臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討身心障礙者就業、社會支持與復原力之關係，在不同背景變項的差異情形，以及身心障礙者就業、社會支持與復原力之相關性。採用「身心障礙職業重建需求調查研究問卷」及「簡明版BRS復原力量表」為研究工具。以中部某縣市年滿15歲～65歲且領有政府機關發給之身心障礙證明者為訪問對象，並使用問卷調查法收集資料，得到有效樣本，共計 794 人。再以背景變項之描述統計、差異分析、相關分析等統計方法分析處理所得資料。主要研究結果如下：身心障礙者之復原力會因教育程度、婚姻狀況、障礙嚴重程度、目前工作狀態、新舊制障礙類別、行業別及居住狀況而有所不同；生活滿意度會因性別、年齡、教育程度、新制障礙分類類別、舊制障礙分類類別、障礙嚴重程度、居住類型、經濟來源、工作狀態而有所不同。工作能力、工作動機、工作意願與因障礙產生的就業不便程度會因經濟來源與居住類型這類客觀社會支持條件而有所不同。回歸分析結果指出，工作經驗、工作能力與工作意願可以預測工作動機，工作經驗、工作能力、工作意願、免費的心理諮商對就業幫助程度與教育程度可以預測復原力，工作能力、免費的心理諮商對就業幫助程度、因取得身障證明對心理障礙影響程度及復原力可以預測生活滿意度。
本研究結果發現與身心障礙者復原力、生活滿意度與工作動機的相關因素，這些結果一致指出工作能力是其中相當重要的因素，中央及地方政府可在政策評估及制定時多考慮如何增加身心障礙者就業、再就業及穩定就業方向，藉由提供給身心障礙者生活上福利制度的設計或就業時所需的職業重建服務規劃來提昇其工作能力，身心障礙者的工作動機、復原力及生活滿意度應可逐步提升。本研究之結果，除了可供專業輔導、協助身心障礙者之人員、家屬及未來相關研究與政策研擬之參考，後續研究亦可進一步探討各種職業重建措施對身心障礙者復原力、生活滿意度與工作動機之效果，期待未來能採用更有效的各種職業重建措施來協助身心障礙人士穩定就業。

The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between occupation, social support and resilience of people with disabilities in different background variables, and the correlation among them. The research instruments of this study included Research Questionnaire on the Vocational Reconstruction Needs of People with Disabilities and the Brief Resilience Scale BRS. The interview subjects were people aged 15 to 65 years old in a county in central Taiwan who had a disability certificate issued by the government. The questionnaire method was used to collect data, and a valid sample of 794 people was obtained. The data was statistically analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis.
The main findings are as follows: The resilience of disabilities varies depending on their education, marital status, severity of the disability, current work status, and classified by ICF or16 categories, industry and live status. Life satisfaction varies depending on gender, age, education, classified by ICF or16 categories, severity of disability, live status, financial resources, and work status. Work ability, work motivation, willingness to work, and the inconvenience caused by disability of employment will vary depending on perceived social support conditions such as financial resources and live status. The regression analysis indicates that work experience, work ability and work willingness can predict work motivation. Work experience, work ability, work willingness, and free psychological consultation can predict resilience. Life satisfaction could be predicted by working ability, the employment assistance provided by free psychological consultation, the impact of disability on psychological disorders and resilience.
Work ability is a very important factor related to the resilience, life satisfaction and work motivation of people with disabilities. Central and local governments can consider how to increase physical and mental health when evaluating and formulating policies. The direction of employment, re-employment and stable employment of people with disabilities is to improve their work ability by providing them with the design of a welfare system for their daily lives or the planning of career reconstruction services required for employment, and the work motivation, resilience and Life satisfaction should gradually improve.
The results of the study can not only serve as a reference for professional counseling, assistance to people with disabilities, their families, and future related research and policy development, but follow-up research can also further explore the impact of various career reconstruction measures on the resilience and life satisfaction of people with disabilities. and work motivation, it is expected that more effective career reconstruction measures will be adopted in the future to help people with disabilities stabilize their employment.

目錄
中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT III
目錄 V
表目次 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 身心障礙者就業現況及相關研究 5
第二節 職業重建內容及功能 9
第三節 復原力及身心障礙者復原力相關研究 12
第四節 社會支持及身心障礙者社會支持相關研究 20
第五節 復原力、客觀社會支持與生活滿意度的關係 24
第三章 研究方法 29
第一節 研究架構 29
第二節 研究假設 29
第三節 研究對象 31
第四節 研究工具 31
第五節 研究程序 33
第六節 資料分析 34
第四章 結果 35
第一節 基本資料敍述統計 35
第二節 復原力、生活滿意度與客觀社會支持之比較 57
第三節 社會支持、復原力及生活滿意度之相關分析 86
第五章 討論與建議 93
第一節 研究結果 93
第二節 研究討論 101
第三節 研究建議 107
第四節 研究限制 111
第五節 研究貢獻與未來建議 112
參考文獻 113
附表 120

表目錄
表3-3- 1 分層隨機抽樣個數分配表 31
表4-1- 1 樣本分布及分類 35
表4-1- 2 受訪者之基本資料統計-性別、年齡、教育程度、居住狀況、婚姻狀態、致障因素及時間、目前工作狀態及問卷填答者 37
表4-1- 3 受訪者之基本資料統計-新/舊制障別分類及障礙程度 39
表4-1- 4 性別與受訪者工作現況統計 41
表4-1- 5 年齡、教育程度與工作現況統計表 42
表4-1- 6 婚姻狀況與受訪者工作現況統計 44
表4-1- 7 問卷填答者與受訪者工作現況統計 44
表4-1- 8 障礙發生距今時間及就業現況統計 45
表4-1- 9 新制障礙類別、舊制障礙類別及障礙嚴重程度與就業現況 46
表4-1- 10 以性別、年齡及障礙嚴重程度分類統計職業類別 49
表4-1- 11 以性別、年齡及障礙嚴重程度分類統計行業類別 52
表4-1- 12 依新制及舊制障礙分類受訪者目前就業之職業類別統計 55
表4-2- 1 復原力正/負向題分數統計 57
表4-2- 2 以性別統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 58
表4-2- 3 以年齡統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 58
表4-2- 4 以教育程度統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 59
表4-2- 5 以目前婚姻狀況統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 60
表4-2- 6 以致障原因統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 61
表4-2- 7 以致障迄今時間統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 62
表4-2- 8 以新制障礙分類統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 63
表4-2- 9 以舊制障礙分類統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 64
表4-2- 10 以障礙嚴重程度統計復原力正/負向題及總分數 66
表4-2- 11 依居住狀況與復原力因子間統計結果 66
表4-2- 12 受訪者不同工作狀態之復原力分數統計 67
表4-2- 13 不同行業別之就業狀況與復原力間的關係 68
表4-2- 14 不同性別與生活滿意度比較 69
表4-2- 15 不同年齡與生活滿意度比較 70
表4-2- 16 不同教育程度與生活滿意度比較 70
表4-2- 17 不同婚姻狀態與生活滿意度比較 71
表4-2- 18 不同致障原因與生活滿意度比較 72
表4-2- 19 不同致障發生時間與生活滿意度比較 73
表4-2- 20 不同新制障礙分類與生活滿意度比較 74
表4-2- 21 不同舊制障礙分類與生活滿意度比較 74
表4-2- 22 不同障礙嚴重程度與生活滿意度比較 76
表4-2- 23 不同居住類型與生活滿意度比較 76
表4-2- 24 不同變項及居住類型統計 77
表4-2- 25 不同居住類型與相關因素統計 79
表4-2- 26 不同經濟來源與相關因素統計 80
表4-2- 27 不同工作狀態與相關因素統計 81
表4-2- 28 不同求職途徑與相關因素統計 82
表4-2- 29 不同行業別與相關因素統計 83
表4-2- 30 不同職業別與相關因素統計 85
表4-3- 1 就業相關因子、復原力、生活滿意度之相關矩陣（N＝794） 87
表4-3- 2 就業相關因素與工作動機之線性迴歸 89
表4-3- 3 工作相關因素、教育程度及年齡與復原力之線性迴歸 90
表4-3- 4 生活滿意度迴歸分析 91

申斯靜(2018)。身障者罹患憂鬱症與自殺行為及死亡之風險。〔博士論文。中國 醫藥大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7cvk9g。

白倩如(2004)。慢性精神病患社會職業能力、工作環境中社會支持與工作適應相關性之研究∼以台北縣市為例。〔碩士論文。東海大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yr9t64。

吳秀照. (2007).台中縣身心障礙者就業需求:排除社會障礙的就業政策探討.社會政策與社會工作學刊, 11(2), 148-197.

蔡貞芬(2016)。成人視覺障礙者社會支持與復原力之研究。〔碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/42hcz4。

李育慈(2021)。成人生命意義感與復原力之關係:以制握信念為調節變項。〔碩士論文。國立屏東大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/73yr7b。

杜維鏌、顏敏琪、吳佳蓉、林梅足、王敏行、陳方、李允白(2017)。簡明復原力量表中文版之信效度研究-以小兒麻痺患者為例。復健諮商，(8)，1-18。 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000536-201703-201803270009- 201803270009-1-18

辛昱融(2020)。簡版復原力量表之信效度驗證。〔碩士論文。國立屏東大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/snv32c。

張秋香(2009)。青少年家庭環境、社會支持與復原力之相關研究。〔碩士論文。大葉大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6km5nb。

張瀚云、郭乃文(2014)。身心障礙者就業協助之家庭支持度問卷的建立及應用。臨床心理學刊，8(1)，77-78。https://doi.org/10.6550/ACP.0801.041

許素彬、胡慧嫈、張秀玉(2015)。身心障礙者就業性家庭支持服務的內涵與遞送分析 : 以臺中市為例。臺 大社會工作學刊，(32)，133-176。https://doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr2015.32.04

陳恭權(2023)。Martin Seligman 的心理傳記及其復原力理論之研究。〔碩士論文。南華大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3c6kj4。

陳泰元(2021)。思覺失調症患者就業復原力研究。〔碩士論文。國立臺北護理健康大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8d3s92。

曾文志(2006)。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。諮商輔導學報:高師輔導所刊，(14)，1-35。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCG.14.01

Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., & Galinsky, M. J. (1999). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/23.3.131

Bandura, A (1999) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1),20-28.

Borg, M., & Kristiansen, K. (2004). Recovery-oriented professionals: Helping relationships in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 13(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230400006809

Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676- 684.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering
hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

Feroz-Nainar, C. (2005). Confounding factors for depression in adults with mild learning disability.. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 187, 89; author reply 89-90 . https://doi.org/10.1192/BJP.187.1.89-A.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.

Fung, S. (2020). Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale and Brief Resilient Coping Scale in a Chinese Sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041265.

Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(4), 416-430.

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R., & Kahn, S. (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 168-177.

Labrague LJ. Psychological resilience, coping behaviors and social support among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of quantitative studies. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Oct;29(7):1893-1905. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13336. E pub 2021 Apr 28. PMID: 33843087; PMCID: PMC8250179.

Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and measurement. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 29-52). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lanctot, N., Corbiere, M., & Durand, M. –J. (2012). Job tenure and quality of work life of people with psychiatric disabilities working in social enterprises. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2012-0598

Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.

Marquez, J., Francis-Hew, L. & Humphrey, N. Protective factors for resilience in adolescence: analysis of a longitudinal dataset using the residuals approach. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 17, 140 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-023-00687-8

Masood, A., Masud, Y., & Mazahir, S. (2016). Gender differences in resilience and psychological distress of patients with burns.. Burns : journal of the International Societyfor Burn Injuries, 42 2, 300-6 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.10.006.

Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.

McDermott, S., Moran, R., Platt, T., Issac, T., Wood, H., & Dasari, S. (2005). Depression in adults with disabilities, in primary care. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 117 - 123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400007380.

Naseem, S., & Munaf, S. (2020). Resilience and Aggression of Adolescents, Early and Middle-Aged Adults: Analyzing Gender Differences. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies. https://doi.org/10.46568/pjgs.v20i1.107.

Ong, A. D., Bergeman, C. S., Bisconti, T. L., & Wallace, K. A. (2006). Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 730-749.

Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press.

Pidbutska, N., & Martynenko, Y. (2023). PROTECTIVE FACTORS OF THE RESILIENCY PROCESS. Theory and practice of social systems management. https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7782.2023.3.05.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 335-344.

Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 243-252.

Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.

Smith, B.W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K. et al. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. Int. J. Behav. Med. 15, 194–200 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972

Tansey, T., Kaya, C., Moser, E., Eagle, D., Dutta, A., & Chan, F. (2016). Psychometric Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale in a Sample of Vocational Rehabilitation Consumers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 59, 108 - 111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355215573539.

Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011 Jun;52(2):145-61. doi: 10.1177/0022146510395592. PMID: 21673143.

Tu, W-M, Yan, M-C, Wu, J-R, Lin, M-T, Wang, M-H, Chan, F and Lee, B (2017) Assessing resilience in persons with polio: a psychometric validation of the Taiwanese version of the Brief Resilience Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling 8, 1–18.Google Scholar

Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320-333.

Werner, E. E. (1995). Resilience in development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(3), 81-85.

Ye, Y., Wu, C., Huang, T., & Yang, C. (2022). The difference between the Connor– Davidson Resilience Scale and the Brief Resilience Scale when assessing resilience: Confirmatory factor analysis and predictive effects. Global Mental
Health, 9, 339-346. doi:10.1017/gmh.2022.38

Yule, K., Houston, J., & Grych, J. (2019). Resilience in Children Exposed to Violence: A Meta-analysis of Protective Factors Across Ecological Contexts. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 22, 406 - 431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00293-1.