臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

國人補習文化盛行，根據2004年「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」所公佈的一份「學生課後輔導、補習與家教情況調查」顯示，國高中生參加課業輔導或家教補習的學生比率高達七成、每週平均約4小時。據瞭解補習班教室是相當擁擠，尤其有升學名師的大班式教學，另一方面根據文獻報告室內二氧化碳濃度過高，會導致學習效率降低，然而目前大多數的補習班，仍然沒有採取空氣淨化的措施，所以本研究探討學生及家長對補習班之重要性之認知。
本研究以補習班學生及家長為研究對象，先以專家訪談進行問卷設計，再以通過信度、效度檢驗後的自編問卷進行補習班室內空氣品質之認知調查，然後再使用統計分析方法解析學生、家長對於補習班室內空氣品質的知識與態度。
本研究共回收有效問卷626份，得到結論如下：
1. 媒體的重要性，家長比較有長時間接觸新聞媒體，且研究調查結果，家長對於室內空氣品質的
知識及認知上比學生表現的好。
2. 有過敏或呼吸道疾病者表現上的矛盾，有過敏或呼吸道疾病的受試者在環境認知的得分表現較
好，但是在環境知識的得分表現卻比沒有過敏或呼吸道疾病的受試者來的低，所以缺乏正確的
知識可能也就是這些人罹患呼吸道疾病的原因。
3. 教育訓練的效能不佳，大多數的受試者在室內空氣污染的訊息來源以新聞媒體最多，但教育訓
練竟然是訊息來源為最低，因此學校方面的教育訓練內容則有待改進。
4. 必須正視二氧化碳的影響，學生在補習班的自覺問題以精神或注意力不集中及嗜睡為最多，因
此必須加強室內二氧化碳濃度的改善。
5. 室內空氣品質會影響受試者選擇補習班，受試者大部分還是以師資陣容為優先，其次就是考慮
室內空氣品質，可見室內空氣品質的重要性不可疏忽，因此補習班做室內空氣品質改善，即
使，而增加補習收費，受試者的意願也不會降低。

In a Crowded Classroom learning are highly popular in this country. According to “Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS)” published in 2004, 70% of junior and senior high school students participate in complement academic work, spending an average of four hours per week after school. The authors’ understanding is that classroom is very crowded, especially the big classes with sought after teachers. On the other hand, research shows that carbon dioxide concentration in the classroom is very high, resulting in lowered learning efficacy. However, most crowded classrooms still do not implement air purification measures. Therefore, this study aims to understand students’ and parents’ awareness on the importance of crowded classroom air quality.
The subjects for this study are the students and parents of crowded classrooms. Experts were consulted to design reliable and effective surveys on crowded classroom indoor air quality awareness, which were distributed to the subjects. Statistic methods were then used to analyze the subjects’ awareness and attitude towards crowded classroom indoor air quality.
The 626 returned survey summed up to the following conclusions:
1.The importance of media: parents have more exposure to news media. The study
found that parents have better knowledge and awareness of indoor air quality.
2.Contradictory results on subjects with allergies or respiratory illness:
subjects with allergies or respiratory illness have better environmental
awareness but worse environmental knowledge. Thus, the lack of correct
knowledge may be part of the reason these subjects have
3.Poor educational training: most subjects received information on indoor air
pollution from news media and little from educational sources. Therefore,
educational training in schools needs to be improved.
4.Must address the impact of carbon dioxide: the conscious issues identified by
the students are mostly lack of concentration and lethargy. Therefore, indoor
carbon dioxide concentration needs to be improved.
5.Indoor air quality does affect subjects’ decision in choosing crowded
classrooms: subjects usually first consider faculty quality, then consider
indoor air quality. It is clear that the importance of indoor air quality
cannot be overlooked. Therefore, even if crowded classrooms increase tuition
to better indoor air quality, subjects would still be willing to enroll.

誌　謝 i
摘　要 ii
Abstract iv
目　錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 3
第三節 研究範圍與限制 6
第四節 名詞釋義 7
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節 室內空氣污染物定義 8
第二節 室內空氣污染物 10
第三節 二氧化碳的影響 13
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究架構 15
第二節 研究假設 16
第三節 預試問卷之建立 20
第四節 預試問卷的分析 24
第五節 問卷資料之分析 35
第四章 結果與討論 37
第一節 各相關變項描述性統計分析 37
第二節 學生及家長對於補習班室內空氣品質之現況分析 58
第三節 不同背景變項在各研究變項上之描述性統計分析 61
第四節 各研究變變項相關分析 68
第五節 不同背景變項在各研究變項上之差異性分析 70
第六節、補習班室內空氣品質改善後選擇之意願相關分析 87
第五章 結論與建議 94
第一節 結論 94
第二節 建議 96
參考文獻 98
附錄一 103
附錄二 109
附錄三 114
附錄四 123
附錄五 124
附錄六 預試/正式問卷 131

參考文獻
中文文獻
1.彭定吉(1992)。集合住宅室內空氣環境（CO2、CO、粉塵）現場量測方法之探討，國立成功大學建築工程研究所，碩士論文。
2.江哲銘(1997)。建築物理，三民書局。
3.蘇慧貞、李俊璋、江哲銘(2003)。室內空氣品質檢測方法之研究，行政院環保署研究報告。
4.江哲銘(2005)。整合生命週期及健康風險評估建構永續健康環境之研究-總計畫暨子計畫三：建築物理環境控制評估生命週期中健康風險之研究（III）(2/2)，國科會研究報告。
5.周豐志 吳淑姿 凃瑞澤 余世宗(2012)。低分壓下二氧化碳吸附劑吸附效能評估，科學與工程技術期刊，第八卷，第二期。
6.吳明隆(2014)。SPSS統計應用學習實務，易習圖書。
7.林傑斌、林川雄、馮兆康(2011)。SPSS統計分析與實務，博碩文化。
8.龔聖佑、張嘉智、陳成裕(2010)。談室內空氣品質，勞工安全衛生簡訊，第103期。
9.林佐美(2004)。都會區空氣品質與呼吸性就診人數之研究，東海大學環境科學系，碩士論文
10.蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋(1999)。內空氣品質標準草案及管制策略探討，行政院環境保護署研究報告。
英文文獻
1.Duci,A., Papakonstantinou,K., Chaloulakou,A., & Markatos,N.(2004). Numerical approach of carbon monoxide concentration dispersion in anenclosed garage. Building and Environment,1043-1048.
2.Erdmann CA and APte MG.(2004).Mucous membrane and lower respiratory building related symptoms in relation to indoor carbon dioxide cincentrations in the 100-building BASE dataset. Indoor 14:127-134.
3.Farrow,A., Taylor,H., Northstone,K., & Golding,J.(2003). Symptoms ofmothers and infants related to total volatile organic compounds in householdproducts. Archives of Environmental Health, 58(10), 633-641.
4.DHHS/ATSDR.(1999). Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. p.75.
5.Lin M, Chen Y, Burnett, et al.(2002). The infiuence of ambicet coarse particukate matter on asthma hospitalization in children : case-crossover and time-series analyses. Environ Health Persp,110,575-581.
6.Flodin U and Jonsson P.(2004). Non-sensitising air population at workplace and adult onset asthma. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health ,77,17-22.
7.Daisey, J.M., Angell, W.J., & Apte,M.G.(2003). Indoor air quality,ventilation and health symptoms in schools: an analysis of existing information. Indoor Air, 13(1), 53-64.
8.Yang W., Sohn J., Kim J., Son B., Park J.(2009). Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school buildings in Korea. Journal of Environmental Management Volume 90, Issue 1, January , Pages348–354
9.Yoon C., Lee K., Park D.(2011). Indoor air quality differences between urban and rural preschools in Korea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, ,Volume 18,Issue 3,p 333-345
10.Mainka A. and Zajusz-Zubek E.(2015). Indoor Air Quality in Urban and Rural Preschools in Upper Silesia, Poland: Particulate Matter and Carbon Dioxide. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health , 12, 7697-7711
11.Branco P.T.B.S., Alvim-Ferraz M.C.M., Martins F.G.,(2015). Sousa S.I.V. Children's exposure to indoor air in urban nurseries-part I: CO2 and comfort assessment. Environmental Research 140 1–9
12.Rice S. A. (2004). Human Health Risk Assessment of CO2: Survivors of Acute High-Level Exposure and Populations Sensitive to Prolonged Low-Level Exposure. Third annual conference of carbon sequestration . May 3-6, 2004, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
13.Annesi-Maesano I, Hulin M, Lavaud F, Raherison C, Kopferschmitt C, de Blay F, et al.(2012). Poor air quality in classrooms related to asthma and rhinitis in primary schoolchildren of the French 6 Cities study. Thorax,67,682–8.
14.Kajtar L, Herczeg L, Lang E, Hrustinszky T, Banhidi L.( 2006). Influence of carbon-dioxide pollutant on human well-being and work intensity. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings , 85–90.
15.Satish U, Mendell M J, Shekhar K, Hotchi T, Sullivan D, Streufert S, and Fisk W J,(2012). Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-Moderate CO2 Concentrations on Human Decision-Making Performance. Environmental Health Perspectives, volume 120, number 12, 1671-1677,
16.Pereira LD, Raimondo D, Corgnati SP, Gameiro da Silva M, (2014).Assessment of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in Portuguese secondary classrooms: Methodology and results. Building and Environment,81,69~80.
網路資料
1.行政院環境保護署。室內空氣品質資訊網。取自：認識室內空氣品質（http://iaq.epa.gov.tw/indoorair/index.aspx）。
2.短期補習班資訊管理系統。(http://ap4.kh.edu.tw/)。
3.台灣室內空氣品質協會。(http://www.iaqa.org.tw/)