跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.140.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/08 09:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:鐘金鳳
研究生(外文):Dewi Saraswati
論文名稱:公司關心碳排放嗎? 以台灣上市公司為例
論文名稱(外文):Does the Company Care about Carbon Emissions? Evidence from Taiwanese Listed Companies
指導教授:高惠娟高惠娟引用關係
指導教授(外文):Erin Hui Chuan Kao
口試委員:李佳蓉羅仙法
口試委員(外文):Chia Jung LeeLuo Xian Fa
口試日期:2024-06-24
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:國際經營與貿易學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:英文
論文頁數:61
中文關鍵詞:碳風險排放環境責任社會責任ESG表現自願CSR披露臺灣企業
外文關鍵詞:carbon emissionsenvironmental responsibilitysocial responsibilityESG performancevoluntary CSR disclosureTaiwanese companies
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:12
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究探究臺灣企業對碳風險的環境意識及其對財務表現的潛在影響。我們分析了2017年至2021年五年間臺灣2430家公司的資料。研究發現,一家公司的環境評分(ENV)和自願的披露企業社會責任(CSR)對碳排放(包括碳強度和總碳水準)都有負面影響。然而,社會評分和披露CSR只對碳強度有負面影響,但對碳水準沒有影響。此結果顯示,專注於環境可持續性和透明溝通這些努力對於實現更低的碳足跡至關重要。儘管社會責任投入可能改善運營效率並降低排放強度,但它們不一定會導致總排放量的減少。這突顯了區分不同類型的CSR活動及其對環境結果具體影響的重要性。此外,研究發現較低的碳排放顯著改善了企業的財務表現。公司自願性揭露CSR投入、並且在環境保護高度參與,皆能強化碳強度對財務績效的負面影響。然而,與碳問題不直接相關的投入, 如: 總綜合ESG(TESG)表現、社會責任參與或CSR揭露則減弱了碳排放和財務績效的負向關係。此外,研究還發現,碳強度是比總排放量更有效的指標。研究結果意涵,公司正戰略性地專注於優化以減少排放強度比率,但不一定顯著減少總排放量。
This study examines the environmental awareness of Taiwanese companies about carbon emissions and their potential impact on financial performance. We analyze data for 2,430 companies in Taiwan over five years (2017-2021). The study found that a company's environmental score (ENV) and voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures negatively impact carbon emissions regarding carbon intensity and total carbon level. However, social scores and CSR disclosure have negative impacts on carbon intensity but not on the level of carbon. The results indicate that initiatives focused on environmental sustainability and transparent communication about these efforts are crucial for reducing carbon emissions. While social initiatives might improve operational efficiency and reduce the intensity of emissions, they do not necessarily lead to an overall reduction in total emissions. This highlights the importance of distinguishing between the types of CSR activities and their specific impacts on environmental outcomes. Additionally, the study found that lower carbon emissions significantly improve firm performance. Companies that voluntarily disclose their CSR efforts and achieve high environmental engagement tend to strengthen the negative impact of carbon intensity on financial performance. However, total composite ESG (TESG) engagement, social engagement, or CSR disclosures not directly related to environmental carbon issues alleviate the negative association between carbon emissions and financial performance. Furthermore, the study indicates that carbon intensity is a more effective metric than total emissions. The findings imply that companies strategically focus on optimizations to reduce the emission intensity ratio without significantly reducing total emissions.
Abstract I
摘要 II
Table Of Contents III
List of Figures V
List of Tables VI
I. Introduction 7
II. Literature 11
2.1 Taiwan’s Carbon emission 11
2.2 Taiwan's Commitment to Carbon Emission Reduction 12
2.3 Stakeholder Theory 13
2.4 ESG Scores and Carbon Emission 14
2.5 The Relationship Between CSR Disclosure and Carbon Emission 15
2.6 Voluntary Disclosure and its Influence on Carbon Emissions 16
2.7 Examining the Role of Green Bonds in Carbon Emissions 17
2.8 The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Financial Performance 18
III. Data & Methodology 21
3.1 Data 21
3.2 Carbon Emission 21
3.3 Model Specifications 23
3.3.1 ESG Scores and Carbon Emission 23
3.3.2 The Relationship Between CSR Disclosure and Carbon Emission 23
3.3.3 Voluntary Disclosure and its Influence on Carbon Emissions 25
3.3.4 Examining the Role of Green Bonds in Carbon Emissions 25
3.3.5 The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Financial Performance 25
IV. Empirical Results 29
4.1 Descriptive Analysis 29
4.2 Examining the Relationship Between ESG Scores and Carbon Emission 33
4.3 The Impact of CSR Transparency on Carbon Emissions 38
4.4 Does Voluntary CSR Disclosure Drive Carbon Emission Reduction? 40
4.5 Investigating the Impact of Green Bonds on Carbon Emission Management 42
4.6 Investigating the Moderating Effect of ESG Engagement on The Relationship between Financial Performance and Carbon Emission 45
V. Conclusion 56
5.1 Conclusion 56
5.2 Limitations and Future Research 57
References 59

References
Aslan, N. (2022, August 10). Taiwan unveils ambitious net-zero plan but faces challenges. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Picks/Interview/Taiwan-steps-up-climate-leadership-with-ambitious-reforms
Baldi, F., & Pandimiglio, G. (2022). Greenwashing in green bonds. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(3), 321-343. [doi: 10.1080/20438009.2021.1978002]
Banga, B. (2019). Green finance: A literature review and agenda for future research. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 512-532. [doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.06.015]
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. (2008). When fearing nature becomes risky: Contaminated water, state inaction and grassroots activism in Bolivia. Geoforum, 39(6), 1720-1734.
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon emissions? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
Chau et al. (2022) Key policies for net zero carbon emissions. 中華民國經濟部(Ministry of Economic Affairs,R.O.C.)全球資訊網. https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/english/Policy/Policy.aspx?menu_id=32904&policy_id=29
Chen, T.-H., & Chen, J.-L. (2018). The impact of environmental regulations on corporate environmental performance: The moderating effect of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 881-893. [doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3329-3]
Chen, Y., Luo, L., & Wang, H. (2020). The effect of stakeholders on voluntary carbon disclosure within Chinese business organizations. Sustainability, 12(14), 5589. [doi: 10.3390/su12145589]
Cheng, B., & Liu, X. (2018). Does public attention improve environmental performance? Evidence from China's SOEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 829-845.
Chou, P., & Liou, M. (2022). The problems of sustainability: Carbon emissions and electricity consumption in Taiwan's electronics and petrochemical industries. Sustainability, 14(20), 12722. [doi: 10.3390/su142012722]
Chou, W.-Y. (2017). Energy transition and climate policy for Taiwan: Decarbonization roadmap and policy recommendations. Energy Policy, 107, 591-602.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Pinnick, G., & Richardson, G. D. (2010). The relation between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate financial performance. Accounting Forum, 34(3), 215-221. [doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2009.12.001]
Cooper, A., Pearce, J., & KPMG. (2018). Why ESG? An investor's guide to environmental, social, and governance factors. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2021/12/kpmg-esg.html
Damiani, C., & Frederiksson, T. (2016). The co-evolution of environmental and social corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(2), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2641-1
Delmas, M., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behaviour: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61(C), 729-739. [doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.046]
Dyck, J. B., Hodge, R. W., & CSR Initiative. (2004). CSR reporting practices of North American companies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 59-73. [doi: 10.5465/amp.2004.13562250]
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1086-1107. [doi: 10.1002/smj.2237]
Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Greenleaf Publishing.
Flammer, C. (2019). Corporate sustainability and financial risk. Review of Corporate Finance, 12(1), 1-27. [doi: 10.1093/rcf/cfr001]
Flammer, C., & Sewerin, A. (2018). Heterogeneity and persistence of ESG effects. Financial Management, 47(1), 217-242.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG (environmental, social, and governance) factors in corporate finance – A literature survey. The Research Institute of Sustainable Finance and Management, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x
Ghoul, S., Guedjri, N., & Kwok, B. H. (2011). Voluntary disclosure, corporate social responsibility, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(4), 306-344. [doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.03.002]
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, T. G. (2011). The effect of socially responsible investment screening on firm risk and return. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 255-273. [doi: 10.1002/smj.808]
Gutierrez-Nieto, B., Ruiz-Ortega, A., & Garcia-Manzano, A. (2016). The role of corporate social responsibility in bank risk management: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(2), 279-295.
Hamilton, L. C. (2018). The International Business Environment. Oxford University Press.
Hsu, C. C., & Wang, C. H. (2017). The drivers and effects of corporate social responsibility disclosure revisited: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(4), 425-454.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2019). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2019. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/fuel-share-of-co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2019
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The impact of corporate social responsibility on access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 768-787. [doi: 10.1002/smj.1885]
Kleimeiser, C. M., & Viehs, M. (2018). Environmental performance and greenwashing: Tensions, contradictions, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 7-22. [doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3240-0]
Kung, F. H., Lin, S. J., & Wu, J. L. (2021). Green bond issuance and the development of the bioenergy sector in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 103, 105422. [doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105422]
Lee, J., & Min, B. D. (2015). Corporate environmental responsibility and firm financial performance: The moderating role of environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 700-710. [doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.083]
Lee, Y., & Cho, S. (2021). Carbon emission and firm valuation in Korean chaebol affiliates. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 321-334.
Liao, S., Luo, Y., & Tang, B. (2010). Can environmental regulation promote technological innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's large and medium-sized industrial enterprises. Ecological Economics, 116, 57-64.
Lin, C. Y., Huang, Y. C., & Wu, K. Y. (2018). Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in Taiwan's manufacturing industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(18), 17703-17714.
López-Calvo de la Fuente, M., Escolar-Hernández, F. J., & Serrano-Cinca, C. (2017). The financial performance of carbon-efficient firms in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1717-1729. [doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.030]
Mainitz, V., & Kristine, S. (2020, September). Green bonds and their contribution to environmental performance: An empirical analysis using Thomson Reuters database. In 26th Bled Economics and Management Conference (pp. 1-20).
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695-725.
Monasterolo, I., & de Angelis, L. (2020). Blind to carbon emissions? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris Agreement. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 170, p. 106571). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106571
Nenonen, S., Järvinen, J. P., & Juntunen, J. I. (2019). Green bonds and energy efficiency investments in Finnish real estate companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 465-481. [doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.06.008]
Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Is there a link? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(1), 160-170. [doi: 10.1111/jiec.12432]
Raghunandan, K., & Rajgopal, S. (2022). Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure reduce the cost of capital? Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 1043-1075. [doi: 10.1002/smj.3322]
Reuters. (2021, April 21). EU agrees with landmark climate change law, sharpening emissions targets. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/eu-countries-meet-agree-stance-un-climate-negotiations-2022-10-24/
Saifullah, N., Abdullah, H., Zakaria, I., & Rahman, N. (2021). The impact of environmental performance on the financial performance of firms listed on emerging stock exchanges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124423.
Saka, C. A., & Oshika, H. (2014). Environmental performance and shareholder value in Japan. Ecological Economics, 108, 127-137. [doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.012]
Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TPEX). (2022). Taiwan greenhouse gas reduction roadmap. https://www.tpex.org.tw/web/regular_emerging/governance/corporate_governance_01.php?l=en-us
Tseng, M., Bebbington, J., & Perrini, F. (2012). Integrating social and environmental disclosures in corporate reports: A comparative study of FTSE 4 Good and DJSI companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(8), 1215-1244. [doi: 10.1108/09090401211278322]
Verbeek, A., Berrone, P., & Nijdam, C. S. (2019). Environmental disclosure, governance, and cost of capital. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1209-1224. [doi: 10.1002/bse.2550]
Wang, J., Lin, C., & Hung, M. (2016). A framework for stakeholder pressure and corporate environmental disclosure: A content analysis approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(2), 303-323. [doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2642-2]
Xu, J., Li, Y., & Wan, J. (2022). Greenwashing and green bond certification: Do certifiers mitigate the risk? Research in International Business Finance, 66, 101817. [doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101817]

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊