跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.171.74) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/08/12 07:53
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡昀佳
研究生(外文):Yun-ChiaTsai
論文名稱:產能限制與專利授權
論文名稱(外文):The Capacity Constraint and the Patent Licensing
指導教授:翁名宏
指導教授(外文):Ming-Hung Weng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:經濟學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:45
中文關鍵詞:專利授權產能限制二階段訂價
外文關鍵詞:patent licensingcapacity constrainttwo-part tariff
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:546
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:17
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文討論產能限制如何影響雙佔產量競爭模型市場下之最佳授權決定,並發現外部研發者在面對受產能限制的生產者時,可能傾向於使用單一廠商授權;而內部研發者則可能相對偏好專利費用授權。此兩結果皆顯著相異於Kamien and Tauman (1984, 1986) 及Wang (1998)等傳統授權理論,足見產能限制對最佳授權方式之顯著影響。若進一步討論產能限制分配之影響,則發現若產能限制越集中於單一廠商,則對市場效率及外部研發者之利潤將有越負面之影響。另外,我們亦進一步檢視產能限制對最佳二階段定價授權之影響。
The present research investigates how the capacity constraint may impact the innovator’s optimal licensing decision in a Cournot duopoly. An outside innovator may prefer to license to just one of the producing firms when they face capacity constraints. On the contrary, the inside innovator may prefer fixed fee to royalty licensing. These sharp contrasts compared to the classic findings in Kamien and Tauman (1984, 1986) and Wang (1998) prove the importance of the capacity constraint on the optimal licensing decision. We further show that the less symmetric the distribution of capacity constraints is between the producers, the less efficient the market equilibrium will be, and the lower revenue the outside innovator will generate from licensing its cost reducing technology. Moreover, we also investigate the optimal two-part tariff licensing under capacity constraint.
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature review 3
Chapter 3 Model 6
3.1 The licensing game 6
3.1.1 Royalty licensing 6
3.1.2 Fixed fee licensing 7
3.1.3 Fixed fee licensing versus royalty licensing 12
3.1.4 Non-discriminating fixed fee 13
3.2 Symmetric capacity constraints 14
3.3 Inside innovator 16
3.3.1 Firm 1 with capacity constraint 17
3.3.2 Firm 2 with capacity constraint 18
3.4 Licensing with Two-part tariff 19
3.4.1 Without capacity constraint 20
3.4.2 With capacity constraint 21
Chapter 4 Conclusion 30
References 32
Appendix 34
Arrow, K., 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Nelson PR (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, pp. 609-626.
Bousquet, A., Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M., Wolkowicz, M., 1998. Risk sharing in licensing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16, 535-554
Caballero-Sanz, F., Moner-Colonques, R., Sempere-Monerris, J.J., 2002. Optimal Licensing in a Spatial Model. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique 66, 257-279
Fosfuri, A., Roca, E., 2004. Optimal Licensing Strategy: Royalty or Fixed Fee? International Journal of Business and Economics 3 1, 13-19
Kamien, M.I., and Tauman, Y., 1984. The private value of a patent: A game theoretic analysis. Journal of Economics (Supplement) 4, 93-118
Kamien, M.I., Oren, S.S., Tauman, Y., 1992. Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation. Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 483-508
Kamien, M.I., Tauman, Y., 2002. Patent Licensing: The Inside Story. Manchester School 70, 7-15
Moldovanu, B., Sela, A., 2003. Patent Licensing to Bertrand Competitors. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 1-13
Muto, S., 1993. On Licensing Policies in Bertrand Competition. Games and Economic Behavior 5 2, 257-67
Rostoker, M.D., 1984. A survey of corporate licensing. IDEA: J. Law Tech. 24, 59–92
Schmitz, P.W., 2002. On Monopolistic Licensing Strategies under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Economic Theory 106, 177-189
Sen, D., 2002. Monopoly Profit in a Cournot oligopoly. Economics Bulletin 4, 1-6
Sen, D., Tauman, Y., 2007. General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation. Games and Economic Behavior 59, 163-186
Taylor, C., Silberstone, Z., 1973. The Economic Impact of the Patent System. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
Tauman, Y., Weng, M.-H., 2012. Selling patent rights and the incentive to innovate. Economics Letters 114, 241-244
Wang, X.H., 1998. Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. Economics Letters 60, 55-62
Wang, X.H., 2002. Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly. Journal of Economics and Business 54 2, 253-66
Wang, X.H., Yang, B.Z., 2003. A Note on Technology Transfer by a Monopoly. Australian Economic Papers 42 1, 50-55
Wang, X.H., Yang, B.Z., 2004. On Technology Licensing in a Stackelberg Duopoly. Australian Economic Papers 43 4, 448-58

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top