臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

低視力學生日常學習多半在近距離情況下，對教材的內容進行辨識。但是由於低視力的緣故，將所要辨識的內容放大即成了最常見的需求。因國內針對繁體中文的放大相關研究缺乏系統性的實驗驗證過程，針對此問題，國際上常見方法是以臨界文字尺寸作為放大的依據，但近年部分國內外研究顯示臨界文字尺寸應用在實際的現場，與學生表現出來的需求有落差。因此本研究旨在瞭解中等教育階段低視力學生，使用標準化測量條件時使用臨界文字尺寸時的視角，與日常不受限閱讀條件時所使用的視角間是否存在差異。本研究採取前實驗設計，以2022與2023學年度全臺就讀公私立中等教育階段國中一年級至高中三年級之間的低視力學生為研究範圍，有效樣本30人。使用之研究工具為「繁體中文標準化臨界文字尺寸測驗」，透過標準化測驗蒐集受試者的臨界文字尺寸視角（理論值），再以不受限閱讀距離的一般閱讀情境下，給予臨界文字尺寸，蒐集受試者實際需要的文字尺寸視角（觀察值），比較兩者間是否有差異。實驗結果表明在控制背景變項的條件下，常用的文字尺寸11pt至55 pt範圍內，兩者間存在顯著差異。根據受試者的實際文字尺寸需求建立迴歸線函數為y = 0.0001x2 + 0.0088x + 0.0283，y為觀察值x為臨界文字尺寸，發現標準化測驗結果須以函數進行修正，依統計結果得到結論為，經過標準化測驗得到之文字尺寸逕行放大1.5倍後，可快速獲得該名受試者最佳閱讀文字尺寸。未來研究希望持續蒐集低視力受試者數據，進一步完善迴歸線函數。

Low vision students often need to magnify reading materials for better recognition, but systematic research on magnification methods for traditional Chinese characters in Taiwan is not well-researched. Internationally, critical print size is used for magnification, but recent studies show a gap between that and the actual size students need in daily practical life. This research aims to find out the difference.
The pre-experimental design study included low vision students from grades 7 to 12 in Taiwan during the 2022 & 2023 academic year (n = 30). Using the "Standardized Critical Print Size Test for Traditional Chinese," the study collected theoretical visual angles under standardized conditions and compares them with actual visual angles in unrestricted reading conditions. Results indicated a significant difference between these values within the print size range of 11pt to 55pt.
A regression function (y = 0.0001x² + 0.0088x + 0.0283) based on actual needs suggests that standardized test results need correction. The study concludes that magnifying the standardized test's critical print size by 1.5 times can quickly determine each student's optimal reading size. Future research will continue collecting data to refine the regression function.

摘要.....................................i
Abstract................................ii
致謝.....................................iii
目錄.....................................iv
表目錄....................................vi
圖目錄....................................vii
第一章 緒論................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機........................1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題.....................4
第三節 研究範圍與限制........................5
第四節 名詞釋義.............................6
第二章 文獻探討.............................9
第一節 低視力閱讀之探究......................9
第二節 國際低視力之實施現況..................15
第三節 繁體中文臨界文字尺寸之探究.............18
第三章 研究設計與實施.......................23
第一節 研究架構與步驟.......................23
第二節 研究對象............................28
第三節 研究工具............................31
第四節 實施程序............................35
第五節 資料處理與分析.......................38
第六節 研究倫理............................39
第四章 研究結果與討論.......................41
第一節 受試者樣本描述.......................41
第二節 受試者理論值與觀察值之差異分析..........44
第三節 受試者觀察值數據對各文字尺寸之預測分析...51
第四節 視力值與測驗結果間的相關性研究..........53
第五節 綜合討論............................56
第五章 結論與建議..........................61
第一節 結論...............................61
第二節 建議...............................63
參考文獻..................................67
附錄一 新北市視覺障礙大字書需求評估表..........71
附錄二 研究參與者同意書......................74
附錄三 各受試者全文字尺寸受測結果..............80
附錄四 作者簡介.............................95

壹、中文部分
小田浩一（2002）。MNREAD-Jチャートマニュアル。東京：はんだや。
王滿堂（2005）。眼屈光學。藝軒。
中野泰志、山本亮、新井哲也（2011）。読書の際の視距離調節—晴眼者とロービジュン者の比較—。基礎心理学研究，29，185。
陳一平（2011）。視覺心理學第一版。雙葉書廊。
莊素貞（2009）。弱勢生閱讀媒介評量之研究—以印刷放大文字與電腦擴是文字為例。五南。
呂建志（2005）。三種閱讀媒介對低視力學生閱讀成效之比較研究［未出版之碩士論文］。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士班。
翁詩婷（2018）。閱讀媒介對國民中學低視力學生閱讀成效之研究［未出版之碩士論文〕。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系研究所。
黃柏翰（2009）。黃斑部病變之低視力學生閱讀媒介比較研究［未出版之碩士論文］。臺北市立教育大學特殊教育學系碩士班。
黃柏翰、柿澤敏文、Hisham, B. S. (2018）。臺灣低視力學生近距離閱讀研究。特教園丁，34（2），41-48。
教育部（2022）。111年度特殊教育統計年報。
教育部（2021）。110年度特殊教育統計年報。
教育部（2013）。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法。
劉宛靈（2007）。弱勢生閱讀媒介評量之研究：以印刷放大文字及放大鏡放大文字為例［未出版之碩士論文］。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育與輔助科技研究所。
萬明美（2001）。視障教育。五南。 
貳、英文部分
Bailey, I. L., & Lovie, J. E. (1976). New design priciples for visual acuity letter charts. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 53(11), 740-745.
Bailey, I. L., & Lovie, J. E. (1980). The design and use of a new near-vision chart. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 57(6), 378-387.
Bailey, I. L., Lueck, A. H., Greer, R. B., Tuan, K. M., Bailey, V. M., & Dornbusch, H. G. (2003). Understanding the relationships between print size and reading in low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(6), 325—334.
Barraga, N. C., Collins, M., & Hollis, J. (2021). Development of efficiency in visual functioning: A literature analysis. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 71(9), 387-391.
Cheung, P. Y., Liu, S. K., Lam, C. C. & Cheong, M. Y. (2015). Development and validation of a new Chinese reading chart for children. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 35, 514-521.
Chi, C. F., Cai, D., & You, M. (2008). Assessment of English letters’ legibility using image descriptors. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 107(1), 618-628.
Cline, D., Hofstetter, H. W., & Griffin, J. (1997). Dictionary of visual science (4th ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Committee on Vision, N. R. C., National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1980). Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Advances in Ophthalmology, 41, 103-148. https://doi.org/0.1016/B978-0-08-044978-4.50008-3
Cotter, S. A., Cyert, L. A., Miller, J. M., Quinn, G. E., & National Expert Panel to the National Center for Children’s Vision and Eye Health. (2015). Vision screening 36 to G72 months: recommended practices. Optometry and Vision Science, 92, 6-16.
Gregory, L., Richard. (1997). Eye and brain: the psychology of seeing (5th ed.). Princeton University Press.
Hamm, M. L., Mistry, K., Black, J. M., Grant, C. C., & Dakin, S. C. (2019). Impact of children’s postural variation on viewing distance and estimated visual acuity. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 8(16), 1-16.
Huang, P. H. & Kakizawa, T. (2020). A development and validation of traditional Chinese reading chart for students with low vision in Taiwan (I) Sighted subjects. In: Bakar, A. Y. A., Tahar, M. M., Yasin, M. H. M. (Eds.) (2020) Global Conference Series: Social Sciences, Bangi, Malaysia: Education and Humanities (GCSSSEH), 4, 325–330.
Huang, P. H. & Kakizawa, T. (2023). Analysis of variation in viewing distance among low vision individuals under Chinese free-reading condition. Journal of Special Education Research. 11(1), 21-35.
Huurneman, B., & Boonstra, F. N. (2016). Assessment of near visual acuity in 0-3 year olds with normal and low vision: a systematic review. BMC Ophyhalmology, 16, 215.
International Organization for Standardization (1986). Visual acuity testing: standard optotype and its presentation. Optics and Optical Instruments. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
Jackson, A. J., & Wolffsohn, J. S. (2007). Low vision manual. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier.
Kakizawa, T. (2016) .National wide survey on the causes of visual impairment of students in special needs schools of blind and special need classes of low vision at ordinary elementary and junior high schools - 2015 survey report -. Revision of disability sciences, faculty of human science 2016, University of Tsukuba, Japan. Available at: http://www.human.tsukuba.ac.jp/~kakizawa/images/pdf/report.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2022.
Kakizawa, T. & Aoki, H. (2005). The effect of the text size on the distance in individual with low vision. Vision 2005 London: Proceedings of Vision 2005 conference, International Congress Series, 1282, Elsevier, 617-621.
Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239-252.
Legge, G. E., Ross, J. A., Luebker, A., & LaMay, J. M. (1989). Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota low-vision reading test. Optometry and Vision Science, 66, 843-853.
Legge, G. E. (2007). Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Twin City, Minnesota, MN. CRC Press.
Mackeben, M., Nair, U., Walker, L., & Fletcher, D. C. (2015). Radom word recognition chart helps scotoma assessment in low vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 92(4), 421-428.
Owsley, C., McGwin, G. Jr., Lee, P. P., Wasserman, N., Searcey, K. (2009). Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 127, 681-689.
Radner, W., Willinger, U., Obermayer, W., Mudrich, C., Eisonwort, B. (1998). A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed. Klin Monatsbl Augenbeilkd, 213, 174-181.
Rassow, B. & Wang, Y. (1994). Correlation of letter optotypes with Landolt ring for different degrees of visual acuity. Optometry & Vision Science, 215(2), 6-13.
Rosenblum, L. D. (2010). See what I’m saying: The extraordinary powers of our five senses. W. W. Norton & Company.
Schwartz, M. W. (2002). The 5-minute pediatric consult (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 110.
Sloan, L. L. (1951). Measurement of visual acuity: a critical review. A. M. A. Archives of Ophthalmology, 45(6), 704-725.
Tanaka, E. (2017). Preferred writing size for students with low vision. Poster session presented at 12th International Low Vision by the International Society for Low Vision Research and Rehabilitation, Hague.
Tidbury, L.P. & O’Connor, A. R. (2015). Testing vision testing: Quantifying the effect of movement on visual acuity measurement. Eye (Lond), 29, 129-135.
Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., Dietz, K., & IReST Study Group (2012). Standardized assessment of reading performance: The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(9), 52-61.
Xiong, YZ., Calabrese, A., Cheong, A. M. Y., Legge, G. E. (2018). Reading Acuity as a predictor of low-vision reading performance. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 59, 4798-4803.
Zhang, JY., Zhang, T., Xue, F., Liu, L., & Yu, C. (2007). Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48, 2383-2390.
Zhang, JY., Zhang, T., Xue, F., Liu, L., & Yu, C. (2009). Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influence on crowding. Vision Research, 49, 44-53.