跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 16:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王迺玟
研究生(外文):Nai-Wen Wang
論文名稱:國民中學教師之教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之相關研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship Among Junior High School Teachers’ Teacher autonomy, Core self-evaluation and Job engagement
指導教授:王智弘王智弘引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-Hung Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:197
中文關鍵詞:教師自主核心自我評價敬業貢獻度
外文關鍵詞:Teacher autonomyCore self-evaluationJob engagement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:437
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究主要目的在於了解國民中學教師在教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之間的關係,並了解不同背景變項的國中教師在變項間反應的差異情形。
  本研究以台灣中部三縣市國民中學教師為研究對象,總共發出1,020份問卷,回收788份有效問卷,並以描述性統計分析、t檢定、單因子變異數分析及結構方程模式進行資料處理與分析。研究結果顯示:
1、教師自主對核心自我評價有正向影響。
2、核心自我評價對敬業貢獻度有正向影響。
3、核心自我評價具有教師自主與敬業貢獻度的完全中介效果。
  最後,根據研究結果,提出結論與建議,以供學校組織、教育相關單位與未來研究者之參考。
The purpose of this study was to reveal the relationships among junior high school teachers’ teacher autonomy, core self-evaluation and job engagement. In addition, the study also examined the mediating effect of core self-evaluation between teacher autonomy and job engagement.
Participants were recruited from junior high school teachers in Central Taiwan. Out of the 1,020 questionnaires and 788 valid questionnaires were obtained, the valid questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and to construct the structural equation model of a study of junior high school teachers’ teacher autonomy, core self-evaluation and job engagement. The result are as follows:
1.Teacher autonomy had a positive effect on core self-
evaluation.
2.Core self-evaluation had a positive effect on job
engagement.
3.Core self-evaluation had the full mediating effect
between teacher autonomy and job engagement.
Based the above findings, this study proposed some suggestions to the teacher, school, education-related authorities and future researchers.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目次 iii
表次 vi
圖次 xi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 待答問題 6
第四節 研究流程 6
第五節 名詞釋義 9
第六節 研究範圍 11
第二章 文獻探討 13
第一節 教師自主理論基礎與其相關研究 13
第二節 核心自我評價理論基礎與其相關研究 17
第三節 敬業貢獻度理論基礎與其相關研究 22
第四節 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之關係 27
第三章 研究方法 31
第一節 研究架構 31
第二節 研究假設 32
第三節 研究對象 32
第四節 研究工具 35
第五節 資料分析之方式 100
第四章 結果與討論 103
第一節 國民中學教師之教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之現況分析103
第二節 不同背景變項之國民中學教師在教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業
貢獻度的差異性分析 109
第三節 國民中學教師之教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之測量模式
檢驗 124
第四節 國民中學教師之教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之結構模式
檢驗 145
第五節 中介效果的驗證 153
第六節 綜合討論 157
第五章 結論與建議 161
第一節 結論 161
第二節 建議 164
參考文獻 169
中文部份 169
英文部分 170
附錄 180
附錄一 專家效度審查學者名單 180
附錄二 教師自主、核心自我評價及敬業貢獻度調查問卷(專家效度) 181
附錄三 教師自主、核心自我評價及敬業貢獻度調查問卷(預試) 190
附錄四 教師自主、核心自我評價及敬業貢獻度調查問卷(正式) 194

表次
表3-1 台中市、彰化縣及南投縣國民中學教師人數與抽樣比例摘要表 33
表3-2 預試問卷回收統表 33
表3-3 正式問卷回收統計表 34
表3-4 教師自主量表項目分析 38
表3-5 模式適配度指標判斷規準 41
表3-6 教師自主-課程自主測量模式之偏態與峰度摘要表 42
表3-7 教師自主-課程自主測量模式路徑係數估計 43
表3-8 教師自主-課程自主測量模式適配指標值 43
表3-9 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式1之偏態與峰度摘要表 45
表3-10 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式1路徑係數估計 46
表3-11 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式1之適配指標值 47
表3-12 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式2之偏態與峰度摘要表 48
表3-13 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式2路徑係數估計 49
表3-14 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式2之適配指標值 49
表3-15 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式3路徑係數估計 51
表3-16 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式3之適配指標值 52
表3-17 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式2與測量模式3之適配指標比較表53
表3-18 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式4路徑係數估計 55
表3-19 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式4之適配指標值 56
表3-20 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式3與測量模式4之適配指標比較表57
表3-21 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式5路徑係數估計 59
表3-22 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式5之適配指標值 59
表3-23 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式4與測量模式5之適配指標比較表60
表3-24 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式6路徑係數估計 62
表3-25 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式6之適配指標值 62
表3-26 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式5與測量模式6之適配指標比較表63
表3-27 教師自主量表信度分析摘要表 64
表3-28 「教師自主量表」分量表、題號及題數 64
表3-29 核心自我評價量表項目分析 66
表3-30 核心自我評價測量模式1之偏態與峰度摘要表 69
表3-31 核心自我評價測量模式1路徑係數估計 70
表3-32 核心自我評價測量模式1適配指標值 71
表3-33 核心自我評價測量模式2路徑係數估計 73
表3-34 核心自我評價測量模式2適配指標值 73
表3-35 核心自我評價測量模式1與測量模式2之適配指標比較表 74
表3-36 核心自我評價測量模式3路徑係數估計 76
表3-37 核心自我評價測量模式3適配指標值 76
表3-38 核心自我評價測量模式2與測量模式3之適配指標比較表 77
表3-39 核心自我評價測量模式4路徑係數估計 79
表3-40 核心自我評價測量模式4適配指標值 79
表3-41 核心自我評價測量模式3與測量模式4之適配指標比較表 80
表3-42 核心自我評價測量模式5路徑係數估計 82
表3-43 核心自我評價測量模式5適配指標值 82
表3-44 核心自我評價測量模式4與測量模式5之適配指標比較表 83
表3-45 敬業貢獻度量表項目分析 86
表3-46 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式1之偏態與峰度摘要表 88
表3-47 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式1路徑係數估計 88
表3-48 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式1適配指標值 89
表3-49 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式2路徑係數估計 90
表3-50 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式2適配指標值 91
表3-51 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式1與測量模式2之適配指標比較表 91
表3-52 敬業貢獻度-奉獻測量模式之偏態與峰度摘要表 92
表3-53 敬業貢獻度-奉獻測量模式路徑係數估計 93
表3-54 敬業貢獻度-奉獻測量模式適配指標值 93
表3-55 敬業貢獻度-專注測量模式1之偏態與峰度摘要表 94
表3-56 敬業貢獻度-專注測量模式1路徑係數估計 95
表3-57 敬業貢獻度-專注測量模式1適配指標值 95
表3-58 敬業貢獻度-專注測量模式2路徑係數估計 97
表3-59 敬業貢獻度-專注測量模式2適配指標值 97
表3-60 敬業貢獻度-專注測量模式1與模式2適配指標比較表 98
表3-61 敬業貢獻度量表信度分析摘要表 99
表3-62 「敬業貢獻度量表」分量表、題號及題數 99
表3-63 模式適配度指標準則 102
表4-1 男、女比例分佈表 104
表4-2 年齡比例分佈表 104
表4-3 任教學校比例分佈表 105
表4-4 最高學歷比例分佈表 105
表4-5 教學年資比例分佈表 106
表4-6 國民中學教師之教師自主現況分析摘要表 106
表4-7 國民中學教師之核心自我評價現況分析摘要表 107
表4-8 國民中學教師之敬業貢獻度現況分析摘要表 108
表4-9 不同性別教師之教師自主獨立樣本t考驗分析摘要表 109
表4-10 不同性別教師之核心自我評價獨立樣本t考驗分析摘要表 110
表4-11 不同性別教師之敬業貢獻度獨立樣本t考驗分析摘要表 111
表4-12 不同年齡教師之教師自主單因子變異數摘要表 112
表4-13 不同年齡教師之核心自我評價單因子變異數摘要表 113
表4-14 不同年齡教師之敬業貢獻度單因子變異數摘要表 114
表4-15 不同任教地區教師之教師自主單因子變異數摘要表 115
表4-16 不同任教地區教師之核心自我評價單因子變異數摘要表 116
表4-17 不同任教地區教師之敬業貢獻度單因子變異數摘要表 117
表4-18 不同學歷教師之教師自主獨立樣本t考驗分析摘要表 118
表4-19 不同學歷教師之核心自我評價獨立樣本t考驗分析摘要表 119
表4-20 不同學歷教師之敬業貢獻度獨立樣本t考驗分析摘要表 120
表4-21 不同教學年資教師之教師自主單因子變異數摘要表 121
表4-22 不同教學年資教師之核心自我評價單因子變異數摘要表 122
表4-23 不同教學年資教師之敬業貢獻度單因子變異數摘要表 123
表4-24 教師自主測量模式之偏態與峰度摘要 125
表4-25 核心自我評價測量模式1路徑係數估計 127
表4-26 核心自我評價測量模式1適配指標值 128
表4-27 核心自我評價測量模式2路徑係數估計 130
表4-28 核心自我評價測量模式2適配指標值 131
表4-29 核心自我評價測量模式3路徑係數估計 133
表4-30 核心自我評價測量模式3適配指標值 134
表4-31 核心自我評價測量模式4路徑係數估計 136
表4-32 核心自我評價測量模式4適配指標值 137
表4-33 核心自我評價測量模式5路徑係數估計 139
表4-34 核心自我評價測量模式5適配指標值 140
表4-35 核心自我評價測量模式6路徑係數估計 142
表4-36 核心自我評價測量模式6適配指標值 143
表4-37 敬業貢獻度測量模式之偏態與峰度摘要表 144
表4-38 敬業貢獻度測量模式路徑係數估計 144
表4-39 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度結構模式路徑係數估計 147
表4-40 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度結構模式適配指標值 148
表4-41 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度結構模式(效度樣本)路徑
係數估計 151
表4-42 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度結構模式(效度樣本)適配
指標值 152
圖次
圖1-1 研究流程圖 8
圖3-1 研究架構 31
圖3-2 教師自主-課程自主測量模式圖 42
圖3-3 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式1 44
圖3-4 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式2 47
圖3-5 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式3 50
圖3-6 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式4 54
圖3-7 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式5 58
圖3-8 教師自主-一般教學自主測量模式6 61
圖3-9 核心自我評價測量模式1 68
圖3-10 核心自我評價測量模式2 72
圖3-11 核心自我評價測量模式3 75
圖3-12 核心自我評價測量模式4 78
圖3-13 核心自我評價測量模式5 81
圖3-14 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式1 87
圖3-15 敬業貢獻度-活力測量模式2 90
圖3-16 敬業貢獻度-奉獻測量模式圖 92
圖3-17 敬業貢獻度-奉獻測量模式1 94
圖3-18 敬業貢獻度-奉獻測量模式2 96
圖4-1 教師自主測量模式 125
圖4-2 核心自我評價測量模式1 126
圖4-3 核心自我評價測量模式2 129
圖4-4 核心自我評價測量模式3 132
圖4-5 核心自我評價測量模式4 135
圖4-6 核心自我評價測量模式5 138
圖4-7 核心自我評價測量模式6 141
圖4-8 敬業貢獻度測量模式 143
圖4-9 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之結構模式圖 154
圖4-10 教師自主、核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之結構模式圖(效度樣本)150
圖4-11 教師自主與核心自我評價之關係模式 154
圖4-12 核心自我評價與敬業貢獻度之關係模式 155
圖4-13 教師自主與敬業貢獻度之關係模式 155
圖4-14 置入核心自我評價為中介效果後之模式 156
壹、中文部份
李誠 (2000)。人力資源管理的12堂課。天下遠見,62。
余民寧 (2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。台北:高等教育。
林彩釉 (1987)。國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所  碩士論文,未出版,台北。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統記分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析。
  台北:五南圖書。
高義展 (1998)。學校行政官僚體制與教師專業自主關係之探討—以學校教師  會為例。教育研究資訊,6(4),30-47。
涂燕萍、施俊琦 (2008)。自我效能感對神經質、考試焦慮的調節作用。中國
  臨床心理學雜誌,16(3),280-282。
黃芳銘 (2006)。結構方程模式—理論與應用(第四版)。台北:五南。
教育部 (2011)。縣市別教師數。檢索日期:2012.5.17
  取自:http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx? 
     site_content_sn=8869

貳、英文部分
Amabile, T. M., &; Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in   the R &; D laboratory. Greensboro, North Carolina:  
  Author.
Anderson, D. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk,
  responsibility, and love. Journal of Education, 183(1),
  33-48.
Attridge, M. (2009). Measuring and managing employee work
  engagement: A review of the research and business   
  literature. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24,
  383-398. doi: 10.1080/15555240903188398.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., &; Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good,
  but relevance is excellent: Autonomy – enhancing and
  suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’
  engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
doi: 10.1348/000709902158883
Bacharach, S. B., Bauer, S. C., &; Conley, S. (1986).
Organizational analysis of stress: The case of
elementary and secondary schools. Work and Occupations,
13, 7–32.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory
of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-
215.
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., &; Taris, T.
W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in
occupational health psychology. Work &; Stress, 22(4),
187-200. doi: 10.1080/02678370802393649.
Bentler, P. M. (1982). Confirmatory factor analysis via
noniterative estimation: A fast inexpensive method.
Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 417-424.
Bagozzi, R. P., &; Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of
structural equation models. Academic of Marketing
Science, 16(1), 76-94.
Bono, J. E., &; Judge, T. A. (2003). Core-self evaluation: A
review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction
and job performance. European Journal of Personality,
17, 5-18. doi: 10.1002/per.481.
Brockner, J. (1979). The lure consciousness on task of and
social performance. Journal Personality Psychology, 37,
172-174.
Browne, M. W., &; Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of
assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen &; J. S. Long
(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-
162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job
satisfaction among long-term high school teacher.
Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(3), 49-74.
Cattell, R. B. (1965). The Scientific Analysis of
Personality. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
Certo, J., &; Fox, J. (2002). Retaining quality teachers.
The High School Journal, 86(1), 57-75.
Charters, W. W. (1976). Sense of teacher work autonomy:
Measurement &; findings. Eugene, OR: Center for
Educational Policy and Management. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED66840)
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San
Francisco: Freeman.
Costa, P. T. Jr., &; McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO
personality inventory manual. Odessa, Florida:
Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa Jr, P. T., &; McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO
personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor
inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, Florida: Psychological
Assessment Resources, Inc.
Deci, W.L., &; Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and
  self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M., (2002). Handbook of self-
determination research. New York: University of
Rochester.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Janssen, P.P.M. &; Schaufeli,
W.B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a
function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal
of Work, Environment &; Health, 27(4), 279-286.
DeVellis, R. F. (1998). Scale Development: Theory and
Applications. CA: Sage.
Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: a literature
review, System, 23(2), 165-175.
doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(95)00005-5.
Dinham, S., &; Scott, C. (1996). Teacher satisfaction,
motivation and health: Phase one of the Teacher 2000
project. Presented at the annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association. New York.
Drucker, P. F. (2001). The Essential Drucker. New York:
HarperCollins.
Dworkin, A. G., Haney, C. A., Dworkin, R. J., &; Telschow,
R. L. (1990).Stress and illness behavior among urban
public school teachers. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 26, 60–72.
Evers, T. B. (1987). Factors affecting teacher job
satisfaction in a number of high schools in Michigan.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
Eysenck, H. J. (1985). Anxiety and Individual Differences
In G.R.J. Hochey (Ed.) Stress and Fatigue in Human
Performance. New York: Wiley press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four way five factors are not basic.
Personality and Individual Difference, 13(6), 667-673.
Fay, C. (1990). Teaching and leading: The teacher’s voice.
Boston: Annual meeting of the American Educational
Research Association.
  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED206096)
Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation
models with unobservable variables and measurement
errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 39-50.
Franklin, H. L. (1988). Principal consideration and its
relationship to teacher sense of autonomy. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Ganguly, D. (2003). Married to the job. The Economic Times,
7(1), 23-34.
Gordon, D. (1987). Autonomy is more than just the absence
of external constraints, In N. Sabar, J. Rudduck, &; W.
Reid, (Eds.). University of Sheffield: Division of
Education.
Hackman, J. R., &; Oldham, G. R., (1980). Work Redesign.
Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Hall, R. H. (1969). Occupations and the social structure.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hall, B. W., Villeme, M. G., &; Phillippy, S. W. (1989).
Perceptions of autonomy within the beginning teacher’s
work environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting
of the Association of Teacher Education, St. Louis, MO.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., &; Hayes, T. L. (2002).
Business-unit-level relationship between employee
satisfaction, employee engagement, and business
outcomes:A meta-analyis. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Hultell, D., &; Gustavsson J. P. (2010). A psychometric
evaluation of the Scale of Work Engagement and Burnout
(SWEBO). Work, 37, 261-274. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1078
Jones, J. R., &; Harter, J. K. (2005). Race effects on the
employee engagement-turnover intention relationship.
Journal of Leadership &;Organizational Studies, 11, 2,
78-82. doi: 10.1177/107179190501100208
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., &; Durham, C. C. (1997). The
dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core
evaluations approach. Research in organizational
behavior, 19, 151-188.
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., &; Kluger, A. N.
(1998). Dispositional effects on job and life
satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17-34.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., &; Lock, E. A. (2000).
Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of
job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85
(2), 237-249. doi: 10.1037/0021-
Judge, T. A., &; Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core
self-evaluations traits – self-esteen, generalize self- efficacy, locus of control and emotional stability-with
job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. &; Thoresen, C. J.
(2003). The CoreSelf-Evaluations Scale (CSES):
Development of a measure. Journal of Personal
Psychology, 56(2), 303-331.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x.
Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., &; De Pater, I. E.
(2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluation, and
job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda
for future research. Human Performance, 17(3), 325-346.
doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1703_4
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal
engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of
Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational
behavior. Behavior Science, 9, 131-146.
Kline, R.B. (1995). Principles and Practice of Structural
Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kim, I. &; Loadman, W. (1994). Predicting teacher job
satisfaction. Columbus: Ohio State University. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED383707)
Klecker, B. J., &; Loadman, W. (1996). Exploring the
relationship between teacher empowerment and job
satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of
the Mid-Western Educational Association, Chicago, IL.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED400254)
Levin, I., &; Stokes, J. P. (1989). Disposition approach to
job satisfaction: Role of negative affectivity. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 74, 752-758.
Liad, U. (2007). Individual differences in the social
facilitation effect: A review and research in meta-
analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3),
579-601. doi: org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.008
Little, D. ( 1991). Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and
Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Maslach, C., &; Jackson S. E. (1986). The Maslach Burnout
Inventory: Manual Research edition. Palo Alto, CA:
Consulting Psychologists Press.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., &; Leiter, M. (1996). Maslach
Burnout Inventory. Manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA:
Consulting Psychologists Press.
Maslach, C., &; Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about
burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and
what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Macey, W., &; Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee
engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology:
Perspective on Science and Practice, 1(1), 3-30.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
Nargis, A., &; Saiqa, K. (2003). Relationship between job-
stress and burnout: Organizational support and
creativity as predictor variables.Pakistan Journal of
Psychological Research, 18, 139-149.
Parkes, K. R. &; Razavi, T. D. B. (2004). Personality and
attitudinal variables as predictors of union and
individual voluntary membership. Personality and
Individual Differences, 37(2), 333-347.
doi: org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.007
Pearson, L. C., &; Hall, B. C., (1993). Initial construct
validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal
of Educational Research, 86, 172-177.
Pearson, L. C., &; Hall, B. C., (2006). Continuing
validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal
of Educational Research, 100(1), 44-51.
doi: 10.3200/JOER.100.1.44-51
Perie, M., &; Baker, D. P. (1997). Job satisfaction among
America’s teacher: Effects of workplace conditions,
background characteristics, and teacher compensation.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Porter, A. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: The case of
elementary school mathematics. Educational Research, 18
(5), 9-15.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations.
Free Press, New York.
Raykov, T. &; Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course on
structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Reilly, D. (2000). The learner centered high school:
Prescription for adolescents’ success. Educational, 121
(2), 219-228.
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., &; Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job
engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-
image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic
Books.Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies
for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-
28.
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martinez, L, &;
Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy,
subjective well-being and task performance among
electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small
Groups Research, 34(1), 43-73.
  doi: 10.1177/1046496402239577
Salanova, M., Agut, S., &; Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking
Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to
Employee Performance and Customer Loyalty: The
Mediation of Service Climate. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., &;
Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and
burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic
approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schaufeli, W.B., &; Bakker, A.B. (2001).Werk en welbevinden:
Naar een positieve benadering in de Arbeids- en
Gezondheidspsychologie [Work and well-being: Toward a
positive apporach in Occupational Health Psychology].
Gedrag &; Organisatie, 14, 229-253.
Schaufeli, W. B., &; Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES-Utrecht Work
Engagement Scale: Test manual. Department of
Psychology, Utrecht University, 1, 1-58.
Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W., &; Van Rhenen, W. (2003).
Workaholism, burnout and engagement: Three of a kind or
three different kinds of
  employee well-being? Submitted for publication.
Schaufeli, W. R., &; Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands and
job resources and their relationship with burnout and
engagement: A multiple sample study. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
  doi: 10.1002/job.248
Schmacker, R. E., &; Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s
guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ulriksen, J. J. (1996). Perceptions of secondary school
teachers and principals concerning factors related to
job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED424684) (Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Southern California, CA).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(01A), 01-27.
Tharenou, P. (1979). Employee self-esteem: A review of the
literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 316-346.
Wah, L. (1999). Engaging employees a big challenge.
Management Review, 88(9), 10.
Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The profession of everyone? The
American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137-158.
Willner, R. G. (1990). Images of the future now: Autonomy,
professionalism, and efficacy. (Doctoral dissertation,
Fordham University, 1990).
Yee, S. M. (1991). Careers in the classroom: When teaching
is more than a job. New York, NY: Teachers College
Press.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top