( 您好!臺灣時間:2022/08/13 04:39
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


研究生(外文):Chun-Cheng Chen
論文名稱(外文):Patent Infringement Risks in Technology Transfer and Resulting Damages Liability under the U.S. Patent Law
指導教授(外文):Jason Tien Chou
外文關鍵詞:Patent ExhaustionPatent LitigationSubmarine PatentNon-Exclusive LicensingExclusive LicensingPrior ArtTechnology TransferIntellectual PropertyReasonable RoyaltyGeorgia-Pacific Factors
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:1016
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
The subject to be explored in this thesis is inspired by cause of experiences in technology transferring about Erbium Doped Optical Fiber Amplifier from Telecommunication Laboratories of Ministry of Transportation and Communications (now belong to Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.) to serviced company. Another cause is that more and more patent litigation between Taiwan and other countries (such as Japan, South Korea, U.S.A, etc.) occurred in U.S.A. The Intellectual Properties Rights (IPRs) have been paid much attention comes from the reason of U.S.A. use trade law 301 provisions to carry on the warning, revenging, and the retaliation regarding 12 overseas square deal measures, eliminate the trade barrier, especially the Specially 301 provisions is for the protection of Intellectual Properties Rights.
Since 2000, Taiwan takes the possession of 3rd or 4th in patent number list of USPTO. But equals the payment overseas option money approximately to reach 1,500 hundred million NT dollars every year, as well as right infringement harm indemnity which and legal expenses must pay because of the violation patent approximately 300 hundred million NT dollars and has the tendency which increases year after year. Taiwan not only does not have the patent quantity to obtain the considerable patent benefit, it must pay the damage compensate related money loss which, because the patent infringement produces. Why it is happened? The Nature of Taiwan obtains the patent except in the US is not to be good enough, nobody is interested, and then has the technology to transfer or outside the patent authorization motive, the enterprise does not take seriously regarding the patent authorization or the technical transferring idea has the potential risk. Therefore, in the idea only regards the patent authorization contract or the technical authorization contract with patent holder''s technical use letter of consent, have never realized the risk hides behind the contract, contains the patent infringement and meets when the circumstance change how to advocate in the hardship provision the option money to pay has the condition adjustment, sends lives many disputes the source.
The risk which this thesis attempts to discuss the technology transfer contract to schedule when must pay attention, namely must introduce the risk management by the most source''s contract clause consultation, regarding will have the possibility to cause in the future the bilateral cognition difference place and promises when is unable to worry about the circumstance, stipulates in the contract and does in advance takes refuge from danger the plan, or may reduce the nonessential conflict, will see avoid the disputes in the court.
第一章 緒論
第二章 美國專利制度及其法律規範
第三章 技術移轉與專利侵權之風險
第四章 美國聯邦法院對於專利侵權的認定標準
第五章 專利侵權的民事損害賠償責任
第六章 結論········································
Durham, Alan L., Patent Law Essentials, (Praeger; 2 edition, 2004)
Steven D. Anderman, John Kallaugher,Technology transfer and the new EU competition rules : intellectual property licensing after modernization, (Oxford University Press, USA , 2006)
Brian G. Brunsvold, Dennis P. O’Reilley, Drafting Patent License Agreements, (BNA Books (Bureau of National Affairs), 2008)
Duncan Curley,Intellectual property licences and technology transfer : a practical guide to the new European licencing regime, (Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Ltd , 2004)
Robert Harmon, Patents and the Federal Circuit, (BNA Books (Bureau of National Affairs), 9th edition, 2009)
Robert Goldscheider and Alan H. Gordon, Licensing best practices : strategic, territorial, and technology issues, (Wiley, 2006)
Joseph Glannon, Civil Procedure Examples & Explanations, (Aspen Publishers Inc,6th edition, 2008)
Philip J. McCabe, John W. Bateman, Kenyon & Kenyon LLP Donald Knox Duvall, Unfair Competition and the ITC (Actions Before the International Trade Commission Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930), (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 2009)
Kimberly A. Moore, Paul R. Michel, Timothy R. Holbrook , Patent litigation and strategy, (Thomson West; 3 edition, 2008)
Janice Mueller, Patent Law (ASPEN PUBLISHERS, 2009)
Daniel Slottje, Economic damages in intellectual property : a hands-on guide to litigation, (Wiley, 2006)
Guy Tritton ; Richard Davis ... [et al.], Intellectual property in Europ, (Sweet & Maxwell; 3rd edition ,2008)
Abbot Labs. v. Diamedix Corp., 47 F.3d 1128
ABC Industrial, Inc., Plaintiff, v. KASON Industries, Inc., and Kason Merchandising Fixtures, Inc., Defendants.,30 F.Supp.2d 331
A.C. Aukerman Co. v. R.L. Chaides Constr. Co., 960 F.2d 1020
Adams v. Burke, 84 U.S. 17 WL. 453 (1873)
ATLAS POWDER COMPANY, Plaintiff, and Hanex Products, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IRECO INCORPORATED and ICI Explosives USA,Inc., Defendants-Appellees.,190 F.3d 1342
Applera Corp. v. Mp Biomedicals, LLC 173 Cal.App.4th 769, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 178, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5308, 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6324
Aptix Corp. v. Quickturn Design Sys., Inc., 269 F.3d 1369
Arachnid, Inc., v. Merit Indus., Inc., 939 F.2d 1574,1578-79 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 365 U.S. 336 (1961)(Aro I)
Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257, 201 USPQ 1 (1979)
Bauer & Cie v. O’Donnell, 229 U.S. 1(1913)
Bell International Corp. v. U.S., 381 F.2d 1004
Bement v. National Harrow Co, 186 U.S. 70, 91 (1902).
Bio-Rad Laboratories v.Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1984); BIC Leisure Products,Inc. v. Windsurfing International, Inc., 1 F.3d 1214, 1218 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P. No. 06-1503, Federal Circuit
Botec Industries Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp., 215 F.3d 1246, 55 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964)
Burroughs Wellcome Co., v. BARR laboratories, inc., & Novopharm, Inc. and Novopharm, Ltd.,40 F.3d 1223
Calmar, Inc., Plaintiff, v. EMSON Research, Inc., Defendant.,850 F.Supp. 861
Cambridge Prods., Ltd. V. Penn Nutrients, Inc., 962 F.2d 1048
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2007-1296, -1347 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2009)
Carey v. United States, 326 F.2d 975, 140 USPQ 345 (Ct.Cl.1964)
Conopco, Inc. v. May Department Stores Co., 46 F.3d 1556 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & Mach. Works. 261 U.S. 2443(1923)
Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelecs Int’l Inc. 246 F.3d 1336
Cybor Corp. v. DAS Techs. 138 F.3d 654
Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., 138 F.3d 1448
Cytodyn, Inc., v. Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 160 Cal. App. 4th 288, 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 600
Datascope Corp. v. SMEC, Inc., 879 F.2d 820, 825 (Fed. Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1024 (1990; Water Techs. Corp. v. Calco, Ltd., 850 F.2d 660 (Fed. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 968 (1988).
Dawson Chem. Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176,184 (1980)
De Forest Radio Tel. Co. v. United States, 273 U. S. 236 (1927)
Dickinson v. Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999)
Digital Corp. v. Browster Inc., 2008 WL 4104695 (D. Minn. Aug. 26, 2008)
Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. American Ore Reclamation Co., 44 F.Supp. 391 (D.C.N.Y. 1937)
eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange. L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006)
Enzo Apa & Son, Inc. v. Geapag A.G.., 134 F.3d 1090 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
ETHICON, Inc. and InBae Yoon, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION and Young Jae Choi, Defendants-Appellees.,135 F.3d 1456
Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States, 309 U.S. 436 ,446 ,457(1940)
Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. Abbot Laboratories, 03-1067(Fed. Cir. 08/07/2003)
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002)
Finisar Corp v. DirectTV Group Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1339(Fed. Cir 2008)
Fiskars Oy Ab and Fiskars, Inc. v.Hunt Manufacturing Co., 279 F.3d.1378, 1382-83 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Fromson v. Western Litho Plate & Supply Co., 853 F.2d 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
General Mills, Inc. v. Hunt-Wesson, Inc., 103 F.3d 978, 41 USPQ2d 1440 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp. 461 U.S. 648(1983)
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir.1971)
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1(1966)
Haynes Int’l Inc., v. Jessop Steel Co., 8 F.3d 1573
Heidelberg Harris, Inc. v. Loebach, 145 F. 1454, 1458-1459, 46 USPQ2d (BNA) 1948 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Henry v. A.B. Dick Co., 224 U.S. 1(1912)
Herbert v. Lisle Corp., 99 F.3d 1109, 40 USPQ2d (BNA) 1611 (Fed. Cir. 1996).
Herbert MARKMAN and Positek, Inc., v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S. Ct. 1384
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 909 F.2d 1469(Fed. Cir. 1990)
Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002)
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Invamed, Inc., 213 F.3d 1359
Ill. Tool Works, Inc. v. Indep. Ink, Inc. 547 U.S. 28 (2006)
Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of Am., 269 U.S. 459
In Finisar Corp v. DirectTV Group Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1339(Fed. Cir 2008)
In re CFLC, Inc., 89 F.3d 673, 39 USPQ2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1996)
In re SCHREIBER,128 F.3d 1473
In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
In re Van Wanderham, 378 F.2d 981(C.C.P.A.1967)
Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc., 756 F.2d 1556
Jerry F. CONNELL, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc.,Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.,722 F.2d 1542
John H. Coleman, Appellant, v. Martin B. Dines, et al., Appellees,754 F.2d 353
KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. et al. 127 S.Ct. 1727
Lewis Eady v. Bryan K. Lansford. 351 Ark. 249, 92 S.W.3d 57
Lucent Techs. Inc. v. Gateway Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95934(S.D.Cal. Oct. 30, 2007)
Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 79 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Malautea v. Suzuki Motro Co., Ltd., 987 F.2d 1536
Mantech Environmental Corp. v. Hudson Environmental Services, Inc., 152 F.3d 1368, 1376, 47 USPQ2d 1732, 1739 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc., 156 F.3d 1206, 1210, 48 USPQ2d 1010, 1013 (Fed.Cir1998)
Matsishita Electric Industrial Co.,Ltd., et al., Petitioners v. Zenith Radio Corp. et al.,106 S.Ct. 1348
McElmurry v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 995 F.2d 1576, 27 USPQ2d 1129 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Merck KgaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005)
MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech,Inc. 549 U.S. 118 (2007)
Met-Coil Systems Corp. v. Korners Unlimited, Inc., 803 F.2d 684, 231 USPQ 474 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc., Civ. No. 00-792-SLR (U.S.D.C., D. Del., opinion and order filed Jan. 9, 2009).
Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. 550 U.S. 437 (2007)
Minco, Inc. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 95 F.3d 1109 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopedics, Inc., 976 F.2d 1559 1578-79 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
Motion Picture Patent Co., v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U.S. 502, 518(1917)
NIKE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. and Hawe Yue, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.,138 F.3d 1437
Northbrook Digital Corp. v. Browster Inc., 2008 WL 4104695 (D. Minn. Aug. 26, 2008)
Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Brothers Fibre Works, 575 F.2d 1152, 1156, 197 USPQ 726, 730 (6th Cir. 1978).
Permanence Corp. v. Kennametal, Inc., 908 F.2d 98,15 USPQ2d 1550 (6th Cir. 1990)
Pfaff v. Wells Elecs. Inc., 525 U.S. 55 (1998)
Pivonka v. Central Garden& Pet Co., No. 02-cv-02394, 2008 WL 486049 (D. Colo. Feb. 19, 2008)
Plastics, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:04-CV1611 (M.D. Pa., Nov. 14, 2007)
Prima Teck II, LLC. V. A-Roo Co., 222 F.3d 1372
Pro-Mold & Tool Co. v. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc., 75 F.3d 1568(Fed. Cir. 1996)
Protor & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., 917 F. Supp. 305
Quanta Comp.,Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 128 S. Ct. 2109(2008)
Radio-Craft Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co., 7 F.2d 432 (3d Cir. 1925)
Reebok International Ltd. V. J. Baker, Inc., 32 F.3d 1552, 1558 (Fed. Cir.1994).
Rhino Associates, L.P., v. Berg Manufacturing And Sales Corporation and Cencor Plastics, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:04-CV1611 (M.D. Pa., Nov. 14, 2007)
Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. v. DeKalb Genetics Corp., 284 F.3d 1323, 62 USPQ2d 1188 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538
Rock-Ola Mfg. Corp. v. Filben Mfg. Co., 168 F.2d 919, 78 USPQ 175 (8th Cir. 1948)
Rohm & Hass Co. v. Crystal Chem. Co. 736 F.2d 688
Ronald B. BROCKMEYER; Eromedia, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David C. MAY, Defendant, v. Marquis Publications, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant. ,383 F.3d 798
Ruiz v. A.B. Chance Co., 234 F.3d 654
Samuel Gart v. Logiteck, Inc., 254 F.3d 1334
Sidney A. Diamond, v. James R. Diehr, II and Theodore A. Lutton, 450 U.S. 175,101 S. Ct. 1048
Slimfold Mfg. Co., Inc.v. Kinkead Industries, Inc., 932 F.2d 1453(Fed. Cir. 1991).
South Corp. v. U.S., 690 F.2d 1368
Southwall Technologies, Inc., v. Cadinal IG Company, 54.F.3d 1570
Standard Oil Co. v. United States , 283 U.S. 163 (1931)
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing v. United States, 226 U.S. 20 (1912)
SRI International, Inc., v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc., and ATL Washington, Inc., 127 F.3d 1462
Teleflex & Technology Holding c. v. KSR Int’l co., 289 F. Supp. 2d 581(2003)
Textile Productions Inc. v. Mead Corp., 134 F.3d 1481, 45 USPQ2d 1633 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Underwater Devices Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380, 1390 (Fed. Cir 1983)
Union Paper-Bag Mach. Co. v. Murphy , 97 U.S. 120 (1877).
United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241(1942)
Vaupel Texilmaschinen KG v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.p.A., 944 F.2d 870 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576
Water Techs, Corp. v. Calco, Ltd., 850 F.2d 660,668 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Waterman v. Machenzie, 138 U.S. 252
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997)
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF, Inc., 782 F.2d 995 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
WYETH, et al. v. JON W. DUDAS, 580 F. Supp 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2008)
Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2010)
Yarway Corp. v. Eur-Control USA, Inc., 775 F.2d 268
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top