跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.210.85.190) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/12/06 01:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳淑貞
研究生(外文):Shu-Jen Chen
論文名稱:圖書資訊學領域Open Access期刊分析研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of Open Access Journals in Library and Information Science Field
指導教授:吳明德吳明德引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-der Wu
口試委員:陳雪華陳昭珍林奇秀
口試日期:2011-01-26
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:圖書資訊學研究所
學門:傳播學門
學類:圖書資訊檔案學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:234
中文關鍵詞:開放取用自我典藏開放取用期刊
外文關鍵詞:Open Accessself-archivingOpen Access Journal
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:1080
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
學術期刊是科學傳播最基本且重要的正式傳播管道之一,讓科學家快速交流最新的研究成果與進展,讓知識得以不斷累積和進步。但是當研究文獻爆炸性增加,期刊數量快速成長,期刊的訂閱費用大幅提升,形成期刊危機,對學術資訊的傳播造成阻礙,學者開始提倡Open Access的觀念與出版模式,希望藉由公共的網際網路,讓更多使用者可以免除各種障礙,取得學術資源,以提升學術傳播的效益。
隨著OA的角色和功能越來越受到關注,OA期刊數量大幅增加,更有越來越多的學者以不同的方式對所發表的文獻進行自我典藏,圖書資訊學向來關心學術傳播的發展,如何使文章的影響力最大,而使科學傳播的遲滯最小,是圖資領域重要的研究課題,這與OA的發展理念不謀而合,因此圖資領域的OA發展現況値得關注。本研究藉由書目計量法,分析了解圖書資訊學領域之Open Access發展情形,包括圖書資訊學領域Open Access期刊發行現況、圖書資訊學領域Open Access期刊的能見度、圖書資訊學領域期刊之Open Access政策、圖書資訊學領域Open Access議題主要作者之自我典藏情形及研究影響力。
研究結果顯示:(一) 圖資領域的OA期刊以美國為主要出版地、主要出版語言為英文。(二)約一半的圖資領域OA期刊可於領域內的重要資料庫檢索,收錄情形與該期刊的出版地有關。(三)大部份圖書資訊學領域重要期刊及關心OA議題之期刊均至少允許任一形式的自我典藏。(四)圖書資訊學領域OA議題主要作者之自我典藏情形不等,發表文章為OA者被引用次數較高,但與首次被引用時間關係不大。
本研究建議圖資領域資料庫應加強對OA期刊的關注,而OA期刊也可嘗試因應學術領域資料庫可能的收錄需求,以增加重要資料庫的能見度。此外,圖書館應多發揚OA理念,提供自我典藏的工具及管道,整理各學科重要OA資源並提供檢索平臺。研究者也應多投稿OA期刊,或以自我典藏的方式,獲得OA的效益。

Academic journals are one of the most fundamental channels of official scientific communication because they allow scholars to quickly exchange current research results and ideas. This exchange facilitates the accumulation and advancement of knowledge. However, as the amount of research literature increases, so do the number of academic journals and the fee for periodical subscriptions, thereby obstructing the dissemination of information. As a result, scholars are beginning to promote the concept of “Open Access” (OA), which allows more users to obtain academic resources without barriers, and aims to enhance the effectiveness of scholarly communication through the internet.
With the increasing popularity of Open Access, the number of OA journals has expanded substantially, enabling a growing number of scholars to self-archive their published literature. This movement is of great interest to scholars in the field of library and information Science because they traditionally study topics related to the development of scholarly communication. How to create with the greatest research impact and shorten the process of scholarly communication are issues which LIS scholars concern. Therefore, the current OA development in the LIS field is a subject worthy of attention. This study intends to answer questions as follows: What are the characteristics of OA journals in LIS field? Are those journals covered by major databases? What are the OA policies of LIS journals? Who are key authors of OA articles? Do they self-archive their publications? What are their research impacts?
This study resulted in four major discoveries. First, OA journals are mainly published in the United States, and primarily in English. Second, only about half the OA journals are covered in major databases, and whether a given journal is included in the databases or not is related to the location of publication. Third, most of the important journals and periodicals concerned with OA allow at least one form of self-archiving. Finally, not all authors of OA-related research self-archive every one of their articles. OA articles were cited more frequently, but there is no obvious relation between OA articles and its first time of being cited.
Study results suggest that databases in the field of library and information science would benefit from give more attention to OA journals. In addition, OA journals should respond to the selection criteria of databases so that they can increase the visibility of their journals. Libraries should take efforts to promote the OA philosophy and provide tools for self-archiving, to organize OA resources for different disciplines, and to provide retrieving platforms for OA resources. Researchers should also be encouraged to publish more in OA journals or self-archive their articles in order to obtain the benefits of Open Access.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題陳述 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍與限制 5
第四節 名詞解釋 6
第二章 文獻分析 8
第一節 開放取用之發展 8
一、開放取用的定義 8
二、Open Access的起源 11
第二節 Open Access期刊影響力之研究 14
第三節 作者自我典藏策略及學術期刊之Open Access政策 22
一、作者自我典藏策略 22
二、學術期刊之Open Access政策 26
第三章 研究設計與實施 31
第一節、研究方法 31
第二節、研究工具與對象 32
一、研究工具 32
二、研究對象 35
第三節、研究實施步驟 36
一、資料蒐集 36
二、資料查核與分析 39
三、研究結果撰寫 42
第四章 研究結果與討論 44
第一節 圖資領域OA期刊發行現況分析 44
一、圖資領域OA期刊數量與特性分析 44
二、圖資領域OA期刊與社會科學其他學科之OA期刊數量比較 51
第二節 圖書資訊學領域OA期刊能見度 53
一、圖資領域OA期刊被重要資料庫收錄情形 53
二、圖資領域重要且為OA的期刊 57
第三節 圖資領域重要期刊之OA政策 59
一、圖資領域重要期刊之出版政策 59
二、圖資領域關心OA議題期刊之出版政策 60
三、圖資領域重要期刊與關心OA議題期刊之出版政策比較 63
第四節 圖資領域OA議題主要作者之自我典藏情形及研究影響力 65
一、關心OA作者之自我典藏情形分析 65
二、圖資領域OA議題主要作者發表文章的被引用次數分析 67
三、圖資領域OA議題主要作者發表的首次被引用時間分析 69
第五章 結論與建議 71
第一節 結論 71
第二節 建議 75
一、對學術界的建議 75
二、對圖書館的建議 76
三、對研究者的建議 76
第三節 進一步研究之建議 77
參考書目 79
附錄一 圖資領域OA期刊 86
附錄二 圖資領域OA期刊於重要索摘資料庫收錄情形 96
附錄三 圖資領域具有影響力期刊之出版政策色碼 104
附錄四 圖資領域關心OA期刊排序 110
附錄五 圖資領域關心OA期刊之出版政策色碼 116
附錄六 圖資領域關心OA作者排序 120
附錄七 圖資領域OA議題主要作者之自我典藏情形及研究影響力 123
Oppenheim, C. 123
Harnad, S. 136
Carr, L. 143
Jacso, P. 150
Brody, T. 161
Hitchcock, S. 163
Probets, S. 165
McGrath, M. 168
Van De Sompel, H 170
Nelson, M.L. 177
Björk, B-C. 188
Gadd, E. 193
Morris, S. 195
Coleman, A. 196
Fox, E.A. 199



Antelman, K. (2004). Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? College & Research Libraries., 65(5), 372-382.
Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving Practice and the Influence of Publisher Policies in the Social Sciences. Learned Publishing, 19(2), 85-95.
Bailey, C. W. (2005). Open Access Bibliography : Liberating Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals. Retrieved 12/2, 2009, from http://www.digital-scholarship.org/oab/oab.htm
Bailey, C. W. (2006). Open Access and Libraries. Retrieved 11/1, 2009, from http://www.digital-scholarship.org/cwb/OALibraries2.pdf
Bailey, C. W. (2007). What Is Open Access? Retrieved 11/1, 2009, from http://www.digital-scholarship.org/cwb/WhatIsOA.htm
Budapest Open Access Initiative.(2002). Retrieved 7/27, 2009, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess
Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. (2003). Retrieved 7/27, 2009, from http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.(2003). Retrieved 7/27, 2009, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Björk, B.-C. (2004). Open Access to Scientific Publications - an Analysis of the Barriers to Change? Information Research, 9(2).
Case, M. A. (2003). Framing The Issue: Open Access. ARL, 226, 8-11.
Cox, J., & Cox, L. (2008). Scholarly Publishing Practice 3 : Academic journal publishers'' policies and practices in online publishing. Third Survey, 2008. Worthing ALPSP.
Craig, I., Plume, A., McVeigh, M., Pringle, j., & Amin, M. (2007). Do Open Access Articles Have Greater Citation Impact? A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 239-248.
Davis, P. M., & Fromerth, M. J. (2006). Does the ArXiv Lead to Higher Citations and Reduced Publisher Downloads for Mathematics Articles? Retrieved 9/17, 2009, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0603/0603056.pdf
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLoS Biology, 4, 692-698.
Goodman, D. (2004). The Criteria for Open Access. Serials Review, 30(4), 258-270.
Grogg, J. E. (2005). Linking Users to Open Access. . Searcher, 13(4), 56.
Guédon, J.-C. (2004). The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching Serials Review, 30(4), 315-328.
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How It Increases Research Citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4).
Harnad, S. (2004). Color Coding. Retrieved 7/24, 2009, from http://www.iumj.indiana.edu/Librarians/colorcoding.html
Harnad, S. (2005). Respond to The Spectrum of E-Journal Access Policies: Open to Restricted Access. Retrieved 11/1, 2009, from http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0505/msg02213.html
Harnad, S. (2006). Opening Access by Overcoming Zeno''s Paralysis. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford: Chandos.
Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6).
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Les Carr, Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2008). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update. Serials Review, 34, 36-40.
Harnad, S., & Hajjem, C. (2007). The Open Access Citation Advantage: Quality Advantage or Quality Bias? , from http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/191-The-Open-Access-Citation-Advantage-Quality-Advantage-Or-Quality-Bias.html
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Demleitner, M., Murray, S. S., et al. (2004). The Bibliometric Properties of Article Readership Information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved 9/18, 2009, from http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~kurtz/jasist2.pdf
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Demleitner, M., Stephen, S. M., et al. (2004). Worldwide Use and Impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System Digital Library Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved 9/18, 2009, from http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~kurtz/jasist1-abstract.html
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Alberto Accomazzi, Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Edwin Henneken, et al. (2005). The Effect of Use and Access on Citations. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1395-1402.
Kyrillidou, M. (2000). Journal Costs: Current Trends & Future Scenarios for 2020. Retrieved 7/24, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/costs.pdf
Kyrillidou, M., & Young, M. (2005). ARL Statistics, 2003-04: A Compilation of Statistics from the One Hundred and Twenty-Three Members of the Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved 7/25, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstat04.pdf
Lawrence, S. (2001). Free Online Availability Substantially Increases a Paper''s Impact. Nature, 31.
McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns (a Citation Study from Thomson Scientific).
Metcalfe, T. S. (2006). The Citation Impact of Digital Preprint Archives for Solar Physics Papers. Solar Physics, 239, 549-553.
Moed, H. F. (2006). The Effect of ''Open Access'' upon Citation Impact: An Analysis of ArXiv''s Condensed Matter Section. Retrieved 9/17, 2009, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0611060
Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The Citation Advantage of Open-Access Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Tehnology, 59(12), 1963-1972.
Odlyzko, A. (2002). The Rapid Evolution of Scholarly Communication. Learned Publishing 15, 7-19.
Ronald, E. W. (1981). "Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Zipf''s Law." Library Trends, 53-64.
Scaria, V. (2004). Open Access To Scholarly Communication: New Perspective For Health Professionals And Scholars. Mental Health Reviews Retrieved 7/27, 2009, from http://www.psyplexus.com/excl/open_access.html
Sompel, H. V. d., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004). Rethinking Scholarly Communication : Building the System that Scholars Deserve. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9).
Suber, P. (2007). Open Access Overview. Retrieved 7/24, 2009, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004a). Authors and Open Access Publishing Learned Publishing, 17(3), 219-224.
Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004b). JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report. Retrieved 7/24, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf
Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open Access Self-Archiving: An Author Study. Retrieved 9/17, 2009, from http://cogprints.org/4385/1/jisc2.pdf
Wren, J. D. (2005). Open Access and Openly Accessible: a Study of Scientific Publications Shared via the Internet BMJ Retrieved 9/17, 2009, from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7500/1128
毛慶禎(2004)。開放近用學術文獻資源。在王振鵠教授八秩榮慶籌備小組編,王振鵠教授八秩榮慶論文集 (pp。355-362)。
余顯強(2007)。提升學術著作分享與獲取模式之應用研究。圖書資訊學研究, 1(2), 55-69。
吳紹群(2008)。Open Access文獻之資訊組織及取用管道分析。大學圖書館, 12(2), 106-129。
吳紹群,吳明德(2007)。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播。圖書資訊學研究, 2(1), 21-54。
吳瑩月(2007)。電子預印本開放取用對學術傳播之影響:以物理學門為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,台北市。
邱炯友,蔣欣樺(2005)。學術出版傳播之Open Access模式。中國圖書館學會會報, 74, 165-183。
陳素娟(2006)。Open access期刊對我國大學醫學圖書館電子期刊管理的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文,台北市。
陳亞寧(2004)。開放式資訊取用之現況發展分析。圖書與資訊學刊, 51(4), 89-108。
莊正德(2007)。台灣圖書資訊學期刊作者對Open Access看法之研究。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所,台北縣。
黃鴻珠(民93年2月23日)。解鈴還須繫鈴人:誰能為學術期刊訂費高漲的困境解套?。淡江時報,
黃勵立(2008)。國內大學教師利用Open Access期刊之探討:以物理類期刊為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,台中市。
黃瑞娟(2006)。Open Access對圖書館電子資源規劃影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學電機資訊學院碩士在職專班圖書資訊組,新竹市。
曾品方(2006)。從作者觀點探討機構典藏--以國立政治大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班,台北市。
蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市: 編譯館。
賴姿伶(2010)。Open Access發展趨勢與引用優勢之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學資訊學院碩士在職專班數位圖書資訊組,新竹市。
羅淑美(1997)。機構典藏網站功能研究與實作。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學資訊學院碩士在職專班數位圖書資訊組,新竹市。

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top