跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.72.250) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/10/02 11:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳相勳
研究生(外文):Hsiang-Hsun Wu
論文名稱:初始條件,資源配置,與技術績效
論文名稱(外文):Initial Conditions, Resource Configuration, and Technological Performance
指導教授:李吉仁李吉仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ji-Ren Lee
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:國際企業學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:英文
論文頁數:81
中文關鍵詞:初始條件組織生態學資源基礎觀點動態能耐資源配置
外文關鍵詞:initial conditionsorganizational ecologyresource based viewdynamic capabilityresource configuration
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:360
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
組織能否透過資源配置(resource configuration)影響績效,一直是組織理論與策略理論學者的爭論焦點之一。策略理論學者強調組織可透過資源配置,取得較佳的經濟績效。組織理論學者並不否認組織具有配置資源的能力以因應環境變化,然而,因為組織慣性(organizational inertia),組織無法立即改變資源配置以反應新環境的需求。組織理論學者更進一步指出,組織慣性是由組織成立之初、具有隨機性質的初始條件(initial conditions)所形塑而成的。因此,初始條件可能才是績效的最重要決定性因素,而非組織的資源配置。然而,策略理論中的資源基礎觀點與動態能耐觀點,甚少探討組織初始條件對於績效的影響。本研究意圖在組織理論與策略理論觀點之間提出一個綜合的觀點。

本研究分析初始條件對於績效的持久性效果,以及初始條件與資源配置兩者間的交互作用對於績效的影響。這個研究以1988年至2006年的全球TFT-LCD廠商做為實證研究對象。本研究以廠商在產業發展初期的技術網路中的位置—技術地位(technological status)與競爭聚集度(competitive crowding),定義初始條件。廠商的資源配置,分為內部的吸收能力(absorptive capacity)建立,以及外部的資源槓桿運用(external resource leverage)兩類。研究結果指出,初始的技術地位與技術績效呈現正向關係,且其效果與時漸增。而初始的競爭聚集度則與預期相反,與技術績效呈反向關係。結果進一步指出,當廠商處於較差的初始條件時,提高吸收能力與建立外部資源槓桿運用,可以提高技術績效。然而,值得注意的是,細部的結果顯示初始條件相當程度限制了吸收能力與外部資源槓桿運用的效果。例如,當廠商的初始競爭聚集度或是初始技術地位較差時,高度投入於提升吸收能力,也難以達到那些初始競爭聚集度或是初始地位較高廠商的績效水準。這顯示,當我們未考慮初始條件的影響下,可能會過度估計組織的資源配置與績效間關係。這個結果予以組織初始條件豐富的策略意涵,以及更多延伸的研究議題。
Whether the organization can enhance performance through resource configuration has been the one of core arguments between organizational theory and strategy theory. Strategy scholars emphasize that the organization can through the allocation of resources to gain better economic performance. Organizational theory scholars do not deny the organization’s capability of resource configuration but question the organizational capability to timely respond to environmental changes. Because of the organization inertia, organizations can not immediately change the resource configuration to reflect the need of the environment. Organization theory scholars further argue that the organizational inertia is formed by the initial conditions which are characterized with random distribution. Hence, initial conditions might be the most determinant of performance, not organizational resource configuration. However, strategy theories such as the resource-based view and dynamic capability perspective are not so concerned about the influence of initial conditions on the performance. This study intends to propose a comprehensive point of view based on these two theoretical streams.

The current study examined the enduring effect of initial conditions and potential interaction effect between initial conditions and resource configuration on technological performance. The research took global TFT-LCD manufacturers from 1988 to 2006 for the empirical test. In this context, the firm’s network positions -- technological status and competitive crowding in the technological network at the initial stage of industry were used to define the initial conditions. The firm’s resource configuration includes the absorptive capacity and external resource leverage. Results indicated that initial status has positive and increasing effect on technological performance. Initial crowding which was different from expected had positive effect on technological performance. Results further indicated that firms with poor initial conditions can increase the absorptive capacity and leverage the external resources to improve the technical performance. However, it is worthy to note that detailed results showed that initial conditions limit the effectiveness of enhancing absorptive capacity and engaging external resource leverage. For example, the performance of initial low-crowing or low-status firms with highly investment of absorptive capacity cannot eventually be compared with that of initial high-crowding or high-status firms. This showed that, when we did not consider the impact of initial conditions, the influence of resource configuration could be over-estimated. These results provided rich strategic implications for practice and shed light on future research of initial conditions and resource configuration.
口試委員會審定書……II
誌謝……III
中文摘要……IV
ABSTRACT……V
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION……3
CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND……8
CHAPTER 3: HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT……15
3.1: Defining Initial Conditions……17
3.2: Competitive advantages in technology driven industry……24
3.3: Initial Conditions and Persistent Competitive Advantages in Technology Field……26
3.4: Initial Conditions, Resource Configuration, and Persistent Competitive Advantages in Technology Field……28
CHAPTER 4: METHODOLOGY AND VARIABLES……34
4.1: Industry Background (1988-2006)……34
4.2: Data Sources……38
4.3: Analytic Model……42
4.4: Measurements……44
CHAPTER 5: RESULTS……52
CHAPTER 6: DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS……64
REFERENCE……70
Adam, B. J., Manuel, T., & Michael, S. F. 2000. Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2): 215-218.
Ahuja, G. & Katila, R. 2004. Where Do Resources Come From? The Role of Idiosyncratic Situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 887-907.
Akabane, J. 2004. The Taiwanese TFT-LCD Industry: The Role of Japanese Companies and the Taiwanese Government in the Development Process. Asian Studies, 50(4): 1-19.
Aldrich, H. 1999. Organizations Evolving: Thousand Oaks, Calif. Sage.
Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. 1993. Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1): 206-210.
Anderson, P. & Tushman, M. L. 1990. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4): 604-633.
Bamford, C. E., Dean, T. J., & McDougall, P. P. 2000. An Examination of the Impact of Initial Founding Conditions and Decisions Upon the Performance of New Bank Start-Ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3): 253-277.
Barnard, C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive: Cambridge, Mass., Harvard U. P.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Barney, J. 2005. Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Knowledge Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 32(10): 1231-1241.
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. 1992. Cognitive Change, Strategic Action, and Organizational Renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 15-36.
Baum, J. & Singh, J. 1994. Organizational Niches and the Dynamics of Organizational Mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2): 346.
Baum, J. A. C. & Oliver, C. 1992. Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations. American Sociological Review, 57(4): 540-559.
Benjamin, B. & Podolny, J. 1999. Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry, 1981-1991. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3): 563-589.
Bessy, C. & Brousseau, E. 1998. Technology Licensing Contracts: Features and Diversity. International Review of Law and Economics, 18(4): 451-489.
Blomström, M. & Sjöholm, F. 1999. Technology Transfer and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter? European Economic Review, 43(4-6): 915-923.
Blomstrom, M. & Kokko, A. 1998. Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3): 247-277.
Boeker, W. 1989. Strategic Change: The Effects of Founding and History. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 489-515.
Boeker, W. & Wiltbank, R. 2005. New Venture Evolution and Managerial Capabilities. Organization Science, 16(2): 123-133.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. Ucinet 6.0 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis: Analytic Technologies., Harvard, MA.
Bourgeois, L. J. & Singh, J. V. 1983. Organizational Slack and Political Behavior within Top Management Teams: Faculty of Management Studies, University of Toronto.
Bower, J. & Gilbert, C. 2005. From Resource Allocation to Strategy: Oxford University Press.
Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. 1999. Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3): 439-441.
Burgelman, R. 1991. Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research. Organization Science, 2(3): 239-262.
Burgelman, R. 1994. Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 24-56.
Burt, R. S. 1987. Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(6): 1287-1335.
Cantwell, J. & Iammarino, S. 2001. Eu Regions and Multinational Corporations: Change, Stability and Strengthening of Technological Comparative Advantages. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 1007-1037.
Cantwell J. 2006. Innovation and competitiveness. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Jan Fagerberg DCM, Richard R. Nelson (ed.), Oxford University Press.
Carroll, G. 1984. Dynamics of Publisher Succession in Newspaper Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1): 93-113.
Carroll, G. 1985. Concentration and Specialization: Dynamics of Niche Width in Populations of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology: 1262-1283.
Carroll, G. & Hannan, M. 1989. Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3): 411-430.
Carroll, G. & Hannan, M. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries: Princeton University Press.
Carroll, G., Dobrev, S., & Swaminathan, A. 2002. Organizational Processes of Resource Partitioning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24: 1-40.
Carroll, G. R., Bigelow, L. S., Seidel, M. D. L., & Tsai, L. B. 1996. The Fates of De Novo and De Alio Producers in the American Automobile Industry 1885-1981. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 117-137.
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Enterprise. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Chandler, A. D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business: Harvard University Press.
Chang, S. & Rosenzweig, P. 2001. The Choice of Entry Mode in Sequential Foreign Direct Investment. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8): 747-776.
Child, J. 1972. Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6(1): 1.
Cho, D.-S., Kim, D.-J., & Rhee, D. K. 1998. Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea. Organization Science, 9(4): 489-505.
Cockburn, I. M. & Henderson, R. M. 2000. Untangling the Origins of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1123-1145.
Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R. M., & Stern, S. 2000. Untangling the Origins of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 1123-1145.
Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35: 128-152.
Cowen, A. 2006. For Better or Worse? Mergers and Status Outcomes in the Investment Banking Industry. SSRN eLibrary.
Das, T. & Teng, B. 2000. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31.
Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. 1989. Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504-1511.
Doz, Y. L. 1996. The Evolution of Cooperation in Strategic Alliances: Initial Conditions or Learning Processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue: Evolutionary Perspectives on Strategy): 55-83.
Dyer, J. & Singh, H. 1998. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679.
Eden, L., Levitas, E., & Martinez, R. J. 1997. The Production, Transfer and Spillover of Technology: Comparing Large and Small Multinationals as Technology Producers. Small Business Economics, 9(1): 53-66.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1990. Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3): 504-529.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.
Fombrun, C. & van Riel, C. 2004. Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Ford, D. 1988. Develop Your Technology Strategy. Long Range Planning, 21(5): 85-95.
Freeman, J. & Hannan, M. 1983. Niche Width and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6): 1116.
Fudenberg, D., Gilbert, R., Stiglitz, J., & Tirole, J. 1983. Preemption, Leapfrogging and Competition in Patent Races. European Economic Review, 22(1): 3-31.
Galan, J. & Sanchez, M. 2006. Influence of Industry R&D Intensity on Corporate Product Diversification: Interaction Effect of Free Cash Flow. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(3): 531-547.
Galende, J. & de la Fuente, J. M. 2003. Internal Factors Determining a Firm''s Innovative Behaviour. Research Policy, 32(5): 715-736.
Ghoshal, S. & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323-337.
Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. 1997. Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4):750-783.
Greve, A. & Salaff, J. W. 2003. Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1): 1-22.
Gulati, R. 1995. Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4): 619-652.
Hannan, M. & Freeman, J. 1977. The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5): 929-964.
Hannan, M. & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49(2): 149-164.
Hannan, M. & Freeman, J. 1987. The Ecology of Organizational Mortality: American Labor Unions, 1836-1985. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 25-52.
Hannan, M. & Carroll, G. 1992. Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition: Oxford University Press, USA.
Hannan, M., Burton, M., & Baron, J. 1996. Inertia and Change in the Early Years: Employment Relations in Young, High Technology Firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2): 503-536.
Hannan, M., Carroll, G., & Polos, L. 2003. The Organizational Niche. Sociological Theory, 21(4): 309-340.
Helfat, C. E. & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 997-1010.
Henderson, R. & Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1): 63-84.
Hennart, J. F. 1988. A Transaction Costs Theory of Equity Joint Ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 361-374.
Hoppe, H. 2000. Second-Mover Advantages in the Strategic Adoption of New Technology under Uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(2): 315-338.
Hurst, D. K., Rush, J. C., & White, R. E. 1989. Top Management Teams and Organizational Renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1): 87-105.
Inkpen, A. C. & Beamish, P. W. 1997. Knowledge, Bargaining Power, and the Instability of International Joint Ventures. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 177-202.
Jacquemin, A. & Berry, C. 1979. Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4): 359-369.
Jones, G. K., Lanctot, A., & Teegen, H. J. 2001. Determinants and Performance Impacts of External Technology Acquisition. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3): 255-283.
Kelly, D. & Amburgey, T. 1991. Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model of Strategic Change. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 591-612.
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science: 383-397.
Kor, Y. Y. & Mahoney, J. T. 2000. Edith Penrose''s (1959) Contributions to the Resource-Based View of Strategic Management. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1): 183-191.
Lee, J.-R., O''Neal, D. E., Pruett, M. W., & Thomas, H. 1995. Planning for Dominance: A Strategic Perspective on the Emergence of a Dominant Design. R&D Management, 25(1): 3-15.
Leong, S. M. & Tan, C. T. 1993. Managing across Borders: An Empirical Test of the Bartlett and Ghoshal [1989] Organizational Typology. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3): 449-464.
Levinthal, D. A. 1991. Random Walks and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3): 397-420.
Lieberman, M. & Montgomery, D. 1987. First-Mover Advantages: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
Lomi, A. & Larsen, E. R. 1998. Density Delay and Organizational Survival: Computational Models and Empirical Comparisons. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 3(4): 219-247.
Lorenzoni, G. & Lipparini, A. 1999. The Leveraging of Interfirm Relationships as a Distinctive Organizational Capability: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4): 317-338.
Lorrain, F. & White, H. 1977. Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 49-80.
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations: Wiley New York.
Mathews, J. 1998. Jack and the Beanstalk: The Creation of Dynamic Capabilities through Knowledge Leverage by Latecomer Firms. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, San Diego.
Mathews, J. 2002. Competitive Advantage of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-up Strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4): 467-488.
McPherson, J. 1983. An Ecology of Affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48(4): 519-532.
Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810): 56-63.
Milgrom, P., Qian, Y., & Roberts, J. 1991. Complementarities, Momentum, and the Evolution of Modern Manufacturing. The American Economic Review, 81(2): 84-88.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77-91.
Narayanan, K. 1998. Technology Acquisition, De-Regulation and Competitiveness: A Study of Indian Automobile Industry. Research Policy, 27(2): 215-228.
Nelson, R. & Rosenberg, N. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, National innovation systems: a comparative analysis: 3-21: Oxford University Press
Noda, T. & Collis, D. J. 2001. The Evolution of Intraindustry Firm Heterogeneity: Insights from a Process Study. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 897-925.
OECD. 2005. Oecd Factbook 2005: Economic, Environmental, and Social Statistics: Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development.
Penrose, E. 1956. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179-191.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Stanford University Press.
Podolny, J. 1994. Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 458-483.
Podolny, J. 2001. Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1): 33-60.
Podolny, J. M. 1993. A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 829-872.
Podolny, J. M. & Phillips, D. J. 1996. The Dynamics of Organizational Status. Ind Corp Change, 5(2): 453-471.
Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., & Hannan, M. T. 1996. Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3): 659-690.
Porter, M. 1998a. The Competitive Advantage of Nations: With a New Introduction. New York: Free press.
Porter, M. 1998b. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116-145.
Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. 2004. Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1): 23-37.
Robins, J. & Wiersema, M. 2003. The Measurement of Corporate Portfolio Strategy: Analysis of the Content Validity of Related Diversification Indexes. Strategic Management Journal, 24(1): 39-59.
Rosenberg, N. 2000. Why Do Firms Do Basic Research (with Their Own Money)?. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 117: 197-206.
Schilling, M. 1998. Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 267-284.
SID; 40 Years of Sid Symposia - Nurturing Progress in Amlcd Technology; http://www.sid.org/archives/0%20-%20AM%20pdf%20Exhibit%205.pdf; 12/25, 2008.
Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(3): 562-585.
Singh, J. V., House, R. J., & Tucker, D. J. 1986. Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4): 587-611.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking inside the Black Box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 273-292.
Sobrero, M. & Schrader, S. 1998. Structuring Inter-Firm Relationships: A Metaanalytic Approach. Organization Studies, 19(4): 585-615.
Spencer, J. W. 2003. Firms'' Knowledge-Sharing Strategies in the Global Innovation System: Empirical Evidence from the Flat Panel Display Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3): 217-233.
Steinhardt, G. 2004. Who''s Driving Your Company? The Pragmatic Marketer, 2(2).
Stinchcombe, A. 1965. Organizations and Social Structure. Chicago: McNally.
Stinchcombe, A. L. 1987. Constructing Social Theories: University of Chicago Press.
Stuart, T. 1998. Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3): 668-698.
Stuart, T., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. 1999. Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 315-318.
Stuart, T. E. & Sorenson, O. 2005. Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives: 233-252.
Suarez, F. F. & Utterback, J. M. 1995. Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6): 415-430.
Teece, D. & Pisano, G. 1994. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 537-556.
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
Wernerfelt, B. 1995. The Resource-Based View of the Firm?0 Years After. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3): 171-174.
Whitehill, M. 1997. Knowledge-Based Strategy to Deliver Sustained Competitive Advantage. Long Range Planning, 30(4): 621-627.
Williamson, O. E. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548-548.
Winter, S., Schumpeter, J., & utredningsinstitut, I. 1984. Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5(3): 287-320.
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. 2006. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 917-955.
Zucker, L. 1987. Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1): 443-464.
Zuckerman, E. 1999. The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1398-1438.
大西, 宏. 2007. 液晶ディスプレイ産業における知識スピルオーバーと研究開発生産性. 研究技術計画, 21(1): 88-104.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊