中文文獻
Spector, R.(2000)。亞馬遜AMAZON.COM: 傑夫.貝佐期和他的天下第一店 (AMAZON.COM) (劉孟華譯)。臺北市:遠流。
Weinberger, D.(2008)。亂是一種新商機(Everything is Miscellaneous:The power of the new digital disorder)(周宜芳譯)。臺北市:天下遠見。
汪玉紅(2007)。FRBR對OPAC的影嚮。圖書館理論與實踐,2,29-32。
宋登漢、詹萌(2005)。中外八大OPAC系統的比較與分析。圖書.情報.知識,150,44-46。
呂德章(2008,2月)。圖書館科技應用及資料庫分享之趨勢。漢珍數位圖書股份有限公司(主持),文化、科技應用與閱讀:2008年漢珍公司台北國際書展研討會,台北市。
林明(1997)。書目實體、書目關係和目錄的職能。大學圖書館學報,15(3),55-56。
林珊如(2001)。書籍網站資訊組織架構與瀏覽介面設計的考量:以亞馬遜網路書店為例。大學圖書館,5(1),16-32。高紅(2006)。書目關係的綜合研究。圖書情報工作,50(9),108-112。
凌網科技股份有限公司(2009)。HyLib圖書館自動化管理系統。上網日期:2009年6月14日。檢自:http://www.hyweb.com.tw/ct.asp?xItem=235&CtNode=400&mp=1
陳琦(2006)。FRBR及其在國內應用的障礙。圖書館雜志,25(10),16-18。
傳技資訊股份有限公司(2009)。ToKnow!新世代知識探索平台(Library2.0 Knowledge Portal)。上網日期:2009年6月14日。檢自:http://www.transtech.com.tw/info-know.html
張慧銖(2002a)。西洋圖書目錄目的與功能發展之研究。未出版之博士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所,臺北市。張慧銖(2003)。圖書館目錄發展研究。臺北市:文華。
程衛樂(2006)。OPAC與網上書店檢索系統比及啟示。圖書館論壇,26(4),105-107。
遠東科技大學圖書館(2009)。WebPac2.0 線上公用目錄查詢系統。上網日期:2009年6月14日。檢自:http://www.lib.feu.edu.tw/
盧秀菊(2000)。圖書館目錄之書目關係。國家圖書館館刊,89(2),123-134。蘇諼(2007)。大學圖書館網站超連結研究。圖書與資訊學刊,62,22-34。西文文獻
Amazon.com. (2008). Annual Reports and Proxies. Retrieved February, 29, 2008, from http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=97664&p=irol-reportsAnnual
Bean, C. A., & Green, R. (2001). Relevance relationships. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge (chap. 8, pp. 115-132). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Breeding, M. (2007). Thinking about your next OPAC. Computers in libraries, 27(4), 28-30.
Carlyle, A. (1996). Ordering author and work records: An evaluation of collocation in online catalog displays. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 538-554.
Carlyle, A., & Summerlin J. (2002). Transforming catalog displays: Record clustering for works of fiction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 33(3/4), 13-25.
Casey, M. (2005). OPAC Wishlist. Retrieved December 9, 2007, from Librarycrunch Blog http://www.librarycrunch.com/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=OPAC+WISHLIST
Catanio, J., Ghoda, A., Pal, A., Yoo, J., Bieber, M., Im, I., & et al. (2002). Relationship analysis: A research plan for enhancing systems analysis for web development. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp.186-195) . Retrieved July 3, 2008, from IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY Digital Library.
Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Retrieved July 27, 2008, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf
Dey, D., Storey, V. C., & Barron, T. M. (2000). Improving database design through the analysis of relationships. ACM Transaction on Database Systems, 24(4), 453-486.
Dunham, B. (2002). Different formats: Linking serial titles for display through bibliographic relationships. Is it possible? Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 26, 3-17.
Eden, B. (2007). Reinventing the OPAC. Library Technology Reports, 43(6), 13-40.
Fattahi, R. (1997). The relevance of cataloguing principles to the online environment: An historical and analytical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Retrieved December 22, 2007, from http://web.um.ac.ir/~fattahi/CHA4.HTM
Green, R.(2001). Relationships in the organization of knowledge: An overview. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green. (Eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge (chap.1, pp.3-18). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Hagler, R., & Simmons, P. (1982). The bibliographic record and information tecnhology. Chicago: ALA.
Harvard University (2009). HOLLIS Catalogs. Retrieved July 06, 2009, from http://discovery.lib.harvard.edu/
IFLA Working Group on Content Designators (1980). UNIMARC: Universal MARC format. London: IFLA International Office for UBC.
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Reocrds (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final report. Retrieved July 30, 2008, from http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf
IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code (2003). Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. Paper reported at The 1st IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt, Germany. Retrieved August 11, 2008, from The Library of Congress at the 67th IFLA Council and General Conference http://www.loc.gov/loc/ifla/imeicc/source/statement-draft_jan05.pdf; Also could retrieve from http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/scatn/news20.pdf
or http://www.d-nb.de/standardisierung/pdf/statement_chinese.pdf
Indiana University (2008). Indiana University''s online library catalog. Retrieved August 09, 2008, from http://www.iucat.iu.edu/uhtbin/cgisirsi/9CPE4jN8TV/B-WELLS/305150460/60/1185/X
Layne, S. S. (1989). Integration and the objectives of the catalog. In E. Svenonius (Ed.) , The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging (pp.185-195) . San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Leazer, G. H. (1993). A conceptual plan for the description and control of bibliographic works. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Columbia, New York.
Leazer, G. H., & Smiraglia, R. P. (1996). Toward the bibliographic control of works: Derivative bibliographic relationships in an online union catalog. International Conference on Digital Libraries: Proceedings of the first ACM international conference on Digital libraries. Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 36-43. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from The ACM Digital Library.
Marcum, D. B. (2004). The future of cataloging. Library Resources Technical Services, 50(1), 5-9.
Mayernik, M. S. (2007). Bibliographic relationships and FRBR in online catalog collocation. Unpublished master thesis, Library and Information Science of California University, Los Angeles.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2009). Barton Catalog. Retrieved July 06, 2009, from http://library.mit.edu/F?func=find-b-0
McMaster University (2008). Library Catalogue. Retrieved August 01, 2008, from http://www.mcmaster.ca/home.cfm
National Library of Australia (2008). LibraryLabs. Retrieved July 8, 2008, from http://ll01.nla.gov.au/
NCSU Libraries Online Catalog. Retrieved August 02, 2008, from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/
Peterson, A. (2007). Next generation catalog. Retrieved May 27, 2008, from Western Libraries Home Page website: http://www.library.wwu.edu/info/ngcat.
Petek, M. (2007). Derivative bibliographic relationships in the Slovenian online catalogue COBIB. Journal of Documentation, 63(3), 398-423.
The Queens Borough Public Library (2008). Queens Library. Retrieved July 9, 2008, from http://www.queenslibrary.org/index.aspx
Ranganathan, S. R. (1955). Headings and Canons: Comparative study of five catalogue codes. London: G. Blunt.
Riva, P. (2004). Mapping MARC 21 linking ntry fields to FRBR and Tillett''s taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources and Technical Services, 48(2), 130-143.
Schamber, L. (1994). Relevance and information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 3-48.
Schneider, K.G. (2006a). How OPACs suck, part 1: Relevance rank (Or the Lack of It) . Retrieved January 09, 2008, from http://www.techsource.ala.org/blog/2006/03/how-opacs-suck-part-1-relevance-rank-or-the-lack-of-it.html
Schneider, K.G. (2006b). How OPACs suck, part 2: The checklist of shame. Retrieved January 09, 2008, from
http://www.techsource.ala.org/blog/2006/04/how-opacs-suck-part-2-the-checklist-of-shame.html
Schneider, K.G. (2006c). How OPACs suck, part 3: The big picture. Retrieved January 09, 2008, from http://www.techsource.ala.org/blog/2006/05/how-opacs-suck-part-3-the-big-picture.html
Smiraglia, R. P. (1992). Authority Control and the Extent of Derivative Bibliographic Relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Library School, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Smiraglia, R. P., & Leazer, G. H. (1999). Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 493-504.
Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The National of “A Work”: Implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
SOPAG of the University of California Libraries (2005). Rethinking how we provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California. Retrieved August 2, 2008, from http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf
Tennant, R. (2003a). Library catalogs: The wrong solution. Retrieved February, 23, 2008, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA273959.html
Tennant, R. (2003b). The Right Solution: Federated search tools. Retrieved February, 23, 2008, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA302427.html
The New York Times (2008). The 10 Best Books of 2007. Retrieved July, 12, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/books/review/10-best-2007.html
The Task Group on the Future of Cataloging at Indiana University (2006). A White Paper on the Future of Cataloging at Indiana University. Retrieved June 29, 2008, from Indiana University Bloomington Libraries Technical Services http://www.iub.edu/~libtserv/pub
Tillett, B. B. (1987). Bibliographic Relationships: Toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35(2), 150-158.
Tillett, B. B. (1992). Bibliographic relationships: An empirical study of the LC Machine-Readable records. Library Resources and Technical Services, 36, 162-188.
Tillett, B. B. (2001). Bibliographic relationships. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge (chap.2, pp.19-35). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Tillett, B. B. (2005). FRBR and cataloging for the future. Catalog & Classification Quality, 39(3/4), 197-205.
Vellucci, S. L. (1997a). Bibliographic relationship. Retrieved August 2, 2008, from the National Library of Canada Electronic Collection website: http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/bib_rel/r-bibrel.pdf
Vellucci, S. L. (1997b). Bibliographic relationships in music catalogs. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.
Weinberger, D. (2008). Everything Is Miscellaneous: The power of the new digital disorder. New Your: Henry Holt.
Wiberley, S. E., Jr., Daugherty, R. A., & Danowski, J. A. (1995). User persistence in displaying online catalog postings: LUIS. Library Resources & Technical Services, 39(3), 247-264.
Yee, M. M. (1995). What is a work? part 4 : Cataloging theorists and a definition abstract. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 20(2), 21.
Yee, M. M. (1999). Guidelines for OPAC displays. 65th IFLA Council and GeneralConference. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from IFLA http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/098-131e.htm
Yee, M. M. (2007). Will the response of the library profession to the Internet be self-immolation? Retrieved April 21, 2008, from Special Libraries Cataloguing website: http://slc.bc.ca/response.htm
Yoo, J., & Bieber, M. (2000). Finding linking opportunities through relationship-based analysis. ACM, Inc. (Eds), Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 181-190) . Texas: ACM Inc. Retrieved January 15, 2008, from the ACM Digital Library database.