臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣在1980 年代曾是世界第一大自行車出口國，並有著自行車王國的美名。然而
1990 年代開始，面臨中國大陸崛起與大環境不佳的衝擊下，基於產業空洞化的危機感，
由巨大及美利達結合志同道合的零組件廠組成複合型學習聯盟─「A-Team」。藉由聯盟
的治理機制，促進成員間共同學習、凝聚向心力並增進聯盟內的網絡關係，藉由眾人的
力量提升台灣自行車業的體質與競爭力。
由於自行車產業特性是網絡結構鬆散，彼此依存度不高。兩家具有競爭關係的成車
廠，如何率先合作，號召原先依存度不高的零組件廠加入A-Team，聯盟內的網絡關係
扮演了很重要的角色。回顧「聯盟」、「協力網絡」及「網絡關係」相關文獻，探討複合
型學習聯盟內的治理機制如何促進網絡關係變化、如何變化以及是否使成員間的連結關
係變緊密。
本研究發現，透過A-Team 的運作，使零組件廠與成車廠間的連結關係變的更為緊
密，成車廠間也從以往互不往來的競爭，逐漸建立起合作的連結。此外，藉由A-Team
治理機制的運作，的確有助於網絡關係的發展，尤其是短期可感受到成效的組織間學習
機制最有助於網絡關係發展。同時觀察到，A-Team 內的認同與合理信任很高，但競爭
的本質關係還是存在，因此關係信任上的發展並不顯著，說明關係發展有其極限存在。

摘要............................................................................................................................................I
ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................. II
誌 謝................................................................................................................................. III
目錄.........................................................................................................................................IV
圖目錄................................................................................................................................... VII
表目錄..................................................................................................................................VIII
第一章 緒論..........................................................................................................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機....................................................................................................1
1.2 研究目的................................................................................................................3
1.3 研究對象與範圍....................................................................................................4
1.3.2 研究限制............................................................................................................5
1.5 論文架構................................................................................................................5
第二章 文獻探討......................................................................................................................7
2.1 台灣自行車產業發展史.............................................................................................7
2.1.1 政府扶持四大組車廠成立與衰敗(1950 年代) ........................................7
2.1.2 百家爭鳴與台灣自行車產業的危機(1960 年代) ....................................8
2.1.3 擴大輸出與傾銷風波(1970 年代) ............................................................8
2.1.4 產業轉型升級(1980 年代) ........................................................................9
2.1.5 產業出走潮與空洞化 (1990 年代) ........................................................10
2.1.6 產業的再升級的轉折點與A-Team 的出現(2000 年代).......................10
2.1.7 台灣自行車產業特性..............................................................................12
2.2 學習聯盟..............................................................................................................12
2.2.1 策略聯盟定義..........................................................................................13
2.2.2 聯盟、學習聯盟與組織間學習..............................................................16
2.2.3 聯盟學習的形態......................................................................................17
2.2.4 小結..........................................................................................................20
2.3 協力網絡..............................................................................................................20
2.3.1 協力網絡定義..........................................................................................21
2.3.2 協力網絡的形成......................................................................................22
2.3.3 協力網絡類型..........................................................................................23
2.3.4 小結..........................................................................................................25
2.4 網絡關係..............................................................................................................25
2.4.1 認同的定義、範圍與衡量......................................................................26
2.4.2 信任的定義、範圍與衡量......................................................................30
2.4.3 機制與網絡關係之關連性探討..............................................................36
第三章 分析架構....................................................................................................................38
3.1 分析架構一：企業間連結變化..........................................................................38
3.1.1 企業間連結之定義..................................................................................38
3.2 分析架構二：機制與網絡關係之關連性..........................................................39
3.2.1 A-Team 內治理機制與網絡關係之關連性...........................................40
3.2.2 機制與網絡關係之關連性探討架構導出..............................................44
3.3 研究分析架構......................................................................................................44
第四章實證研究......................................................................................................................45
4.1 實證研究目的、方法與對象選定......................................................................45
4.1.1 實證研究的目的......................................................................................45
4.1.2 實證研究方法..........................................................................................45
4.1.3 實證資料取得..........................................................................................47
4.1.4 實證研究對象選定..................................................................................47
4.1.5 A-Team 的三大運作機制簡介...............................................................49
4.1.6 訪談問題設計..........................................................................................50
4.1.7 訪談資料彙整與衡量..............................................................................50
4.2 實證研究～次級文獻歸納部份..........................................................................52
4.2.1 A-Team 成立前後的企業連結...............................................................52
4.2.2 A-Team 成員企業間不同體系的問題...................................................54
4.3 實證研究～個案訪談部份..................................................................................55
4.3.1 A1 公司個案（從A1 公司的角度看與A2 公司的關係）..................55
4.3.2 A2 公司個案（從A2 公司的角度看與A1 公司的關係）..................59
4.3.3 S1 公司個案............................................................................................64
4.3.4 S2 公司個案............................................................................................68
4.3.5 S3 公司個案............................................................................................73
4.3.6 S4 公司個案............................................................................................77
4.3.7 S5 公司個案............................................................................................83
4.4 個案實證結果彙整..............................................................................................88
4.4.1 企業間連結變化......................................................................................88
4.4.2 機制與網絡關係之關連性......................................................................89
4.4.3 網絡關係的深入探討..............................................................................91
4.5 實證研究發現暨討論..........................................................................................93
第五章 結論與未來課題........................................................................................................97
5.1 研究結論..............................................................................................................97
5.2 管理涵義............................................................................................................100
5.2.1 實務意涵................................................................................................100
5.2.2 理論意涵................................................................................................101
5.3 未來課題............................................................................................................101
參考文獻................................................................................................................................103
附錄一、零組件廠訪談問題................................................................................................114
附錄二、成車廠訪談問題....................................................................................................122

一、中文部份
1. A-Team 網址，http://www.a-team.tw
2. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S.,著，古永嘉、楊雪蘭譯，《企業研究方法》，美商麥
格羅•希爾，2009 年。
3. Richard Jenkins 著，王志弘、許妍飛譯，《社會認同》，巨流，2006。
4. 工研院，2004，《2004 汽、機、自行車產業年鑑》，新竹市 : 產業經濟與資訊服務
中心。
5. 工研院，2005，《2005 汽、機、自行車產業年鑑》，新竹市 : 產業經濟與資訊服務
中心。
6. 工研院，2006，《2006 汽、機、自行車產業年鑑》，新竹市 : 產業經濟與資訊服務
中心。
7. 司徒達賢，1995，《策略管理》，遠流出版社。
8. 台灣區自行車輸出同業公會網址，http://www.tbea.org
9. 巨大機械工業股份有限公司，2000-2007，「2000-2007 年度年報」，《公開資訊觀測
站》(http://newmops.twse.com.tw)。
10. 朱素玥，2006，「關係信任與關係學習對關係績效影響之研究─結合交易成本理論
與社會交換理論觀點」，國立台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
11. 李志斌，1997，「企業策略聯盟關鍵成功因素與聯盟績效關係之研究」，淡江大學國
際貿易研究所碩士論文。
12. 李文端、曹為忠、吳美珍，2000，「策略聯盟類型與績效影響因素之研究」，《中山
管理評論》，8(2):273-302。
13. 李瓊瑤，2007，「自行車產業推動A-Team 的關鍵成功因素與績效評估」，輔仁大學
管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
14. 吳子綾，2000，「台灣自行車產業成車廠專業製造地位之建立」，中山大學企業管理
研究所碩士論文。
15. 吳思華，1992，「產業網路與產業經理機制之探討」，《第一屆產業管理研討會論文
集》，7 月，輔仁大學管理學院、豐群基金會。
16. 吳思華，1994，「產業經理與產業合作網路體系」，《台灣經濟研究月刊》。
17. 吳敏正，2008，「A-Team 完成1028 公里環台長征」，《自行車市場快訊》，No.120，
頁17-43。
18. 呂鴻德，1996，《企業策略聯盟—提升競爭力的經營利器》，台北：商周文化。
19. 周立鼎，2006，「台灣自行車產業組織間學習與信任構築之探討─以A-Team 為例」，
東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文。
20. 林育諄、金家禾，2006，「產業之群聚吸納與能力：以台灣自行車為例」，《地理學
報》，第45 期，頁21-50。
21. 林佩璇，2000，「個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用」，載於中正大學主編，《質的
教育研究方法》，頁239-262。
22. 林泰成，2003，「協力網路觀點下模組產品創新類型之探討─台灣工具機業的實證
研究」，東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文。
23. 花櫻芬，1996，「高科技事業中技術知識特質與知識資源吸收之研究」，國 立政治
大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
24. 邱柏松，1996，「國際策略聯盟在國內的現況與績效」，《經濟情勢暨評論》，2(3)，
頁14-21。
25. 邱柏松，1996，「國際策略聯盟 ─在國內的現況與績效」，《經濟情勢暨評論》，第
二卷第三期，頁 14-21。
26. 邱憶惠，1999，「個案研究：質化取向」，《國立高雄師範大學教育系教育研究》，
七期，頁113-127。
27. 邱耀冠，1995，「台灣工具機產業分工網路的類型及特質之探討」，東海大學工業工
程研究所碩士論文。
28. 洪村明，2007，「剖析A-Team 導入的個案~自行車產業在TPS 大放異彩」，《中衛報
告(7 月創刊號)》，頁41-47。
29. 洪紹榮，2004，「組織認同、領導風格與海外派遣員工工作投入關係之研究」，大葉
大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
30. 美利達工業股份有限公司，2000-2007，「2000-2007 年度年報」，《公開資訊觀測站》
(http://newmops.twse.com.tw)。
31. 翁旋書，2006，「企業內影響員工對組織認同因素之研究─以某精密工業為例」，義
守大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
32. 高孔廉，1979，「中小企業之合作型態及其困難」，企銀季刊，3(2)，頁77-81。
33. 高孔廉，1981，「合作經營以突破中小企業之困難」，企銀季刊，4(4)，頁24-31。
34. 高孔廉、鍾東仁，2004，「大陸台商策略聯盟管理作為與其績效之關聯性研究」，《中
原學報》，32(2)，頁121-139。
35. 高承恕，1994，「台灣中小企業的社會生活基礎－經驗及展望」，《第一屆中小企業
發展學術研討會論文集》，中華經濟研究院。
36. 張文德，2001，「協力廠商參與產品創新之類型探討－台灣工具機業的實證研究」，
東海大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
37. 張凱堯，2006，「策略聯盟的夥伴關係對聯盟績效的影響:知識移轉與人力資源規劃
的節制效果之研究」，國立屏東技術學院國際企業研究所碩士論文。
38. 張書文，2008，「台灣自行車產業A-Team 的組織間學習與共創」，《共創─建構台
灣產業競爭力的新模式》，頁53-96。
39. 張淑青，2004，「顧客滿意度與信任對忠誠度影響之研究」，《管理學報》，第21 卷
第5 期，612－614 頁。
40. 張經義，2006，「大膽的老二才能威脅老大」，《天下雜誌》，2006 年二月號，頁
220-223。
41. 梁雙蓮，1984，「中央行政機關公務人員組織認同的研究」，國立台灣大學政治學研
究所未出版之碩士論文。
42. 許士軍，1988，「用行銷眼光掃描生活型態」，《卓越雜誌》，第41 期， 頁29-30。
43. 許仲川，2001，「從地方產業網絡觀點檢視高雄多功能經貿園區規劃與推動」，國立
中山大學高階經營碩士班。
44. 許正和、邱創勳，2007，《台灣自行車產業發展史：躍上峰頂的台灣鐵馬》，國立科
學工藝博物館。
45. 陳一姍，2003，「自行車A-Team 大結盟」，《天下雜誌》，2003 年7 月1 日，頁70-76。
46. 黃琡珺，2006，「策略聯盟夥伴之關係(Guanxi)、信任、聯盟績效及未來繼續合作
意願」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
47. 黃鈺婷，2007，「雙重組織認同與角色衝突之關聯性研究：以夥伴關係品質為干擾
變項」，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
48. 楊長春，1998，「策略聯盟夥伴間行為、信任與聯盟績效相關之研究」，淡江大學國
際貿易研究所碩士論文。
49. 劉仁傑、謝章志，1997，「台灣機械產業網路的類型與特質」，《機械工業雜誌》，第
170 期，5 月，頁180-185。
50. 劉仁傑，1998，《分工網路－剖析台灣工具機產業競爭力的奧秘》，聯經出版社。
51. 劉仁傑、Brookfield Jonathan，2008，「磨合共創型協力網路的實踐與理論：台灣自
行車A-Team 的個案研究」，《共創─建構台灣產業競爭力的新模式》，頁17-52。
52. 蔡正揚、許政郎，1991，「運用策略聯盟促進技術引進之研究」，《中華民國科技管
理研討會論文集》，頁209-218。
53. 蔡正揚、許政郎，1992，「企業策略聯盟探討—照明設備個案研究」，《科技管理研
討會論文集》，新竹：交通大學科技管理研究所。
54. 蔡雅芳，，2005，「跨組織學習對事業網絡價值創造之影響」，國立雲林科技大學管
理研究所博士論文。
55. 輪彥國際有限公司網址，http://www.wheelgiant.com.tw
56. 鄭祥麟，2005，「策略聯盟所引發組織改變之研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所
博士論文。
57. 謝秀雯，2006，「關係資本、學習能力與聯盟績效關係之研究」，南台科技大學企業
管理研究所碩士論文。
58. 謝國雄，1991，「網路式生產組織：台灣外銷工業中的外包制度」，《中央研究院民
族學研究所集刊》，第71 期，頁161-182。
59. 謝安田，1979，「企業研究方法」，台北：謝安田印行。
60. 謝章志，1997，「台灣中小型機械廠協力網路結構之探討」，東海大學工業工程研究
所碩士論文。
61. 瞿宛文、董安琪，1990，「 有效匯率的變動對台灣貿易結構的影響」，《經濟論文叢
刊》， 18(1)， 65-98。
62. 瞿宛文，2002，《經濟成長的機制：以台灣石化業與自行車業為例》，台灣社會研究
叢刊。
63. 魏錫鈴，2004，《騎上峰頂：捷安特與劉金標傳奇》，聯經出版社。
64. 嚴仁鴻，1998，「結合交易成本理論與網絡理論新專業工策略─以台灣積體電路公
司為例」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
二、日文部份
1. 山岸俊男, 1998, 「信頼の構造 こころと社会の進化ゲーム」, 東京大学出版会.
2. 伊丹敬之, 1988, 「見える手による競争：部品供給体制の効率性」, 伊丹敬之・加
護野忠男・小林孝雄・榊原清則・伊藤元重 『競争と革新－自動車産業の企業成
長』, 144-165 頁, 東洋経済新報社.
3. 西口敏宏・アレクサンダ・ボーデ, 1999, 「カオスにおける自己組織化─トヨタ・
グループと アイシン精機火災─」, 『組織科学』, Vol.32 No.4: 58-72 頁.
4. 延岡健太郎, 1996, 「顧客範囲の経済：自動車サプライヤの顧客ネットワーク戦
略と企業成果」, 「国民経済雑誌」, 第173 巻第6 号, 84－97 頁.
5. 真鍋誠司, 1998, 「自動車部品取引における信頼の担保メカニズム」, 『六甲台
論集』, 第45 巻 第2 号, pp.135-154.
6. 真鍋誠司、延岡健太郎,2002,「組織間学習システムとネットワーク信頼」, 神戸
大学Discussion Paper Series J44.
7. 真鍋誠司，2002, 「企業間信頼の構築 : トヨタのケース」, 神戸大学経済経営研
究所 Discussion Paper Series J42.
8. 真鍋誠司, 2001, 「サプライヤー・ネットワークにおける組織間信頼の意義―日
本自動車産業の研究―」, 神戸大学大学院経営学研究科博士課程学位論文.
9. 張書文, 2009. 「空洞化の危機と台湾自転車産業の組織間学習」（ 野村重信編, 『ア
ジア地域のモノづくり経営』, 学文社, 所収）
三、英文部份
1. Aaker, D.A., 1992, Developing Business Strategies, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
2. Andaleeb, S. S., 1992, “ The Trust Concept: Research Issues for Channels of
Distribution,”Research in Marketing, 11: pp.1-34,
3. Anderson, E., 1990, “ Two firms, one frontier: on assessing joint venture
performance”, Sloan Management Review, winter 31(2), 19-30.
4. Anderson, J.C., & Narus, J., 1990, “A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm
working relationships”, Journal of Marketing.
5. Anand, B. and T. Khanna, 2000, “Does firms create value? The case of alliance,”
Strategic Management Journal, 21(3) Special Issue: Strategic Networks：295-315.
6. Anderson, E., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D., 1994, “Customer satisfaction, market share,
and rofitability: Findings from Sweden,” Journal of Marketing, 16：53-66.
7. Burt, R., 1992, ”Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition,” Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Bonner, J. M., Kim D., Cavusgil S. T., 2005, "Self-perceived strategic network identity
and its effects on market performance in alliance relationship," Journal of Business
Research, 58, 1371-1380.
9. Borys, B. & Jemison, D.B., 1989, “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances:
Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations, ” Academy of Management
Review, 14(2), 234-249.
10. Brookfield, J, & Liu Ren-Jye, 2005, “ The Internationalization of an Industrial System
and the Replication Dilemma: Building Supplier Networks in Mainland,” Asia Pacific
Journal of Management, vol.22 no.4, 355-380.
11. Brown, M. E., 1969, “Identification and some conditions of organiza-tional
identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 338-346.
12. Child, J. and Faulkner, D., 1998, “Straegies of Cooperaion,” Oxford University
Press.
13. Cheney, G., 1983, "On the various and changing meaning of organizational membership:
A Field study of organizational identification," Communication Monographs, 50,
342-362.
14. Cho, W., W., 1997, "Case of growth: A study of Taiwan's bicycle industry," Cambridge
Journal of Economics, 21:55-72.
15. Chen, H.F. & I.C. Wang, 2001, “The Determinants and Effects of Embeddendness on
MNC’s Subsidiaries,” Conference Proceeding of Trade Investment, and Industrial
Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Taipei: Soochow University, pp.283-303.
16. Chow, S., & R. Holden, 1997, “Toward an Understanding of Loyalty: The Moderating
Role of Trust,” Journal of Management Issues, 9(3)：pp.275-98.
17. Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P., 2002, "The growth of alliances in the knowledge-based
economy," International Business Review, 11, 485-502.
18. Davlin, G. & Bleackley, M., 1988, “Strategies Alliances--Guidelines for Success,”
Long Range Planning, 21(5), 18-23.
19. Dodgson, M., 1993, “Learning, trust and technological collaboration, ”Human
Relations, 46(1): pp.77-95.
20. Doney, P. M., and J. P. Cannon, 1997, “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in
Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing , (April 1997)：35-51.
21. Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. , 1998, "Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through
partnering," Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22. Driscoll, J.W., 1978, "Trust and participation in organizational decision making as
predictors of satisfaction," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21（1）, pp. 44-58.
23. Dussauge, P., Garrette, B. & Mitchell, W., 2000, “Learning from competing partners:
outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia”,
Strategic Management Journal, 21, 99-126.
24. Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P. H., Oh, S., 1987, "Developing buyer-seller relationship," J Mark,
51(2):11-27.
25. Dyer J. H., & Nobeoka k., 2000,“Creating and managing a high performance
knowledge-sharing network:the TOYOTA case”, Strategic Management Journal,
21(3), 345-368.
26. Dyer J., & W. Ouchi, 1993, “ Japanese-style partnerships: giving companies a
competitive edge”, Sloan Management Review, 35(1):51-63.
27. Dyer, Jeffery H., & Hatch, N. W., 2004, “Using supplier to learn faster,” Sloan
Management Review, 45(3), pp.57-63.
28. Dyer, J.H., 1994, “Dedicated assets: Japan’s manufacturing edge,” Harvard Business
Review 72 (6):174-178.
29. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S., 2000, „Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions
perspective,” Organization Science, 11(1), 77-101.
30. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989, “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of
Management Review, Vol.1 4,No.4, 532-550.
31. Fujimoto, T., & Heller, D. A., 2004, "Inter-Firm Learning in High-Commitment
Horizontal Alliances: Findings from Two Cases in the World Auto Industry," Annals of
Business Administrative Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.35-52
32. Fujimoto, T., & Takeishi, A., 2001,June, "Relocation and reorganization of Japanese
industries: Automobiles. Paper presented at the FRI-MIT-SOFI “Can Japan be a
Global Player?,”Symposium, Tokyo.
33. Fujimoto, T., Takeishi, A., & Nobeoka, K., 1999, "Jidousha sangyou no sekaiteki saihen:
Kibou koso subete? [Shake out in the world auto industry: Is volume all you need?],"
Hitotsubashi Business Review, 47(2), 11-25. (In Japanese).
34. Granovett, M., 1973, “The Strength of Weak Tie,” American Journal of the Sociology
78:1360-80.
35. Granvoett, M.,1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of
Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91:481-510.
36. Granovett, M., 1992, “Problem of Explanation in Economic Sociogy, In Noharia, N. and
R. Eccles(eds.),” Networks and Organizations: Structure, From, and Action, pp.25-56.,
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
37. Ganesan, S., 1994, “ Determaints of Long-term Orientation in Buyer-Seller
Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 58: 1-19.
38. Gulati, R., 1998, "Alliances and networks," Strategic Management Journal, 19,
293-317.
39. Ghertman, M, & Obadia, J., 1992, “Balance of Complementary Assets and Stability
Conditions of a Dynamic Transaction Cost Theory of Alliances: The Case of US
Biotechnology,” Working Paper, Chamber de Commerce et D’ industrie de Paris.
40. Gao, Tao, M. Joseph Sirgy & Monroe M. Bird, 2005, “Reducing Buyer
Decision-making Uncertainty in Organizational Purchasing: Can Supplier Trust
Commitment, and Dependence Help?” Journal of Business Research, 58,397-405.
41. Hamel, G., 1991, "Competition for competence and interpartner learning within
international strategic alliances," Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer Special
Issue), 83-103.
42. Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., Prahalad, C. K., 1989, "Collaborate with your competitors ─
and win," Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133-139.
43. Helper S., 1993, “An Exit-Voice Analysis of Supplier Relations: The Case of the U.S.
Automobile Industry,” in: G. Grabher (ed.), The Embedded Firm: on the
Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, Routledge, London..
44. Harrigan, K .R., 1986, “Management for Joint Venture Success,” New York: Lexington
Books.
45. Harrigan, K.R, 1988, “Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries,” In Contractor,
F.J. & P. Lorange(eds), Cooperative strategies in international business, Lexington:
D.C. Heath and Company, pp.205-226.
46. Harrigan, K.R., 1987, “Strategic Alliance: Their New Role in Global Competition,”
Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(2), 67-69.
47. Hennart, J. F., 1988, "A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures," Strategic
Management Journal, 9(4), 361-374.
48. Hergert, M., & Morris, D., 1988, "Trends in international collabolative agreements," In F.
J. Contractor, & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp.
99 -110). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
49. Hosmer, L. T., 1995, “Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and
Philosophical Ethics,” The Academy of Management Review 20, no.2 (1995):
379-403.
50. Huemer, L., 2004, "Balancing between stability and variety: Identity and trust trade-off
in networks," Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 251-259.
51. Huemer, L., Becerra, M., Lunnan, R,. 2004, "Organization identity and network
identitication: relating within and beyond imaginary boundaries," Scandinavian Journal
of Management, 20, 53-73
52. Humphrey, J., & Schmtiz, H., 1998, "Trust and inter-firm relations in developing and
transition economies," The Journal of Development Studies, Vol.34, No.4, 32-61.
53. Heller, D. A., 2003, “An inquiry into the role of interfirm relationships in recent
organizational change initiatives in Japanese automobile firms,” Shinshu University
Economic Review, 49, 45-88.
54. Inkpen, A. C., 1995, "The management of international joint ventures: An organizational
learning perspective," New York: Routledge.
55. Inkpn, A. C.,1998, "Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic
alliances," Academy of Management Excecutive, Vol.12, No.4, 69-80.
56. Ishii, S., 2003, "Kigyoukan teikei no senryaku to soshiki [Strategy and organization of
corporate alliance]," Tokyo: Chuo Keizaisha. (In Japanese).
57. Jarillo, J. C., 1988, ”On strategic networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9,
31-41.
58. Johnson J., & L. G. Mattson, 1987, “Interorganizational relations in industrial systems:
a network approach compared with the transactional cost approach,”International
Studies of Management & Organization, Vol.XVII, no.1, 34-48, M.E.sharpe, Inc.
59. Kagan , 1958, "The concept of identification," Psychological Review, 65 (5),96-305.
60. Krackhardt, D., 1992, “The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in
organizations,” In Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. G. ed., Networks and Organizations, Boston:
Harvard Business School Press.
61. Kale, P., H. Singh and H. Perlmutter, 2000, “Learning and Protection of Proprietary
Assets in Strategic Alliances：Building Relational Capital”, Strategic Management
Journal, 21(3), 217-237.
62. Killing, J.P., 1988, “Understanding Alliances: The Role of Task and Organizational
Complexity”, Cooperative Strategies in International Business, in F.J. Contractor & P.
Lorange(eds), Mass./ Toronto : D.C. Heath & Co./Lexington.
63. Kogut, B. and U. Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and
the replication of technology," Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
64. Kogut, B., & Zander, U., 1996, “What firms do? Cooridination, identity, and learning,”
Organization Science, 7(5): 502-518.
65. Kogut, B., 1988, "Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives," Strategic
Management Journal, 9(4), 319 -332.
66. Kogut, B., 1988, “Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspective”, Strategic
Management Journal, 9, 319-332.
67. Kummar N., Scheer, L. K. ＆ Steenkamp, E. M., 1995," The Effects of Supplier
Fairness on Vulnerable Reseller," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, February, pp.
55-65.
68. Langlois, N. R., & P. L. Robertson, 1992, “Networks and innovation in a modular
system: lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries,” Research
Policy, 21(4), .297-313.
69. Kim Langfield-Smith, 2008, “The relations between transactional characteristics, trust
and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance,” Management Accounting
Research 19: 344–364.
70. Lei, D. & Slocum Jr., J.W., 1991, “Global Strategic Alliance: Payoffs and Pitfalls”,
Organizational Dynamics, 19 (Winter), 44-62.
71. Lohtia, R., Bello, D. C., Porter, C. E., 2009, "Building trust in US–Japanese business
relationships: Mediating role of cultural sensitivity," Industrial Marketing Management
38, 239–252.
72. Luhmann, N., 1979, "Trust and power," Chichester: Wiley
73. Lynch, R.P., 1989, "The Practical Guide to Joint Ventures and Corporate Alliance," New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
74. Liu Ren-Jye & Jonathan Brookfield, 2006, “Japanese Firms and Subcontracting in
Mainland China: A Study of the Toyota Group and Shanghai Koito,” Supply Chain
Management: An International Journal, vol.22 no.4. pp.99-103.
75. Liu, R. J. and J. Brookfield, 2000, “Stars, Rings and Tiers: Organizational Networks and
Their Dynamics in Taiwan's Machine Tool Industry,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 33,
Issue 3: 322 – 348.
76. MacDuffie, J., & Helper, S., 1997, "Creating lean suppliers: Diffusing lean production
through the supply chain," California Management Review, 39(4), 118-151.
77. Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, 1995 “An Integrative Modle of
Organizational Trust.” Academy of management Review 20, no.3:709-734.
78. Meal, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E., 1992, "Alumni and their alma mater：A partial test of
the reformulated model of organization identification," Journal of organization
Behavior, 13, 103-123
79. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. , 1992, “Causes of failure in network organizations”,
California Management Review, Summer, 53-72
80. Mohr, J. and R. Spekman, 1994,“Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership
Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques,” Strategic
Management Journal, vol.15: 135-152.
81. Moingeon, B. and A. Edmondson, 1998,“Trust and Organizational Learning” in N.
Lazaric and E. Lorenz, eds., Trust and Economic Learning, Edward Elgar Publishing,
pp.247-265,.
82. Merriam, S. B., 1988, “Case study research in education,” Thousand Oaks, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
83. Moorman, C., Deshpande´, R., Zaltman, G., 1993, “Factors affecting trust in market
research relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 57, .81–101
84. Moorman, C., G. Zaltman, and R. Deshpande, 1992,“Relationships between Providers
and User of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust within and between
Organizations.” Journal of Marketing Research 29, no.3: 314-328.
85. Morgan R., & S. Hunt, 1994, “ The commitment-trust theory of relationship
marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38
86. Morrison, M., & Mezentseff, L., 1997, “Learning alliances- a new dimension of
strategic alliances”, Management Decision, 35(5), 351-357.
87. Nishiguchi, T., 1994, “Strategic industrial sourcing: The Japanese advantage (1st ed.”,
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88. Nonaka, I., 1991, "Senryaku teikei jyosetsu [Introduction to strategic alliances],"
Business Review, 38(4), 1-14. (In Japanese)
89. Nooteboom, B., H. Berger, and N.G. Noorderhaven, 1997,“Effects of Trust and
Governance on Relational Risk,” Academy of Management Journal, vol.40, no.2,
308-338.
90. O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J., 1986, "Organizational commitment and psychological
attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial
behavior," Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492- 499.
91. Pfeiffer & Salancik., 1978, “The External Control of Organizations:A Resource
Dependence Prespective,” Social Control of Organization, Haper & Row Publishers.
92. Parkhe, A., 1998, "Understanding Trust in International Alliances," Journal of Business,
33(3), pp.219-240.
93. Parson.T., 1951, "Toward a General Theory of Action combridge Mass"：Harvard
University Press.
94. Patchen, M., 1970, "Participation, Achievement, and Involvement on the Job,"
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
95. Porter, M.E., & Fuller, M.B., 1986, “Competition in global industries”, Boston, MA:
Harvard Business Press.
96. Pratt, M. B., 1998, "To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational
identification" In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations, (pp.
172-178). California: Sage.
97. Ring, P. S., & A. H. Van de Ven, 1994, “Developmental Process of Cooperative
Interorganizational Relationships, ” Academy of Management Review, 19, No.1,
pp.90-118
98. Ring, P. S., and A. H. Van de Ven, 1992,“Structuring Cooperative Relationships
Between Organizations,” Sraegic Management Jurnal, 13: p.p.483-498.
99. Root, F.R., 1988, “Some Taxonomies of International Cooperative Arrangements,”
in Contractor, F.J. & P. Lorange(eds). Cooperative strategies in international business,
Lexington: D.C. Heath and Company, pp.69-80.
100. Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer, 1998, “Not So Different
After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” The Academy of Management Review
23, no.3 (1998): 393-404.
101. Straton, R., 1982, “Organizational characteristics of consortia in intensive technology
industries,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, California.
102. Sako, M., 1991,“The role of ‘ Trust’ in Japanese buyer-supplier relationships,”
Ricerche economihe, ｘｌｖ，2-3: pp.449-474, 1991.
103. Sako, M., 1996, “Suppler Associations in the Japanese Auto Industry:Collective
Action for Technology Diffusion?,” Cambidge Journa of Eonomic , 20(3): pp.651-667.
104. Sako, M., and S. Helper, 1998,“Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence
from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States,” Journal of Eonomic
Behavior & Organizaion, 34: pp.387-
105. Scott, C. L., 1980, “Interpersonal Trust: A comparison of Attitudinal and Situational
Factors.” Human Relations 33, 805-812.
106. Sherman, S., 1992, "Are strategic alliances working?," Fortune, 125(9), 77- 78.
107. Szulanski, G., 1996, "Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best
practice within the firm," Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue),
27-43.
108. Selnes, Fred & James Sallis, 2003, “Promoting Relationship Learning,” Journal of
Marking, 67(July),80-95.
109. Thorelli, H. B., 1986, “Network: Between Markets and Hierarchies,” Strategic
Management Journal, Vol.7, 37-51.
110. Uzzi, B., 1997, "Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of
embeddedness," Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
111. Wheatley, M.J. & Kellner-Roger, M., 1996, “Self-organization: The irresistible future of
organizing,” Strategy & Leadership, 24(4): 18-24.
112. Westney, D. E., 1988, "Domestic and foreign learning curves in managing international
cooperative strategies," In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in
international business (pp. 339-346). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
113. Weitz, Barton. A., and Sandy D. Jap, 1995, “Relationship Marketing and Distribution
Channels,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.23, 305–320.
114. Williamson, Oliver E., 1981, “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost
Approach,” The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87, No.3, pp.548-577.
115. Yin, R. K., 1984 , "Case Study Research," CA: Sage Publications
116. Zaheer, A., and N. Venkatraman, 1995,“Relational governance as inter-organizational
strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange,” Sraegic
Management Journal, 16: pp.373-392,
117. Zaheer, A., B. McEvily, and V. Perrone, 1998,“Does Trust Matter? Exploring the
Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance,” Organizaion
Sience, 9(2), March-April: pp.141-159