臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，隨著環保意識的抬頭，企業和投資者的價值取向逐漸轉變。人們正積極應對全球暖化等氣候變遷的威脅，意識到氣候變化可能對環境、社會和全球經濟造成影響。因此，環境、社會和公司治理(Environmental, Social, Governance，以下簡稱ESG) 的概念逐漸成為關注焦點和重要議題。這使得企業不僅僅關注財務數據，而是致力於維護企業商譽、穩定營運，進而提升資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率、公司價值(Tobin’s Q)等企業績效。如今，已擴展至全面追求企業的永續性(Sustainability)發展。本研究主要探討公司在ESG議題下，ESG的表現是否與企業績效產生關連性。研究樣本為臺灣和美國上市金融業之公司，期間為2013年至2022年，資料來源Thomson Reuters (簡稱Datastream)資料庫，結果顯示臺灣與美國在企業獲得ESG績效後，與企業績效呈顯著正相關，故面對ESG應保持正面態度，促使企業願意執行ESG，以達到良好的企業績效，並且有利於企業永續發展。

In recent years, with the rise of environmental awareness, the value orientation of enterprises and investors has gradually changed. People are actively responding to the threat of climate change, such as global warming, and are aware of the impact that climate change can have on the environment, society, and the global economy. Therefore, the concept of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) has gradually become the focus of attention and an important issue. This allows companies to focus not only on financial data, but also on maintaining corporate goodwill, stabilizing operations, and improving corporate performance such as return on assets, return on shareholders' equity, and company value (Tobin's Q). Today, it has expanded to fully pursue the development of corporate sustainability. This study mainly explores whether ESG performance is related to corporate performance under ESG issues. The study sample is listed in Taiwan and United States financial companies, the period from 2013 to 2022, the data source is Thomson Reuters (Datastream) database, the results show that Taiwan and United States after enterprises obtain ESG performance, there is a significant positive correlation with corporate performance, so we should maintain a positive attitude towards ESG, and promote enterprises to be willing to implement ESG to achieve good corporate performance and conducive to corporate sustainability.

內容目錄
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
誌謝辭 v
內容目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 4
第三節 研究問題與目的 8
第四節 研究架構與流程 9
第二章 文獻探討 13
第一節 企業參與ESG之動機 13
第二節 環境對企業之影響 15
第三節 社會責任對企業之影響 17
第四節 公司治理對企業之重要性 19
第五節 ESG對企業績效之影響 20
第三章 研究方法與設計 23
第一節 研究樣本與資料來源 23
第二節 研究設計與模型建立 28
第四章 實證結果與分析 30
第一節 敘述性統計分析 30
第二節 皮爾森相關係數分析 32
第三節 迴歸分析 36
第五章 結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
第二節 實務意涵 54
參考文獻 55

一.中文部分
楊馥如、王偉權、張曉楨、李念慈(2014)，企業社會責任與企業財務績效之關聯性分析，績效與策略研究，11(2)，103-126。


二.英文部分
Aabo, T., & Giorici, I. C. Do female CEOs matter for ESG scores? Global Finance Journal, 56, forthcoming.

Abedifar, P., Bouslah, K., Neumann, C., & Tarazi, A. (2023). Resilience of environmental and social stocks under stress: lessons from the COVID‐19 pandemic. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 32(2), 23-50.

Acquier, A., Gond, J. P., & Pasquero, J. (2011). Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s legacy: The unachieved agenda and continuing relevance of social responsibilities of the businessman. Business & Society, 50(4), 607-646.

Ahmad, S., Ullah, S., Akbar, S., Kodwani, D., & Brahma, S. The impact of compliance, board committees and insider CEOs on firm survival during crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, forthcoming.

Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409-1428.

Al-Shaer, H., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, forthcoming.

Alzayed, N., Eskandari, R., Eshraghi, A., & Yazdifar, H. Revisiting corporate governance and financial risk‐taking. International Journal of Finance & Economics, forthcoming.

Andrieș, A. M., & Sprincean, N. ESG performance and banks’ funding costs. Finance Research Letters, 54, forthcoming.

Ayaz, M., Mohamed Zabri, S., & Ahmad, K. (2021). An empirical investigation on the impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Finance, 47(8), 1107-1127.

Başar, B. D., Bouteska, A., Büyükoğlu, B., & Ekşi, İ. H. (2021). The effect of corporate governance on bank performance: evidence from Turkish and some MENA countries banks. Journal of Asset Management, 22(3), 153-162.

Bose, S., Khan, H. Z., & Monem, R. M. (2021). Does green banking performance pay off? Evidence from a unique regulatory setting in Bangladesh. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(2), 162-187.

Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press.

Bruna, M. G., Loprevite, S., Raucci, D., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. Investigating the marginal impact of ESG results on corporate financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 47, forthcoming.

Buallay, A., Fadel, S. M., Alajmi, J., & Saudagaran, S. (2021). Sustainability reporting and bank performance after financial crisis: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(4), 747-770.

Cox, J. D., & Hazen, T. L. (2011). Cox and Hazen's Treatise on the Law of Corporations, 3d. Thomson West.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.

Do, T. K., & Vo, X. V. Is mandatory sustainability disclosure associated with default risk? Evidence from emerging markets. Finance Research Letters, 55, forthcoming.

Du, L. Y., & Sun, J. Washing away their stigma? The ESG of “Sin” firms. Finance Research Letters, 55, forthcoming.

El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2023). ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: concavity–convexity patterns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 406-430.

Feng, J., Goodell, J. W., Li, M., & Wang, Y. Environmental information transparency and green innovations. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 86, forthcoming.

Fiordelisi, F., Ricci, O., & Santilli, G. Environmental engagement and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the European banking industry. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, forthcoming.

Hassan, H. S. (2022). The impact of the share buyback process on financial performance: An economic and accounting perspective. Evidence from Egypt. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(1), 210-224.

Hemphill, T. (2013). The ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility international standard: What are the business governance implications? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 305-317.

Homroy, S. GHG emissions and firm performance: The role of CEO gender socialization. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, forthcoming.

Houston, J. F., & Shan, H. (2022). Corporate ESG profiles and banking relationships. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(7), 3373-3417.

Hu, J., Zou, Q., & Yin, Q. Research on the effect of ESG performance on stock price synchronicity: Empirical evidence from China's capital markets. Finance Research Letters, 55, forthcoming.

Hu, X., Yao, G., & Zhou, T. (2022). Does ownership structure affect the optimal capital structure? A PSTR model for China. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 2458-2480.

Hunjra, A. I., Jebabli, I., Thrikawala, S. S., Alawi, S. M., & Mehmood, R. How do corporate governance and corporate social responsibility affect credit risk? Research in International Business and Finance, 67, forthcoming.

Ignatov, K. When ESG talks: ESG tone of 10-K reports and its significance to stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, forthcoming.

Jagirani, T. S., Chee, L. C., & Kosim, Z. B. (2023). Board characteristics and firm value: The moderating role of capital adequacy. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(2), 205-214.

Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 141-186.

Jung, H., Lee, J., & Song, C. K. Carbon productivity and volatility. Finance Research Letters, 56, forthcoming.

Kizys, R., Mamatzakis, E. C., & Tzouvanas, P. Does genetic diversity on corporate boards lead to improved environmental performance? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 84, forthcoming.

Komath, M. A. C., Doğan, M., & Sayılır, Ö. Impact of corporate governance and related controversies on the market value of banks. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, forthcoming.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 3-27.

La Torre, M., Leo, S., & Panetta, I. C. (2021). Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1620-1634.

Lee, J., Koh, K., & Shim, E. D. (2024). Managerial incentives for ESG in the financial services industry: Direct and indirect association between ESG and executive compensation. Managerial Finance, 50(1), 10-27.

Lehenchuk, S., Zakharov, D., Vyhivska, I., Makarovych, V., & Sheveria, Y. (2024). The impact of intellectual capital on company financial performance: Evidence from the Omani industrial sector. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(1), 343-355.

Li, Z., Crook, J., Andreeva, G., & Tang, Y. Predicting the risk of financial distress using corporate governance measures. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, forthcoming.

Lian, Y., Ye, T., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). How does corporate ESG performance affect bond credit spreads: Empirical evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 85, 352-371.

Liu, B., Sun, P. Y., & Zeng, Y. (2020). Employee-related corporate social responsibilities and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 70, 357-372.

Lu, J., Li, W., & Huang, W. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and stock resilience to COVID-19: A contract theory perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 12-29.

Ma, D., Zhang, Y., Ji, Q., Zhao, W. L., & Zhai, P. Heterogeneous impacts of climate change news on China's financial markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, forthcoming.

Malik, I. A., Chowdhury, H., & Alam, M. S. Equity market response to natural disasters: Does firm's corporate social responsibility make difference? Global Finance Journal, 55, forthcoming.

Mughal, Y. H., Jehangir, M., Khan, M., & Saeed, M. (2021). Nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm’s performance: A panel data approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 3173-3188.

Narula, R., Rao, P., Kumar, S., & Matta, R. (2024). ESG scores and firm performance-evidence from emerging market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 1170-1184.

Obloj, T., & Sengul, M. (2020). What do multiple objectives really mean for performance? Empirical evidence from the French manufacturing sector. Strategic Management Journal, 41(13), 2518-2547

Panda, M., Sharma, P., Laszlo, V., Kapse, M., Sharma, V., & Mahajan, Y. (2024). ESG factors in M&A in India: Performance and market insights from 2010 to 2023. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(2), 310-322.

Qian, K., Shi, B., Song, Y., & Wu, H. ESG performance and loan contracting in an emerging market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 78, forthcoming.

Saini, D., & Singh, B. (2023). CEO confidence and firm performance: Exploring the moderating role of board independence. Managerial Finance, 49(6), 975-991.

Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., De Masi, S., Zambelli, S., & Paci, A. Towards higher sustainability: If you want something done, ask a chairwoman. Finance Research Letters, 58, forthcoming.

Tang, J., Wang, X., & Liu, Q. The spillover effect of customers' ESG to suppliers. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 78, forthcoming.

Uyar, A., Lodh, S., Nandy, M., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2023). Tradeoff between corporate investment and CSR: The moderating effect of financial slack, workforce slack, and board gender diversity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, forthcoming.

Wang, L., Qi, J., & Zhuang, H. Monitoring or Collusion? Multiple Large Shareholders and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 53, forthcoming.

Wang, L., & Yang, L. (2023). Environmental, social and governance performance and credit risk: Moderating effect of corporate life cycle. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 80, forthcoming.

Wang, Y. H., Hung, J. C., Lee, Y. H., & Chuang, C. C. (2012). Computing regression quantiles to analysis the relationship between market behavior and political risk. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1047-1055.

Xu, N., Chen, J., Zhou, F., Dong, Q., & He, Z. Corporate ESG and resilience of stock prices in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, forthcoming.

Xue, S., Chang, Q., & Xu, J. The effect of voluntary and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on firm profitability: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, forthcoming.

Yoo, S., & Managi, S. Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, forthcoming.

Yu, E. P. Y., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987-1004.

Zhang, Q., Ding, R., Chen, D., & Zhang, X. The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure on price discovery efficiency around the world. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, forthcoming.

Zhao, T., & Chan, K. C. Corporate social network and corporate social responsibility: A perspective of interlocking directorates. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, forthcoming.

Zhao, X., Fang, L., & Zhang, K. (2023). Online search attention, firms’ ESG and operating performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 223-236.

Zhou, M., Huang, Z., & Jiang, K. Environmental, social, and governance performance and corporate debt maturity in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, forthcoming.

三.網路資料
行政院公務出國報告資訊網(2023)，法務部參加2022年全美州檢察長協會(NAAG)首都論壇報告[線上資料]，來源：https://report.nat.gov.tw/ReportFront/ReportDetail/detail?sysId=C11200338。

全國法規資料庫，氣候變遷因應法[線上資料]，來源：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020098

金融監督管理委員會，綠色金融行動方案(包含1.0~3.0) [線上資料]，來源：https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=616&parentpath=0,7

哈佛商業評論(2020)，專訪金管會黃天牧/加入ESG精神，推動台灣公司治理3.0[線上資料]，來源：https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0010105.html。

歐盟(2020)，歐洲永續分類標準[線上資料]，來源：https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/tools-and-standards/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en

歐盟(2020)，永續金融揭露規範[線上資料]，來源：https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/disclosures/sustainability-related-disclosure-financial-services-sector_en

歐盟(2020)，企業永續報告指令[線上資料]，來源：https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en

歐盟(2023)，企業永續盡職調查指令[線上資料]，來源：https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/14/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence-council-and-parliament-strike-deal-to-protect-environment-and-human-rights/

聯合國(2004)，Who Cares Wins [線上資料]，來源：https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2004/stocks/who_cares_wins_global_compact_2004.pdf

聯合國(2015)，聯合國永續發展目標SDGs [線上資料]，來源：https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統，期貨商風險管理實務守則[線上資料]，來源：https://www.selaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=G0101542

證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統，中華民國證券投資信託暨顧問商業同業公會證券投資信託事業風險管理實務守則[線上資料]，來源：https://www.selaw.com.tw/LawContent.aspx?LawID=G0101051

證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統，證券商風險管理實務守則[線上資料]，來源：https://www.selaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=G0100835