跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.221.66.130) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/06/24 06:30
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:謝清華
研究生(外文):HSIEH CHING-HUA
論文名稱:幼兒園教師使用互動式電子白板接受度之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of Kindergarten Teachers’ Acceptance of the Use of Interactive Whiteboards
指導教授:蔡俊彥蔡俊彥引用關係
口試委員:陳世興陳君瑜
口試日期:2015-01-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:正修科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:互動式電子白板科技接受模式整合科技接受模式
外文關鍵詞:Interactive whiteboardTechnology Acceptance ModelUnified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:204
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著資訊科技的發達,教學環境E化已成教育新趨勢,互動式電子白板融入教學,教學者不再只是課教內之教師,嶄新的學習風貌,新的學習型態及學習方式因應而生,然而推動互動式電子白板是否能如預期般的成功,教師們的使用意圖與行為影響甚大,值得深入研究與探討。本研究是以整合科技接受模式探討幼兒園教師使用互動式電子白板接受度之研究,以教師資訊素養、績效期望、預期努力、社群影響及促進條件等五個預測變項,對知覺有用性、知覺易用性、使用態度與行為意願之影響,進而了解幼兒園教師使用互動式電子白板教學的意願。經過專家建議,編寫問卷進行調查,獲得以下結果:教師資訊素養、預期努力及社群影響皆對「互動式電子白板接受度」有正向影響。然而,績效期望與促進條件對「互動式電子白板接受度」則不具顯著影響。本研究結果可提供給教育主管機關及幼兒園,在推動與擬訂互動式電子白板相關教育政策之依據,對幼兒園教師推動資訊科技融入教學之參考。
關鍵字:互動式電子白板、科技接受模式、整合科技接受模式
With the social diversity trend, learning is not confined to be done only in classroom. Students can be taught by not only teachers. The totally new learning features,style and method come into being, and let the students achieve better result and adaptability with the development of information technology.However, whether to promote interactive whiteboard successful as expected, teachers' intentions and behavior affect the use of very large, worthy of further study and discussion.This paper use technology acceptance model to discuss the acceptability of kindergarten teacher using interactive whiteboard and furthermore improve the desire of the teacher to use it to teach.Teacher information literacy, performance expectations, expectations efforts, social influence and promote conditions for the five variables to predict the surname of perceived usefulness, perceived ease surname, attitudes and behaviors affect willingness to use it. The questionnaire was written and edited for conducting the survey following designing the questionnaire and consulting experts. and the following conclusions have Information literacy teachers, effort expectancy and social influence have all the efforts have a positive impact on "interactive whiteboards acceptance." However, performance expectations and promote the conditions for "interactive whiteboard acceptance of" not having a significant impact.The results of the study on the practice can be provided to the competent authorities and kindergarten education in promoting and interactive whiteboard based on policies related to education, and kindergarten teachers promote information technology into teaching reference.
Key Words:Interactive whiteboard,Technology Acceptance Model, Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology.
目錄
摘要……................................................................................................................................. i
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………..ii
誌謝………………………………………………………………………………………...iii
目錄………………………………………………………………………………………...iv
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………………………………vii
圖目錄………………........................................................................................................ viii
壹、緒論................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 研究背景與動機........................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究目的與研究問題................................................................................... 3
1.3 研究方法與步驟.......................................................................................... 4
 1.3.1 研究方法............................................................................................ 4
 1.3.2 研究步驟............................................................................................ 4
1.4 研究流程....................................................................................................... 6
1.5 論文結構....................................................................................................... 7
1.6 研究範圍與限制........................................................................................... 7
 1.6.1 研究範圍............................................................................................ 7
 1.6.2 研究限制............................................................................................ 8
貳、文獻探討........................................................................................................................ 9
2.1 互動式電子白板之意涵............................................................................... 9
 2.1.1 互動式電子白板之定義....................................................................... 9
 2.1.2 互動式電子白板之功能..................................................................... 10
 2.1.3 互動式電子白板教學之特色與限制................................................. 12
2.2 互動式電子白板之相關研究..................................................................... 19
 2.2.1 國內互動式電子白板之相關研究..................................................... 19
 2.2.2 國外互動式電子白板之相關研究..................................................... 20
 2.2.3 小結.................................................................................................. 21
2.3 科技接受模式之理論基礎......................................................................... 22
 2.3.1 理性行為理論.................................................................................. 22
 2.3.2 計畫行為理論.................................................................................. 23
 2.3.3 科技接受模型.................................................................................. 27
 2.3.4 整合科技接受模式.......................................................................... 32
 2.3.5 理論比較.......................................................................................... 36
參、研究方法...................................................................................................................... 40
3.1 研究架構..................................................................................................... 40
3.2 研究假設..................................................................................................... 41
3.3 研究對象..................................................................................................... 42
 3.3.1 樣本選取.......................................................................................... 42
 3.3.2 抽樣方式.......................................................................................... 42
3.4 研究工具..................................................................................................... 42
 3.4.1 影響互動式電子白板使用因素量表.............................................. 43
 3.4.2 互動式電子白板接受度量表............................................................. 44
 3.4.3 個人背景變項..................................................................................... 45
3.5 研究程序..................................................................................................... 45
3.6 資料處理與分析......................................................................................... 47
 3.6.1 資料處理.......................................................................................... 47
 3.6.2 統計分析.......................................................................................... 47
肆、結果與討論.................................................................................................................. 51
4.1 影響互動式電子白板使用因素對互動式電子白板接受度之現況分析.......................... 51
 4.1.1 樣本基本資料分析.......................................................................... 51
 4.1.2 影響互動式電子白板使用因素之描述統計分析........................................... 54
 4.1.3 互動式電子白板接受度之描述統計分析...................................... 59
4.2 影響互動式電子白板使用因素和互動式電子白板接受度之差異分析 ......................................................................... 63
 4.2.1 個人背景變項和影響互動式電子白板使用因素之差異性分析.. 63
 4.2.2 個人背景變項和互動式電子白板接受度之差異性分析.............. 70
4.3 影響互動式電子白板使用因素和互動式電子白板接受度之相關性分析 .................................................................... 75
 4.3.1 影響互動式電子白板使用因素各向度間之相關分析.................. 75
 4.3.2 互動式電子白板接受度各向度間之相關分析.............................. 76
4.4 影響互動式電子白板使用因素對互動式電子白板接受度之預測分析. 77
伍、結論與建議.................................................................................................................. 81
5.1 研究結論..................................................................................................... 81
5.2 研究建議..................................................................................................... 82
 5.2.1 對教育主管機關之建議.................................................................. 82
 5.2.2 對幼兒園之建議.............................................................................. 83
 5.2.3 對幼兒園教師之建議...................................................................... 84
 5.2.4 未來研究建議.................................................................................. 84
參考文獻............................................................................................................................. 86
附錄.……………………………………………………………………………………95
參考文獻
一、中文文獻
1. 周素華(1992),電子通訊科技使用行為之研究─以交大學生為例,交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,新竹。
2. 陳焜元(1995),行政管理資訊系統使用者參與效果之研究─技術接受性模式檢證,政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,台北。
3. 吳俊毅(2000),科技接受模型之實徵研究—從動機角度,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
4. 馮炫竣(2000),消費者使用電子銀行之行為研究—以 ATM、電話銀行及網路銀行為例,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 吳肇銘(2006),影響消費者網站忠誠度之因素研究-以購物型網站為例,資訊管理展望,8 卷,1 期,45-68 頁。
6. 邱皓政(2006),量化研究與統計分析:SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(初版),台北:五南。
7. 陳惠邦 (2006 ),互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考,發表於臺北市全球華人資訊教育創新論壇,台灣宜蘭。
8. 林儀惠(2008),互動式電子白板在國小數學教學之探討─以五年級面積單元為例,亞洲大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,未出版,台中縣。
9. 周孝俊(2008),互動式電子白板學習活動設計和實驗,(未出版之碩士論文), 國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。
10. 陳韻文(2008),桃園縣國民小學教師使用互動式電子白板之調查研究,國立臺北教育大學教育事業創新經營碩士論文。
11. 劉正山(2008),交互白板環境下國小數學領域教學設計的互動研究,(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
12. 張明慧(2009),「電子白板融入教學」創新推廣歷程之研究-以臺北市某私立高級中學為例,(未出版之碩士論文),淡江大學,新北市。
13. 陳韻雯(2009),桃園縣國民小學教師使用互動式電子白板之調查研究,國立臺北教育大學教育事業創新經營碩士論文。
14. 張詠瑄(2010),運用互動式電子白板於國小五年級學生社會領域學習成效之研究,(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
15. 陳宗德(2010),《嘉義縣國民小學教師互動式白板使用因素研究》,私立南華大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
16. 陳彥君(2010),互動式電子白板融入數學領域對國小高年級學生學習動機與成效之研究,國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士論文。
17. 沈家成、蔣秀清(2010),電子白板學習環境中使用者行為意圖之研究,嘉義市教育研究集刊,pp.73-92。
18. 黃郁婷(2010),電子白板結合小組合作策略輔助國小大意摘要教學之研究-以一所小型學校爲例,彰化師大教育學報,17 期,93 -119。
19. 高嘉汝(2011),運用互動式電子白板融入教學來探討國小教師創新接受度、科技接受度與使用滿意度之相關研究-以雲林縣為例,(未出版之碩士論文),國立虎尾科技大學,雲林縣。
20. 徐偉貿(2011),互動式電子白板融入教學之探索性研究-以一所國小為例,(未出版之碩士論文),國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。
21. 徐章華(2011),運用電子白板註記與摘要對國小學生社會科學習之影響,未出版之碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
22. 覃業芬(2011),互動式電子白板應用於國小資源班社會領域教學之行動研究。(未出版之碩士論文),國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
23. 董松喬(2011),運用互動式電子白板進行社會領域問題導向學習之研究,(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
24. 徐式寬、關秉寅(2011),國民中小學教師資訊融入教學素養評量表之建構與調查。科學教育學刊 19 (4):335-357。
25. 李欣璋(2013),整合科技接受模式應用於高職教師使用教學部落格的意圖與行為,國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文。


二、英文文獻
1. Ajzen, I. (1985). ‘From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior’ in Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (Eds) Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag, 11-39.
2. Austin, N. (2003). Mighty white. Retrieved September 4, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2003/jan/07/elearning.technology6
3. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall,Inc.
4. Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard.Micromath, 19 (1), 4-7.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Fundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. BECTA. (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Retrieved September 14, 2013, from http://smartboard-t.wikispaces.com/file/view/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf
7. Beeland, W. D. Jr. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help? Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teaching Education, Trinity College, Dublin.
8. Bell, M. A. (2002). Why Use an Interactive Whiteboard? A Baker’s Dozen Reasons! Retrieved May 1, 2013, from http://teachers.net/gazette/JAN02/mabell.html
9. Coyle, Y., Yanez, L., & Verdu M. (2010). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on  the teacher and children’s language use in an ESL immersion classroom. System. 38(4), 614–625.
10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, September, 319-340.
11. DfES. (2004). Laptops for teachers. An evaluation of the first year of the initiative. Retrieved July 10, 2013, from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5247/1/Becta%20paper
%2019%20%20Laptops%20for%20Teachers.pdf
12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
22(14), 1111-1132.
13. Edwards, J-A., Hartnell, M., & Martin, R. (2002). Interactive whiteboards: some lessons from the classroom. Micromath, 18(2), 30-33.
14. Ekhaml, L. (2002). The power of interactive whiteboards. School Library Media Activities Monthly, XVIII, 35-37.
15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2007). Into the unknown: The professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 319–331.
17. Goodison, T. (2002). Learning with ICT at primary level. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 282–29.
18. Gruber, B. (2011). A Case Study of an Interactive Whiteboard District-Wide Technology Initiative Into Middle School Classrooms. (Doctoral Dissertation, Doctor of Philosophy n Educational). Retrieved September 14, 2012, from http://digilib.gmu.edu:8080/dspace/bitstream/1920/6309/1/Gruber_dissertation_2011.pdf
19. Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 102-117. Higgins, S. &
Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F.,
20. Higgins, S. & Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H.,& Wall, K. (2005).Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies: final report..Retrieved SJuly 3, 2013, from http://dro.dur.ac.uk/1899/1/1899.pdf?DDD29+ded4ss
21. Jamerson, J. (2002). Helping all children learn: action research project. Retrieved May 14, 2013, from http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/sitecore/en/pdf/research_library/ k-12/helping_all_children_learn.pdf
22. Jones, P.T., Kervin, L.K., & McIntosh, S. (2011). The interactive whiteboard: Tool and/or agent of semiotic mediation. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 38-60.
23. Kent, P. (2006). Using interactive whiteboards to enhance mathematics teaching. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 11(2), 23-26.
24. Latham, P. (2002). Teaching and learning primary mathematics: the impact of interactive whiteboards–Results of the North Islington Education Action Zone RM
Easiteach Mathematics Project. BEAM Education, London. Retrieved May 2, 2013, from http://www.beam.co.uk/uploads/discpdf/RES03.pdf
25. Lee, M., & Boyle, M. (2003). The Educational Effects and Implications of the Interactive Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School. Richardson Primary
School: ACT, Australia. Retrieved September 19, 2013, from http://www.richardsonps.act.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0020/83117/RichardsonReview_Grey.pdf
26. Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Retrieved September 19, 2013, from
http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
27. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systens
Research, 2(3), 192-222.
28. Martin, S. (2007). Interactive whiteboards and talking books: A new approach to teaching children to write? Literacy, 41(1), 26-34.
29. Mathews-Aydinli, J., & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms, Computer Assisted
Language Learning, 23(3), 235-252.Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology
innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
30. Shenton, A., & Pagett, L. (2007).From ‘bored’ to screen: the use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3),
129-136.
31. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443–457.
32. Smith, H.,& Wall, K. (2005). Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies: final report.. Retrieved SJuly 3, 2013, from http://dro.dur.ac.uk/1899/1/1899.pdf? DDD29+ded4ss
33. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443–457.
34. Somyurek, S., Atasoy, B., & Ozdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers and Education, 53, 368-374.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995).
Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
35. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: Atest of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 145-176.
36. Thomas, A. (2003). Little touches that spell success. Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved September 14, 2012, fromhttp://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=379883
37. Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers &
Education, 54, 379–383.
38. Türel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1),
381–394.
39. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46(2),
186-204.
40. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
41. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., and Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of
Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
42. Walker, D. (2002). Meet Whiteboard Wendy. Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved September 19, 2013, from http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=371268
43. Weiner, S. A. (2012). Institutionalizing Information Literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(5), 287–293.
44. Wood, C. (2001). Interactive whiteboards – a luxury too far? Teaching ICT, 1(2). Retrieved September 20, 2013, from
http://acitt.digitalbrain.com/acitt/web/resources/pubs/Journal%2002/ whiteboards.htm
45. Xu, H.L. & Moloney, R. (2011a). Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 27(2), 307-325.
46. Xu, H.L. & Moloney, R. (2011b). It Makes the Whole Learning Experience Better”: Student Feedback on the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Learning Chinese at
Tertiary Level. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 20-34.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top