跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/14 03:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:柯君函
研究生(外文):Ke, Jun-Han
論文名稱:仁慈領導之雙構面模式與員工創新行為之關係-以工作敬業心為中介變項
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between The Dual Dimensions of Benevolent Leadership and Employee Innovative Behavior - Work Engagement as the Mediating Variable
指導教授:陳必碩陳必碩引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Pi-So
口試委員:李昭蓉董玉娟
口試委員(外文):Li, Jau-RongTung, Yu-Chuan
口試日期:2015-06-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:人力資源發展系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:90
中文關鍵詞:仁慈領導工作敬業心員工創新行為
外文關鍵詞:Benevolent LeadershipWork EngagementEmployee Innovative Behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:1628
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:56
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
在全球化及科技環境迅速變遷的時代,創新對於高科技產業而言,是形成差異化與使企業蓬勃發展的關鍵因素,當員工付諸心力於創新行為時,組織內部就能湧入源源不絕的新思維,進而為企業創造無限價值。
本研究為檢驗主管的仁慈領導風格,是否透過工作敬業心的中介效果,進而改變員工創新行為,因而以高科技產業之研發部門員工為研究對象,進行問卷調查,共發出390份問卷,有效問卷306份,有效回收率為78.46%,並運用階層迴歸分析驗證各變項之間的關係。研究結果發現:
一、主管之仁慈領導-生活照顧與員工創新行為有正向關係。
二、主管之仁慈領導-工作照顧與員工創新行為有正向關係。
三、主管之仁慈領導-生活照顧與工作敬業心有正向關係。
四、主管之仁慈領導-工作照顧與工作敬業心有正向關係。
五、工作敬業心與員工創新行為有正向關係。
六、工作敬業心於主管仁慈領導-生活照顧與員工創新行為間有完全中介效果。
七、工作敬業心於主管仁慈領導-工作照顧與員工創新行為間有部分中介效果。
因此,本研究建議管理者或企業領導者於領導行為上,能夠給予員工更多關懷照顧,並輔以工作指導,關心部屬的個別感受,給予適當的支持,促使員工盡力於具有創造性的績效,為組織創造最大價值。
With the rapidly changes of globalization and technology environment, innovation is the key factor for high-tech industry to become differentiation and development. When employee pay attention to perform innovation, it will be rich of new thinking among organization. Therefore, it will create endless value to company.
This study tested the Benevolent Leadership style of the competent. Whether through intermediary effect of the Work Engagement, thus have an impact employee innovative behavior, therefore the study focuses on the employees working for the R & D department of the high-tech industry employees, the questionnaire survey for sample collection, there were 390 paper questionnaires sent to people. Total number of surveys returned was 306, with 78.46% valid return rate. And using Hierarchical regression analysis to verify the relationship between the variables. The result showed:
1. The competent’ Benevolent Leadership life-oriented have positive relationship to the employee's innovative behavior.
2. The competent’ Benevolent Leadership work-oriented have positive relationship to the employee's innovative behavior.
3. The competent’ Benevolent Leadership- life-oriented have positive relationship to the Work Engagement.
4. The competent’ Benevolent Leadership- work-oriented have positive relationship to the Work Engagement.
5. Work engagement has positive relationship to employee's innovative behavior.
6. Work engagement has fully mediated between the competent Benevolent Leadership life-oriented and employee's innovative behavior.
7. Work engagement has partially mediated between the competent Benevolent Leadership work-oriented and employee's innovative behavior.
Therefore, the study suggest that the manager or leader of company should pay more concern to employee, teach them, care about their feeling and give them support. Encourage employees to try to have a creative performance, and to create the most value to the organization.
摘要
Abstract
謝誌
目錄
表目錄
圖目錄
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與研究動機
第二節 研究目的
第三節 研究流程
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 員工創新行為
第二節 仁慈領導
第三節 工作敬業心
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構
第二節 研究假設
第三節 研究變項之定義與衡量工具
第四節 研究對象與資料蒐集
第五節 資料分析方法
第四章 研究結果
第一節 各變項之描述性統計
第二節 各變項之相關分析
第三節 各變項之迴歸分析與中介效果分析
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究發現與結論
第二節 理論意涵與管理實務建議
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議
參考文獻
一、中文部分
二、英文部分

一、中文部分
1111人力銀行(民104年1月)。資訊科技產業分類。取自http://www.1111.com.tw/
王智安(民93)。從轉型式領導到創造性績效產出的心理歷程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。台北。
吳清山(民93)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
呂明潔(民101)。主管創新行為、家長式領導、知識分享意願、與團隊創新績效關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。長庚大學。台南。
李昌楷(民97)。家長式領導對研發相關人員創造力的影響與動機的調節作用(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學。台北。
林姮妤(民97)。領導型態對員工組織自尊:敬業貢獻度與離職傾向之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北大學。台北。
林家五、王悅縈、胡宛仙(民101)。真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠影響之差異效果。本土心理學研究,38,205-256。
林曄(民101)。家長式領導、效率改進性打破規則與權力距離對員工創新行為的影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。澳門科技大學。澳門。
邱皓政(民99)。量化研究與統計分析(第五版),台北:五南圖書公司。
姜定宇、丁捷、林伶瑾(民101)。家長式領導與部屬效能:信任主管與不信任主管的中介效果,中華心理學刊,54(3),269-291。
唐永泰(民95)。轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係。人力資源管理學報,6(4),44-66。
唐永泰(民97)。轉換型領導、交易型領導與員工創新行為之關係。創新與管理,5(1),53-81。
張力仁(民99)。轉換型領導、組織自尊對組織公民行為影響之研究-以敬業貢獻度為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。台北。
張火燦、劉淑寧(民96)。人力資源領先指標對研發人員敬業貢獻之影響:中介模式的測試,人力資源管理學報,7(3),1-24。
張火燦、劉嘉雯、許宏明、繆敏智、童志隆(民100)。主管心情感染與員工創新行為的關係:敬業貢獻與工作倦怠的中介角色。人力資源管理學報,11(2),1-24。
陳俊偉(民97)。幽默的使用對轉換型領導行為與員工創意績效的關係之調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。台中。
陳冠政、羅仁鴻(民102)。電子產業家長式領導之轉化-個案分析。中華管理評論,16(1)。
陳淑玲、黃讌茹(民103)。轉換型領導對工作敬業心的影響歷程:心理資本與服務氣候之跨層次中介觀點。臺大管理論叢,25(1),129-155。
陳群聰(民93)。影響 R&D 人員創新行為之因素探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。高雄。
陳嵩、李佩芬、陳光偉(民97)。上司家長式領導對銷售人員目標取向及績效之影響:以銀行理財專員為例。企業管理學報,77,1-47。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(民95)管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救,23(1),77-98。
黃美桓(民97)。轉換型領導、員工的內在動機與組織承諾對組織公民行為之影響-以部門為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學。桃園。
黃致凱(民93)。組織創新氣候知覺、個人創新行為、自我效能知覺與問題解決型態關係之研究-以銀行業為研究對象(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。高雄。
蔡啟通(民95)。領導者部屬交換與員工創新行為:組織正義之中介效果及組織特性之干擾效果。管理學報,23(2),171-193。
蔡啟通、高泉豐(民93)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),571-592。
鄭伯壎(民84)。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,119-173。
鄭伯壎(民85)。家長權威與領導行為之關係探討(二)。國科會專題研究報告,報告編號85-2413-H-002-005。
鄭伯壎(民86)。華人自評式績效考核中的自謙偏差:題意、謙虛價值及自尊之影響。中華心理學刊,39(2),103-118。
鄭伯壎(民94)。華人領導:理論與實際。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
鄭伯壎、林姿葶(民101)。華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育:仁慈領導之雙構面模式。本土心理學研究,(37),253-302。
鄭伯壎、姜定宇(民92)。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,19,175-210。
鄭伯壎、莊仲仁(民70)。基層軍事幹部有效領導行為之因素分析:領導績效、領導角色與領導行為之關係。中華心理學刊,4,2-41。
鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(民89)。華人企業組織中的領導:一項文化價值的分析。中山管理評論,8(4),583-617。
鄭伯壎、樊景立(民89)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究,(13),126-180。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(民89)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,(14),3-64。
鄭伯壎、徐瑋伶、黃敏萍(民91)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本土心理學研究,18,51-94。
鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳(民95)。家長式領導:模式與證據。台北:華泰文化。
鄭伯壎、任金剛、周婉茹、周麗芳(民99)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究。34,223-284。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清(民92)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據。本土心理學研究。20,209-280。
盧小君、張國梁(民96)。工作動機對個人創新行為的影響研究。軟科學,21(6),124-127。
賴君彥(民102)。個人傳統性-現代性對創新行為關係之研究-以家長式領導為調節變數(未出版之碩士論文)。長庚大學。台南。
謝廷豪、林益永、鍾瑞國、楊雯惠、陳盈臻(民102)。創造力人格特質對創新行為之研究-以幸福感為中介變項。修平學報,27,66-77。
謝婉柔、王智安(民103)。恩威並濟的家長式領導:機制探討與模式修正(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學。桃園。
蘇英芳、黃賀(民95)。魅力領導、家長式領導、德性領導與領導效應之研究。中山管理評論,14(4),939-968。
二、英文部分
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder. CO: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. doi:2307/256995
Amabile, T. M., Sigal, G. B., Jennifer, S. M., & Barry, M. S. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367-403.
Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F. (1987). Management Issues Facing New-Product Teams in High Technology Companies. Greenwich, Ct: JAI Press.
Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349-359.
Ashkanasy, N. M., Hartel, C. E. J., & Daus, C. S. (2002). Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in organizational behavior research. Journal of Management, 28, 307-338. doi:10.1177/014920630202800304
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779-806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147-154. doi:10.1002/job.515
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bates, S. (2004). Getting engaged. HR Magazine, 49(2), 44-51.
Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success. Workspan, 47, 48-52.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Bono, J. E. Foldes, H. J. Vinson, G. & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1357-1367. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357
Bono, J. E. & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554-571. doi: 10.2307/30040649
Bowen, D. E. & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, 33, 31-39.
Campbell, A. (1997). Keeping the engine humming: The balanced scorecard approach is fast gaining use among leading organizations in monitoring company performance. Business Quarterly, 61(4), 40-46.
Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W. M. (2012). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 285-301. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9275-3
Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Chou, L. F. (2002). Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from 11 Chinese organizational teams. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3, 85-112.
Cheng, B. S., Shieh, P.Y., & Chou, L. G. (2002). The principal's leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher's extra-role behavior: The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17, 105-161.
Chiu, C., & Yang, C. F. (1987). Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 18, 39-50.
Conti, R., Amabile, T. M., & Pollak, S. (1995). The positive impact of creative activity: Effects of creative task engagement and motivational focus on college students’ learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1107-1116. doi:10.1177/01461672952110011
Cummings, A., & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40, 22-38. doi: 10.2307/41165920
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
Drucker, P. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45-53.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). The Practice of Innovation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice and Principles. New York: Harper & Row.
Erben, G. S., & Güneşer, A. B. (2008). The Relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 955-968. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9605-z.
Erickson, T. J. (2005). Testimony submitted before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.
Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1994). Positive affect improves creative problem-solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 285-299.
Farh, J. L. & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations. London: Macmillan.
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese Organizations: Research Progress and Future Research Directions.
Farr, J., & Ford, C. (1990). Individual innovation. In West, M. & Farr, J. (Ed.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies , Wiley: Chichester. 63-80.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. USA: Perseus Books Group.
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K. & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity intwo German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139-161. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x
Ganguly, D. (2003). Married to the job. The Economic Times, 7(1), 23-34.
Gaynor, G. H. (2002). Innovation by design:What It Takes to Keep Your Company on The Cutting Edge. New York: AMACOM.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt.
Hu, H. H., Hsu, W. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2004). Thereward allocation decision of the Chinese manager: Influences of employee categorization and allocation situation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 221-232.
Huhtala, H. & Parzefall, M. R. (2007). Promotion of employee wellbeing and innovativeness: an opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 299-307.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302. doi: 10.1348/096317900167038
Janssen, O., & Yperen, N. W. V. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368-384. doi: 10.2307/20159587
Jones, A. P., James, L. R., & Bruni, J. R. (1975). Perceived leadership behavior and employee confidence in the leader as moderated by job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 146-149. doi:10.1037/h0076359.
Jones, J. & Harter, J. (2005). Race effects on the employee engagement-turnover intention relationship. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(2), 78-88. doi: 10.1177/107179190501100208
Jong, J. P. J. & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64. doi: 10.1108/14601060710720546
Jung, D. I., Chow, C. & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525-544. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287
Kanter, R. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489–501. doi:10.1177/014920639201800304
Kleysen, R. F. & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005660
Lawler, E. E., III. & Hall, D. T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction and intrinsic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 305-312. doi:10.1037/h0029692
Liang, S. K., Ling, H. C., & Hsieh, S. Y. (2007). The mediating effects of leader-member exchange quality toinfluence the relationships between paternalistic leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(2), 127-137.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Macey, W., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
Martín, P. & Salanova, M. (2002). La innovación y la creatividad personales en el entorno organizacional: aproximaciones a su estudio. Proyecto social, 9, 145-161.
Martinez, P. G. (2003). Paternalism as a positive form of leader-subordinate exchange: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(227-242). doi: 10.1108/15365430380000529.
Maslach, C. & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The Truth About Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
May, D. R., Gilson, R, L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37. doi:10.1348/096317904322915892
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509.
Meijman, T. F. & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological Aspects of Workload. England: Psychology.
Messmann, G., Mulder, R. H., & Gruber, H. (2010). Relations between vocational teachers’characteristics of professionalism and their innovative work behaviour. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(1), 21-40.
Mone, E. M. & London, M. (2010). Employee Engagement: Through Effective Performance Management. A Practical Guide for Managers. New York: Routledge Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262-270.
Pye, L. W. (1985). Asia Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. MA: Harvard University Press.
Ramamoorthy N., Flood, P. C., Slattery T., & Sardessai R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 142-150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
Redding, S. G. (1980). Cognition as an aspect of culture and its relation to management processes: An exploratory view of the Chinese case. The Journal of Management Studies, 17(3), 127-148.
Redding, S. G. (1990). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Richman, A. (2006). Everyone wants an engaged workforce how can you create it? Workspan, 49, 36-39. doi: 10.1002/9781444395150
Rothbard, N. P., & Patil, S. V. (2011). Being There: Work Engagement and Positive Organizational Scholarship. UK: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037//0003.066X.55.1.68
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Test manual for The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. doi:10.1002/job.248
Schaufeli, W. B. & Salanova, M. (2008). Enhancing Work Engagement Through The Management of Human Resources. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490064.018
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716. doi: 0.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. dio:10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schutte, N., Toppinnen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W., (2000). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 53–66. doi: 10.1348/096317900166877
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296-303. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20
Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. doi:10.2307/256701
Shalley, C. E. & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33-53. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal andcontextual characteristicson creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 387-409. doi:10.2307/257080
Sheer, V. C. (2013). In search of Chinese paternalistic leadership: Conflicting evidence from samples of mainland China and Hong Kong's small family businesses. Management Communication Quarterly, 67, 34-60.
Shin, S. & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703-714. doi:10.2307/30040662
Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and Value: The Organization of Large-Scale Taiwan Enterprises. MA: Harvard University Press.
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518-528. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518
Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). Transformational leadership and dimensions of creativity: motivating idea generation in computer‐mediated groups. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 111-121. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1102_3
Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the causes of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(3), 414-432.
Storn, K. & Rothmann, S. (2003). The relationship between burnout, personality traits and coping strategies in a corporate pharmaceutical group. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(4), 35-42.
Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employeecreativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413-432. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.001
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The Nature Of Creativity As Manifest In Its Testing. England: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Tsui, A. S. & Farh, J. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1), 56-79.
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Vosburg, S. K. (1998). Mood and the quantity and quality of ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 315-324. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1104_5
Waldman, D. A., Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (1990). Adding to contingent-reward behavior: The augmenting effects of charismatic leadership. Group & Organization Studies, 15(4), 381-394. doi:10.1177/105960119001500404
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B., & Zhu, W. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: the role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 793-825. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00131.x
Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121.
Wang, A. C., Chiang, T. J., Tsai, C. Y., Lin, T. T., & Cheng B. S. (2013). Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 101-113.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leadermember exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behavior, 4, 15-30.
Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 455-480.
Westwood, R. I. & Chan. A. (1992). Headship and Leadership. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
Yang, K. S. (1998). Chinese responses to modernization: A psychological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 75-97.
Zhang, X. & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
Zhou, J. & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696. doi:10.2307/3069410
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 吳清山(民93)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
2. 吳清山(民93)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
3. 林家五、王悅縈、胡宛仙(民101)。真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠影響之差異效果。本土心理學研究,38,205-256。
4. 林家五、王悅縈、胡宛仙(民101)。真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠影響之差異效果。本土心理學研究,38,205-256。
5. 姜定宇、丁捷、林伶瑾(民101)。家長式領導與部屬效能:信任主管與不信任主管的中介效果,中華心理學刊,54(3),269-291。
6. 姜定宇、丁捷、林伶瑾(民101)。家長式領導與部屬效能:信任主管與不信任主管的中介效果,中華心理學刊,54(3),269-291。
7. 唐永泰(民95)。轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係。人力資源管理學報,6(4),44-66。
8. 唐永泰(民95)。轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係。人力資源管理學報,6(4),44-66。
9. 唐永泰(民97)。轉換型領導、交易型領導與員工創新行為之關係。創新與管理,5(1),53-81。
10. 唐永泰(民97)。轉換型領導、交易型領導與員工創新行為之關係。創新與管理,5(1),53-81。
11. 張火燦、劉淑寧(民96)。人力資源領先指標對研發人員敬業貢獻之影響:中介模式的測試,人力資源管理學報,7(3),1-24。
12. 張火燦、劉淑寧(民96)。人力資源領先指標對研發人員敬業貢獻之影響:中介模式的測試,人力資源管理學報,7(3),1-24。
13. 陳冠政、羅仁鴻(民102)。電子產業家長式領導之轉化-個案分析。中華管理評論,16(1)。
14. 陳冠政、羅仁鴻(民102)。電子產業家長式領導之轉化-個案分析。中華管理評論,16(1)。
15. 陳淑玲、黃讌茹(民103)。轉換型領導對工作敬業心的影響歷程:心理資本與服務氣候之跨層次中介觀點。臺大管理論叢,25(1),129-155。