跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 15:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳玉雯
研究生(外文):Wendy Yu-Wen Chen
論文名稱:知覺自主支持、工作動機與創造力之相關研究
論文名稱(外文):Relationships among Perceived Autonomy Support, Work Motivation, and Creativity
指導教授:王智弘王智弘引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-Hung Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:54
中文關鍵詞:知覺自主支持自主性動機控制性動機創造力自我決定理論
外文關鍵詞:perceived autonomy supportautonomous motivationcontrolled motivationcreativityself-determination theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:426
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:50
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
本研究主要目的在於探討知覺自主支持、工作動機 (自主性動機、控制性動機)與創造力之間的關係。問卷採主管與員工配對之方式,先以81組有效配對進行第一階段預試,以項目分析和驗證性因素分析確認研究工具的信效度後,再進入第二階段正式施測的部分。正式施測回收有效問卷258組配對,以皮爾森相關分析和階層性迴歸分析進行假說驗證。分析結果發現,部分結果與過去文獻相符:知覺主管自主支持與員工的表現(創造力)具有正向的顯著關係;主管的自主支持也與員工的自主性動機有正向的顯著關係。知覺同事自主支持亦與員工的自主性動機具有正向關係。另外,員工的自主性動機與員工的創造力具有正向的顯著關係。未預期的結果則為:知覺主管自主支持與員工的控制性動機具有正向的顯著關係;知覺同事自主支持則和員工創造力未有顯著的關聯性;自主性與控制性動機和員工創造力皆未有顯著的關聯性。最後,根據研究結果說明主要發現與未預期發現的內容,也進一步提出實務意涵與後續研究之建議。
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among perceived autonomy support from manager and colleagues, work motivation (autonomous and controlled motivation) and creativity. By dyadic questionnaire survey, total of 258 paired-samples were collected through survey. Data were analyzed via Pearson correlation and hierarchical regression to test proposed model. As in previous studies, perceived autonomy support from manager was significantly and positively related to employee’s outcome (creativity); and positively related to autonomous motivation. Also, perceived autonomy support from colleagues was positively related to autonomous motivation. Besides, autonomous motivation was positively relate to creativity. Unexpected results showed that perceived autonomy support from manager was positively related to controlled motivation; and autonomy support from colleagues was unrelated to employee’s creativity. Also, there was no correlation between work motivation and creativity. In final, theoretical and practical implications and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.
Table of Contents
Abstract I
中文摘要 II
Table of Contents III
List of Tables V
List of Figures VI
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1.Research Background and Motives 1
1.2.Research Objectives 3
1.3.Research Procedure 3
1.4.Definition of Terms 4
Perceived autonomy support 4
Work Motivation 4
Creativity 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1.Self-Determination and Perceived Autonomy Support 6
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) 6
Perceived autonomy support 8
2.2.Perceived Autonomy Support and Creativity 9
2.3.Work Motivation 10
2.4.Perceived Autonomy Support, Work Motivation and Creativity 13
Perceived autonomy support and work motivation 13
Work motivation and creativity 15
Chapter 3 Methodology 17
3.1.Research Framework and Hypotheses 17
3.2.Research Participants 18
3.3.Instrument 19

Perceived autonomy support 19
Work Motivation 20
Creativity 20
Demographic information 20
Reliability and validity of pre-testing questionnaires 21
3.4.Data Collection 27
Procedure 27
Methods to avoid Common Method Variance (CMV) 27
3.5.Data Analysis 28
Chapter 4 Results 29
4.1.Sample Description 29
Sample Description 29
Control variables 31
4.2.Descriptive Statistics of Major Variables 32
4.3.Hypotheses Examination 33
Perceived autonomy support and creativity 33
Perceived autonomy support and work motivation 35
Work motivation and creativity 36
Summary of research results 37
Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusions 38
Major findings 38
Unexpected findings 39
Managerial implications 40
Limitations and Future Research 41
References 42
Appendix A: Manager Questionnaire 47
Appendix B: Employee Questionnaire 50

List of Tables
Table 1 Item Analysis and Confirm Factor Analysis_ All Original Items 23
Table 2 Demographic Statistics 30
Table 3 Means, Standard Deviations, Correlations, and Reliabilities 32
Table 4 Results of Hierarchical Regression 34
Table 5 Summary of Results 37

List of Figures
Figure 1 Self-determination Continuum 12
Figure 2 Research Framework 17
Figure 3 Relationships among All Variables 37

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., &; Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154–1184.
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Weil‐Being in Two Work Settings1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068.
Benita, M., Roth, G., &; Deci, E. L. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 258-267.
Bentler, P. M., &; Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Black, A. E., &; Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science &; Education, 84, 740–756.
Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative behavior: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2 &; 3), 187-199.
De Cooman, R., Stynen, D., Van den Broeck, A., Sels, L., &; De Witte, H. (2013). How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: Implications for work effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(6), 1342-1352.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., &; Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,580-590.
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., &; Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.
Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and Self-Determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M. (2010). Self‐Determination. New York: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc.
Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., &; Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 499-521.
Farmer, S. M., Tiemey, P., Kung-Mclntyre, K. (2003).Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal,46(5),618-630.
Fisher, R., In R. Fisher(Eds), M. Williams (Eds) (2000).Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum. London: David Fulton.
Gagné, M., &; Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., &; Malorni, A. (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628-646.
George, D., &; Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.
Grant, A. M., &; Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.
Jack Ma. (2013). True reasons of employee turnover. 2013. Retrieved from http://pro.udnjob.com/mag2/hr/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=120&;f_SUB_ID=448&;f_ART_ID=84244.
Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. B., Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 247-258.
Jungert, T., Koestner, R. F., Houlfort, N., &; Schattke, K. (2013). Distinguishing source of autonomy support in relation to workers' motivation and self-efficacy. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(6), 651-666.
Koestner, R., Otis, N., Powers, T. A., Pelletier, L., &; Gagnon, H. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1201-1230.
Liu, D., Chen, X. P., &; Yao, X. (2011). From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 294-309.
Liu, D., &; Fu, P. P. (2011). Motivating protégés' personal learning in teams: A multilevel investigation of autonomy support and autonomy orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1195-1208.
Locke, E. A., &; Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Mageau, G. A., &; Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Science, 21(11), 883-904.
Oldham, G. R., &; Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Otis, N., &; Pelletier, L. G. (2005). A motivational model of daily hassles, physical symptoms, and future work intentions among police officers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2193-2214.
Peng, T. K., Kao, Y. T., &; Lin, C. C. (2006). Common method variance in management research: Its nature, effects, detection, and remedies. Journal of Management, 23(1), 77-98.
Perceived autonomy support: The climate questionnaires. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/perceived-autonomy-support/
Pink, D. H. (2009). The puzzle of motivation. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/zh-tw/dan_pink_on_motivation.html
Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Penguin Books.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., &; Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
Porter, L. W., &; Lawler, E. E. III. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.
Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. Handbook of Self-Determination Research, 2, 183-204.
Reeve, J., &; Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C., &; Vallerand, R. J. (2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089-2113.
Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., &; Kaplan, H. (2006). Assessing the experience of autonomy in new cultures and contexts. Motivation and Emotion,30(4), 361-372.
Ryan, R. M., &; Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., &; Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., &; Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1586.
Ryan, R. M., La Guardia, J. G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V., &; Kim, Y. (2005).On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relationships, 12, 145–163.
Scott, S. G., &; Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (Vol. 3). New York: Free Press.
Stone, D. N., Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M. (2009). Beyond talk: Creating autonomous motivation though self-determination theory. Journal of General Management, 34(3), 75-91.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
Turkel, S. (1972). Working. New York: Pantheon.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271-360.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., &; Koestner, R. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 257-262.
Woodman, R. W., &; Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(4), 279-290.
Zhou, Jing, George, &; Jennifer M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Zhou, J., &; Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp.165-217). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊