臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

第一章 前言 1
1-1研究背景 1
1-2研究動機 4
第二章 理論基礎與文獻回顧 6
2-1 牙齒的結構組成 6
2-2 牙髓疾病(Pulp disease) 7
2-3 三氧礦化物牙髓填充材料(Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, MTA) 9
2-3-1矽酸三鈣和矽酸二鈣的簡介 9
2-3-2溶膠-凝膠法 (Sol-gel method) 12
2-3-3溶膠-凝膠法的反應影響參數 13
2-3-4水合反應 13
2-4牙本質接著劑( Dental Bonding Agent ) 14
2-4-1 不同世代的牙本質接著劑( Generation ) 15
2-4-2 全酸蝕與自酸蝕 18
2-4-3 理想的牙本質接著劑 18
2-4-3-1 良好的黏合性能 19
2-4-3-2 適應性和相容性 19
2-4-3-3 生物相容性 19
2-4-3-4 耐久性和穩定性 19
2-4-3-5 黏合後與口腔環境的適應性 19
2-4-3-6 易用性和操作性 20
2-4-3-7 預期效果 20
2-4-3-8 良好的保存期限 20
2-5 玻璃離子體水泥(Glass ionomer cement, GIC) 21
2-6 文獻回顧 22
2-6-1 矽酸三鈣的合成和性質優化探討 22
2-6-2 剪切強度分析實驗方法回顧 23
第三章 實驗原理與方法 42
3-1實驗介紹 42
3-1-1實驗流程 42
3-1-2實驗藥品 43
3-1-3 部分藥品備註 44
3-1-3-1 3M single bond universal (3M) 44
3-1-3-2 Clearfil SE (SE) 44
3-1-3-3 Clearfil S3 (S3) 44
3-1-3-4BeautiBond Xtreme (BB) 44
3-2實驗方法 46
3-2-1 合成矽酸三鈣(C3S) 46
3-2-2矽酸三鈣的反應機轉 48
3-2-3矽酸三鈣的製程參數優化 50
3-2-4 球磨矽酸三鈣 51
3-2-5 C3S與高分子樹酯接著方法 51
3-3分析儀器介紹 54
3-3-1 X射線繞射分析儀(X-ray Diffractometer, XRD) 54
3-3-2 動態光散射儀(Dynamic Light Scattering, DLS) 58
3-3-3 萬能材料試驗機(Universal Testing Machine) 60
3-3-4 吉爾摩針入儀(Gillmore Needle Apparatus) 62
3-3-5 掃描式電子顯微鏡( Scanning Electron Microscope, SEM ) 63
3-4分析方法 65
3-4-1 晶相結構分析 65
3-4-2 粒徑分析 65
3-4-3 球磨後C3S表面形貌分析 66
3-4-4 抗壓強度分析 66
3-4-5 硬化時間分析 67
3-4-5剪切強度分析 68
第四章 結果與討論 71
4-1矽酸三鈣的製程參數優化 71
4-1-1急冷轉爐冷對矽酸三鈣的影響 72
4-1-2熟成時間對矽酸三鈣製程的影響 73
4-1-3催化劑硝酸用量對矽酸三鈣製程的影響 74
4-1-4四水硝酸鈣用量對矽酸三鈣製程的影響 77
4-1-5 鍛燒時間對矽酸三鈣製程的影響 78
4-1-6 比較急冷新舊製程差異 80
4-1-7 最佳急冷參數轉爐冷測試 80
4-2製程優化後的重複試驗 81
4-3矽酸三鈣的物理性質 83
4-3-1 不同四水硝酸鈣含量的抗壓強度比較 84
4-3-2 不同鍛燒時間的抗壓強度比較 85
4-3-3 新舊製程爐冷與急冷矽酸三鈣的抗壓強度比較 86
4-3-4 舊製程爐冷與急冷矽酸三鈣的硬化時間比較 87
4-3-5 新製程爐冷與急冷矽酸三鈣的硬化時間比較 89
4-4矽酸三鈣球磨前後 91
4-4-1矽酸三鈣球磨前後DLS粒徑分佈 91
4-4-2矽酸三鈣球磨後晶相結果 92
4-4-3 矽酸三鈣球磨前後的表面形貌 93
4-5 牙本質接著劑剪切強度結果 95
第五章 結論 101
第六章 參考文獻 102

[1]M. P. Gutiérrez-Salazar and J. Reyes-Gasga, Microhardness and chemical composition of human tooth. Mater. Res. 2003, 6, 367.
[2]G. S. Penmetsa and C. D. Dwarakanath, Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of novamin and pro-argin in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity: a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Adv. Med. Dent. Sci. Res.
[3]M. S. J. Lee, M. Monsef, and M. Torabinejad, Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J. Endod. 1993, 11, 541.
[4]M.Parirokh and M.Torabinejad, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Comprehensive Literature Review—Part I: Chemical, Physical, and Antibacterial Properties. J. Endod. 2010, 1, 16.
[5]S. H. Kang, Y. S. Shin, H. S. Lee, S. O. Kim, Y. Shin, Y. I. Jung and J. S. Song, Color Changes of Teeth after Treatment with Various Mineral Trioxide Aggregate–based Materials: An Ex Vivo Study. J. Endod. 2015, 5, 737.
[6]P. C. Aïtcin, Portland cement. in Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures, Elsevier Inc., 2016, 27.
[7]N. Roussel, From industrial testing to rheological parameters for concrete. Elsevier Ltd., 2011.
[8]W. Zhao and J. Chang, Sol–gel synthesis and in vitro bioactivity of tricalcium silicate powders. Mater. Lett. 2004, 19, 2350.
[9]J. Camilleri, F. E. Montesin, K. Brady, R. Sweeney, R. V. Curtis and T. R. P. Ford, The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent. Mater. 2005, 4, 297.
[10]S. Sakka, History of the Sol–Gel Chemistry and Technology. Handb. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2016, 1.
[11]S. Skink, Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 2012.
[12]T. Thi Be Lan, Y.C. Tsai, Z.Y. Huang, Y.L. Chen, G.C. Hermosa, K.W. Lu, C.C. Chien, A.C.A. Sun, Modification and characterization of tricalcium silicate bio-ceramic powders synthesized by sol-gel process for potential application in dental treatment. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 690, 133743.
[13]E. Yilmaz and M. Soylak, Functionalized nanomaterials for sample preparation methods. Handb. Nanomater. Anal. Chem. Mod. Trends Anal. 2020, 375.

[14]G. Migliau, Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann. Stomatol. (Roma).2017, 1, 1.
[15]B. S. Lee and D. M. Wang, 牙齒黏合劑及塗層劑. 2012.
[16]J. Perdigão, S. Geraldeli, and J. S. Hodges, Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: Effect on postoperative sensitivity. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2003, 12, 1621.
[17]M. G. BUONOCORE, Principles of adhesive retention and adhesive restorative materials. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1963, 67, 382.
[18]A. D. Wilson and B. E. Kent, The glass-ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material. J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 1971, 21, 313.
[19]S. K. Sidhu and J. W. Nicholson, A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J. Funct. Biomater. 2016, 7, 16.
[20]L.FORSTEN, Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 1991, 99, 241.
[21]M. John, T. Bds, and M. J. Tyas, Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cement restorations. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2006, 14, 10.
[22]B. S. CHONG and T. R. P. FORD, Root-end filling materials: rationale and tissue response. Endod. Top. 2005, 11, 114.
[23]陳奕倫, 矽酸三鈣之製備及其應用於臨床之潛力探討 2021.
[24]H. Çolak, U. Tokay, R. Uzgur, Z. Uzgur, E. Ercan, and M. M. Hamidi, The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between Biodentine and composite. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2016, 14, 217.
[25]P. Neelakantan, D. Grotra, C. V. Subbarao, and F. Garcia-Godoy, The shear bond strength of resin-based composite to white mineral trioxide aggregate. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2012, 143, 40.
[26]P. J. Palma, J. A. Marques, R. I. Falacho, A. Vinagre, J. M. Santos, and J. C. Ramos, Does Delayed Restoration Improve Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Protocols to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements? Mater. (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, 11.
[27]P. Barret, D. Ménétrier, and D. Bertrandie, Mechanism of C3S dissolution and problem of the congruency in the very initial period and later on. Cem. Concr. Res. 1983, 13, 728.
[28]P. W. Brown, E. Franz, G. Frohnsdorff, and H. F. W. Taylor, Analyses of the aqueous phase during early C3S hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 1984, 14, 257.
[29]M. Torabinejad and M. Parirokh, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Comprehensive Literature Review—Part II: Leakage and Biocompatibility Investigations. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 190.
[30]M. Parirokh and M. Torabinejad, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Comprehensive Literature Review—Part III: Clinical Applications, Drawbacks, and Mechanism of Action, J. Endod. 2010, 36, 400.
[31]S. W. Chang, W. J. Shon, W. C. Lee, K. Y. Kum, S. H. Baek, and K. S. Bae, Analysis of heavy metal contents in gray and white MTA and 2 kinds of Portland cement: a preliminary study, Oral Surgery, Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontology. 2010, 109, 642.
[32]S. Ebnesajjad, Theories of Adhesion. Surf. Treat. Mater. Adhes. Bond. 2014, 77.
[33]S. Rajasekharan, L. C. Martens, R. G. E. C. Cauwels, and R. M. H. Verbeeck, BiodentineTM material characteristics and clinical applications: A review of the literature. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 2014, 15, 147.
[34]H. Singh, A. Professsor, M. Kaur, S. Markan, and P. Kapoor, Open Access Biodentine: A Promising Dentin substitute. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci, 2014, 2, 5.
[35]N. Butt, S. Talwar, S. Chaudhry, R. R. Nawal, S. Yadav, and A. Bali, Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2014, 25, 692.
[36]P. Z. Tawil, D. Abe, D. J. Duggan, and J. C. Galicia, MTA: A Clinical Review.
[37]H. Çolak, U. Tokay, R. Uzgur, Z. Uzgur, E. Ercan, and M. M. Hamidi, The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between biodentine and composite. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2016, 14, 217.
[38]M. Kaur, H. Singh, J. S. Dhillon, M. Batra, and M. Saini, MTA versus Biodentine: Review of Literature with a Comparative Analysis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11.
[39]B. S. Lee, H. P. Lin, J. C. C. Chan, W. C. Wang, P. H. Hung, Y. S. Tsai, Y. L. Lee, A novel sol-gel-derived calcium silicate cement with short setting time for application in endodontic repair of perforations. Int. J. Nanomedicine, 2018, 13, 261.
[40]M. Wu, T. Wang, Y. Wang, F. Li, M. Zhou, and X. Wu, A novel and facile route for synthesis of fine tricalcium silicate powders. Mater. Lett. 2018, 227, 187.
[41]Y. N. Tan, W. J. Chen, Y. Liu, and Y. J. Liu, Preparation of tricalcium silicate and investigation of hydrated cement. J. Cent. South Univ. 2020, 27, 3227.
[42]I. Primathena, D. Nurdin, H. Hermawan, and A. Cahyanto, Synthesis, Characterization, and Antibacterial Evaluation of a Cost-Effective Endodontic Sealer Based on Tricalcium Silicate-White Portland Cement. Mater. 2021, Vol. 14, Page 417, 2021, 14, 417.
[43]X. Song and A. Díaz-Cuenca, Sol–Gel Synthesis of Endodontic Cements: Post-Synthesis Treatment to Improve Setting Performance and Bioactivity. Mater. 2022, Vol. 15, Page 6051, 2022, 15, 6051.
[44]Y. Wei, N. Baskaran, H. Y. Wang, Y. C. Su, S. C. Nabilla, and R. J. Chung, Study of polymethylmethacrylate/tricalcium silicate composite cement for orthopedic application. Biomed. J. 2023, 46, 100540.
[45]M. Y. Özata, S. Falakaloğlu, G. Plotino, and Ö. Adıgüzel, The micro-shear bond strength of new endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putty: An in vitro study. Aust. Endod. J. 2023, 49, 124.
[46]A. de P. Melo, C. M. P. deRosatto, D. C. Ferraz, G. L. deSouza, and C. C. G. Moura, Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Cell Attachment, and Elemental Characterization of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers. Mater. 2023, Vol. 16, Page 6705, 2023, 16, 6705.
[47]“專利證書：矽酸三鈣的製備方法” .
[48]A. Hermansson, Standardization and optimization of index for 28 day strength for cement made from standard clinker.
[49]D. A. Skoog, F. J. Holler, and S. R. Crouch, Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 7th Editio. Cengage Learning, 2018.