|
1.Altarazi, A., et al., Assessing the physical and mechanical properties of 3D printed acrylic material for denture base application. Dent Mater, 2022. 38(12): p. 1841-1854. 2.Al-Dwairi, Z.N., A.A. Al Haj Ebrahim, and N.Z. Baba, A Comparison of the Surface and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printable Denture-Base Resin Material and Conventional Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Journal of Prosthodontics, 2023. 32(1): p. 40-48. 3.Tian, Y., et al., A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning, 2021. 2021: p. 9950131. 4.Zheng, Y., et al., Hyperbranched polymers: advances from synthesis to applications. Chem Soc Rev, 2015. 44(12): p. 4091-130. 5.Das, A. and P. Mahanwar, A brief discussion on advances in polyurethane applications. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, 2020. 3(3): p. 93-101. 6.Maurya, S.D., et al., A Review on Acrylate-Terminated Urethane Oligomers and Polymers: Synthesis and Applications. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2017. 57(7): p. 625-656. 7.Liao, F., et al., Synthesis and properties of UV curable polyurethane acrylates based on two different hydroxyethyl acrylates. Journal of Central South University, 2012. 19(4): p. 911-917. 8.Ngo, T.D., et al., Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018. 143: p. 172-196. 9.Voet, V.S.D., J. Guit, and K. Loos, Sustainable Photopolymers in 3D Printing: A Review on Biobased, Biodegradable, and Recyclable Alternatives. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2021. 42(3). 10.Lim, W.-B., et al., A novel UV-curable acryl-polyurethane for flexural 3D printing architectures. Additive Manufacturing, 2022. 51. 11.Raszewski, Z., et al., Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of 3D Printing Acrylic Material with Bioactive Components. J Funct Biomater, 2022. 14(1). 12.Lee, S., et al., The thermal properties of a UV curable acrylate composite prepared by digital light processing 3D printing. Composites Communications, 2021. 26. 13.Rosace, G., et al., Photosensitive acrylates containing bio-based epoxy-acrylate soybean oil for 3D printing application. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2021. 138(44). 14.Tzeng, J.J., et al., Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Urethane Acrylate-Based 3D-Printed Denture Base Resin. Polymers (Basel), 2021. 13(5). 15.Shi, S., C. Croutxé-Barghorn, and X. Allonas, Photoinitiating systems for cationic photopolymerization: Ongoing push toward long wavelengths and low light intensities. Progress in Polymer Science, 2017. 65: p. 1-41. 16.Allen, N.S., Photoinitiators for UV and visible curing of coatings: Mechanisms and properties. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 1996. 100(1-3): p. 101-107. 17.Decker, C., Photoinitiated crosslinking polymerisation. Progress in Polymer Science, 1996. 21(4): p. 593-650. 18.Srivastava, R., et al., BisGMA analogues as monomers and diluents for dental restorative composite materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2018. 88: p. 25-31. 19.Meereis, C.T.W., et al., Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2018. 82: p. 268-281. 20.Ranganathan, A., et al., Effect of novel cycloaliphatic comonomer on the flexural and impact strength of heat-cure denture base resin. Journal of Oral Science, 2021. 63(1): p. 14-17. 21.GABI TOPO, et al., Mechanical Properties of Bis-GMA/HEMA Resin Composite with Addition of Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles. Materiale Plastice, 2021. 22.Amiri, P., et al., Improved performance of Bis-GMA dental composites reinforced with surface-modified PAN nanofibers. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2021. 32(7): p. 82. 23.Kowalska, A., J. Sokolowski, and K. Bociong, The Photoinitiators Used in Resin Based Dental Composite-A Review and Future Perspectives. Polymers (Basel), 2021. 13(3). 24.Pivesso, B.P., et al., 3D printed dental protheses using TPO-initiated photopolymerization. Effect of the photoinitiator concentration and the use of a UV-blocker. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials, 2023. 62(4): p. 433-442. 25.Kowalska, A., et al., Can TPO as Photoinitiator Replace "Golden Mean" Camphorquinone and Tertiary Amines in Dental Composites? Testing Experimental Composites Containing Different Concentration of Diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine Oxide. Int J Mol Sci, 2022. 23(19). 26.Lara, L., et al., Effect of combining photoinitiators on cure efficiency of dental resin-based composites. J Appl Oral Sci, 2021. 29: p. e20200467. 27.de Oliveira, D.C.R.S., et al., Effect of different photoinitiators and reducing agents on cure efficiency and color stability of resin-based composites using different LED wavelengths. Journal of Dentistry, 2015. 43(12): p. 1565-1572. 28.Schneider, L.F., et al., Curing efficiency of dental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone or trimethylbenzoyl-diphenyl-phosphine oxide. Dent Mater, 2012. 28(4): p. 392-7. 29.Sandro Barone, et al., Development of a DLP 3D printer for orthodontic applications. 2019. 30.Aati, S., et al., Effect of post-curing light exposure time on the physico–mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of 3D-printed denture base material. Dental Materials, 2022. 38(1): p. 57-67. 31.Dai, J., et al., Post-processing of DLP-printed denture base polymer: Impact of a protective coating on the surface characteristics, flexural properties, cytotoxicity, and microbial adhesion. Dental Materials, 2022. 38(12): p. 2062-2072. 32.Li, P., et al., Postpolymerization of a 3D-printed denture base polymer: Impact of post-curing methods on surface characteristics, flexural strength, and cytotoxicity. Journal of Dentistry, 2021. 115: p. 103856. 33.Bagis, Y.H. and F.A. Rueggeberg, The effect of post-cure heating on residual, unreacted monomer in a commercial resin composite. Dental Materials, 2000. 16(4): p. 244-247. 34.Soto-Montero, J., et al., Color alterations, flexural strength, and microhardness of 3D printed resins for fixed provisional restoration using different post-curing times. Dental Materials, 2022. 38(8): p. 1271-1282. 35.Zirak, N., et al., Stereolithography of (meth)acrylate-based photocurable resin: Thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2022. 139(22): p. 52248. 36.Jindal, P., et al., Effects of post-curing conditions on mechanical properties of 3D printed clear dental aligners. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2020. 26(8): p. 1337-1344. 37.Alifui-Segbaya, F., et al., Characterization of the double bond conversion of acrylic resins for 3D printing of dental prostheses. Compendium, 2019. 40(10): p. e7-e11. 38.Altarazi, A., et al., 3D printed denture base material: The effect of incorporating TiO(2) nanoparticles and artificial ageing on the physical and mechanical properties. Dent Mater, 2023. 39(12): p. 1122-1136. 39.Dantagnan, C.A., et al., Degree of conversion of 3D printing resins used for splints and orthodontic appliances under different postpolymerization conditions. Clin Oral Investig, 2023. 27(6): p. 2935-2942. 40.Aati, S., et al., Effect of post-curing light exposure time on the physico-mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of 3D-printed denture base material. Dent Mater, 2022. 38(1): p. 57-67. 41.Al-Hamdan, R.S., et al., Influence of Hydroxyapatite Nanospheres in Dentin Adhesive on the Dentin Bond Integrity and Degree of Conversion: A Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Raman, Fourier Transform-Infrared (FTIR), and Microtensile Study. Polymers (Basel), 2020. 12(12). 42.Dimitrova, M., et al., Evaluation of Water Sorption and Solubility of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM Milled, and PMMA Denture Base Materials Subjected to Artificial Aging. Journal of Composites Science, 2023. 7(8). 43.Al-Qarni, F.D. and M.M. Gad, Printing Accuracy and Flexural Properties of Different 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins. Materials (Basel), 2022. 15(7). 44.Gad, M.M., et al., Strength and Surface Properties of a 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymer. J Prosthodont, 2022. 31(5): p. 412-418. 45.Alhotan, A., et al., Assessing Fracture Toughness and Impact Strength of PMMA Reinforced with Nano-Particles and Fibre as Advanced Denture Base Materials. Materials (Basel), 2021. 14(15). 46.Khan, A.A., et al., Mechanical Properties of the Modified Denture Base Materials and Polymerization Methods: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci, 2022. 23(10). 47.Albertini, P., et al., Stress Relaxation Properties of Five Orthodontic Aligner Materials: A 14-Day In-Vitro Study. Bioengineering (Basel), 2022. 9(8). 48.Meereis, C.T.W., et al., Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analyses of composition strategies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018. 82: p. 268-281. 49.Liu, D., et al., Synthesis of a novel tertiary amine containing urethane dimethacrylate monomer (UDMTA) and its application in dental resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2013. 24(6): p. 1595-603. 50.Jiang, T., et al., Study of Forming Performance and Characterization of DLP 3D Printed Parts. Materials (Basel), 2023. 16(10). 51.Yang, Y., et al., Printability of External and Internal Structures Based on Digital Light Processing 3D Printing Technique. Pharmaceutics, 2020. 12(3). 52.Zhao, M., et al., 3D-printed strong hybrid materials with low shrinkage for dental restoration. Composites Science and Technology, 2021. 213. 53.Shen, M., et al., Effects of exposure time and printing angle on the curing characteristics and flexural strength of ceramic samples fabricated via digital light processing. Ceramics International, 2020. 46(15): p. 24379-24384. 54.Steyrer, B., et al., Visible Light Photoinitiator for 3D-Printing of Tough Methacrylate Resins. Materials (Basel), 2017. 10(12). 55.Schiavi, A. and A. Prato, Evidences of non-linear short-term stress relaxation in polymers. Polymer Testing, 2017. 59: p. 220-229. 56.Reis, P.N.B., M.P. Silva, and P. Santos, Stress Relaxation in Delaminated Carbon/Epoxy Composites. Fibers and Polymers, 2019. 20(6): p. 1284-1289.
|