臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，地球極端氣候事件的頻率和嚴重程度不斷加劇，對人類生活和環境造成嚴重影響。隨著時間的推移，政府、企業和民眾逐漸意識到氣候變遷的迫切性，全球各國開始積極推動減碳行動，要求各行各業落實淨零轉型，其中營造產業被視為重點減碳對象。營造產業作為能源消耗和碳排放的主要來源之一，其減碳潛力巨大，而臺灣地狹人稠，擁有發達的工業基礎，但相對應的碳排放問題日益嚴峻。因此，加強建築物在其整個生命週期中的節能減碳技術勢在必行。
本研究通過整理文獻，彙整出幾項幫助營造廠加強減碳方式的構面與要素，並利用層級分析法(AHP)對各主構面與要素進行兩兩比較，計算各項權重及全面性權重大小，並對排序結果進行分析。本研究在計算後所得出的構面排序由大至小為，「材料因素(0.346)」、「工法因素(0.238)」、「運輸因素(0.224)」、「管理因素(0.192)」。評估要素的前五項，由大至小分別是「採用本地材料(0.111)」、「採用低能耗低碳材料(0.106)」、「降低排放汙染(0.085)」、「優化運輸距離(0.084)」、「採用低碳工法(0.071)」。經由以上所得出的結果，四大構面在減碳策略中的重要性有所不同，但每個構面內的評估要素均對實現減碳目標具有關鍵作用。未來在制定和實施減碳策略時，需綜合考慮各構面的不同影響，以提升減碳效益。

In recent years, the frequency and severity of extreme climate events on Earth have continued to intensify, causing serious impacts on human life and the environment. As time goes by, governments, enterprises and the public have gradually realized the urgency of climate change. Countries around the world have begun to actively promote carbon reduction actions and require all walks of life to implement net-zero transformation, among which the construction industry is regarded as a key carbon reduction target. As one of the main sources of energy consumption and carbon emissions, the construction industry has huge potential for carbon reduction. While Taiwan is a small and densely populated country with a developed industrial base, the corresponding carbon emissions problem is becoming increasingly severe. Therefore, it is imperative to strengthen energy-saving and carbon-reduction technologies for buildings throughout their life cycle.
By sorting out the literature, this study compiled several aspects and elements that help construction companies strengthen their carbon reduction methods, and used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to compare the main aspects and elements in pairs, calculate the weights of each item and comprehensive gender weight, and analyze the ranking results. The ranking of the aspects obtained after calculation in this study from largest to smallest is, "Material factors (0.346)", "Construction method factors (0.238)", "Transportation factors (0.224)", "Management factors (0.192)". The top five evaluation factors, from largest to smallest, are "Use local materials (0.111)", "Use low energy consumption and low carbon materials (0.106)", "Reduce emission pollution (0.085)", "Optimize transportation distance (0.084)" ”, “Adopt low-carbon construction methods (0.071)”. Based on the results obtained above, the importance of the four major aspects in the carbon reduction strategy is different, but the evaluation elements within each aspect play a key role in achieving the carbon reduction goal. When formulating and implementing carbon reduction strategies in the future, the different impacts of each aspect need to be comprehensively considered to improve carbon reduction benefits.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
一、 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機與背景 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究範圍 3
1.4 研究方法與流程 3
1.5 論文架構 6
二、 文獻回顧 7
2.1 名詞解釋 7
2.2 營建碳排放來源 8
2.3 國內外減碳計畫彙整 10
2.3.1 國內減碳計畫 10
2.3.2 國外減碳計畫 13
2.4 營建碳排放階段 15
2.4.1 建材生產運輸階段 17
2.4.2 營建施工階段 22
2.5 相關研究 28
2.6 小結 31
三、 研究方法 33
3.1 研究流程 33
3.2 層級分析法 35
3.2.1 AHP法的層級與要素 35
3.2.2 AHP的評估尺度 36
3.2.3 AHP的運算步驟 36
3.3 問卷設計 40
3.3.1 層級架構 40
3.3.2 要素分析 42
四、研究結果 45
4.1 問卷填答對象背景資料分析 45
4.2 權重計算結果 46
4.2.1 決策構面的權重計算 46
4.2.2 評估要素的權重計算 49
4.3 權重結果討論 53
五、結論與建議 59
5.1 研究結論 59
5.2 研究建議 60
參考文獻 61
附錄 67

一、中文文獻
[1]info. (2024). 氣候變遷學堂：「淨零排放」是什麼意思？8個常見問題與解答. 擷取自 新竹縣永續發展暨氣候變遷環保小學堂: https://www.hcepbcc.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=307
[2]Kai. (2023). 擠進ESG生態鏈！建築產業必須要知道的10個關鍵字. 擷取自 id SHOW: https://www.idshow.com.tw/article/id/5287
[3]內政部建築研究所. (2018). 我國近零能源建築發展策略與可行性研究. 內政部建築研究所自行研究報告 .
[4]日本經產省為實現2050年碳中和目標，制定「綠色成長戰略」工程表. (無日期). 擷取自 經濟部產業發展署經濟部台日產業合作推動辦公室: https://www.tjpo.org.tw/NewsDetail.aspx?id=1000
[5]王彬墀；周麗芳；盧芬絹. (2022). 2050淨零排放新思維解析《歐洲綠色新政》. 擷取自 科學月刊: https://www.scimonth.com.tw/archives/5801
[6]生命週期的視野. (無日期). 擷取自 低碳建築聯盟: https://www.lcba.org.tw/article/?article_item_id=78
[7]低碳建築聯盟LCBA. (2015). 碳足跡產品類別規則. 擷取自 碳足跡產品類別規則: https://www.lcba.org.tw/user_files/news/14-019%2B%E5%BB%BA%E7%AF%89%E7%89%A9PCR%E7%AC%AC1_0%E7%89%88.pdf
[8]呂灯哲. (2022). 建設公司開發建案產品規劃定位之探討 - 以低樓層透天建築物為例. 碩士論文，國立雲林科技大學營建工程系.
[9]我國溫室氣體排放及減量總覽. (2023). 擷取自 氣候公民對話平台: https://www.climatetalks.tw/%E6%88%91%E5%9C%8B%E6%BA%AB%E5%AE%A4%E6%B0%A3%E9%AB%94%E6%8E%92%E6%94%BE%E5%8F%8A%E6%B8%9B%E9%87%8F%E7%B8%BD%E8%A6%BD
[10]李宜蓁. (2022). 占全球排碳量近四成，建築產業減碳的困境與展望. 擷取自 CSRone: https://csrone.com/topics/7562
[11]林盈秀. (2022). 建築物生命週期評估　揪出高達28％被忽略的「隱含碳」. 擷取自 CSR@天下: https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/42352
[12]林憲德. (2013). 建築物設計階段碳揭露標示法之研究（1）－建築物碳揭露方法及碳排放資料庫之研究. 中華民國內政部建築研究所.
[13]邱品諺. (2022). 民間推動危老重建相關風險因素之探討. 碩士論文，國立雲林科技大學營建工程系.
[14]氣候公民對話平臺. (無日期). 擷取自 氣候公民對話平臺: https://www.climatetalks.tw/
[15]財團法人台灣建築中心. (無日期). 再生綠建材. 擷取自 財團法人台灣建築中心: https://gbm.tabc.org.tw/modules/pages/regeneration
[16]國際減碳政策. (無日期). 擷取自 全球碳規範指引: https://www.netzeroexport.com.tw/carbon_guidelines/
[17]張又升. (2002). 建築物生命週期二氧化碳減量評估. 博士論文，國立成功大學建築學系碩博士班.
[18]淨零建築風潮正熱 全球政府拚減碳. (2022). 擷取自 Delta Electronics: https://www.deltaww.com/zh-TW/news/35682
[19]陳凱中. (2022). 我國營建業及其廢棄物創新應用之研究. 碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所.
[20]游伯堅. (2020). 日本近零能源建築發展觀摩研習計畫. 擷取自 中華民國內政部建築研究所: https://www.abri.gov.tw/PeriodicalDetail.aspx?n=861&s=2334&key=87&isShowAll=false
[21]黃偉任；林雲翔. (2023). COP28對台灣淨零建築政策的啟示與挑戰. 擷取自 國立臺灣大學社會科學院風險社會與政策研究中心: https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/climate-change/1834-cop28.html
[22]新創圓夢網. (無日期). 淨零排放NET ZERO一次搞懂. 擷取自 新創圓夢網: https://startup.sme.gov.tw/home/event/net_zero/
[23]新聞傳播處. (2023). 臺灣2050淨零排放. 擷取自 行政院: https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/7a65a06e-3f71-4c68-b368-85549fbca5d1
[24]綠色和平Greenpeace. (2023). 什麼是淨零碳排？臺灣怎麼實現？國際作法一次看. 擷取自 Greenpeace 綠色和平: https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/38067/%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%E6%98%AF%E6%B7%A8%E9%9B%B6%E7%A2%B3%E6%8E%92%EF%BC%9F%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E6%80%8E%E9%BA%BC%E5%AF%A6%E7%8F%BE%EF%BC%9F%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E4%BD%9C%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%80%E6%AC%A1%E7%9C%8B/
[25]臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. (2022). 擷取自 國家發展委員會: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76
[26]褚志鵬. (2009). 層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作. 國立東華大學企業管理學系教學講義.
[27]劉安瑀. (2014). 建築軀體工程碳足跡評估之研究. 碩士論文，國立成功大學建築學系.
[28]劉洋. (2023). 降低建築物蘊含碳排(EC)與營運碳排(OC)的挑戰. 擷取自 2023秋季論壇:降低建築物蘊含碳排(EC)與營運碳排(OC)的挑戰: https://www.blm.org.tw/pic/download/BLM_2023%E7%A7%8B%E5%AD%A3%E8%AB%96%E5%A3%87%E7%B0%A1%E5%A0%B1_3.%E5%8A%89%E6%B4%8B-%E6%95%B4%E5%90%88%E5%BC%8F%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88%E5%8A%A9%E5%8A%9B%E5%BB%BA%E7%AF%89%E5%85%A8%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E9%80%B1%E6%9C%9F%E7%A2%B3
[29]劉曜. (2011). 臺灣建築減廢設計原則與手法之初探. 碩士論文，國立中央大學營建管理研究所.
[30]潤泰集團. (無日期). 低碳工法. 擷取自 潤泰集團: https://www.rtc.com.tw/technology/post/%E4%BD%8E%E7%A2%B3%E5%B7%A5%E6%B3%95.21.html
[31]鄭政利. (2017). 零碳建築的實踐. 擷取自 建築師雜誌: https://www.twarchitect.org.tw/special/%E9%9B%B6%E7%A2%B3%E5%BB%BA%E7%AF%89%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%A6%E8%B8%90/
[32]鄭家尹. (2016). 營造工程碳足跡分析-以建築結構為例. 碩士論文，國立成功大學土木工程學系.
[33]賴宛靖. (2024). 歐美日逐步落實建築減碳政策. 擷取自 工業技術研究院: https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspx?DisplayStyle=18_content&SiteID=1&MmmID=1036452026061075714&MGID=1252557712641734641
[34]賴姿羽. (2018). 臺灣建築產業之循環經濟發展策略評估因子研究. 碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士班.
[35]營建產業碳管理顧問服務. (無日期). 擷取自 財團法人臺灣營建研究院: https://www.tcri.org.tw/tcriWeb/service31.htm
 
二、英文文獻
[36]Akbarnezhad, A., & Xiao, J. (2017). Estimation and minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: a review. Buildings, 7(1), p. 5.
[37]Arogundade, S., Dulaimi, M., & Ajayi, S. (2023). Holistic review of construction process carbon-reduction measures: a systematic literature review approach. Buildings.
[38]Cang, Y., Yang, L., Luo, Z., & Zhang, N. (2020). Prediction of embodied carbon emissions from residential buildings with different structural forms. Sustainable Cities and Society
[39]Chan, M., Masrom, M. A., & Yasin, S. S. (3.33). Selection of low-carbon building materials in construction projects: Construction professionals’ perspectives. Buildings
[40]Esa, M. R. (2017). Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, pp. 219-229.
[41]Häkkinen, T., Kuittinen, M., Ruuska, A., & Jung, N. (2015). Reducing embodied carbon during the design process of buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, pp. 1-13.
[42]Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Feng, Y., Lau, W. S.-t., & Mao, C. (2015). Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: A case study in China. Journal of cleaner production, pp. 249-259.
[43]Kumari, L., Kulatunga, U., Madusanka, N., & Jayasena, N. (2020). Embodied carbon reduction strategies for buildings. ICSBE 2018: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, pp. 295-308.
[44]Lai, K. E., Rahiman, N. A., Othman, N., Ali, K. N., Lim, Y. W., Moayedi, F., & Dzahir, M. A. (2023). Quantification process of carbon emissions in the construction industry. Energy and Buildings
[45]Li, Z., Shen, G. Q., & Alshawi, M. (2014). Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China. Resources, conservation and recycling, pp. 27-39.
[46]Lo, C.-L. (2017). Environmental benefits of renewable building materials: A case study in Taiwan. Energy and Buildings, pp. 236-244.
[47]Mao, C., Shen, Q., Shen, L., & Tang, L. (2013). Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects. Energy and Buildings, pp. 165-176.
[48]New WorldGBC report outlines how Asia Pacific can build back better by tackling embodied carbon in built environment. (n.d.). Retrieved from World Green Building Council: https://worldgbc.org/article/new-worldgbc-report-outlines-how-asia-pacific-can-build-back-better-by-tackling-embodied-carbon-in-built-environment/
[49]Sbahieh, Sami, Serdar, M. Z., Al-Ghamdi, & G, S. (2023). Decarbonization strategies of building materials used in the construction industry. Materials Today: Proceedings.