跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.120.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/15 14:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭鼎耀
研究生(外文):CHENG, DING-YAO
論文名稱:異常報酬、國家監管品質與私募股權折溢價之關係
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Abnormal Returns, National Regulatory Quality, and Private Equity Premiums and Discounts
指導教授:莊凱旭
指導教授(外文):Chuang, Kai-Shi
口試委員:詹家昌林丙輝
口試委員(外文):Chan, Chia-ChungLin, Bing-Huei
口試日期:2024-07-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:61
中文關鍵詞:私募股權股權折價幅度異常報酬監管品質法律品質
外文關鍵詞:Private equity placementDiscount of the equityAbnormal ReturnsRegulatory qualityRegulations
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究選取亞洲市場上1999年至2021年間共3801家實施私募的公司作為樣本,旨在深入分析私募股權在不同市場和法律環境下的表現。研究分為三個主要部分:首先探討私募的折溢價現象;其次使用事件研究法(Event Study)檢驗市場對於私募的短期和長期反應;最後進一步探討國家法律品質對私募折價幅度及宣告報酬的影響。研究結果顯示,良好的法律監管品質國家相較低分的國家出現了較大的折價幅度,且私募宣告後存在短期的正向異常報酬,而長期則呈現負向異常報酬;當我們同時考慮異常報酬和三個法律品質的變數(監管品質、法治、政府腐敗控制程度)時,研究結果發現這些變數的比率越高,對折價和異常報酬的影響也越大。研究還指出,監管品質和政府腐敗控制可能對私募股權的長期績效產生正面影響,因為較好的監管品質和較低的腐敗環境可以提高投資效率並增加私募的報酬。這些發現為投資者、政策制定者和學術界提供了寶貴的見解,強調了在投資決策和政策制定中考慮法律和監管環境的重要性。
This study examines a sample of 3,801 companies that conducted private placements in Asia‐Pacific markets from 1999 to 2021. The research first explores the discount and premium associated with private placements, then employs an event study methodology to investigate the market reactions in the short and long term. Finally, it delves into the impact of national legal quality on private placement discounts and announcement returns. The results indicate that countries with higher legal regulatory quality experience larger discounts compared to those with lower scores. Additionally, there are short-term positive abnormal returns following private placement announcements, while long-term abnormal returns are negative. When considering abnormal returns along with three legal quality variables (regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption), the study finds that higher ratios of these variables amplify the effects on both discounts and abnormal returns. Moreover, the study suggests that regulatory quality and corruption control may positively influence the long-term performance of private equity, as better regulatory quality and lower corruption environments enhance investment efficiency and increase returns from private placements. These findings provide valuable insights for investors, policymakers, and academics, highlighting the importance of considering legal and regulatory environments in investment decisions and policy formulation.
目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 3
1.3 實證發現 4
1.4預期貢獻 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1公司進行私募折溢價幅度之內涵 8
2.2公司私募對股價累積異常報酬的影響 10
2.3私募股權與投資法律監管制度 13
2.4 本章總結 15
第三章 研究假說 16
第四章 研究方法與樣本 18
4.1 資料來源與樣本分配 18
4.2 變數定義表 20
4.3 研究方法與定義 22
第五章 實證結果與分析 27
5.1敘述統計表分析 27
5.2私募折溢價分析 35
5.3私募短期宣告報酬分析 41
5.4 私募長期宣告報酬分析 46
第六章 研究結論與建議 51
參考文獻 53


1. Albuquerue, R., Wang, N., (2008). Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance 63, 1–40.
2. Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M.S., (2011). Corporate financial and investment policies when future financing is not frictionless. Journal of Corporate Finance17, 675–693.
3. Anderson, A., & Gupta, P. P. (2009). A cross-country comparison of corporate governance and firm performance: do financial structure and the legal system matter?. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 5(2), 61-79.
4. Andriosopoulos, D., & Panetsidou, S. (2021). A global analysis of Private Investments in Public Equity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101832.
5. Axelson, U., Jenkinson, T., Strömberg, P., & Weisbach, M. S. (2013). Borrow cheap, buy high? The determinants of leverage and pricing in buyouts. The journal of finance, 68(6), 2223-2267.
6. Barclay, M.J., Holderness, C.G., Sheehan, D.P., (2007). Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance 13(4), 461–484.
7. Berkman, H., Mckenzie, M.D., Verwijmeren, P., (2017). Hole in the wall: informed short selling ahead of private placements. Rev. Finance. 21, 1047–1091.
8. Chaplinsky, S., & Haushalter, D. (2012). VIPE financing: Venture (capital) investments in public equity. The Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital, 246.
9. Chen, A., R. C. Y. Chen, and K. L. Pan. (2002). The performance of initial public offerings conditioning on issue information: The case of Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review 7 (2),167-190
10. Chen, L. H., Dyl, E. A., Jiang, G. J., & Juneja, J. A. (2015). Risk, illiquidity or marketability: What matters for the discounts on private equity placements?. Journal of banking & finance, 57, 41-50.
11. Chou, D. W., Gombola, M., & Liu, F. Y. (2009). Long-run underperformance following private equity placements: The role of growth opportunities. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 1113-1128.
12. Cumming, D., Johan, S., (2019). Capital-market effects of securities regulation: prior conditions, implementation, and enforcement revisited. Journal of Financial Research Letters, 31.
13. Cumming, D., Walz, U., (2009). Private equity returns and disclosure around the world. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41, 727–754.
14. Cumming, D., Fleming, G., Schwienbacher, A., (2006). Legality and venture capital exits. Journal of Corporate Finance 12, 214–245.
15. Cumming, D., Johan, S., Li, D., (2011). Exchange trading rules and stock market liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics 99, 651–671.
16. Dai, N., (2007). Does investor identity matter? An empirical examination of investments by venture capital funds and hedge funds in PIPEs. Journal of Corporate Finance 13, 538–563.
17. Demsetz, H., Lehn, K., (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. J. Polit. Econ. 93, 1155–1177.
18. Dong, G. N., Gu, M., & He, H. (2020). Invisible hand and helping hand: Private placement of public equity in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101400.
19. Edmans, A. (2009). Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. The journal of finance, 64(6), 2481-2513.
20. Engelen, P.-J., Van Essen, M., (2010). Underpricing of IPOs: firm-, issue-and country-specific characteristics. Journal of Banking and Finance. 34, 1958–1969.
21. Floros, I. V., Nagarajan, N. J., & Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2020). The certification role of insider participation in PIPEs. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54, 1417-1447.
22. Giannetti, M., Simonov, A., (2006). Which investors fear expropriation? Evidence from investors’ portfolio choices. J. Financ. 61, 1507–1547.
23. Gillan, S., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper, (2003-01).
24. Harford, J., Kecsk ́es, A., Mansi, S., (2018). Do long-term investors improve corporate decision making? Journal of Corporate Finance 50, 424–452.
25. Heinkel, R., & Schwartz, E. S. (1986). Rights versus underwritten offerings: An asymmetric information approach. The Journal of finance, 41(1), 1-18.
26. Hertzel, M., and R. L. Smith. (1993). Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. The Journal of Finance 48 (2), 459-485.
27. Hertzel, M., M. Lemmon, J. S. Linck, and L. Rees. (2002). Long-run performance following private placements of equity. The Journal of Finance 57 (6), 2595-2617.
28. Holderness, C. G. “Equity Issuances and Agency Costs : The Telling Story of Shareholder Approvalaround the World.” Journal of Financial Economics, 129 (2018), 415–439
29. Hooper, V., Sim, A.B., Uppal, A., (2009). Governance and stock market performance. Econ. Syst. 33, 93–116.
30. Jansen, M. (2020). Resolving information asymmetry through contractual risk sharing: The case of private firm acquisitions. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(5), 1203-1248.
31. John, K., Mateti, R.S., Vasudevan, G., Amira, K., (2016). Investor protection and firm value: evidence from PIPE offerings. J. Financ. Stab. 26, 78–89.
32. Kang, Jun-Koo., and James Park. (2021). Private placements of equity and firm value: Value enhancing or value destroying? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 56 (6): 2072–2102.
33. Kim, E.H., Lu, Y., (2013). Corporate governance reforms around the world and cross-border acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 22, 236–253.
34. Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. (2005). Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (2), 210-238
35. Kusnadi, Y., Wei, K.J., (2011). The determinants of corporate cash management policies: evidence from around the world. Journal of Corporate Finance 17, 725–740.
36. La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52, 1131–1150.
37. La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., (1998). Law and finance. J. Polit. Econ. 106, 1113–1155.
38. La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54, 471–517.
39. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance 55, 1–33.
40. La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57, 1147–1170.
41. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of financial economics, 69(3), 505-527.
42. Lin, W. C., Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S., & Liao, T. L. (2013). The over-optimism of financial analysts and the long-run performance of firms following private placements of equity. Finance Research Letters, 10(2), 82-92.
43. Lim, J., Schwert, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2021). The economics of PIPEs. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 45, 100832.
44. Manconi, A., Peyer, U., Vermaelen, T., (2019). Are buybacks good for long-term shareholder value? Evidence from buybacks around the world. Journal of Finance Quant. Anal.54, 1899–1935.
45. Mclean, R.D., Pontiff, J., Watanabe, A., (2009). Share issuance and cross-sectional returns: international evidence. Journal of Finance Econ. 94, 1–17.
46. Mclean, R.D., Zhang, T., Zhao, M., (2012). Why does the law matter? Investor protection and its effects on investment, finance, and growth. Journal of Finance 67, 313–350.
47. Myers, S.C., Majluf, N.S., (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Finance Econ. 13, 187–221.
48. Rashid Khan, H. U., Khidmat, W. B., Hares, O. A., Muhammad, N., & Saleem, K. (2020). Corporate governance quality, ownership structure, agency costs and firm performance. Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(7), 154.
49. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy 94, 461–488.
50. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52, 737–783.
51. Shleifer, A., Wolfenzon, D., (2002). Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics 66, 3–27.
52. Sony, B., & Bhaduri, S. (2021). Information asymmetry and financing choice between debt, equity and dual issues by Indian firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 72, 90-101.
53. Wruck, K.H., (1989). Equity ownership concentration and firm value: evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23, 3–28
54. Wu, Y. L. (2004). The choice of equity-selling mechanisms. Journal of Financial Economics 74(1), 93-119

電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20290723)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top