(34.204.200.74) 您好!臺灣時間:2020/01/22 22:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
本論文永久網址: 
line
研究生:吳明坤
研究生(外文):Ming-Kuen Wu
論文名稱:性健康教育自我效能與性騷擾知覺之相關研究-以高雄地區國小高年級學童為例
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Relationship Between Sexual Health Education Self-Efficacy and Perception of Sexual Harassment-An Example for the Higher Grade Elementary School Students in Kaohsiung Area
指導教授:陳國彥陳國彥引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:樹德科技大學
系所名稱:人類性學研究所
學門:其他學門
學類:其他不能歸類之各學類
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:115
中文關鍵詞:性健康教育自我效能性騷擾知覺國小高年級學童
外文關鍵詞:Sexual Health Education Self-EfficacyPerception of Sexual HarassmentHigher Grade Elementary School Students
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:841
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究以高雄地區國小高年級學童為研究對象,根據研究者自編「性健康教育自我效能」與「性騷擾知覺」量表為研究工具,隨機抽取600名高雄地區國小高年級學童為施測對象,回收587份有效正式問卷,研究結果顯示:一、高雄地區國小高年級學童有高強度的性健康教育自我效能。二、高雄地區國小高年級學童有高強度的性騷擾知覺力。三、不同背景之性別在「生理健康」構面有顯著差異;年級在「生理健康」構面有顯著差異;家庭氣氛在「生理健康」、「同儕互動」及「家庭氣氛」構面均有顯著差異。四、性別在「言語性騷擾」、「肢體性騷擾」構面有顯著差異;年級在「性騷擾知覺」構面有顯著差異;家長管教方式在「肢體性騷擾」構面有顯著差異。五、高雄地區國小高年級學童性健康教育自我效能與性騷擾知覺二個量表間為接近中度的正相關。

In this study, Kaohsiung area elementary students that study, researchers have designed "sexual health education, self-efficacy" and "perception of sexual harassment," Scale as a research tool in the Kaohsiung area of 600 randomly selected elementary grade students as the subjects recovered 587 valid formal questionnaire, the results show: First, Kaohsiung elementary grade students with high strength self-efficacy of health education. Second, Kaohsiung elementary grade students with high-intensity strength perception of sexual harassment. Third, the gender of different backgrounds in the "physical health" dimension were significantly different; grades in the "physical health" dimension were significantly different; family atmosphere in the "physical health", "peer interaction" and "family atmosphere" dimensions are significant difference. Fourth, gender in the "verbal sexual harassment," "physical sexual harassment" is the most significant difference; grades in "sexual harassment perception" is the most significant difference; parents, parenting styles in the "physical sexual harassment" is the most significant difference. 5, Kaohsiung fifth and sixth grade students of health education and sexual harassment of perceived self-efficacy between the two scales was close to moderate positive correlation.

表 81
表4-23不同家庭經濟狀況國小高年級學童性騷擾知覺描述性統計摘要表 83
表4-24不同家長管教方式國小高年級學童性騷擾知覺差異分析摘要表 84
表4-25不同家長管教方式國小高年級學童性騷擾知覺描述性統計摘要表 86
表4-26不同家庭氣氛國小高年級學童性騷擾知覺差異分析摘要表
87
表4-27不同家庭氣氛國小高年級學童性騷擾知覺描述性統計摘要表
88
表4-28性健康教育自我效能與性騷擾知覺積差相關分析摘要表 89
表5-1高雄地區不同背景國小高年級學童性健康教育自我效能差異分析 93
表5-2高雄地區不同背景國小高年級學童性騷擾知覺差異分析 94


性騷擾與性侵害。學生輔導通訊,48,26-37。
歐淑玲、李絳桃、陳美伶、曾旭民(2008)。產婦性健康自我效能量
表之發展。實證護理,4(2),138-147。
盧俊宏(1999)。運動心理學。臺北市:師大書苑。
駱俊宏(2006)。運用風險管理概念於「性健康」促進之探究。品質
月刊,8,82-85。
鄭家如、沈珠帆(2000)。台南師院初教系學生性知識與性態度之調
查研究。台南師院學生月刊,17,13-27。
羅燦瑛(2001)。各級中小學性侵害防治教育實施之評鑑研究。教育
部委託研究報告。
羅燦煐(2005)。政策面VS.執行面:校園性侵害及性騷擾防治之政
策分析、現況檢視及實務芻議。國家政策季刊,4(1),101-140。
鐘淑姬(1997)。國小教師性態度、性教育實施現況及進修需求之調
查研究。台灣性學學刊,3(2),1-20。
二、西文部分
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral
change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American
Psychologist, 33, 344-358.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social
cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: W. H.
Freeman.
Finan, S. L. (1997). Promoting health sexuality: Guidelines for the
school-age child and adolescents. Nurse Practitioner, 22(11), 62-72.
Fisher, T. D. (1987). Family relationship and parent-child discussion
about sex. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern
Psychological Association. Atlanta, G. A.
Franklin, C. & Corcoran, J. (2000). Preventing adolescent pregnancy: A
review of programs and practices. Social Work, 45(1), 40-52.
Jacob Cohen (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (second ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39,
31-36.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for
research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30,
607-610.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case
of sex discrimination. NH: Yale University Press.
Mazer, D. B., & Percival, E. F. (1989). Ideology or experience? The
relationships among perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of sexual
harassment in university students. SexRoles, 20(3/4), 135-147.
Miller, B.C.(2001). Family influences on adolescent sexual and
contraceptive behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(1),22-26.
Pan America Health Organization(PAHO), World Health
Organization(WHO), World Association for Sexology(WAS).
(2000). Promotion of Sexual Health Recommendations for Action,
Retrieved November 4, 2009, from
http://paho.org/English/HCP/HCA/PromotionSexualHealth.pdf
Rosenstock,I.M.(1974). Historical origins of the health belief model.
Health Education Monographs,2(4),328-335.
Tata, J. (1993). The structure and phenomenon of sexual harassment:
Impact of category of sexually harassing behavior, gender, and
hierarchical level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(3),
199-211.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2001). The surgeon
general’s call to action to promote sexual health and responsible
sexual behavior. Retrieved November 6, 2009,
from:http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/sexualhealth/call.htm
Woods, N. F. (1984). Human sexuality in health and illness: A holistic
perspective (3rd ed., p.3). MO: Mosby.
World Health Organization (2005). Defining sexual health. Report of a
technical consultation on sexual health 28-31 January 2002, Geneva.
Retrieved November 4, 2009, from
http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/gender/sexual_health.html


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔