貨櫃集散站的定義 9
2.1.1法規定義 9
2.1.2成立要件 9
2.2內陸貨櫃集散站的涵義 12
2.2.1北部(基隆港、臺北港)港口作業能量現況 12
2.2.2基隆港、臺北港進儲內陸貨櫃集散站作業量估算 13
2.3內陸貨櫃集散站轉型 13
2.3.1臺北港的啟用 13
2.3.2基隆捷運計畫規劃作業 15
2.3.3基隆港整體貨櫃裝卸量趨勢 21
2.4 PEST分析 21
2.4.1政策法規 23
2.4.2經濟發展 25
2.4.3社會責任 26
2.4.4技術轉型 27
2.5評估準則彙整 28
第三章 研究方法 32
3.1研究架構 32
3.2分析層級程序法（Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP） 32
3.3模糊集合理論（Fuzzy Set Theory） 33
3.4模糊層級分析法（Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, FAHP） 35
第四章 研究分析 40
4.1問卷發放對象 40
4.2模糊層級分析法結果分析 42
4.2.1評估構面結果分析 42
4.2.2評估指標結果分析-政策法規 46
4.2.3評估指標結果分析-經濟發展 50
4.2.4評估指標結果分析-社會責任 54
4.2.5評估指標結果分析-技術轉型 58
4.2.6 CRH一致性 62
4.2.7層級串聯 63
4.3管理意涵 63
第五章 結論與建議 65
5.1研究結論 65
5.2未來研究建議 66
參考文獻 67
中文文獻 67
英文文獻 69
附件 內陸貨櫃集散站轉型對於基隆港營運走向之方針問卷 76

中文文獻
1.丁吉峰、梁金樹（2003），「從動態資源管理之觀點探討台灣地區港埠經營策略與發展策略」，海運研究學刊，第十五期，頁15-38。
2.江志強（2017），「全球船舶大型化發展下基隆港的挑戰與機會」，國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士學位論文。
3.李宗勳（2009），「現階段基隆港的營運策略」，國立臺灣海洋大學碩士論文。
4.李美慧、呂錦山（2008），「台中港貨櫃營運競爭策略之研究」，國立成功大學交通管理科學系碩士論文。
5.林信成，蕭勝文（2003），「模糊詮釋資料及其在圖書館分類編目之應用」，教育資料與圖書館學，第四十一卷，第一期，頁61-76。
6.邱雅莉（2023），「國際海運減碳趨勢與貨櫃運輸因應探討」，臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
7.邱榮和、黃國英（2004），「分析加入世界貿易組織後對我國海運服務業之衝擊與因應措施」，航運季刊，第十三卷，第一期，頁39-55。
8.徐明聖（2013），基隆港務分公司對基隆港經營策略之個案研究，國立臺灣海洋大學碩士論文。
9.張正武、陳志仁、江啟漢、林宛萱、陳佑昇、許晟松、施語梵、許書耕、賴威伸、邱雅莉（2021），「商港整體發展規劃(111-115年)」，初版，臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
10.張國中（2010），「提升基隆港競爭力之策略探討」，國立臺灣海洋大學碩士論文。
11.張通榮、張志清、林光、林財生（2010），「基隆港市共同發展策略」，航運季刊，第十九卷，第三期，頁67-85。
12.梁金樹、丁吉峯、王淑滿（2021），數量研究方法—理論與應用—，頁1-42，第一版，基隆市。
13.財政部關務署，貨櫃集散站、保稅倉庫及進出口貨棧業者名冊。
14.楊文賢、梁金樹（2010），「從丹絨柏樂巴斯港的快速竄起看台北港的未來發展」，航運季刊，第十九卷，第一期，頁43-75。
15.葉淑華、張志清（2019），「現階段基隆港業務轉型策略」，航運季刊，第二十八卷，第一期，頁23-50。
16.寧世強（2011），「配合港務公司畫基隆港之經營策略」，國立臺灣海洋大學碩士論文。
17.蕭丁訓（2008），「基隆港創新管理與競爭策略之研究」，國立臺灣海洋大學博士論文。
18.蕭丁訓、林光、張志清、陳基國（2005），「由上海港的發展看臺灣港口的競爭策略」，航運季刊，第十四卷，第四期，頁85-107。
19.蕭丁訓、張志清、林光、陳基國（2007），「臺灣港埠發展加值型服務港埠之啟思」，航運季刊，第十六卷，第四期，頁61-80。
20.賴威伸、李霞（2018），「我國海運政策之研析-成效檢討與調查結果分析」，運輸計劃季刊，第四十七卷，第一期，頁29-62。
21.戴輝煌、陳春益、楊清喬、謝幼屏（2014），「我國港埠公司化後貨櫃港碼頭營運模式之探討」，運輸計畫季刊，第四十三卷，第一期，頁1-32。
22.謝文豐（2003），「我國國際港埠裝卸人貨損責任之探討」，國立臺灣海洋大學海洋法律研究所碩士論文。
23.謝幼屏、朱金元、王克尹、林玲煥、吳榮貴、吳朝升、楊世豪、陳秋玲（2013），「臺北港與其他國際商港貨櫃碼頭競合的關係與策略之研究」，初版，臺北市，交通部運輸研究所。
 
英文文獻
1.Akman, M. K. (2020). Defence management and PESTLE analysis. Ante Portas–Security Studies, 1(14), 93-102.
2.Bandara, Y. M., & Nguyen, H. O. (2016). Influential factors in port infrastructure tariff formulation, implementation and revision. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 220-232.
3.Baştuğ, S., Haralambides, H., Esmer, S., & Eminoğlu, E. (2022). Port competitiveness: Do container terminal operators and liner shipping companies see eye to eye? Marine Policy, 135, 104866.
4.Black, J., T. Kyu, V. Roso, and K. Tara. (2013). Critical evaluation of Mandalay dry port, Myanmar. 5th International Conference on Logistics and Transport 2013 (ICLT 2013) “Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Asia Pacific”, November 5–8, 2013. Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan. 107–114.
5.BSR (2010), BSR Conference (2010) Highlights: ‘Sustainability Is Core Business’ and More, Retrieved June 30, 2024, website: https://www.bsr.org/en/blog/bsr-conference-2010-highlights-sustainability-is-core-business-and-more
6.Caballini, C., & Gattorna, E. (2009). The expansion of the port of Genoa: the Rivalta Scrivia dry port. Transport and communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, 78, 103-125.
7.Castellaneta, B., Dastoli, P. S., Corrado, S., Gatto, R., Scorzelli, R., Rahmani, S., & Scorza, F. (2023). Strategic Development Scenarios in Inland Areas: Logical Framework Approach Preparing Collaborative Design. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 138-151). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
8.Chang, Y.-T., Lee, S.-Y., Tongzon, J.L. (2008). Port selection factors by shipping lines: different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Mar. Policy 32 (6), 877–885.
9.Crainic, T.C., P. Dell’olmo, N. Ricciardi, and A. Sgalambro. (2015). Modeling dry-port-based freight distribution planning. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 55: 518–534.
10.Cronje, E. (2008). Trade and transport costs: the role of dry ports in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).
11.Daamen, T. A., & Vries, I. (2013). Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 4-13.
12.Eren, E. (2002). Stratejik yönetim ve işletme politikası. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
13.Gao, Y., & Ge, Y. E. (2023). Integrated scheduling of yard cranes, external trucks, and internal trucks in maritime container terminal operation. Maritime Policy & Management, 50(5), 629-650.
14.Garnwa, P., Beresford, A., & Pettit, S. (2009). Dry ports: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Nigeria. Transport and communications bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, 78(1), 40-56.
15.Gharehgozli, A., Zaerpour, N., & de Koster, R. (2020). Container terminal layout design: transition and future. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 22, 610-639.
16.Ginter, P. M., & Duncan, W. J. (1990). Macroenvironmental analysis for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 23(6), 91-100.
17.Gupta, A. K., Gupta, S. K., & Patil, R. S. (2005). Statistical analyses of coastal water quality for a port and harbour region in India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 102, 179-200.
18.Ha, H., & Coghill, K. (2006). E-government in Singapore-a SWOT and PEST analysis. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 6(2), 103-130.
19.Heaver, T., H. Meersman, and E. Van de Voorde. (2001). Co-operation and competition in international container transport: Strategies for ports. Maritime Policy & Management 28 (3): 293–305.
20.Herazo, J. C. M., Castillo, A. P. P., Eras, J. J. C., Fierro, T. E. S., Araújo, J. F. C., & Gatica, G. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of energy management and efficiency in the maritime industry and port terminals: Trends. Procedia Computer Science, 231, 514-519.
21.Ho, J. K. K. (2014). Formulation of a systemic PEST analysis for strategic analysis. European academic research, 2(5), 6478-6492.
22.Iannone, F. (2012). The private and social cost efciency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (9): 1424–1448.
23.Jeevan, J. (2017). The role of Malaysian dry ports in the container seaport system (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania).
24.Jonker, T., Duinkerken, M. B., Yorke-Smith, N., de Waal, A., & Negenborn, R. R. (2021). Coordinated optimization of equipment operations in a container terminal. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 33, 281-311.
25.Kiani, M., Bonsall, S., Wang, J., & Wall, A. (2006). A break-even model for evaluating the cost of container ships waiting times and berth unproductive times in automated quayside operations. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 5, 153-179.
26.Kissimbo, E. W., & Mashoke, M. A. (2019). Measuring Business to Business of Inland Container Terminal Ports Service Quality in Tanzania: A Study of Dar Es Salaam Port, Tanzania. The International Journal of Business & Management.
27.Knatz, G., Notteboom, T., & Pallis, A. A. (2023). Container terminal automation: assessment of drivers and benefits. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-25.
28.Knatz, G., Notteboom, T., & Pallis, A. A. (2023). Container terminal automation: assessment of drivers and benefits. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-25.
29.Kon, W. K., Abdul Rahman, N. S. F., Md Hanafiah, R., & Abdul Hamid, S. (2021). The global trends of automated container terminal: A systematic literature review. Maritime Business Review, 6(3), 206-233.
30.L. A. Zadeh (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
31.L. A. Zadeh (1973). Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-3(1), 28-44.
32.Lun, Y. V. (2011). Green management practices and firm performance: A case of container terminal operations. Resources, conservation and recycling, 55(6), 559-566.
33.Mak, J. & Tai, B. K. (2010). Port development within the framework of Malaysia's transport, policy: Some considerations, Journal of Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 199-206.
34.Ng, A. K., & Gujar, G. (2009). The spatial characteristics of dry ports in India. Development of Dry Ports, 102.
35.Ng, A. Y., & Gujar, G. C. (2009). Government policies, efficiency and competitiveness: The case of dry ports in India. Transport Policy, 16(5), 232-239.
36.Nguyen, D.V.H. (2014). The development of dry ports in Vietnam. Vietnam: International Cooperation Department.
37.Notteboom, T. and J.-P. Rodrigue (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 297-313.
38.Notteboom, T. E., Parola, F., & Satta, G. (2019). The relationship between transhipment incidence and throughput volatility in North European and Mediterranean container ports. Journal of transport geography, 74, 371-381.
39.Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2009). Inland terminals within North American and European supply chains. Transport and communications bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, 78(1), 1-39.
40.Notteboom, T.E. (2002). Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry. Maritime Policy & Management 29 (3): 257–269.
41.Notteboom, T.E., and W. Winkelmans. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy & Management 28 (1): 71–89.
42.Port of Long Beach (2005), Green Port Policy, Retrieved June 30, 2024, website: https://polb.com/port-info/green-port/#year-1
43.Rashid, C. A. (2023). PESTEL Analysis and Porter’s Five Forces as marketing tools to evaluate Morrison’s performance and strategy. Journal of Global Social Sciences, 4(15), 75-83.
44.Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management 29 (3): 241–255.
45.Robles, L. T. (2013). The Brazilian seaport system: A post-1990 institutional and economic review. Journal of Transportation Business & Management, vol. 8, pp. 17-29.
46.Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2010). Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands. Research in transportation economics, 27(1), 19-29.
47.Rodrigue, J. P., Debrie, J., Fremont, A., & Gouvernal, E. (2010). Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of transport geography, 18(4), 519-529.
48.Rodrigue, J. P., Notteboom, T., & Pallis, A. A. (2011). The financialization of the port and terminal industry: revisiting risk and embeddedness. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(2), 191-213.
49.Rosa, A., & Roscelli, R. (2009). Innovative ideas and design of an integrated dry port and seaport system. Development of Dry Ports, 57.
50.Roso, V., & Lumsden, K. (2009). The dry port concept: moving seaport activities inland. UNESCAP, Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, 5(78), 87-102.
51.Rožić, T., Rogić, K., & Bajor, I. (2016). Research trends of inland terminals: A literature review. Promet-Traffic&Transportation, 28(5), 539-548.
52.Rusgiyarto, F., Sjafruddin, A., Frazila, R. B., Suprayogi, S., & Burhani, J. T. (2018). Inland container depots effect for import container terminal performance at Koja container terminal, Jakarta based on optimization–simulation model. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1977, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
53.Saengsupavanich, C., Chonwattana, S., & Naimsampao, T. (2009). Coastal erosion through integrated management: A case of Southern Thailand. Ocean & Coastal Management, 52(6), 307-316.
54.Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York：McGraw-Hill.
55.Saaty, T. L. (1990). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper, remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management science, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 259-268.
56.Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
57.Sayareh, J., Iranshahi, S., & Golfakhrabadi, N. (2016). Service quality evaluation and ranking of container terminal operators. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(4), 203-212.
58.Sha, M., Zhang, T., Lan, Y., Zhou, X., Qin, T., Yu, D., & Chen, K. (2017). Scheduling optimization of yard cranes with minimal energy consumption at container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 704-713.
59.Shabanova, L., Ismagilova, G. N., Salimov, L. N., & Akhmadeev, M. G. (2015). PEST-Analysis and SWOT-Analysis as the most important tools to strengthen the competitive advantages of commercial enterprises. Mediterranean journal of social sciences, 6(3), 705.
60.Shahid, D. (2022). Impact of COVID19 on the Education System in the United States through PESTLE Analysis: A Case Study. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 4(2), 477-482.
61.Shiau, T. A., & Chuang, C. C. (2015). Social construction of port sustainability indicators: a case study of Keelung Port. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(1), 26-42.
62.Song, J., Sun, Y., & Jin, L. (2017). PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 276-289.
63.Steenken, D., Voß, S., & Stahlbock, R. (2004). Container terminal operation and operations research-a classification and literature review. OR spectrum, 26, 3-49.
64.Sukdanot, S., J. Rudjanakanoknad and W. Suksirivoraboot. (2013). Development of Thai International Ports inaccordance with ASEAN Economic Community Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2013 Taipei.
65.Talib, M., Hamid, A. B., Zulfakar, M., & Jeeva, A. (2014). Halal logistics PEST analysis: the Malaysia perspectives. Asian Social Science, 10(14), 119-131.
66.Teye, C., M.G.H. Bell, and M.C.J. Bliemer. (2017). Urban intermodal terminals: The entropy maximising facility location problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 100: 64–68.
67.Teye, C., M.G.H. Bell, and M.C.J. Bliemer. (2017). Entropy maximising facility location model for port city intermodal terminals. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 100: 1–16.
68.Tseng, P. H., and N. Pilcher. (2016). “Exploring the Viability of an Emission Tax Policy for Ships at Berth in Taiwanese Ports.” Int. J. Shipp 8: 705–722. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2016.079289.
69.Veenstra, A., R. Zuidwijk, and E. Van Asperen. (2012). The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 14: 1479–2931.
70.Walters, D., & Wadsworth, E. (2021). Determinants of effective action on workplace safety and health in global companies—The case of global network container terminal operators. Marine Policy, 124, 104374.
71.Wang, J., Huang, Q., Lin, X., & Yu, M. (2022). Container terminal competition and cooperation considering emission tax. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(7), 930-953.
72.Wang, J., Huang, Q., Lin, X., & Yu, M. (2022). Container terminal competition and cooperation considering emission tax. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(7), 930-953.
73.Wang, L. F., and J. Wang. (2009). Environmental Taxes in a Differentiated Mixed Duopoly. Economic Systems 33 (4): 389–396.
74.Wisetjindawat, W., Sano, K., Matsumoto, S., & Raothanachonkun, P. (2007). Micro-simulation model for modeling freight agents interactions in urban freight movement. In CD Proceedings, 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (pp. 21-25).
75.Wu, P., Zhao, G., & Li, Y. (2022). Green mining strategy selection via an integrated SWOT-PEST analysis and Fuzzy AHP-MARCOS approach. Sustainability, 14(13), 7577.
76.Xu, Y., Wang, M., Lai, K. K., & Ram, B. (2022). A stochastic model for shipping container terminal storage management. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(10), 1429.
77.Yi, Z., Yang, C., & Yu, M. (2022). Managing regional container terminal competition: the roles of information and government support. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(1), 97-117.
78.Yi, Z., Yang, C., & Yu, M. (2022). Managing regional container terminal competition: the roles of information and government support. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(1), 97-117.
79.Yingfa, S., & Hong, Y. (2010, May). The risk study of e-governance based on PEST analysis model. In 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 563-566). IEEE.
80.Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 52.
81.Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 52.
82.Zaerpour, N., Gharehgozli, A., & De Koster, R. (2019). Vertical expansion: a solution for future container terminals. Transportation Science, 53(5), 1235-1251.
83.Zuidwijk, R.A., A.W. Veenstra, and E. van Asperen. (2012). The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 14 (1): 14–3