臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

知識分享是組織裡面一個重要的機制，組織的組織文化、常規、競爭優勢及能力能透過知識分享在組織成員之間散撥開來。但知識分享並不是只是單純的制度上的設計而是一種人跟人之間接觸的行為。知識雖能透過網路上閱讀或分享外，多數的知識分享還是來自於人與人之間的互動與接觸。由於知識分享是一個人與人互動接觸的過程，我們必須先考慮組織裡面的成員是如何互動，再從互動機制裡去了解人是如何分享知識的。由於知識分享是一個會耗費人的資源、精力、時間的行為，且不能確保能在分享後得到什麼好處，所以需要一定程度的信任感存在。此篇論文以正向關係、負向關係及社會地位去分析組織互動情形。一個社會關係裡包含正向與負向關係，本文正向關係以友誼為主負向關係則以嫉妒為主，具有相似背景的友誼圈具有較高度的信任以致於較容易發現成員之間有知識分享的行為，然而有時候我們也會發現即使是朋友群裡面，也不一定有熱絡的知識分享狀況，所以我們要探討負向關係如何影響知識分享。最後，地位也為社會網絡裡一重要影響行為之因子，地位差異代表著位階差異及資源使用差異。高地位者與低地位者對於知識分享的態度會有很顯著的不同，然而地位差距會不會因為接收到負向關係而讓人更不願意分享知識。本研究以問卷方式收集資料，收集對象為收集對象為保險業東部分公司，並以UCINET進行分析，探討社會網絡與知識分享之關係。結果可顯示，在友誼圈內之負向關係與地位差異並不如預期的減低知識分享意願，反之，可能將知識分享視為一種維持彼此友誼關係不被負向情緒及地位所影響之策略。

Knowledge sharing is an important mechanism in an organization. The organization’s culture, practices, competitive advantage, and ability are sent to members through knowledge sharing. Because knowledge sharing is an interactive process of interpersonal communication, we must consider the interaction between members in an organization then interpret how do people share knowledge with others. As knowledge sharing is a behavior that needs resources and may waste energy and time, moreover, the repay and is uncertain. So knowledge sharing needs a certain degree of trust. This study analyzes social relationships and social status within organizational situations. A social relationship contains positive and negative relationships, we focus on friendship in positive relationship and envy in negative relationship. We believe that people in the same circle of friend have similar backgrounds which may leads to higher degree of trust that it is easier for people to share knowledge with similar friends. However, we also found that even people in the same circle do not necessarily have the knowledge sharing, so we have to explore how negative relationships affect knowledge sharing. Finally, the status in an organization is also a quite important factor that affects people’s behavior; status differences represent the differences in resources using. The attitude of knowledge sharing between High status people and low status people are different, especially when people receive negative emotions under the difference of status. This study use questionnaire to collect data from an East branch office of an insurance company and analyze by UCINET. The result shows that members preferred to share knowledge with friends based on common background and will be intensive with friends with whom they have a high frequency of interaction in the workplace. Negative emotions and the status difference may not decrease the tendency of knowledge sharing in friendships. The results are contrary to the prediction. The study argued that an individual probably tries to maintain friendship relationships by actively sharing knowledge with envious and envied and low-status friends.

Title page i
Validation paper ii
Authorization paper iii
Chinese abstract vii
English abstract ix
Acknowledgement xi
Table of Contents xii
List of Table xiii
List of Figure xiii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Theoretical Background and Hypotheses 3
Chapter 3 Methodology 10
3.1 Participants and Procedure 10
3.2 Research Design 10
3.3 Measures 11
3.4 Limitation 16
Chapter 4 Results 17
4.1 Univariate States and Preliminary Results 18
4.2 Hypotheses Testing 26
Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 30
Reference 31

Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. 2011. Where Do Intra-organizational Advice Relations Come From? The Role of Informal Status and Social Capital in Social Exchange. Dynamics of Social Networks (2), Vol. 34: 333-345.
Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. 2013. Considering the situation: Why people are better social psychologists than selfpsychologists. Self and Identity, 12,1–15.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship." Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Blau, P. M. 1955. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bock, G., Zmud, R., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp. 87-111.
Boelen, P. A., & Reijntjes, A. 2009. Negative cognitions in emotional problems following romantic relationship break-ups, Stress and Health, 25: 11–19.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET 6 for Windows, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Brass, D. J. 2006. Exploring The Social Ledger: Negative Relationships And Negative Asymmetry in Social Network in Organizations, Academy of Management Review, (31), 596-614.
Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 441-470
Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. 1999. Social capital, social liabilities, and social resources management. R.Th. A. J Leenders, S. M. Gabbay, eds. Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Kluwer Acdemic Publishers, Boston, MA.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
Bukowitz, W. R., & Williams, R. L. 1999. The Knowledge Management Fieldbook. Pearson Education, FT Press.
Chowdhury, S. 2005. The Role of Affect- and Cognition-based Trust in Complex Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues17.3 (Fall 2005): 310-326.
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. 2001b. Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks 23, 215-235.
Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S.P. 2001a. Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge-intensive work. Organizational Dynamics 30, 100-120.
Cross, R., & Parker, A. 2004. The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Business SchoolPress.
De Klepper, M. C., Sleebos, E., van de Bunt, G. G., & Agneessens, F. 2010. Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82-90.
Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. 2000. Performance and satisfaction in conflicted, interdependent groups: When (and how) does self-esteem make a difference? Academy of Management Journal, 43, 772-784.
Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. 2002. Envy, resentment, schadefreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and underserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953-961.
Flynn, F. J. 2003. How much should I help and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal 46, 539-553.
Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. 2006. Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 91, 1123–1137.
Ford, D. P., & Staples, D. S. 2010. Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same? Journal of Knowledge Management, (14:3), pp. 394-409.
Fowler, J. K., & Christakis, N. A. 2008. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ: British medical journal.
Freeman, L. C., Romney, A.K. & Freeman, S. C. 1987. Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy. American Anthropologist, 2,310-325.
Gold, A., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A., 2001. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. (18:1), p. 185- 214.
Gould, R. 2002. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1143-1178.
Grant, R. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, (17) pp. 109-122.
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
Hacker, D. 1996. A Canadian Writer's Reference, 2nd Ed. Nelson Canada, p. 23.
Hansen, M. T. 1999. The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 82-111.
Huberman, B. A., Loch, C. H., & Onculer, A. 2004. Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 67,103-114.
Kim, S., John W. O., & Cho, H. M. 2009. When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader-member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management Volume 29, Issue 3, September 2010, Pages 530-537.
Krackhardt, D. 1987. “Cognitive Social Strucures” Social Networks, 9, 109-134
Krackhardt, D., & Hansen, J. 1993. Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review 71,104-111.
Lance, A. B., & Stephen, W. B. 1995. Contact Employees: Relationships Among Workplace fairness, Job satisfaction and Prosocial service behaviors. Journal or Retailing, Volume 73(1), pp. 39-61.
Lazega, E., Mounier, L., Snijders, T.A.B., & Tubaro, P. 2011. Norms, status and the dynamic of advice networks: A case study. Social Networks 34 (3), pp. 323-332.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Namy, L. L., & Woolf, N. J. 2010. Psychology: A Framework For Everyday Thinking, Pearson Education Incorporated, p. 380.
Lilleoere, A. M., & Hansen, E. H. 2011. Knowledge-sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development. Journal of Knowledge Management 15.1 (2011): 53-70.
Loch C., Yaziji, M., & Langen, C. 2001. The fight for the alpha position: Channeling status competition in organizations. European Management Journal 19, 16-25
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. 2008. Chapter 8: Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals 2, 351-398.
Malle, B. F. 2004. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction (A Bradford Book). Cambridge University MIT Press.
McPherson, J.M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M., 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.J. 1998. At the margins: a distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal 41, 441–452.
Menon, T., & Thompson, L. 2010. Envy at Work. Harvard Business Review.
Montgomery, J. 1996. The structure of social exchange networks: A game-theoretic reformulation of Blau's model. Sociological Methodology 26, 193-225.
Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. 2006. Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing. Management Learning 37.4 (Dec 2006):523-540.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 2, 242-266.
Neu, J. 1980. "Jealous Thoughts," in Rorty (ed.) Explaining Emotions, Berkeley: U.C. Press.
Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. 1993. Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 906-920.
Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community" Simon and Schuster.
Ravlin, E. C., & Thomas, D. C. 2005. Status and stratification processes in organizational life. Journal of Management 31, 966-987.
Schepman, S. B. & Zárate, M. A. 2008. The Relationship between Burnout, Negative Affectivity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior for Human Services Employees. Proceedings of the World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology, (30), 437-442.
Serban, A, M., & Luan, J. 2002. An Overview of Knowledge Management. University of Kentucky. Retrieved 17 April 2013.
Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. 2000. Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members, Journal of Management, 26(2), 259-279
Smith, R. C., & Kim, S. H. 2007. Comprehending Envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007, Vol.133, No. 1, 46-64.
Stanley, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press. 1–27.
Teece, D. 1998. Research directions for knowledge management. California Management Review, (40:3), pp. 289-292.
Tichy, N. M. 1981. Networks in organizations. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbooic of organization design, vol. 2: 225-248. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van den Hooff, B. & Huysman, M. 2009. “Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches.” Information and Management, (46:1), pp. 1-8.
Vecchio R. P. 1995. Negative emotion in the workplace: Employee jealousy and envy. International Journal of Stress Management, 2000.
Von Hecker, U. 1993. On memory effects of Heiderian balance: A code hypothesis and inconsistency hypothesis. Journal of Experimemtal Social Psychology, 29
Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, (29:1), pp. 35–57.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. 2010. Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation 30(3): 181-194.