臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Innovation in education is not merely put education out of the past but more importantly to make it meet the demands of the future. The purpose of this thesis is to find out the challenges of Vietnamese higher education in innovation perspective. This thesis reviews existing literature on innovation search map and service-dominant logic and co-creation. By applying these theories, suggestion for solving the challenges of Vietnamese higher education is mentioned. The findings indicate that Vietnamese higher education has challenge about quality of training and it does not meet with social requirement and teaching methods is passive and monologue. Furthermore, the documents also indicate other issues in higher education that (1) lectures shortage; (2) out of date of programs of higher education and facilities; and (3) inefficient management of education.

Innovation in education is not merely put education out of the past but more importantly to make it meet the demands of the future. The purpose of this thesis is to find out the challenges of Vietnamese higher education in innovation perspective. This thesis reviews existing literature on innovation search map and service-dominant logic and co-creation. By applying these theories, suggestion for solving the challenges of Vietnamese higher education is mentioned. The findings indicate that Vietnamese higher education has challenge about quality of training and it does not meet with social requirement and teaching methods is passive and monologue. Furthermore, the documents also indicate other issues in higher education that (1) lectures shortage; (2) out of date of programs of higher education and facilities; and (3) inefficient management of education.

Table of Contents
Title Page i
Letter of Approval ii
Letter of Authority iii
Abstract in English iv
Acknowledgement v
Table of Contents vi
List of Tables viii
List of Figures ix
INTRODUCTION 1
Vietnamese education reform - Opportunity 2
INNOVATION APPROACHES 4
A map of innovation search space 4
Service-Dominant Logic 6
Co-creation 8
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 11
Method 11
Case description: Vietnamese Higher Education 11
Unit of analysis 20
Data collection 22
DATA ANALYSIS 24
Flow 1: Data reduction 24
Flow 2: Data Display 25
Flow 3: conclusion drawing/ verification 25
FINDINGS 27
Document finding 27
Interview finding 35
SUGGESTIONS TO CHALLENGES 40
Document suggestions 40
Interview suggestions 42
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 48
Limitation and future research 50
APPENDIX A 52
APPENDIX B 55
REFERENCE 60

Albury D. (2005). Fostering Innovation in Public Services. Public Money &; Management 25(1): 51 – 56.
Albury, D. and Mulgan. G, (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office: London.
Armando A.S., and Oroslinda M.T.G. (2007). Brazil’s National Award for Innovation in Education Management: An Incentive for Local Education Authorities to Improve Municipal Education Systems toward the Goals of the National Education Plan. The Public Sector Innovation Journal 11(3). Article 6.
Ball, S. J., Davies, J., David, M. E. and Reay, D. (2002). ‘Classification’ and ‘judgment’: social class and the ‘cognitive structures’ of choice of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 23(1): 51–72.
Berry, L. L., Shankar, V., Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., and Dotzel, T. (2006). Creating new markets through service innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 47(2): 56–63.
Berthon, P., and John, J. (2006). From entities to interfaces: Delineating value in customer–firm interactions. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions 196–207.
Bates, W.A. (2007). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Second Edition.
Bessant. J and Masher .L, 2009. Developing radical service innovation in healthcare – the role of design methods. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Boothroyd, P, Phạm P.X. (2000). Socioeconomic renovation in Viet Nam: the origin, evolution, and impact of doi moi.
Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation", in Contemporary field Research: A Collection of Readings, Robert M. Emerson, ed., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 109-128.
Cowell, D. (1988). New service development. Journal of Marketing Management 13(3): 296–312.
Dan Tri, (2008). Nguyên Phó chủ tịch nước Nguyễn Thị Bình: Đề nghị một cuộc cải cách giáo dục triệt để. http://www.dantri.com.vn/.../de-nghi-mot-cuoc-cai-cach-giao-duc-triet-de.htm
de Vries. E.J., (2006). Innovation in services in networks of organizations and in the distribution of services. Research Policy 35: 1037–1051.
Ellis. A.K. (2005). Research on educational innovations.
Etgar, M. (2006). Co-production of services: A managerial extension. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions 28–138.
Ferren A.S. and Stanton W.W. (2004). Leadership through collaboration the role of the chief Academic officer. American council on Education praeger, series on higher education.
Fielding. M., (2004). New Wave’ Student Voice and the Renewal of Civic Society. London Review of Education 2(3). L. Vargo (Eds), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions 139–149.
Gallouj, F. and Weinstein, O., (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy 26: 537–556.
Giang, V.T. (2009). Chất vấn Bộ trưởng Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo. Văn phòng Quốc hội và Văn phòng Chính phủ. Công văn số 186/CV-KH5 và số 3772/VPCP-TH.
H.L.Anh - D. Hằng (2005). Giáo dục đại học Việt Nam ngày càng xa chuẩn quốc tế. Được truy cập ngày17/05/2005 từ http://www.nld.com.vn/118329P0C1017/giao-duc-dai-hoc-viet-nam-ngay-cang-xa-chuan-quoc-te-.htm
Harrow, J. and Willcocks, L. (1990). Public services management: activities, initiatives and limits to learning. Journal of Management Studies 27(3): 281-304.
Hartley. J, (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present, Public money and Management.
Hickman, C. and Raia. C. (2002). Incubating innovation. The Journal of Business Strategy 23(3): 14-18.
Holbrook, M. B. (1996). Customer value—A framework for analysis and research. In K. P. Corfman and J. G. Lynch Jr. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research 23: 138–142.
Jaworski, B., and Kohli, A. K. (2006). Co–creating the voice of the customer. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions 109–117.
Kalaignanam, K., and Varadarajan, R. (2006). Customers as coproducers: Implications for marketing strategy effectiveness and marketing operations efficiency. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions 166–180.
Kripendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology.
Lambert, D. M., and Garcia-Dastugue, S. J. (2006). Cross-functional business processes for the implementation of service-dominant logic. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions 150–165.
Levinthal, D, and March, I. G. (1993). The myopia of learning Strategic. Management Journal 14: 95-112.
Lusch R.F, Vargo S.L and Wessels G, (2008). Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM systems journal 47(1).
Magnusson P.R (2003). Benefit of involving users in service innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 6(4): 228.
Mai M. (2008). Hơn 50% sinh viên không… hứng thú học tập. Được truy cập ngày 25/09/2008 từ http://dantri.com.vn/c25/s25-252276/hon-50-sinh-vien-khong-hung-thu-hoc-tap.htm
March, J, (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71-87.
Michel S., Brown S.W. and Gallan A.S, (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academic Marketing Sciencen 36: 54-66.
Michel, S., Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2008). Reconfiguration of the conceptual landscape: A tribute to the service logic of Richard Normann. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis- An Expanded Sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
MOET, (2005). Luat Giao Duc. Congress Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Term 11 Session 7, Law number 38/2005/QH11.
MOET, (2008). Chien luoc phat trien giao duc Viet Nam 2009 – 2020.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Havard University Press, Cambridge.

Nghiem, D.V. (2007). Từ cải cách giáo dục của một số nước hiện nay rút ra bài học kinh nghiệm cho Việt Nam.
http://www.hids.hochiminhcity.gov.vn/Hoithao/VNHOC/TB14/vy.pdf
Nguyen H. H. (2008). Học trò thời nay năng động hơn nhưng không chịu học. Được truy cập ngày19/11/2008 từ http://vietnamnet.vn/giaoduc/2008/11/814351/
Nguyen H.V. (2009). Một số vấn đề về nâng cao chất lượng giảng dạy đại học. http://vinatexcollege.edu.vn/tabid/105/forumid/33/postid/13/scope/posts/Default.aspx
Nguyen T. B. ex-vice President of Vietnam, (2008), “Phát triển giáo dục - đào tạo: Cần một cuộc cải cách mới”.
http://www.dongtrieu.edu.vn/forums.asp?level=post&;id=116
Nguyen. T.M.H (2009). Thực trạng Giáo dục Đào tạo Đại học Việt Nam. Center for Evaluation and Testing of Education Quality - Education Research Institute.
OECD. (2008). Workshop on Advancing Innovation: Human resources, education and training. Bad Honnef, Germany Session 7.
Oke, A. (2007). Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies. International Journal of Operations &; Production Management 27(6): 564-587.
Oliveira, P. and von Hipper E, (2009), Users as Service Innovators: The Case of Banking Services, MIT Sloan School of Management working paper 4748-09
Oliver, R. L. (2006). Co-producers and co-participants in the satisfaction process: Mutually satisfying consumption. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions, 118–127.
Pham, P.Y. (2007). Biện pháp nâng cao chất lương đào tạo đại học cần sự đồng bộ. http://thongtinphapluatdansu.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/691/
Pham, P.T. (2009). Chất vấn Bộ trưởng Bộ Giáo dục và đào tạo. Văn phòng Quốc hội và Văn phòng Chính phủ. Công văn số 84/CV-KH5
Payne, A., and Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing 69: 167–176
Payne, A., Storbacka. F., K. and Frow, P., (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of Academic Marketing Science 36: 83-96.
Prahalad. C.K. and Ramasswamy. V. (2004). Co-opting customer competence. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(3).
Reay, D., David, M. E. and Ball, S. J. (2005). Degrees of choice: class, race and gender in higher education, Stoke on Trent, Trentham Books.
Schatzman, M. 2009). Education in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam.
www.eaie.org/pdf/madrid/1101.pdf
Sheth, J. N., and Mittal, B. (2004). Customer behavior. A managerial perspective. Mason, OH: South-Western, Thomson.
Shiner, M. and Modood, T. (2002). Help or hindrance? Higher education and the route to ethnic equality, British Journal of Sociology of Education 23(2): 209–232.
Sinh, H. X. and Sloper, D. (1995). An entrepreneurial development: Thang Long University. In Higher Education in Vietnam: Change and Response, ed. D. Sloper and L.T. Can. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
Tran. T. B. L. and Gaede. C. S. (2007). Phân tích chất lượng giáo dục đại học Việt Nam và Mỹ trong hoàn cảnh của mỗi nước và bài học rút ra cho Việt Nam.
Vallely T. J. and Wilkinson B. (2008). Vietnamese Higher Education: Crisis and Response, ASH Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School.
Van Driel J. H., Beijaard D. and Verloop N. (2001). Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers' Practical Knowledge. Journal of research in science teaching 38(2): 137±15.
Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be. In R. F. Lusch, and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (43–56). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Vargo, S. L. and Robert F. Lusch (2004). Evolving to aNewDominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing 68: 1–17.
Viet H. (2009). Việt Nam thiếu 2 vạn giảng viên đại học http://www.rfa.org/vietnamese/in_depth/VN-in-lack-of-20000-college-professors-reasons-and-consequences-05262009162650.html
Vietnam Education Law, (2005). Luat giao duc Viet Nam nam 2005”, Quoc hoi, luat so 38/2005/QH11.
Vietnam General Statistic Office, (2008). http://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=435&;idmid=3
Vietnam Government, (2001). Chien luoc phat trien giao duc 2001 – 2010. Quyết định số 201/2001/QĐ-TTg.
Vietnam Government, 2008 “Annual report 2008”.
Vietnam Net (2005). Draft project: Building world standard university in Vietnam, October/05.
Vnexpress, (2010). Học bổng 70% học phí tại Mỹ, http://vnexpress.net/GL/Xa-hoi/Co-hoi-Du-hoc/2010/03/3BA19709/
Vo T.X. (2008). Việt Nam: Giáo dục đại học và Kỹ năng cho tăng trưởng. New Era, Journal of Research and Discussion 13.
Voss K., Tsikriktsis N. and Frohlich M. (2002). Case research in operation management. International Journal of Operations &; production Management 22(2): 195.
Vu Q V. (2005). So sánh chương trình giáo dục đại học ở Mỹ và Việt Nam. Vietnam Asian-Pacific Economic Center.
Vu Q. V., (2008). Giao duc Viet Nam: Nguyen nhan cua su xuong cap va cac cai cach can thiet. New Era, Journal of Research and Discussion 13.
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(2): 139–153.
Woodruff, R. B. and Flint, D. J. (2006). Marketing’s service-dominant logic and customer value. In R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (183–195). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
World Bank, (1997). World Development Report.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research－Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.