跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.169) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/22 03:39
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李欣眉
研究生(外文):Sin-Mei Li
論文名稱:國小高年級學童父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之相關研究
論文名稱(外文):The relationships among parenting style, creativity and problem solving
指導教授:王智弘王智弘引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-Hung Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:130
中文關鍵詞:父母教養方式創造力問題解決
外文關鍵詞:parenting stylecreativityproblem solving
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:489
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究目的主要在探討國小高年級學童父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之相關研究,期建立結構模式以解釋之間的相互關係,並瞭解不同年級與性別之間在各變項之差異情形。本研究以台灣地區九十八學年度國小高年級學童為研究母群,抽取台灣本島北部、中部與南部地區國小高年級學生共879名學生為研究對象,以調查研究法為蒐集資料,結構方程模式為資料分析方法。研究結果發現模式經修正後各潛在變項之測量模式成立、修正過後路徑分析成立,而該模式在性別與年級具有測量恆等性,不同性別學童在創造力上達顯著差異,不同年級之學童在問題解決上達顯著差異。
The study revealed the relationship among parenting style, creativity and problem solving of fifth and sixty graders and compared the gender and grade differences in the above variable. Participants were fifth and sixth graders recruited from the north, medial and south side of the main island in Taiwan in 2009 academic year. AMOS 7.0 was conducted to construct the structural equation model of study of fifth and sixth graders’ parenting style, creativity and problem solving. Then the result showed that (1) students’ creativity had a positive effect on problem solving; (2) students’ parenting style had a positive effect on creativity and problem solving; (3) the measurement invariance on gender and grade were found.
中文摘要………………………………………………………… I
英文摘要………………………………………………………… II
目次……………………………………………………………… III
表次……………………………………………………………… VI
圖次……………………………………………………………… VIII
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機…………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題……………………………… 4
第三節 名詞釋義…………………………………………… 5
第四節 研究範圍…………………………………………… 7
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………… 9
第一節 父母教養方式相關理論基礎……………………… 9
第二節 創造力相關理論基礎……………………………… 18
第三節 問題解決相關理論基礎…………………………… 33
第四節 創造力、問題解決與父母教養方式相關研究…… 41
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………… 49
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………… 49
第二節 研究假設…………………………………………… 50
第三節 研究對象…………………………………………… 51
第四節 研究工具…………………………………………… 55
第五節 資料處理與分析…………………………………… 68
第四章 研究結果與討論……………………………………… 71
第一節 描述統計…………………………………………… 71
第二節 測量模式檢證……………………………………… 74
第三節 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之結構模
式檢驗……………………………………………… 82
第四節 測量恆等性檢驗…………………………………… 89
第五節 獨立樣本t 考驗…………………………………… 93
第六節 綜合討論…………………………………………… 97
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………… 103
第一節 結論………………………………………………… 103
第二節 建議………………………………………………… 106
參考文獻
中文部份……………………………………………………… 109
英文部分……………………………………………………… 111
附錄
附錄一 量表授權使用同意書……………………………… 125
附錄二 專家效度審查學者名單…………………………… 128
附錄三 父母教養方式正式量表…………………………… 129


表次
表2-1 CPS 模式……………………………………………… 43
表3-1 各地區抽樣之預試樣本數與班級數………………… 51
表3-2 各地區之預試回收率與有效率……………………… 52
表3-3 各地區抽樣之正式樣本數與班級數………………… 53
表3-4 各地區之回收率與有效率…………………………… 54
表3-5 父母教養方式項目分析……………………………… 57
表3-6 父母教養方式項目分析2 …………………………… 59
表3-7 父母教養方式第一次探索性因素分析……………… 60
表3-8 父母教養方式第二次探索性因素分析……………… 62
表3-9 父母教養方式量表預試結果之因素分析摘要表…… 63
表3-10 父母教養方式量表之信度分析表…………………… 64
表3-11 父母教養方式量表各層面題目之分配情形………… 64
表3-12 模式各項適配度指標………………………………… 69
表4-1 正式樣本之所在地區之年級、性別人數與百分比統計表…………………………………………………… 72
表4-2 各變項及其子量表得分之平均數與標準差摘要…… 73
表4-3 父母教養方式測量模式偏態及峰度摘要…………… 74
表4-4 創造力測量模式偏態及峰度摘要…………………… 75
表4-5 問題解決測量模式偏態及峰度摘要………………… 77
表4-6 問題解決測量模式路徑係數估計…………………… 77
表4-7 問題解決測量模式適配指標值……………………… 78
表4-8 問題解決測量模式2 路徑係數估計………………… 79
表4-9 問題解決測量模式2 適配指標值…………………… 80
表4-10 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之結構模式路徑係數估計……………………………………………… 83
表4-11 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決結構模式適配指標值…………………………………………………… 84
表4-12 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之結構模式路徑係數估計……………………………………………… 87
表4-13 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決結構模式適配指標值…………………………………………………… 88
表4-14 不同性別結構模式之恆等性檢驗各項適配指標值… 90
表4-15 不同性別結構模式之差異檢驗結果………………… 90
表4-16 不同年級結構模式之恆等性檢驗各項適配指標值… 92
表4-17 不同年級結構模式之差異檢驗結果………………… 92
表4-18 性別在各變項之獨立樣本t 考驗…………………… 94
表4-19 年級在各變項之獨立樣本t 考驗…………………… 96



圖次
圖3-1 研究架構……………………………………………… 49
圖4-1 父母教養方式測量模式圖…………………………… 74
圖4-2 創造力測量模式圖…………………………………… 75
圖4-3 問題解決測量模式圖………………………………… 76
圖4-4 問題解決測量模式圖2 ……………………………… 79
圖4-5 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之結構模式圖… 82
圖4-6 父母教養方式、創造力與問題解決之結構模式圖2 86
參考文獻
壹、中文部份
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。台北:高等教育。
余雅婷(2008)。創造性問題解決模式介入籃球教學對五年級學童籃
球問題解決能力之研究。國立台灣體育大學體育推廣學系碩士論
文,桃園縣。
吳靜吉(1998)。新編創造力測驗。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究
報告。
柳秀蘭(1994)。資優學生、普通學生、山地學生創造力與問題解決
能力之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,彰
化縣。
洪巧(2006)。國小學生父母教養方式與社交技巧關係之研究。國
立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
洪綉雯(2005)。國中學生父母管教方式,共依附特質與創造力關
係之研究。台南女子技術學院生活應用科學研究所碩士論文,
台南市。
郭有遹(1993)。行為主義的創造觀。創造思考教育,5,1-8。
黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學-結構方程模式。台北市:
五南。
張世彗(2007)。創造力:理論、技法與教學。台北市:五南。
教育部統計處(2009)。國小概況表。2010年1月1日取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8869.
陳穎(2009)。國小高年級學童數學領域之成就目標導向、情境興趣與自我效能間之關係研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,彰化縣。
蔡孟辰(2009)。少子化現象中家庭教養方式對國小低年級教師班級經營之影響。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,台東縣。
鄭英耀、王文中、周宛俞(2002)。科學創意教學實驗與教材發展-以國小自然科為例(國科會專題研究計畫期中成果報告,NSC90-2511-S-110-005-)。(未出版)











貳、英文部分
Alan, E. C., Wendy, C., & Alexandra, S. (2009). Family of origin characteristics as predictors of perfectionism. Australian Psychological Society, 61(3), 136-144.
Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1989). Independence and cognitive ability in gifted and exceptionally gifted boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 221–230.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., & Brandeis, U. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(2), 393-399.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Baer, M. & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963-970.
Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37, 887–907.
Baumrind, D. (1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and Society, 9, 239–276.
Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of early adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
Baumrind, D. (1996). The discipline controversy revisited. Family Relations, 45, 405-414.
Becker, W. C. (1964). Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development (pp. 169-208). New York: Russell Stage Foundation.
Berk, L. E. (2006). Development through the lifepan (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Berns, R. M. (1993). Child, family, community: Socialization and support. (3th ed.). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Bilgin, I. (2005). The effect of problem-solving strategies on university students’ problem-solving achievements of quantitative problems in chemistry. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 5(2), 628-635.
Blair, S. L., & Qian, Z. (1998). Family and Asian students’ educational performance. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 335–374.
Blechman, E. A., & McEnroe, M. J. (1985). Effective family problem solving. Child Development, 56, 429–437.
Broderick, P.C., & Blewitt, P. (2003). The life span: Human development for helping professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Burn, G. L., Walsh, J. A., Gomez, r., & Hafetz, N. (2006). Measurement and structural invariance of parent ratings of ADHD and ODD symptoms across gender for American and Malaysian children. Psychological Assessment, 18, 452-457.
Carton, A. F. (2003). Social sensitivity and children’s collaborative problem solving. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 181.
Chang, C. Y. (2002). Does computer-assisted instruction+problem solving=improved science outcomes? A pioneer study. Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 143-150.
Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111–1120.
Chao, R. K. (2000). The parenting of immigrant Chinese and European American mothers: Relations between parenting styles, Socialization goals, and parental practices. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 233-248.
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 62, 1336–1343.
Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2004). Evaluating the extent of ill-structured problem solving process among pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion and reflection log learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 197-227.
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human ability: An information-processing approach (pp.169-186). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Coleman, P. K., & Karraker. (2000). Parenting self-efficacy among mothers of school-age children: Conceptualization, measurement, and correlates. Family Relations, 49(1), 19-24.
Cropley, A. (2006a). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404.
Cropley, A. (2006b). Dimension of creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28, 125–130.
Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: HarperCollins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-318). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cumming, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Campbell, S. B. (2000). Developmental psychopathology and family process. Theory, research, and clinical implications. New York: Guilford Press.
Damast, A. M., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1996). Mother–child play: Sequential interactions and the relation between maternal beliefs and behaviors. Child Development, 67, 1752–1766.
Davis, G. A. (1999). Creativity is forever. Iowa: Kendall-Hunt.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
De Souza, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153.
DeCorte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Masui, C. (2004). The CLIA-model: A framework for designing powerful learning environment for thinking and problem solving. European Journal of Psychology Education, 19, 365-384.
Dereli, E. (2009). Examining the Permanence of the Effect of a Social Skills Training Program for the Acquisition of Social Problem-Solving Skills. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 37(10), 1419-1427.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: P. C. Heath.
Ekvall, G. (1999). Creative climate. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. I, pp. 403–412). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Elliott, T. R. (1994). Personality Correlates of Self-Appraised Problem Solving Ability: Problem Orientation and Trait Affectivity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 489.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Iowa: Hendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Florida, R. (2004). America’s looming creativity crisis. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 122-130.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in chiddren’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perpective. Creativity Reasearch Journal, 1(1), 8-26.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedure and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549.
Giangreco, M. F. (1993). Using creative problem-solving methods to include students with severe disabilities in general education classroom activities. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultayion, 4(2), 113.
Grolnick, W. S., Gurland, S. T., DeCourcey, W., & Jacob, K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of mothers’ autonomy support: An experimental investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 143–155.
Gruber, H. E., & Wallas, D. B. (2001). Creauve work: The acse of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist, 56(4), 346-349.
Guilford, J.P.(1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NJ: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation, Imc.
Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talent: Their nature, uses and development. New York: Bearly.
Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes the Structure of Intellect Model. Journal of educational and psychological measurement, 48(1), 1-4.
Harrington, D. M. (1999). Conditions and settings=environment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. I, pp. 403-412). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Harzem. P. (2004). Behaviorism for new psychology: what was wrong with behaviorism and what wrong with it now. Behavior & Philosophy, 32, 5-12.
Hayes, J. (1989). The complete problem solver. New York: Erlbaum.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology.
Hershey, D. A. (1999). Age Differenceon on a Procedurally Oriented Test of Practical Problem Solving. Journal of Adult Development, 6(2), 87-104.
Hoffman, M. I., (2001). A comprehensive theory of prosocial moral development. In A. Bohart & D. Stipek & (Eds), Constructive and destructive behavior (pp. 61-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hong, S., Malik, M., & Lee, M. (2003).Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean incariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 636-654.
Hoover, S. M. (1994). Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth-grade students. Roeper Review, 16(3), 156-159.
Hughes, G. D. (2003). Add Creativity to Your Decision Processes. Journal for Quality & Participation, 26(2), 4-13.
Hurlock, L. B. (1978). Child development (6th. ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365.
Isaksen, S. G. & Parnes, S. J. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving. The Journal of creative Behavior, 19(1), 1-29.
Isaksen, S. G., Kenneth, J. L., Ekvall, G. & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.
Jonassen, D. H. (2002). Case-Based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. ETR&D, 50(2), 65-77.
Jonassen, D. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of research on technology education, 35, 362-381.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. American Psychological Association, 13(1), 1-12.
Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training: Treatment for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.
Khaleefa, O. H., Erdos, G., & Ashria, I. H. (1996). Creativity in an indigenous Afro-Arab Islamic culture: The case of Sudan. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 268–282.
Kim, K. H. (2005). Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American education. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 337–347.
Kline, R.B. (1995). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lamb, M. E., & Lewis, C. (2005). The role of parent-child relationships in child development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamd (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (5th ed., pp. 429-468). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, ndulgent, neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1076.
Lim, S., & Smith, J. (2008). The structural relationships of parenting style, creative personality, and loneliness. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 412-419.
Lubart, T. I. (2003). In search of creative intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey & T. I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 279-292). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization within the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In P.H. Mussen & E.M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psycholog (4th ed, pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.
Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017.
Martini, R., & Shore, B. M. (2008). Pointing to parallels in ability-related differences in the use of metacognition in academic and psychomotor tasks. Learning & Individual Differences, 18(2), 237-247.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.449-460). New York: Scribner’s.
Mumford, M. D., Decker, B. P., Connelly, M. S., Osburn, H. K., & Scott, G. (2002). Belief and creative performance: Relationship across three tasks. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(3), 153-181.
Nakamura, K., Yaegashi, R., & Suzuki, S. (2005). A group problem solving system based on kepner-tregoe program: Experiment-Based confirmation of effectiveness as coordinator support faciclities. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, 9(2), 47-64.
Nielsen, B. D., Pickett, C. L., & Simonton, D. K. (2008). Conceptual versus experimental creativity: Which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks? Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 131-138.
Nietzel, C., & Stright, A. D. (2004). Parenting behaviours during child problem solving: The roles of child temperament, mother education and personality, and the problem-solving context.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s Sons.
Parnes, S. J. (1966). Creative behavior guildebook. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Parnes, S. J. (1987). Visioneering: State of the art. The journal of creative behavior, 21, 283-299.
Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. Technology Teacher, 61(4), 7-10.
Pratt, M. W., Green, D., MacVicar, J., & Bountrogianni, M. (1992). The mathematical parent: Parental scaffolding, parenting style, and learning outcomes in long-division mathematics homework. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 17–34.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rudowicz, E., & Ng, T. S. (2003). On Hg’s Why Asians are less creative than Westerners [Book review]. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 301–302.
Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427–438.
Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2005). Parents’ personality and the creative potential of exceptionally gifted boys. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 355–367.
Saeki, N., Fan, X., & Dusen, L. V. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 24–38.
Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s report of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 25, 413–424.
Shek, Daniel T. L. (1998). Adolescents’ perceptions of paternal and maternal parenting styles in a Chinese cintext. Journal of Psychology, 132(5), 527-537.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American psychologist, 55(1), 151-158.
Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creativ process in picasso’s guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic varians. Creativity Research Journal, 19(4), 329-344.
Şİrİn, A., & GÜzel, A. (2006). The relationship between learning styles and problem solving skills among college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(1), 255-264.
Slicker, E. K. (1998). Relationship of parenting style to behavioral adjustment in graduating high school seniors. Journal Youth Adolescent, 27(3), 345-72.
Solso, R. L. (1995). Cognitive psychology (4th ed.). Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Stanley, L. (2002). How your warmth helps your child learn, Scholastic Parent & Child, 10.
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1988). Assessing measurement invariance in crossnational consumer research. Journal of Consumer Resrarch, 25, 78-90
Steinberg, L., & Belsky, J. (1991). Infancy, childhood, and adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-fact model of creativity. In R. J. Strenberg (Ed), The nature of creativity. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The development of creativity as a decisionmaking process, In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura, & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 91-138). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). A systems model of leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 34-42.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000-2001). Guilford’s structure of intellect model and model of creativity: Contributions and Limitations. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 309-316.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. NY: The Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Silvia, P. J. (2009). Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 3(1), 48-51.
Tan, A. G. (2001). Singaporean teacher? perception of activities useful for fostering creativity. Journal of creative behavior, 35(2), 131-148.
Torrance, E. P. (1970). Encouraging creativity in the classroom. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Borwn Company Publishers.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children think creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Triandis, H. T. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–512.
Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Matthews, J. (2009). Divergent thinking ability is related to faster relatedness judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2). 99-103.
Victor, R., Jenaro, G., Carlos, F., & Amparo, V. (2002). Spanish teacher’ views of the goals of science education in secondary education. Research in Science & Technological Education. 20(1), 39-52.
Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought. NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovuch.
William, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Gardner, H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Practical intelligence for school: Developing metacognitive sources of achievement in adolesence. Developmental Review, 22(2), 162-170.
Woolfolk, A. (2009). Educational Psychology. (11nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Yiyuan, X., Farver, J. A. M., Zhang, Z., Zeng, Q., Lidong Y., & Cai. B. (2005). Mainland Chinese parenting styles and parent-child interaction. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(6), 524-531.
Zambo, R., & Follman, J. (1997). Gender-related differences in problem solving at the 6th and 8th grade levels. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, 62, 3-6.











連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top