跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/07 04:08
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:沈筱涵
研究生(外文):SHEN, XIAO-HAN
論文名稱:早發性與晚發性第一型和第二型糖尿病患者的心血管疾病及死亡風險
論文名稱(外文):Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Risk in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Patients
指導教授:陳詠宸陳華芬陳華芬引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHEN, YONG-CHENCHEN, HUA-FEN
口試委員:周雨青陳詠宸陳華芬徐志雄
口試委員(外文):CHOU, YU-CHINGCHEN, YONG-CHENCHEN, HUA-FENHSU, CHIH-HSIUNG
口試日期:2024-07-11
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:醫療暨健康產業大數據碩士學位學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2024
畢業學年度:112
語文別:中文
論文頁數:118
中文關鍵詞:糖尿病照護網早發糖尿病心血管疾病
外文關鍵詞:Diabetes Shared Careearly-onset diabetescardiovascular disease
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:16
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 背景及重要性 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 早發型糖尿病 5
第二節 血糖控制 11
第三節 早發型糖尿病及心血管疾病間的相關性 17
第四節 糖尿病照護網 23
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 資料來源 26
第二節 研究設計與變項之定義 30
第三節 資料處理與統計分析 37
第四章 結果 38
第一節 研究對象之人口學特徵、生理及生化血液檢驗結果與共病分布 38
第二節 研究期間生理及生化血液檢查指標控制變化 50
第三節 與心血管疾病的相關性 56
第四節 糖尿病診斷年齡與心血管疾病風險 67
第五節 分層未受照護時間結果 73
第六節 分層性別結果 79
第七節 分層平均糖化血色素結果 85
第八節 分層有無使用高血壓藥物之結果 91
第九節 分層有無使用高血脂藥物之結果 97
第五章 討論 103
第一節 糖尿病發病年齡與心血管疾病風險相關性探討 103
第二節 加入照護網的可能影響 107
第三節 糖尿病胰島功能 109
第四節 研究限制 111
第六章 結論 112
參考文獻 113
1."International Ciabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th edition 2021. Western Pacific [Internet] 2021 11/08/2021 [cited 2023 12/20]; 10:[Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/region/8/wp.html.
2.Sun, H., et al., IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2022. 183: p. 109119.
3.潘文涵, 國民營養健康狀況變遷調查 (102-105 年), 衛生福利部國民健康署, Editor. 2019. p. 72.
4.潘文涵, 國民營養健康狀況變遷調查(106-109年), 衛生福利部國民健康署, Editor. 2022. p. 82.
5.衛福部國民健康署, 2007年台灣地區高血壓、高血糖、高血脂之追蹤調查研究, 衛福部國民健康署, Editor. 2008, 衛福部國民健康署: 衛福部國民健康署.
6.社團法人中華民國糖尿病衛教學會, 臺灣糖尿病年鑑. 2019第2型糖尿病. 2019, 臺灣.
7.社團法人中華民國糖尿病衛教學會, 臺灣糖尿病年鑑. 2020第1型糖尿病. 2020, 臺灣.
8.”International Diabetes Federation, Diabetes Complications. Vol. 2024. Brussels, Belgium.
9.衛生福利部統計處. 111年死因統計結果. [Internet] 112 2023/08/31 [cited 2024 03/15]; Available from: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-5069-113-xCat-y111.html.
10.Lo, W.-C., et al., Adult mortality of diseases and injuries attributable to selected metabolic, lifestyle, environmental, and infectious risk factors in Taiwan: a comparative risk assessment. Population Health Metrics, 2017. 15(1): p. 17.
11.Ojo, O.A., et al., Diabetes mellitus: From molecular mechanism to pathophysiology and pharmacology. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices, 2023. 19: p. 100247.
12."DiABETES UK. diabetes and heart disease. [Internet] 2022 08/24 [cited 2024 04/09]; Available from: https://www.diabetes.org.uk/guide-to-diabetes/complications/cardiovascular_disease.
13.Xie, J., et al., Global burden of type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults, 1990-2019: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Bmj, 2022. 379: p. e072385.
14.Wagenknecht, L.E., et al., Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002-18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2023. 11(4): p. 242-250.
15.Liu, L.L., et al., Prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth with diabetes in USA: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Pediatr Diabetes, 2010. 11(1): p. 4-11.
16.Koye, D.N., et al., Temporal Trend in Young-Onset Type 2 Diabetes-Macrovascular and Mortality Risk: Study of U.K. Primary Care Electronic Medical Records. Diabetes Care, 2020. 43(9): p. 2208-2216.
17.Chuang, L.M., et al., Comparisons of the outcomes on control, type of management and complications status in early onset and late onset type 2 diabetes in Asia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2006. 71(2): p. 146-55.
18.Yeung, R.O., et al., Metabolic profiles and treatment gaps in young-onset type 2 diabetes in Asia (the JADE programme): a cross-sectional study of a prospective cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2014. 2(12): p. 935-43.
19.Wei, J.N., et al., National surveillance for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwanese children. Jama, 2003. 290(10): p. 1345-50.
20.Hillier, T.A. and K.L. Pedula, Complications in young adults with early-onset type 2 diabetes: losing the relative protection of youth. Diabetes Care, 2003. 26(11): p. 2999-3005.
21.Zeitler, P., et al., Treatment options for type 2 diabetes in adolescents and youth: a study of the comparative efficacy of metformin alone or in combination with rosiglitazone or lifestyle intervention in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes, 2007. 8(2): p. 74-87.
22.Song, S.H. and C.A. Hardisty, Early onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: a harbinger for complications in later years—clinical observation from a secondary care cohort. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2009. 102(11): p. 799-806.
23.Chan, J.C., et al., Premature mortality and comorbidities in young-onset diabetes: a 7-year prospective analysis. Am J Med, 2014. 127(7): p. 616-24.
24.Huo, X., et al., Risk of non-fatal cardiovascular diseases in early-onset versus late-onset type 2 diabetes in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2016. 4(2): p. 115-24.
25.Zou, X., et al., The characteristics of newly diagnosed adult early-onset diabetes: a population-based cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 46534.
26.Hu, C., et al., Association Between Age at Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Nationwide, Population-Based, Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021. 12: p. 717069.
27.Constantino, M.I., et al., Long-term complications and mortality in young-onset diabetes: type 2 diabetes is more hazardous and lethal than type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2013. 36(12): p. 3863-9.
28.中華民國糖尿病學會. 糖化血色素(HbA1c)值. [Internet] 2011 2011/05/31 [cited 2024 05/19]; Available from: http://www.diabetes.org.tw/wddt_heduc01.jsp?P_TNO=EDUC990010005&P_HCTG=A.
29.Committee, A.D.A.P.P., 6. Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care, 2023. 47(Supplement_1): p. S111-S125.
30."The Diabetes Association of the Republic of China (Taiwan) (2022), DAROC Clinical Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Care- 2022. 2022, Taipei, Taiwan: The Diabetes Association of the Republic of China (Taiwan).
31.Diabetes Association of the R.O.C., DAROC Clinical Practice Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes Care- 2022. 2022, Taiwan.
32.Riddle, M.C., The Treat-to-Target Trial and related studies. Endocr Pract, 2006. 12 Suppl 1: p. 71-9.
33.Wangnoo, S.K., et al., Treat-to-target trials in diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab, 2014. 18(2): p. 166-74.
34.Eeg-Olofsson, K., et al., New aspects of HbA1c as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). J Intern Med, 2010. 268(5): p. 471-82.
35.Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet, 1998. 352(9131): p. 837-53.
36.Holman, R.R., et al., 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2008. 359(15): p. 1577-89.
37.Stratton, I.M., et al., Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Bmj, 2000. 321(7258): p. 405-12.
38.Patel, A., et al., Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2008. 358(24): p. 2560-72.
39.Gerstein, H.C., et al., Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2008. 358(24): p. 2545-59.
40.Nathan, D.M., et al., Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2005. 353(25): p. 2643-53.
41.Bebu, I., et al., Risk Factors for First and Subsequent CVD Events in Type 1 Diabetes: The DCCT/EDIC Study. Diabetes Care, 2020. 43(4): p. 867-874.
42.Zeitler, P., et al., A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(24): p. 2247-56.
43.Bjornstad, P., et al., Long-Term Complications in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2021. 385(5): p. 416-426.
44.Nanayakkara, N., et al., Impact of age at type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis on mortality and vascular complications: systematic review and meta-analyses. Diabetologia, 2021. 64(2): p. 275-287.
45.Si, D., et al., Comparison of diabetes management in five countries for general and indigenous populations: an internet-based review. BMC Health Services Research, 2010. 10(1): p. 169.
46.Lai, M.-S. and S.-T. Chiou, Concept and Content of Diabetes Shared Care. Formosan Journal of Medicine, 2002. 6(4): p. 560-568.
47.Chen, Y.-Y. and Y.-C. Tung, Association between value-based payments and quality of diabetes care. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 2023. 42(6): p. 689-699.
48.Lee, I.T., et al., Pay-for-performance for shared care of diabetes in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc, 2019. 118 Suppl 2: p. S122-s129.
49.Tan, E.C., et al., Is a diabetes pay-for-performance program cost-effective under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan? Qual Life Res, 2014. 23(2): p. 687-96.
50.Hsieh, H.M., et al., Cost-effectiveness of diabetes pay-for-performance incentive designs. Med Care, 2015. 53(2): p. 106-15.
51.Yang, Y.H., et al., Effectiveness of diabetes shared care program on metabolic indicators of people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes, 2024. 18(3): p. 257-267.
52.Pan, C.C., et al., Patients with diabetes in pay-for-performance programs have better physician continuity of care and survival. Am J Manag Care, 2017. 23(2): p. e57-e66.
53.Chen, C.C. and S.H. Cheng, Does pay-for-performance benefit patients with multiple chronic conditions? Evidence from a universal coverage health care system. Health Policy Plan, 2016. 31(1): p. 83-90.
54.Lu, C.W., et al., A nationwide cohort investigation on pay-for-performance and major adverse limb events in patients with diabetes. Prev Med, 2021. 153: p. 106787.
55.Li, P.I. and H.R. Guo, Long-term quality-of-care score for predicting the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes, 2023. 14(7): p. 1091-1102.
56.Lipscombe, L.L., et al., Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study. BMC Health Serv Res, 2018. 18(1): p. 316.
57.KU, F.-P., et al., Variations in case definition algorithms in diabetes-related studies using Taiwan National Health Insurance claims data. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 2021. 40(6): p. 725-733.
58.Chen, H.-F., et al., Incidence of idiopathic cardiomyopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: age, sex, and urbanization status-stratified analysis. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2020. 19(1): p. 177.
59.財團法人腎臟病防治基金會. 腎絲球過濾率計算. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2024 06/14]; 使用MDRD公式]. Available from: https://www.tckdf.org.tw/Main/GFR02.
60.國民健康署使用. 腎絲球過濾率(eGFR)及低密度脂蛋白膽固醇(LDL)計算公式. [Internet] 2015 2018/01/22 [cited 2024 06/14]; Available from: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1115&pid=6472.
61.Schwartz, G.J., et al., New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2009. 20(3): p. 629-37.
62.Hsieh, H.M., et al., The association between participation in a pay-for-performance program and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Prev Med, 2016. 85: p. 53-59.
63.Bacha, F., et al., Determinants of glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes at randomization in the TODAY study. Pediatr Diabetes, 2012. 13(5): p. 376-83.
64.Tromp, J., et al., Age dependent associations of risk factors with heart failure: pooled population based cohort study. Bmj, 2021. 372: p. n461.
65.Huo, L., et al., Impact of age at diagnosis and duration of type 2 diabetes on mortality in Australia 1997–2011. Diabetologia, 2018. 61(5): p. 1055-1063.
66.Chen, Y.C., et al., Impact of pay-for-performance on mortality in diabetes patients in Taiwan: A population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016. 95(27): p. e4197.
67.Chou, C.W., et al., Pay-for-performance programmes reduce stroke risks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study. BMJ Open, 2019. 9(10): p. e026626.
68.Sarwar, N., et al., Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet, 2010. 375(9733): p. 2215-22.
69.Group, T.S., Effects of metformin, metformin plus rosiglitazone, and metformin plus lifestyle on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in TODAY. Diabetes care, 2013. 36(6): p. 1749-1757.
70.Postintervention Effects of Varying Treatment Arms on Glycemic Failure and β-Cell Function in the TODAY Trial. Diabetes Care, 2021. 44(1): p. 75-80.
71.衛生福利部國民健康署. 國人吸菸行為調查結果. [Internet] 2023 2024/06/25 [cited 2024 07/04]; Available from: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1718&pid=9913.
72.Gao, M., et al., The Impact of Different Antihypertensive Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk in Isolated Systolic Hypertension with Type 2 Diabetes Patients. J Clin Med, 2022. 11(21).
73.Colhoun, H.M., et al., Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2004. 364(9435): p. 685-96.
74.Kannel, W.B., et al., Role of blood pressure in the development of congestive heart failure. The Framingham study. N Engl J Med, 1972. 287(16): p. 781-7.
75.Levy, D., et al., The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. Jama, 1996. 275(20): p. 1557-62
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20260930)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top