( 您好!臺灣時間:2022/06/29 20:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


研究生(外文):Li-Min Kao
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Mobile MOOCs "Creative Problem Solving" Course for Innovation and Problem-Solving Competences
指導教授(外文):Ching-Jung Liao
外文關鍵詞:E-lareningMOOCsMobile MOOCsInnovation and Problem-Solving
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:482
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
由於現今網路的普及,隨處可看到幾乎人手一個3C產品,不管是手機、平板還是筆記型電腦,漸漸的學校也開始會嘗試有別於傳統的教學方式,透過數位教材以及線上互動的方式進行教學,讓學生的學習變的更加多元化,可以隨時隨地甚至反覆的學習,像是大規模開放式線上課程(Massive Open Online Courses;簡稱MOOCs),因為最近4G高速網路的興起,漸漸的大家變得開始倚賴行動裝置,比起桌上型電腦以及筆記型電腦需要定點使用,行動裝置可以跳脫定點的限制,讓學習變的無所不在,因此磨課師又進一步形成行動磨課師。行動磨課師強調可以在移動中利用短暫的五到十分鐘時間,以行動裝置學習一個觀念或是一項知識,透過精緻的行動磨課師「創意思解」課程融入有趣的活動App,讓修課者能在學習中無形的提升核心能力。

Due to the popularity of the Internet today, almost everyone have 3C products, whether it is phone, tablet or laptop, and school gradually begin to try to use new teaching methods that are different from traditional methods. The new methods is like digital learning materials or online interaction courses. These methods could make Students have diverse way to study, and could learn anytime, anywhere such as Massive Open Online Courses (“MOOCs”). Furthermore, due to the rapid growth of 4G mobile Internets, gradually we start becoming dependent on mobile devices compared to personal computers or laptops. Mobile device with Internet could make learning become more convenient. Therefore, the MOOCs with mobile devices become “Mobile MOOCs,” which emphasize that people could learn concepts in few minutes anywhere. In addition, Mobile MOOCs with creative application could make learners upgrade core capability virtually. The experiment included 82 samples of pre and post-test of the application, and use t-test and ANOVA to analyze couples of sample in 5 levels: finding questions, stating and delimiting questions, proposing resolutions, estimation and decision and execution. After 8 weeks, we interviewed students whose post-test is worse than pre-test to understand the idea of learners. However, The result showed that average grade of post-test was better than pre-test .and all levels reach the significance in addition to fifth facets, which showed that the Mobile MOOCs courses for learners’ innovation and of problem-solving have influence.

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的與問題 1
第二章 文獻探討 3
2.1大規模開放式線上課程(MOOCs) 3
2.2行動磨課師 5
2.3創新與問題解決能力 7
第三章 研究方法 11
3.1研究架構與設計 11
3.2研究流程 12
3.3研究工具 20
3.4研究實施程序 21
第四章 資料結果分析 24
4.1量化資料分析 24
4.2質性訪談分析 33
第五章 結論與建議 38
5.1研究結論 38
5.2研究建議 38
5.3研究範圍 38
參考文獻 39
附錄一 前測問卷 44
附錄二 後測問卷 47

圖 2-1以智慧型手機觀看磨課師程示意圖 4
圖 3-1實驗架構圖 11
圖 3-2研究流程圖 13

表 2-1磨課師的特性 : 3
表 2-2數位學習比較表 6
表3-1實驗階段 12
表3-2行動磨課師「創意思解」課程內容 14
表3-3行動磨課師「創意思解」課程活動部分舉隅 19
表3-4專家學者名錄 21
表3-5預試樣本的基本資料分析表 22
表3-6預試問卷信度檢驗結果整理 22
表 4-1前後測樣本基資料整理 24
表 4-2前測敘述性統計表 24
表 4-3前測性別與不同構面間的差異 25
表 4-4前測院別與不同構面間的差異 25
表 4-5實驗組前後測成績比較表 27
表 4-6前後測成對樣本 t檢定 27
表 4-7後測樣本基資料分析 28
表 4-8後測性別與不同構面差 異 30
表 4-9後測院別與不同構面差異 31
表 4-10 男生前後測 t檢定 32
表 4-11 女生前後測 t檢定 33
表 4-12 編碼方式與代號說明表 34
表 4-13 質性訪談問項 34

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.
Anderson, N. (2013). Design thinking as a means of enhancing the creative and innovative abilities of undergraduate students when creating web based learning activities., 2013, 4181–4186.
Brandt, R. (1992). On outcome-based education: A conversation with Bill Spady. Educational Leadership, 50, 66–66.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Conley, S., Schmidle, T., & Shedd, J. (1988). Teacher participation in the management of school systems. The Teachers College Record, 90(2), 259–280.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3).
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think DC Heath & co. Boston, Mass.
D’Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gadanidis, G. (2013). Designing a Mathematics-for-All MOOC. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government,Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013, 2013, 704–710.
Harris, D. G., & Blank, S. S. (1983). A Comparative Study: Two Approaches to Enhance Creative Problem-Solving in Grade Five Students. BC Journal of Special Education, 7(2), 129–52.
Hentenryck, P. V., & Coffrin, C. (2014). Teaching Creative Problem Solving in a MOOC. Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 677–682.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
King, J. A., & Evans, K. M. (1991). Can we achieve outcome-based education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 73–75.
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–629.
Lee, Y. G. (2013). The Teaching Method of Creative Education. Creative Education, 4(8A), 25–30.
Parnes, S. (1963). Education and creativity. The Teachers College Record, 64(4), 331–331.
Uzakbaeva, S., Baimukhanbetov, B., & Berkimbaev, K. (2013). To the problem of forming creative competence of future teachers. Creative Education, 4(3), 234–240.
Viitala, T., & Lehtelä, P.-L. (2011). Can Innovation be learnt? Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011, 879–883.
Wright, G., & Skaggs, P. (2009). Increasing Student Innovation and Creativity by Emerging Students in Collaborative, Cross-Discipline, Technology Enhanced Innovation Bootcamps, 2009, 775–781.
Wright, G., & Skaggs, P. (2010). How to Improve Student Innovation, 2010, 1607–1611.
Wright, G., & West, R. (2010). Using Design Thinking to Improve Student Innovation, 2010, 391–395.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Baecker, E. M., & Hanft, A. (2010). Validation of competencies in e-portfolios: A qualitative analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(1), 42–60.
Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92–93, 194–203.
劉怡甫. (2013). 與全球十萬人作同學:談MOOC現況及其發展. 評鑑雙月刊, (42).
吳清山. (2013). 教育名詞 磨課師. 教育資料與研究, (111), 267–268.
張俊彥, & 董家莒. (2000). 「問題解決」或「無問題解決」?電腦輔助教學成效的比較研究. 科學教育學刊, 8(4), 357–377.
張瑞雄. (2013). MOOCs的現況與未來. 師友月刊, (550), 36–40.
李坤崇. (2011). 大學基本素養與核心能力意涵及其建置, (211), 114–126.
樊愛群, 郭建志, 饒忻, & 許政行. (2009). 談中原大學以學生基本能力培育落實大學教育之發展. 教育研究月刊, 186, 59–74.
洪文東. (2003). 創造性問題解決化學單元教學活動設計與評估. 科學教學學刊, 11(4), 404–430.
洪新原, 陳鴻基, & 葉景琳. (2006). 創意支援系統提昇使用者創造力之研究:自我效能理論之解釋與實證. 資訊管理學報, 13(4), 1–26.
王保進. (2011). 引導學生學習成效品質保證機制之推動與落實-論第二週期系所評鑑之核心內涵. 評鑑雙月刊, (32).
王晃三, & 顧志遠. (2000). 問題解決學. 台北: 東華書局.
莊孟翰. (2014). 大規模網路開放式課程:本地化發展議題研究. 成功大學.
陳冠宇. (2015). 使用電腦與行動裝置進行行動磨課師學習之態度差異分析. 淡江大學.
陳龍安. (2010). 台灣的創造力教育發展與突破之道. 創造學刊, 1(1), 5–37.
黃鈺晴. (2015). 磨課師發展現況與展望.
Ewant育網開放教育平台. (2014). ewant育網開放教育平台
Sharecourse學聯網.(2014.). Sharecourse學聯網
教育部4G行動寬頻暨教育雲創新應用推動辦公室.(2015. ).

第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top